Do You Support Iran Or Israel/US?

Do You Support Iran Or Israel/US?

  • Iran

  • Israel/US

  • Other


Results are only viewable after voting.
I only support peace.


Peskov is purposely getting it wrong on whether the US will get involved with the Zionist regime against Iran.

It depends entirely on whether the Zionist regime can win without US help?

America's attack on Iran will come before the speculated 2 weeks delay.

Peskov is probably getting it right on America turning it into a much bigger war.
 
Obama signed an agreement allowing uranium enrichment, ballistic missile production, supporting terrorists around the world, the making of nuclear bombs after 10 years, while also delivering billions of dollars in cash right to their doorstep. Good reason to tear up the agreement.
BS. You ignorant Fox News viewers need to do research before you run your mouths.
 
Obama signed an agreement that limited their enrichment to levels too low to be dangerous.

Trump ended that agreement which allowed them to enrich uranium as much as they wanted.
Obama signed an agreement which allowed Iran to make nuclear weapons after a 10 year period.
 
The U.S. government employed Saddam.
Wow. I can't really believe you posted that with a straight face. I knew you were hopelessly biased but this is my biggest clue yet that you are a card carrying member of the tin foil hat club.
 
Obama signed an agreement that limited their enrichment to levels too low to be dangerous.

Trump ended that agreement which allowed them to enrich uranium as much as they wanted.
Barry's EO was shit. Several military sites were off limits to inspections, and the Mullahs refused many of the inspections they agreed to.

It was a joke, like you.
 
Trump made the deal with the Taliban, and Russia would have invaded regardless.
Trump started a deal with the Taliban, finished by Biden getting out so badly that the Taliban took over the whole country lickity split, which signaled to Russia that they could invade Ukraine while we sat on our thumbs and denounced them in the strongest possible terms.
 
BS. You ignorant Fox News viewers need to do research before you run your mouths.
I don't watch Fox News. Don't even have cable. I cut the cord and stream, but I don't stream Fox News. It is YOU who watch Fox News, not I.
 
Trump started a deal with the Taliban, finished by Biden getting out so badly that the Taliban took over the whole country lickity split, which signaled to Russia that they could invade Ukraine while we sat on our thumbs and denounced them in the strongest possible terms.
No, Trump finalized the agreement and set a deadline for departure.
 
BS. You ignorant Fox News viewers need to do research before you run your mouths.
Myth: The Agreement Is Permanent, With No “Sunset”“Contrary to the assertions of some, this agreement has no sunset. It doesn’t terminate…some of the provisionsare in place for 10 years, others for 15 year, others for 25 years.” – Secretary KerryThe Facts


The essential restrictions on Iran’s key bomb-making technology do expire, or “sunset” in 10 to 15 years.After these restrictions expire, Iran will be left with an internationally recognized, industrial scale nuclearprogram—just like Japan. Iran could even legitimately enrich to levels near weapons grade under the pretextof powering a nuclear navy—as Brazil is currently doing. All these activities are permissible under the NPT – and all would be endorsed by this agreement. Indeed,as President Obama said of his own agreement, in year “13, 14, 15,” Iran’s “breakout times would haveshrunk almost down to zero.” As a result, the U.S. and its allies will be left with no effective measures to prevent Iran from initiating anaccelerated nuclear program to produce the materials needed for a nuclear weapon. And Iran surely wouldbe able to speed toward a nuclear weapon faster than an international sanctions regime could bereestablished. One nonproliferation expert told the Committee that this sunset clause is “a disaster.” It is precisely this sunset clause that the Prime Minister is referring to when he notes that this agreement paves the way for a nuclear Iran.
 
I don't watch Fox News. Don't even have cable. I cut the cord and stream, but I don't stream Fox News. It is YOU who watch Fox News, not I.
Then maybe you should watch cable instead of getting your information from non-credentialled right-wing idiots.
 
15th post
BS. You ignorant Fox News viewers need to do research before you run your mouths.
Myth: The Agreement Contains Unprecedented Inspections and Verification

“We will have installed an unprecedented inspections regime”… “That entire infrastructure that we knowabout, we will have sophisticated 24/7 monitoring of those facilities”… “the nature of nuclear programs andfacilities is such -- this is not something you hide in a closet. This is not something you put on a dolly and kindof wheel off somewhere.” – President ObamaThe Facts Just a few months ago, the Secretary of Energy—himself a nuclear physicist—make it clear that “we expectto have anywhere, anytime access.” Yet after the Iranians boasted that “They will not even be permitted to inspect the most normal military sitein their dreams,” we ended up with “managed access.” “Managed access” would be better called “manipulated access” as inspectors will get access to suspectedsites only after consultations between the world powers and Iran, over as long as 24 days. China, Russiaand Iran will have a say on the consultations as to who can go where. The former head of the CIA, Michael Hayden, testified in front of the Committee, “we never believed thatthe uranium at Iran’s declared facilities would ever make its way into a weapon. We always believed thatthat work would be done someplace else, in secret.” As a top State Department official has said, the Iranianshave deception in their DNA. Hayden also explained that requiring consultations between the world powers and Iran takes inspectionsfrom the technical level and puts it at the political level, which he calls “a formula for chaos, obfuscation,ambiguity, doubt…” Former top weapons inspector Charles Duelfer explained to this Committee that after the First Gulf War—even with anytime, anywhere inspections; sanctions remaining on; and the burden of proof on the Iraqis—Page 4 of 5his team “could not do their job” and were stymied. Yet, the inspections process negotiated by the ObamaAdministration would have much less authority.
 
No, Trump finalized the agreement and set a deadline for departure.
Trump didn't finalize getting out so badly that the Taliban would take over the country, which Biden didn't even listen to his own people warning him about getting out the way he did.
 
Then maybe you should watch cable instead of getting your information from non-credentialled right-wing idiots.
I get a lot of my news from Yahoo headlines, which is owned by left leaning ABC News.
 
Back
Top Bottom