Do You Believe We Came From Monkeys?

[james bond]

There continue to be internet atheists on this forum who cannot do a simple search.

"Humans first evolved in Africa, and much of human evolution occurred on that continent. The fossils of early humans who lived between 6 and 2 million years ago come entirely from Africa."
...

"One of the earliest defining human traits, bipedalism -- the ability to walk on two legs -- evolved over 4 million years ago."

Introduction to Human Evolution

This is racism at its worst.

And again- still you can't explain why science is somehow 'racism'.

It is unlikely that any of the 'races' of modern man even existed when when modern man first evolved in Africa or when our ancestors first ventured out of Africa.

Do you consider the Theory of Gravity racist also?

I think I've covered how racism was tied in the Darwinism and humans evolving from apes and how it became eugenics and so forth.

Racism existed before Darwin's theory of evolution and exists to this day.

And again- still you can't explain why science is somehow 'racism'.

It is unlikely that any of the 'races' of modern man even existed when when modern man first evolved in Africa or when our ancestors first ventured out of Africa.

Do you consider the Theory of Gravity racist also?

Eyeroll. Eyeroll. Eyeroll.

All of the pseudoscientific racism led up to Darwinism and then social Darwinism and Eugenics.

 

[james bond]

Almost the entire Neanderthal genome has been deciphered, new fossils have been discovered, and a hypothesis with a very high probability of being fair has been formulated. Facts :

- Genetics shows that we have about 3% of our genes of Neanderthal origin, and that this concerns the entire world population, except for Africans

- in an Israeli cave, was recently discovered a skull with indisputable traits "sapiens", but also indisputable traits "Neanderthal".

- The fact that only African populations do not have Neanderthalian genes has led to the following hypothesis: at a given moment, a peak of cold, probably the beginning of the Wurm glaciation (+/- from -95000 to -12000 ) pushed Neanderthal populations towards the south, while at the same time homo sapiens left Africa. The two populations would have crossed where the current state of Israel is (there was shortly before the aforementioned cave, discovered two other nearby caves, one having sheltered Neanderthals, the other sapiens, the all in a too short period of time so that they could not cross each other), and crossbreeding took place. Subsequently, homo sapiens and hybrids were brightened all over the planet, and the Neanderthalian genes were diluted to represent only the current 3%, but were distributed throughout the populations. outside Africa.

If the infertility of a hybrid proves that its two parents are of different species, the opposite is not necessarily true, nevertheless, the universality of the survival of Neanderthalian genes outside African populations seems to be wrong to the followers of the classification "homo neanderthalensis v / s homo sapiens", and reason to those who prefer it "homo sapiens neanderthalensis v / s homo sapiens sapiens"

I agree with most of this. Neanderthals were hominids. Whether this included gorilla, chimpanzee and orangutan is still up for debate. Creation scientists state they were genetically isolated humans,.

'Creation scientists'......lol....that always cracks me up. It's like saying Chiropractic car mechanics......

That's for atheist scientists.

 

[james bond]

Because if Earth is the only place in the universe that contains life that would disprove evolution. Now go find some aliens.

Why anyone thinks that life would 'be everywhere' because of evolution is a mystery to me.

There is nothing in the theory of evolution that makes that claim.

Sent from my SM-S975L using Tapatalk

Again- you just keep demonstrating you don't understand the theory of evolution.

The theory of evolution makes no claims as to how life started on Earth.

The Theory of Evolution doesn't care whether Earth is unique or whether life is everywhere.

Ha ha. We talked about this already. People who just want to argue ToE are the ones who doesn't understand ToE and how it's based on evolutionary thinking. And no aliens means that it's a point for creation. God didn't create aliens. In terms of evolution, the reason aliens do not exist is based on the fine tuning facts that atheist scientists discovered while trying to formulate the Big Bang Theory. There plenty of evidence of no aliens. Look up Fermi Paradox.

History of evolutionary thought - Wikipedia

And once again- the Theory of Evolution makes no claims about how life started on Earth- or even cares how life started on earth.


Hell it could even be that Zeus created the first life on Earth- and the Theory of Evolution would still be just as valid.

Agree! But more likely Enki created humans... jus sayin....

You're kidding. Maybe atheists do believe in no God and mythological gods

 

[Syriusly]

Almost the entire Neanderthal genome has been deciphered, new fossils have been discovered, and a hypothesis with a very high probability of being fair has been formulated. Facts :

- Genetics shows that we have about 3% of our genes of Neanderthal origin, and that this concerns the entire world population, except for Africans

- in an Israeli cave, was recently discovered a skull with indisputable traits "sapiens", but also indisputable traits "Neanderthal".

- The fact that only African populations do not have Neanderthalian genes has led to the following hypothesis: at a given moment, a peak of cold, probably the beginning of the Wurm glaciation (+/- from -95000 to -12000 ) pushed Neanderthal populations towards the south, while at the same time homo sapiens left Africa. The two populations would have crossed where the current state of Israel is (there was shortly before the aforementioned cave, discovered two other nearby caves, one having sheltered Neanderthals, the other sapiens, the all in a too short period of time so that they could not cross each other), and crossbreeding took place. Subsequently, homo sapiens and hybrids were brightened all over the planet, and the Neanderthalian genes were diluted to represent only the current 3%, but were distributed throughout the populations. outside Africa.

