1. What is the point of doing that ?
The illegitimatemacy of this flimsy fake news "article" reveals itself right in the beginning, when claiming JD Vance "walked back" a statement that people who committed violence on Jan 6, should obviously not be pardoned.
Then they claim the walkback was > that he & Trump care about people unjustly accused.
That's not a walkback one iota. Yes, those violent shouldn't be pardoned, AND Yes they care about the unjustly accused.
As for the 5 that this credibility-lacking article cites, well what if there WERE 5 violent rioters pardoned ?
5 out of hundreds is a tiny %. Does anyone demand 100% perfection ? If all those pardoned (except 5) were nonviolent, that's not a bad job.
Let he who is 100% perfect through all his life, cast the first stone.

.
.
.