Do you consider LGBTQ lifestyles/choices a mental disorder?

[Ame®icano]

He tells it like it is. Deal with it.

Deal with it? I already dealt with that tiresome gas bag.
Anyone who whines about the Constitutional rights of gays being under attack is full of crap! It is the essence of pearl clutching hyperbole and over reaching nonsense.

You think he tells it like it is? Go back to drama school, drama queen.

Really?? Here is just one recent example

Tennessee Seeks tonBar Same Sex Marriage

There are many more

What constitutional gay right is under attack here?

Can you read?

Your link is to another thread, I am not reading all that, so I am asking you specifically, what constitutional gay rights are under attack?

 

[Ame®icano]

. Hopefully no state will call these relationships "marriage" BECAUSE THEY ARENT AND NEVER CAN BE.

I have sad news for you. EVERY state call them marriage

Definition of marriage is only one. They can call it whatever they want, it doesn't make it true.

There is the conservative religious definition. There is the moronic bigoted definition. Then there is the legal definition. Read Obergefell. Same sec couples are getting MARRIED across the US and in many other places .It is indeed called MARRIAGE Deal with it. Get over it. It has nothing to do with you.

There is only one definition of marriage.

The same sex couples are not getting "married", because that is simply impossible. You, and them, want it to be called marriage, so it gives you impression of being legal, and/or equal. Whatever you idiots call it, it's still NOT marriage.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

. Hopefully no state will call these relationships "marriage" BECAUSE THEY ARENT AND NEVER CAN BE.

I have sad news for you. EVERY state call them marriage

Definition of marriage is only one. They can call it whatever they want, it doesn't make it true.

There is the conservative religious definition. There is the moronic bigoted definition. Then there is the legal definition. Read Obergefell. Same sec couples are getting MARRIED across the US and in many other places .It is indeed called MARRIAGE Deal with it. Get over it. It has nothing to do with you.

There is only one definition of marriage.

The same sex couples are not getting "married", because that is simply impossible. You, and them, want it to be called marriage, so it gives you impression of being legal, and/or equal. Whatever you idiots call it, it's still NOT marriage.

You are in denial living in an alternative reality. Not my problem

 

[Ame®icano]

He tells it like it is. Deal with it.

Deal with it? I already dealt with that tiresome gas bag.
Anyone who whines about the Constitutional rights of gays being under attack is full of crap! It is the essence of pearl clutching hyperbole and over reaching nonsense.

You think he tells it like it is? Go back to drama school, drama queen.

Really?? Here is just one recent example

Tennessee Seeks tonBar Same Sex Marriage

There are many more

What constitutional gay right is under attack here?

Can you read?

You're asking the great uneducated here, the MAGA DOPers a question?
As to being educated in real-world fact-based in summa type research?
Bibles don't offer this type of reality-based facts. Or any real research.
Is that the question of your premise in your post?
Is this to perfect a lib. type question?

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

He tells it like it is. Deal with it.

Deal with it? I already dealt with that tiresome gas bag.
Anyone who whines about the Constitutional rights of gays being under attack is full of crap! It is the essence of pearl clutching hyperbole and over reaching nonsense.

You think he tells it like it is? Go back to drama school, drama queen.

Really?? Here is just one recent example

Tennessee Seeks tonBar Same Sex Marriage

There are many more

What constitutional gay right is under attack here?

Can you read?

Your link is to another thread, I am not reading all that, so I am asking you specifically, what constitutional gay rights are under attack?

Marriage! Marriage has been established as a constitutional right and a least one state is trying to take that away. What part of Constitutional right don't you understand?

 

[Ame®icano]

Deal with it? I already dealt with that tiresome gas bag.
Anyone who whines about the Constitutional rights of gays being under attack is full of crap! It is the essence of pearl clutching hyperbole and over reaching nonsense.

You think he tells it like it is? Go back to drama school, drama queen.

Really?? Here is just one recent example

Tennessee Seeks tonBar Same Sex Marriage

There are many more

What constitutional gay right is under attack here?

Can you read?

Your link is to another thread, I am not reading all that, so I am asking you specifically, what constitutional gay rights are under attack?

Marriage! Marriage has been established as a constitutional right and a least one state is trying to take that away. What part of Constitutional right don't you understand?

Can you point where exactly in the US Constitution / Bill of Rights, marriage is established as a right?

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Really?? Here is just one recent example

Tennessee Seeks tonBar Same Sex Marriage

There are many more

What constitutional gay right is under attack here?

Can you read?

Your link is to another thread, I am not reading all that, so I am asking you specifically, what constitutional gay rights are under attack?

Marriage! Marriage has been established as a constitutional right and a least one state is trying to take that away. What part of Constitutional right don't you understand?

Can you point where exactly in the US Constitution / Bill of Rights, marriage is established as a right?

