Do you notice how RWs never establish a line on their 2nd amendment rights?

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Guns are killing innocent people, and they aren't doing much else.

Guns also prevent the killing of innocent people.

Guns need to be prosecuted for murder.

 

[Auld Phart]

I love you guys. I will start this off with that. We are a family, we want what is best for all of us. Guns are becoming an affliction, and addiction and it's time for a wake up call or a intervention here. Guns are killing innocent people, and they aren't doing much else. So let's get real here.

Guns are killing innocent people, and they aren't doing much else. So let's get real here.

you want to get real?

33,000, (give or take), deaths by firearm annually.

(and 3/5s of those are suicides)


300,000,000 firearms owned by civilians.


Which means, about 1 in 300,000 of the firearms in this country are used to kill civilians.

 

[KissMy]

Do they want ANYONE to be able to carry fully automatic weapons anywhere, anytime?

Yes. So do libertarians. And we should. And we MOTHERFUCKING WILL!!!

**** off, commie. We're getting our fully automatic, belt-fed machine guns, and you can suck it.

Dear Idiot - All those gun toting citizens & police in vegas could not stop 1 man from shooting 600 people.

You can't block a sucker punch either.

So, what's your point?

Obviously you have never been at gunpoint. They never give you warning so you can grab yours. When is it not a sucker punch?

 

[tinydancer]

I ******* hunt. I hunt. When I lived in Tennessee I ******* hunted. I'm in Canada now. I ******* HUNT MY FOOD.

**** OFF.

Even if you didn’t, it’s really no ones business .

They won't let it go.

 

[MaryL]

Guns are killing innocent people, and they aren't doing much else. So let's get real here.

You can have my gun just as soon as it kills an innocent person. Until then... hands off.

Stop it, for all we know you will be the next mass shooter. End it.

 

[ColonelAngus]

OP is a ******* jackass.

Educate yourself.

District of Columbia v. Heller - Wikipedia

Read the SCOTUS decision on D.C.vs. Heller.

Then make your arguments.



District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008), is a landmark case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held, in a 5–4 decision, that the Second Amendment protects an individual's right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home, and that Washington, D.C.'s handgun ban and requirement that lawfully-owned rifles and shotguns be kept "unloaded and disassembled or bound by a trigger lock" violated this guarantee. Due to Washington, D.C.'s special status as a federal district, the decision did not address the question of whether the Second Amendment's protections are incorporated by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment against the states,[1] which was addressed two years later by McDonald v. City of Chicago (2010) in which it was found that they are. It was the first Supreme Court case to decide whether the Second Amendment protects an individual right to keep and bear arms for self-defense.[2]

Oh for **** sake. You people really struggle with nuance huh? I never said it was illegal to own a gun nor am I against your right to do it. I’m just pointing out your fallacious reasoning when it comes to any kind of gun control.

What are your specific issues with this decision by SCOTUS?

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Obviously you have never been at gunpoint. They never give you warning so you can grab yours. When is it not a sucker punch?

Who gives a rat ****?

We get machine guns and that's final. **** off.

 

[Auld Phart]

Fully automatic weapons are illegal for civilians to own or purchase and have been for some time now this fact has been brought to you by reality.

Ban on fully automatic weapons was by President Ronald Reagan!

but automatic weapons manufactured before 1986 were grandfathered.

wade thru the red tape, and you can purchase one

You failed to mention the $200 tax stamp.

You failed to mention the $200 tax stamp.

falls under the red tape I mentioned

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Do they want ANYONE to be able to carry fully automatic weapons anywhere, anytime?

Yes. So do libertarians. And we should. And we MOTHERFUCKING WILL!!!

**** off, commie. We're getting our fully automatic, belt-fed machine guns, and you can suck it.

Dear Idiot - All those gun toting citizens & police in vegas could not stop 1 man from shooting 600 people.

You can't block a sucker punch either.

So, what's your point?

Obviously you have never been at gunpoint. They never give you warning so you can grab yours. When is it not a sucker punch?

I have not. Also, I've had guns since childhood and never pointed one at anyone.

Shit happens. Like the old Boy Scout axiom, "Be Prepared". If prepared you may have a chance. Unprepared, you'll have none.

 

[Auld Phart]

Guns are killing innocent people, and they aren't doing much else. So let's get real here.

You can have my gun just as soon as it kills an innocent person. Until then... hands off.

Stop it, for all we know you will be the next mass shooter. End it.

