Does a business that advertises itself as a gun free zone deserve to be attacked?

******* dumb shits.

The idea behind businesses not permitting guns on their property is to prevent chicken shits like you from ACCIDENTALLY OFFING SOMEONE or from TRYING TO PLAY SUPER HERO if someone does attempt to rob the joint. Your help is not wanted.

Assholes who are determined to shoot up a place don't give a **** if there are armed people inside or not. They are SUICIDAL or otherwise DERANGED and are not concerned with consequences.

Years......it's been ******* years that you dipshits have been making this stupid argument. Figure it out already. Shit.
Actually you are dead wrong. Thugs definitely care if there are armed people in the places they try to rob. Study after study has demonstrated the fact. The record of mass killers demonstrates the fact.

IF I owned a business, I would be happy to have armed customers, and even happier if they blew away someone trying to rob the place.

Rob? You idiot. Guys who rob places ain't there to kill anyone. They are there to rob.

Mass killers don't care. **** your study.


Except when they do shoot people.....you guys are dumb..........
 
What are the odds that you will be in a place where a mass shooter opens fire?

That's for any of you chicken shits to answer.
 
What are the odds that you will be in a place where a mass shooter opens fire?

That's for any of you chicken shits to answer.

The odds that you will be in a place that gets robbed are pretty high.
 
so how many people have been shot in a gun free business ?

the news stations and news papers aren't exactly full of headlines about it.

name me ONE ...

more RW fear BS...


Here is a guy robbed leaving a gun free zone...since the criminal knew he was unarmed...

Yes…..leaving a gun free zone means you are "gun free" when you leave the zone…and that is just what criminals like….you are vetted for crime by the gun free policies of gun grabbers….

And get this….the guy gave the robber what he wanted, and the robber shot him anyway….

Sooo…

Baseball Fan Shot While Leaving Gun Free Stadium AFTER Complying With Robbers, No One Is Around To Protect Him | Concealed Nation

ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI — A 43-year-old man was leaving a Cardinals game at Busch Stadium with his girlfriend Saturday when the couple were robbed at gunpoint.

They complied, and were shot at while trying to run away after handing over their valuables. One of the bullets struck the 43-year-old, Christopher Sanna, in the back.

The bullet damaged Sanna’s spinal cord and it is unlikely he will ever be able to walk again.

“They said it was shattered, and no surgery could repair it,” said his mother, Candis Sanna. “They said he could eventually get a little feeling back, but there was no hope for him to walk. It’s horrible.”

This incident is a sad reminder of how compliance with an armed robber can still have devastating consequences.

“They turned to run away, but they didn’t make it very far,” Candis Sanna said. “As soon as they gave them the stuff, they were going to try to run away, but he shot them. They were within arm’s reach.”


So…….which anti gun extremist self defense technique saved this man…..let's review the 3 anti gun extremist self defense techniques as applied to this situation:

1) hope the robber who plans on shooting you after he gets your stuff is kind….

2) Hope the robber who plans on shooting you after he gets your stuff is incompetent…

3) Hope that when you are robbed by a sociopath who is going to shoot you anyway doesn't kill you because of pure, dumb luck…..

Okay…..

1) Apparently the kindness of a sociopath who was going to shoot his victim was not in evidence here

2) if the robber was planning on killing the victim…he did shoot him after all….he only shot him in the spine and crippled him for life…so a win for the anti gun extremists, no one was killed…right? And so we could say the robber was incompetent….

3) pure dumb luck…if surviving being shot, but being left paralyzed is lucky….so sure….number 3 applies as well….

a stadium?.... gee.

wtf are YOU talking about?

what about gun free businesses like the Dairy Queen or CVS Pharmacy ??


Hmmmmm....seems to me there was another gun free zone theater....was it in Colorado....where there was an incident.......and it too was a "gun free zone..."

Colorado theater called ‘gun-free’ zone

Gun advocates say the movie theater where a Colorado gunman opened fire Friday, killing 12 and wounded 58, has a strict policy against firearms on its premises – even for patrons with concealed handgun permits.

Cinemark Holdings Inc. owns 459 theaters and 5,181 screens in the U.S. and Latin America – including the Century 16 movie theater in Aurora, Colo., scene of the mass shooting.



Read more at Colorado theater called ‘gun-free’ zone
Think they'll change that policy now?
 
Think about it. If you're a criminal looking for a place to rob, or a terrorist looking for a "soft" target, who do you think they're going to go after? A gun free sign is just asking for trouble. Isn't it?

From swaggering gunlubbers who think it's their right to threaten business owners for exercising their right to conduct business according to their own moral code?

Your post certainly seems to say exactly that.

Culture clash right there.
 
Think about it. If you're a criminal looking for a place to rob, or a terrorist looking for a "soft" target, who do you think they're going to go after? A gun free sign is just asking for trouble. Isn't it?

Criminals don't give a shit about "gun free zones".
Perhaps a better idea would be "myth free zones".

What kind of myths, like mass shootings mostly happen in gun free zones?

Uh --- yeah, exactly. Good catch, state-the-obvious man.
 
Think about it. If you're a criminal looking for a place to rob, or a terrorist looking for a "soft" target, who do you think they're going to go after? A gun free sign is just asking for trouble. Isn't it?

Criminals don't give a shit about "gun free zones".
Perhaps a better idea would be "myth free zones".


actually, they do......they are rational to the point they want to survive and studies show they select victims based on how easy they think it will be to attack and succeed......mass shooters the same thing....those mass shooters who chose their target without regard to a past connection picked gun free targets.....and those who chose schools...the schools were already legally made gun free zones...so they didn't have to consider that in their equation.