Read Obergefell .Rights are established by case law as well as the bill of rights.

But this is not a matter of whether or not marriage is a right. It is about due process and equal protection under the law. It has been treated as a right for hetero couples who could take for granted that they could get married. Gays were denied that expectation. So it is not that marriage itself is a right, but rather, if treated as a right for one group, it must be treated as a right for another group who -in the language of the court-is similarly situated.

I really do not understand your hysterical apoplexy over this issue which has absolutely no effect on your life and is none of your ******* business.

 

[Ame®icano]

What constitutional gay right is under attack here?

Can you read?

Your link is to another thread, I am not reading all that, so I am asking you specifically, what constitutional gay rights are under attack?

Marriage! Marriage has been established as a constitutional right and a least one state is trying to take that away. What part of Constitutional right don't you understand?

Can you point where exactly in the US Constitution / Bill of Rights, marriage is established as a right?

Read Obergefell .Rights are established by case law as well as the bill of rights.

But this is not a matter of whether or not marriage is a right. It is about due process and equal protection under the law. It has been treated as a right for hetero couples who could take for granted that they could get married. Gays were denied that expectation. So it is not that marriage itself is a right, but rather, if treated as a right for one group, it must be treated as a right for another group who -in the language of the court-is similarly situated.

I really do not understand your hysterical apoplexy over this issue which has absolutely no effect on your life and is none of your ******* business.

But hetero couples are not granted the right to get married. Constitutionally, nobody is granted that "right", and since is not federal issue, it falls under 10th amendment.

True, it does not have effect on my life, but it does have effect on institution of marriage itself. Marriage is possible and compatible only between a man and a woman, and if you can just change the definition to suits your/someone's need, than everything can be called marriage by just accepting different definition. What about marriage between human and an animal, would you accept that?

It is my ******* business, because by changing definition of what I, as hetero have, you're demeaning the marriage institution itself. Where does it end?

 

[Baz Ares]

Deal with it? I already dealt with that tiresome gas bag.
Anyone who whines about the Constitutional rights of gays being under attack is full of crap! It is the essence of pearl clutching hyperbole and over reaching nonsense.

You think he tells it like it is? Go back to drama school, drama queen.

Really?? Here is just one recent example

Tennessee Seeks tonBar Same Sex Marriage

There are many more

What constitutional gay right is under attack here?

Can you read?

You're asking the great uneducated here, the MAGA DOPers a question?
As to being educated in real-world fact-based in summa type research?
Bibles don't offer this type of reality-based facts. Or any real research.
Is that the question of your premise in your post?
Is this to perfect a lib. type question?

View attachment 247593

You need to label red state humans 3rd world. Most red states are 5th world. Please explain this?

 

[Ame®icano]

How this is fair to girls? And leftists are calling this "brave and stunning".

#Woke

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

But hetero couples are not granted the right to get married. Constitutionally, nobody is granted that "right", and since is not federal issue, it falls under 10th amendment.

Did you bother to read # 467 before writing this drivel? I stated that the issue is NOT whether or not marriage is a right in and of itself. I will add that while marriage is not mentioned in the Constitution, the courts, on numerous occasions have in fact ruled that it is a right. That is what is called case law or binding precedent , which carries the same force of law.

14 Supreme Court Cases: Marriage is a Fundamental Right | American Foundation for Equal Rights

Again, the issue is equal protection under the law and due process as provided for in the 14th Amendment. While marriage is generally a state issue, discrimination is most certainly a federal issue and states do not have absolute authority over marriage or anything else when they violate the constitution, as you can see from by above link. By your reasoning, the states should have also been permitted to ban interracial marriage. Are you also of the opinion that Loving v. Virginia was a federal over reach.?

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

True, it does not have effect on my life, but it does have effect on institution of marriage itself. Marriage is possible and compatible only between a man and a woman, and if you can just change the definition to suits your/someone's need, than everything can be called marriage by just accepting different definition. What about marriage between human and an animal, would you accept that?

It is my ******* business, because by changing definition of what I, as hetero have, you're demeaning the marriage institution itself. Where does it end?

More hysterical maudlin horseshit. If it has changed marriage at all, it has changed it for the better because it has broadened the base and made it more inclusive. Who the **** are you to determine that same sex couples should not be allowed to participate ? To say that marriage is only possible between a man and a woman is an arrogant appeal to authority logical fallacy and an appeal to ignorance fallacy as well. And you idiotic reference to marrying animals is a false equivalency fallacy as well as a red herring fallacy intended to derail the issue and mask the fact that you can't mount a rational and logical argument as to why gays should not be allowed to marry. Oh and it's also a slippery slope fallacy. Wow Slick, you get the prize for the most logical fallacies in one paragraph!!