How?

repeal the Second?

might want to look up what it takes to remove it.

(psst, never happen)

 

[KissMy]

Obviously you have never been at gunpoint. They never give you warning so you can grab yours. When is it not a sucker punch?

Who gives a rat ****?

We get machine guns and that's final. **** off.

You will be the one who is fucked in a gunfight. Why couldn't all those guns save the 600 in Vegas???

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

I love you guys. I will start this off with that. We are a family, we want what is best for all of us. Guns are becoming an affliction, and addiction and it's time for a wake up call or a intervention here. Guns are killing innocent people, and they aren't doing much else. So let's get real here.

GOOD!!!!

I don't know about y'all, but I **** my guns. And, there's not a goddamn thing you can do about it.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Obviously you have never been at gunpoint. They never give you warning so you can grab yours. When is it not a sucker punch?

Who gives a rat ****?

We get machine guns and that's final. **** off.

You will be the one who is fucked in a gunfight. Why couldn't all those guns save the 600 in Vegas???

That question has been answered. Thickheaded much?

 

[ColonelAngus]

I don't understand how D.C. Versus Heller is not establishing a line on 2nd ammendment rights.

If one wants to be educated on the issue, read the decision.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

You will be the one who is fucked in a gunfight. Why couldn't all those guns save the 600 in Vegas???

Because, **** you.


Who gives a flying frog ****?

That has ZERO to do with my right to have guns and to **** them if I choose.

I don't give a aardvark anus **** if 14,000,000,000,000 children and twice as many puppies die from gun violence ever motherfucking day.

We are not surrendering ANYTHING. We're going the other way. **** you.

 

[MaryL]

I am an ex-liberal. Truly, now I am a realist. Liberals have this pro gay rights, pro illegal alien delusion, but Conservatives have the same delusions but about Guns. I don't know which is worse, really. And all the pro gun post the came before, or after just reinforce my cynicism. Let's end all this political bullshit and get real.

 

[KissMy]

Obviously you have never been at gunpoint. They never give you warning so you can grab yours. When is it not a sucker punch?

Who gives a rat ****?

We get machine guns and that's final. **** off.

You will be the one who is fucked in a gunfight. Why couldn't all those guns save the 600 in Vegas???

That question has been answered. Thickheaded much?

Was that answer because the police we must worship are a bunch of pussies that took over an hour to approach a dead man?

 

[fncceo]

Stop it, for all we know you will be the next mass shooter.

You'll just have to wait and see ... where do you live?

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Dear Idiot - All those gun toting citizens & police in vegas could not stop 1 man from shooting 600 people.

Dear commie -- it makes not one bit of ******* difference. 5,000,000 people could have died and it wouldn't matter one cocksucking bit.

**** you. We're not giving up on the guns and we will have autos. We'll have REALLY SCARY looking guns too.

Now, take your "save the children" bullshit and **** OFF!!!

 

[KissMy]

You will be the one who is fucked in a gunfight. Why couldn't all those guns save the 600 in Vegas???

Because, **** you.


Who gives a flying frog ****?

That has ZERO to do with my right to have guns and to **** them if I choose.

I don't give a aardvark anus **** if 14,000,000,000,000 children and twice as many puppies die from gun violence ever motherfucking day.

We are not surrendering ANYTHING. We're going the other way. **** you.

Way to go queer fucktard!

 

[Billy000]

OP is a ******* jackass.

Educate yourself.

District of Columbia v. Heller - Wikipedia

Read the SCOTUS decision on D.C.vs. Heller.

Then make your arguments.



District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008), is a landmark case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held, in a 5–4 decision, that the Second Amendment protects an individual's right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home, and that Washington, D.C.'s handgun ban and requirement that lawfully-owned rifles and shotguns be kept "unloaded and disassembled or bound by a trigger lock" violated this guarantee. Due to Washington, D.C.'s special status as a federal district, the decision did not address the question of whether the Second Amendment's protections are incorporated by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment against the states,[1] which was addressed two years later by McDonald v. City of Chicago (2010) in which it was found that they are. It was the first Supreme Court case to decide whether the Second Amendment protects an individual right to keep and bear arms for self-defense.[2]

Oh for **** sake. You people really struggle with nuance huh? I never said it was illegal to own a gun nor am I against your right to do it. I’m just pointing out your fallacious reasoning when it comes to any kind of gun control.

What are your specific issues with this decision by SCOTUS?

My issue is common sense gun control laws that prevent guns from getting to the mentally ill.