"Studies" huh? :lmao:

Don't suppose these "studies" would have what we call "links", would they?
 
Think about it. If you're a criminal looking for a place to rob, or a terrorist looking for a "soft" target, who do you think they're going to go after? A gun free sign is just asking for trouble. Isn't it?

Of course they don't deserve it. No one deserves to be robbed, threatened, and possibly killed.

Now, if you asked whether they're setting themselves up for it, that's different. Just because I don't deserve to be assaulted for walking down a dark street alone in a crime-infested neighborhood doesn't mean I shouldn't be smart enough not to put myself in that position in the first place.
 
Think about it. If you're a criminal looking for a place to rob, or a terrorist looking for a "soft" target, who do you think they're going to go after? A gun free sign is just asking for trouble. Isn't it?

Criminals don't give a shit about "gun free zones".
Perhaps a better idea would be "myth free zones".

What kind of myths, like mass shootings mostly happen in gun free zones?

Uh --- yeah, exactly. Good catch, state-the-obvious man.

Why I did. Thank you.
 
Think about it. If you're a criminal looking for a place to rob, or a terrorist looking for a "soft" target, who do you think they're going to go after? A gun free sign is just asking for trouble. Isn't it?

From swaggering gunlubbers who think it's their right to threaten business owners for exercising their right to conduct business according to their own moral code?

Your post certainly seems to say exactly that.

Culture clash right there.

That's what his post seems to say? I didn't get that from his post at all.
 
What are the odds that you will be in a place where a mass shooter opens fire?

That's for any of you chicken shits to answer.

Sure, I'll answer:

If the odds are so low, why is it you fear honest citizens owning and carrying guns around? Why is it you want us disarmed?
 
I don't think I've ever seen a "gun free zone " sign ?
 
What are the odds that you will be in a place where a mass shooter opens fire?

That's for any of you chicken shits to answer.

Sure, I'll answer:

If the odds are so low, why is it you fear honest citizens owning and carrying guns around? Why is it you want us disarmed?

Oh brother . Who said anything about banning guns? Can't anyone have a gun control argument without the standard reply .
 
******* dumb shits.

The idea behind businesses not permitting guns on their property is to prevent chicken shits like you from ACCIDENTALLY OFFING SOMEONE or from TRYING TO PLAY SUPER HERO if someone does attempt to rob the joint. Your help is not wanted.

Assholes who are determined to shoot up a place don't give a **** if there are armed people inside or not. They are SUICIDAL or otherwise DERANGED and are not concerned with consequences..

Sure they are concerned about the consequences. They want to make sure they are dead as a door nail so they don't have to suffer imprisonment. That's why they pick gun free places; so nobody will injure them enough so they can't commit suicide.
 
Think about it. If you're a criminal looking for a place to rob, or a terrorist looking for a "soft" target, who do you think they're going to go after? A gun free sign is just asking for trouble. Isn't it?

Criminals don't give a shit about "gun free zones".
Perhaps a better idea would be "myth free zones".

You sure have a low opinion of the intelligence of the average ghetto dweller....
 
15th post
******* dumb shits.

The idea behind businesses not permitting guns on their property is to prevent chicken shits like you from ACCIDENTALLY OFFING SOMEONE or from TRYING TO PLAY SUPER HERO if someone does attempt to rob the joint. Your help is not wanted.

Assholes who are determined to shoot up a place don't give a **** if there are armed people inside or not. They are SUICIDAL or otherwise DERANGED and are not concerned with consequences..

Sure they are concerned about the consequences. They want to make sure they are dead as a door nail so they don't have to suffer imprisonment. That's why they pick gun free places; so nobody will injure them enough so they can't commit suicide.

Who says they pick gun free zones? That's just what the gun nuts say. Has anyone ever confessed to that ?
 
******* dumb shits.

The idea behind businesses not permitting guns on their property is to prevent chicken shits like you from ACCIDENTALLY OFFING SOMEONE or from TRYING TO PLAY SUPER HERO if someone does attempt to rob the joint. Your help is not wanted.

Assholes who are determined to shoot up a place don't give a **** if there are armed people inside or not. They are SUICIDAL or otherwise DERANGED and are not concerned with consequences..

Sure they are concerned about the consequences. They want to make sure they are dead as a door nail so they don't have to suffer imprisonment. That's why they pick gun free places; so nobody will injure them enough so they can't commit suicide.

Who says they pick gun free zones? That's just what the gun nuts say. Has anyone ever confessed to that ?

No, it just happens to be a coincidence that most all of the mass shootings happen in gun free zones. :dunno:
 
Think about it. If you're a criminal looking for a place to rob, or a terrorist looking for a "soft" target, who do you think they're going to go after? A gun free sign is just asking for trouble. Isn't it?

Of course they don't deserve it. No one deserves to be robbed, threatened, and possibly killed.

Now, if you asked whether they're setting themselves up for it, that's different. Just because I don't deserve to be assaulted for walking down a dark street alone in a crime-infested neighborhood doesn't mean I shouldn't be smart enough not to put myself in that position in the first place.
Just remember that these turds are the same ones who claimed Pam Geller would be to blame if she and her attendees were massacred by Muslims for staging a contest to see who could draw Muhammad the best. Now they claim that people who announce to the world that they are utterly defenceless don't deserve the criminal attention they attract.
 
Back
Top Bottom