 

[Silhouette]

Yes to the title’s question. This week is the week to not forget

 

[sparky]

Do you consider LGBTQ lifestyles/choices a mental disorder?

I consider the human race insane

~S~

 

[caddo kid]

We drug kids for being hyper(being normal).
We have drugs for depression.
We have drugs for OCD.
We have drugs for stress.
We have drugs for schizophrenia.
We have drugs for bipplar.

The list goes on and on. But we dont treat people who think they are something they clearly are not or people who think unnatural behavior is okay?

planet Earth was doing just fine until humans came along and fucked that all to Hell, particularly those humans that
(1) seek power & influence over others
(2) seek to create religion & force that upon others
(3) seek to create empire which is intolerant of the masses

Humans are replete with massive fault, and for most humans just getting along with their fellow humans is not an acceptable situation, because most humans lack the ability to tolerate those they disagree with.

The two demographics that have been persecuted the most in all of human history have been
(1) homosexuals
(2) Jews

It seems the OP has an issue with homosexuals, which is his problem.

 

[Polishprince]

The two demographics that have been persecuted the most in all of human history have been
(1) homosexuals
(2) Jews

It seems the OP has an issue with homosexuals, which is his problem.

Back in history, there were very few homosexuals as compared to today. And those who chose to pursue the Lifestyle waited until they were in adulthood.

The real difference that the adherents of Judaism really don't recruit new members. If you look at the document the Gay Revolutionary by Michael Swift, the homosexual leadership seeks to actual recruit.

I don't think that any of the protocols published over the years by the Learned Elders of Zion have ever done that.

Internet History Sourcebooks Project

 

[caddo kid]

The two demographics that have been persecuted the most in all of human history have been
(1) homosexuals
(2) Jews

It seems the OP has an issue with homosexuals, which is his problem.

Back in history, there were very few homosexuals as compared to today. And those who chose to pursue the Lifestyle waited until they were in adulthood.

The real difference that the adherents of Judaism really don't recruit new members. If you look at the document the Gay Revolutionary by Michael Swift, the homosexual leadership seeks to actual recruit.

I don't think that any of the protocols published over the years by the Learned Elders of Zion have ever done that.

Internet History Sourcebooks Project

I believe most humans just want to live their lives without being hassled by other people.

It's a shame that many religious & political folk don't see the world in that light.

 

[mdk]

The two demographics that have been persecuted the most in all of human history have been
(1) homosexuals
(2) Jews

It seems the OP has an issue with homosexuals, which is his problem.

Back in history, there were very few homosexuals as compared to today. And those who chose to pursue the Lifestyle waited until they were in adulthood.

The real difference that the adherents of Judaism really don't recruit new members. If you look at the document the Gay Revolutionary by Michael Swift, the homosexual leadership seeks to actual recruit.

I don't think that any of the protocols published over the years by the Learned Elders of Zion have ever done that.

Internet History Sourcebooks Project

Are you still peddling this satire piece as proof of some neferious conspiracy? Swift is mocking you dumb ***** and the fact that you take it seriously only makes it all the more delightful.

 

[Polishprince]

The two demographics that have been persecuted the most in all of human history have been
(1) homosexuals
(2) Jews

It seems the OP has an issue with homosexuals, which is his problem.

Back in history, there were very few homosexuals as compared to today. And those who chose to pursue the Lifestyle waited until they were in adulthood.

The real difference that the adherents of Judaism really don't recruit new members. If you look at the document the Gay Revolutionary by Michael Swift, the homosexual leadership seeks to actual recruit.

I don't think that any of the protocols published over the years by the Learned Elders of Zion have ever done that.

Internet History Sourcebooks Project

Are you still peddling this satire piece as proof of some neferious conspiracy? Swift is mocking you dumb ***** and the fact that you take it seriously only makes it all the more delightful.

The document is in the Congressional Record, its hardly a joke.

 

[mdk]

The two demographics that have been persecuted the most in all of human history have been
(1) homosexuals
(2) Jews

It seems the OP has an issue with homosexuals, which is his problem.

Back in history, there were very few homosexuals as compared to today. And those who chose to pursue the Lifestyle waited until they were in adulthood.

The real difference that the adherents of Judaism really don't recruit new members. If you look at the document the Gay Revolutionary by Michael Swift, the homosexual leadership seeks to actual recruit.

I don't think that any of the protocols published over the years by the Learned Elders of Zion have ever done that.

Internet History Sourcebooks Project

Are you still peddling this satire piece as proof of some neferious conspiracy? Swift is mocking you dumb ***** and the fact that you take it seriously only makes it all the more delightful.

The document is in the Congressional Record, its hardly a joke.

The joke is you citing a satire piece as some sort of evidence for your position.

This document opens with: This essay is an outré, madness, a tragic, cruel fantasy, an eruption of inner rage, on how the oppressed desperately dream of being the oppression.