Does Anyone Still Not Understand There is No Such Thing as an Unarmed "Insurrection" Like They Tell You J6 Was?

[hadit]

What people miss is that part of Godwin’s rule is that sometimes the comparison is accurate

Not in this case, not even close.

 

[Captain Caveman]

J6 was just a protest with the usual unfortunate element of crowd/herd/mob mentality. Those that claim it was an insurrection are just being disingenuous.

 

[hadit]

J6 was just a protest with the usual unfortunate element of crowd/herd/mob mentality. Those that claim it was an insurrection are just being disingenuous.

Agreed. There was no attempt to overthrow the government and install a new one. They didn't even have a new Secretary of State picked out.

 

[Independent thinker]

- No insurrection in history has ever been unarmed, even slave rebellions fought with pitchforks and machetes. That is because insurrectionists expect to have to hold their gains against usually armed regime forces. Usually superior. You take a parliament chamber, you are not going to have it long once soldiers arrive with Bradleys and machine-guns.

- In insurrections, armed rebel forces, whether they are civilian or rebel military units, usually fight pitched street battles to keep those troops from ever arriving. This could devolve into civil war that last for years.

- Insurrectionists usually take TV and radio stations so they can announce that someone else is in charge.

Already can anyone not see how historically ignorant and lame-brained it is to call J6 an "insurrection" and a tiny handful of rioters "insurrectionists? Is everyone ready to agree that Democrats are the dumbest, most uneducated people on Earth. There is no such thing as an unarmed insurrection.


The Iranian insurrection 1953, tanks outside government buildings
View attachment 1117599

Jan 6th wasn't an insurrection. Not one person was convicted of insurrection. Not one person was even charged with insurrection. Therefore, there was no insurrection.