Do you support taxing unrealized gains (Poll)

Do you support taxing unrealized gains?

  • Yes

    Votes: 2 5.7%
  • No

    Votes: 33 94.3%

  • Total voters
    35
What have we done to get money out of our political system? Saying corporations are people is one problem

I see you're not a man of La Mancha. No problem.
You can't get money out of politics, its "free speech".
Otherwise "the government" controls who gets money, that is communism.

To ’tilt at windmills’ is to attack imaginary enemies. (Not sure who you think is imaginary?)

The US Budget deficits and the US $35T DEBT can only be blamed on Congress, no one else.
Congress is NOT imaginary, they are real, and they need to have term limits so that they know they will have to live under the Laws they pass.
 
Based on the $100 million, no one in the middle class will be affected, and not all considered rich will be affected either!!!
/---/ I know that's the lie you libtards are pushing. But like everything else you Progs pass, it will involve more and more people at a higher and higher rate. And that is your goal.

There is significant criticism around the idea of a wealth tax, however. One of the most significant question remains a legal one. Critics argue that the federal government does not have the authority to tax individual assets outside of a transaction. This argument is primarily based on the Fifth Amendment Taking's clause, which reads in relevant part "nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation" and on the Direct Taxation Clause of the Constitution which reads, in relevant part, "No Capitation, or other direct, Tax shall be laid, unless in Proportion to the Census or enumeration herein before directed to be taken."
 
You can't get money out of politics, its "free speech".
Otherwise "the government" controls who gets money, that is communism.
I think only Americans should have that free speech protection, not some (foreign-owned?) corporate entity. I also don't think it is good for our democracy to have billionaires buying the government.

The US Budget deficits and the US $35T DEBT can only be blamed on Congress, no one else.
Congress is NOT imaginary, they are real, and they need to have term limits so that they know they will have to live under the Laws they pass.
They certainly need something since they don't really represent people who can't donate to them, like corporations and billionaires.
 
If democrats win in November, the IRS will be going after unrealized gains. Is this even constitutional?

The policies proposed in the FY2025 budget target extremely high-net-worth individuals and entities, attempting to ensure wealth accumulation through investment is looped in to the taxable base—even when those investments are not sold. The general principle behind equitable taxation is that a broad base is to be preferred over higher rates—in other words, increasing tax revenue without imposing additional burdens on middle and lower income brackets, merely reshuffling the deck so higher income earners are taxed under existing rate structures.
Among the proposals is a plan to tax the unrealized gain on a trust, partnership or other non-corporate entity that has not been subject to a recognition event in the previous 90 years—something of a one time tax true-up for complex tax structures that are and have been growing untaxed for generations.
/----/ So Commie Harris is going to pay 50% taxes and give away most of her wealth now?
 
How could it even be done?

You report what your holdings are on Dec 31 of last year (say $800,000) and then this year (12%, so it’s now $900,000), and you have to pay taxes on an additional $100,000?

What if your salary is $100,000? You have to pay taxes on $200,000?

Great way to wipe out the savings of successful people, discourage investment, and make more people dependent on the Democrat Socialist Regime - which is what this is all about.
The democrats need more money for their illegals. At what point do they decide to tax “unrealized gains” on home appreciation?

Dims are like a black hole of want- they want what you have for their own.
 
RCP in 2016 had Hillary up by 6 points in nationwide poll averaging. She still lost the election.

Currently they have Harris by 1.5 points in poll averaging.
Assuming that these numbers and methods haven't changed their formulas at all....

It's looking like a landslide for Trump. However....the Harris campaign is chipping away at Trump's commanding lead. He is slipping in the polls. But is it enough?

We still do not have a platform from Harris. Nada, zero, nill.....empty set....division by zero.

Are they ever going to publish one?
 
The democrats need more money for their illegals. At what point do they decide to tax “unrealized gains” on home appreciation?

Dims are like a black hole of want- they want what you have for their own.
/----/ "At what point do they decide to tax “unrealized gains” on home appreciation?"
There is a whole thread on this. The Commie Libs are chomping at the bit to steal more money.
 
I hope your projections are correct.

Getting all three "rust belt" states (PA, MI, WI) is the goal, but that will be hard to do.
The VA and New Hampshire vote? They are sqeakers for sure at this point.

And to the point...
Harris's CAMPAIGN is actually doing surprisingly well chipping away at Trumps lead. But not on a pace fast enough to win. We are just 2 months out. Most voters have already decided.
But Harris has yet to publish a platform. Even after the DNC she has nothing. And a convention gives the candidates their highest numbers usually. Those voters who weigh all options carefully have nothing to weigh on her side. They either won't vote or vote Trump in droves. Trump is picking up 65% (roughly) of RFK votes....but we knew that already. h2h vs full field.

So...just interesting to watch and see if the polls change much after a debate. Do they shift at all or does Harris take a nose dive?



Kamala, IOW is at her highest polling numbers.
 
I hope your projections are correct.

Getting all three "rust belt" states (PA, MI, WI) is the goal, but that will be hard to do.
True, but PA and GA would be a very reasonable goal. He’s already ahead in GA, and only 2 points behind in PA - which can easily be negated by RFK’s endorsement (to say nothing of what happens as Kamala continues to obfuscate and hide.
 
alang1216

What are you disagreeing with? The mission of the military is to break shit and kill people. Do you think the US military is building the tanks and missiles? Do you think the AF is building the JSF? The Navy builds the ships?
 
alang1216

What are you disagreeing with? The mission of the military is to break shit and kill people. Do you think the US military is building the tanks and missiles? Do you think the AF is building the JSF? The Navy builds the ships?
The 'production' of the military is to break shit and kill people. That requires equipment. Who owns the equipment that is the means of production?
 
The 'production' of the military is to break shit and kill people. That requires equipment. Who owns the equipment that is the means of production?
The US Government dum dum, but neither the US Governnent or the military produces it. I own a car. I dont own the means of it’s production
 
alang1216

Again I dont know what you are disagreeing with. Who do you think is making the tanks, and planes? Who do you think is paying for it?
 

Do you support taxing unrealized gains​

Of course not. Taxation is theft and I do not support thievery in any form.
Death and taxes...everyone has them.

You can cheat on your taxes....MIGHT get away with it too....but probably not.

Can't cheat death though...no one has done it. One per customer unless you are Lazarus.

Taxes on gains already exists in state/County property taxes. Part of what the escrow account pays if you have a mortgage.
 
Back
Top Bottom