You do realize though that prior to the Heller v DC ruling in 2008 that SCOTUS claimed that the 2nd did NOT grant or rather protect the right of an individual to keep & bear arms, that instead that right belonged to "the state" (government).
To have a well regulated militia
The problem with Griswold is there is no concensus as to where such privacy originates. Multiple Justices cite multiple clauses. That diminishes the legitimacy.
Only in your mind
Which directly contradicts how the Founders governed.
In what respect?
Owning a gun is a Constitutional right, and abortion is not, our lawmakers had 50 years to clarify and make abortion legal forever but instead used it for political gain and division. Why would we the people allow our representatives to be so cavalier with such a law?‘Read back to back, the rulings conveyed nothing but contempt. "The Constitution makes no reference to abortion, and no such right is implicitly protected by any constitutional provision," Samuel Alito wrote for the majority in Dobbs. In Bruen, meanwhile, Clarence Thomas wrote passionately and at length about a constitutional right to "individual self-defense," which he described—quoting the court's earlier decision against Washington, D.C.'s handgun ban in District of Columbia v. Heller—as "'the central component' of the Second Amendment right.” The Constitution, of course, makes no reference to individual self-defense, and those words certainly do not appear in the amendment where Thomas described them as being the central component.’
Such hypocrisy and inconsistency are typical of conservative jurists.
The right to privacy is no more a ‘made up’ right than the individual right to possess a firearm and the right to self-defense.
Indeed, nowhere in the text of the Second Amendment will one find the words ‘individual’ or ‘self-defense.’
Whereas the Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendments clearly recognize and codify the right to privacy – the Fourth Amendment in particular.
Store up some tears, no doubt you'll need them. It seems this Court wants to correct the massive overreaches of the past. High time somebody did.
If SCOTUS returns contraception to the States, do you see any states outlawing it? I don't.
But SCOTUS has ruled that people have a right to privacy and the "right to privacy" is not explicitly mentioned in the Bill of Rights unless you want to consider the 4th amendment's admonishment that the people have the right to be secure in their homes, persons, personal affects, etc. (paraphrased) as a stand-in for "privacy".
The individual right to keep and bear arms. Settlers and pioneers were not sent forth with an army or militia at their back, they were responsible for their own defense. Farmers and hunters did not require government permission to keep and bear arms in their daily lives. Signatories to the Constitution itself had privately owned firearms with no link to any militia.
That's not the point.
So all those years when the law of the land was that the 2nd only protects the state's right to KABA, not the individual rights of "the people", SCOTUS was violating our constitutional rights?
They were lying before.
You done lying about banning and confiscating? We knownthat's what you want.‘Read back to back, the rulings conveyed nothing but contempt. "The Constitution makes no reference to abortion, and no such right is implicitly protected by any constitutional provision," Samuel Alito wrote for the majority in Dobbs. In Bruen, meanwhile, Clarence Thomas wrote passionately and at length about a constitutional right to "individual self-defense," which he described—quoting the court's earlier decision against Washington, D.C.'s handgun ban in District of Columbia v. Heller—as "'the central component' of the Second Amendment right.” The Constitution, of course, makes no reference to individual self-defense, and those words certainly do not appear in the amendment where Thomas described them as being the central component.’
Such hypocrisy and inconsistency are typical of conservative jurists.
The right to privacy is no more a ‘made up’ right than the individual right to possess a firearm and the right to self-defense.
Indeed, nowhere in the text of the Second Amendment will one find the words ‘individual’ or ‘self-defense.’
Whereas the Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendments clearly recognize and codify the right to privacy – the Fourth Amendment in particular.
Where in the constitution was power given to our government to force a 9 month pregnancy on a woman or girl if she and her husband or partner are not ready to have children in their lives yet? Not enough money to be a good parent, still in college, still a child and under age, date raped, or birth control didn't work, or partner left when they found out and were not ready to be a father etc etc etc???
For the security of a free state and to enable a well regulated militia.
Your perspective is flawed. The individual right was practiced daily, there was no need to presume otherwise.