If the infertility of a hybrid proves that its two parents are of different species, the opposite is not necessarily true, nevertheless, the universality of the survival of Neanderthalian genes outside African populations seems to be wrong to the followers of the classification "homo neanderthalensis v / s homo sapiens", and reason to those who prefer it "homo sapiens neanderthalensis v / s homo sapiens sapiens"

I agree with most of this. Neanderthals were hominids. Whether this included gorilla, chimpanzee and orangutan is still up for debate. Creation scientists state they were genetically isolated humans,.

'Creation scientists'......lol....that always cracks me up. It's like saying Chiropractic car mechanics......

That's for atheist scientists.

Scientists use science.

"Creation Scientists' are a contradiction in terms.

 

[Syriusly]

There continue to be internet atheists on this forum who cannot do a simple search.

"Humans first evolved in Africa, and much of human evolution occurred on that continent. The fossils of early humans who lived between 6 and 2 million years ago come entirely from Africa."
...

"One of the earliest defining human traits, bipedalism -- the ability to walk on two legs -- evolved over 4 million years ago."

Introduction to Human Evolution

This is racism at its worst.

And again- still you can't explain why science is somehow 'racism'.

It is unlikely that any of the 'races' of modern man even existed when when modern man first evolved in Africa or when our ancestors first ventured out of Africa.

Do you consider the Theory of Gravity racist also?

I think I've covered how racism was tied in the Darwinism and humans evolving from apes and how it became eugenics and so forth.

Racism existed before Darwin's theory of evolution and exists to this day.

And again- still you can't explain why science is somehow 'racism'.

It is unlikely that any of the 'races' of modern man even existed when when modern man first evolved in Africa or when our ancestors first ventured out of Africa.

Do you consider the Theory of Gravity racist also?

All of the pseudoscientific racism led up to Darwinism .

Creationism led to Institutionalized racism.

 

[Syriusly]

Because if Earth is the only place in the universe that contains life that would disprove evolution. Now go find some aliens.

Why anyone thinks that life would 'be everywhere' because of evolution is a mystery to me.

There is nothing in the theory of evolution that makes that claim.

Sent from my SM-S975L using Tapatalk

Again- you just keep demonstrating you don't understand the theory of evolution.

The theory of evolution makes no claims as to how life started on Earth.

The Theory of Evolution doesn't care whether Earth is unique or whether life is everywhere.

Ha ha. We talked about this already. People who just want to argue ToE are the ones who doesn't understand ToE and how it's based on evolutionary thinking. And no aliens means that it's a point for creation. God didn't create aliens. In terms of evolution, the reason aliens do not exist is based on the fine tuning facts that atheist scientists discovered while trying to formulate the Big Bang Theory. There plenty of evidence of no aliens. Look up Fermi Paradox.

History of evolutionary thought - Wikipedia

And once again- the Theory of Evolution makes no claims about how life started on Earth- or even cares how life started on earth.


Hell it could even be that Zeus created the first life on Earth- and the Theory of Evolution would still be just as valid.

You are too weak and ignorant to understand the history of evolutionary thinking. We know Zeus does not exist because Mt. Olympus did not exist in the ancient past.

Prove that Mt. Olympus did not exist in the ancient past- go for it.

You are too weak to actually defend Christianity or understand the Theory of Evolution.

Remember- the Theory of Evolution makes no claim as to how life started on Earth.

While Christianity posits that the world was created around 6,000 years ago- and that every species of bird, mammal and reptile got onto a single boat and sailed around for awhile- and then unloaded them all on Mt. Ararat- and then miraculously in a couple thousand years- all of those animals made it to their individual far corners of the earth.

 

[Syriusly]

Has there ever been a Jew who was a Creationist? A modern Jew who believes in a literal interpretation of the Old Testament and uses pretend science like the Creato-Christians do- to somehow bolster their own feeble faith in their God?

I can't think of any.

The Creato-Christian movement is a rather odd Christian cult that somehow feels a need to deny science in order to somehow convince themselves that Jesus is their savior.

 

[LittleNipper]

The the earth was likely created roughly 6000 to 10,000 years ago by GOD. When the Fall of Adam & Eve occurred, deterioration kicked in for the entire Universe. Prior to that event everything existed in a continuing state of perfection. Monkeys, gorillas and humans in no way share a common ancestor; however, they do share a common CREATOR. The present state of our planet reflects the continuing deterioration of the environment due to the FALL and the scares from the FLOOD. Meteor and asteroid strikes throughout the Solar system are the result of the FALL.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

The the earth was likely created roughly 6000 to 10,000 years ago by GOD. When the Fall of Adam & Eve occurred, deterioration kicked in for the entire Universe. Prior to that event everything existed in a continuing state of perfection. Monkeys, gorillas and humans in no way share a common ancestor; however, they do share a common CREATOR. The present state of our planet reflects the continuing deterioration of the environment due to the FALL and the scares from the FLOOD. Meteor and asteroid strikes throughout the Solar system are the result of the FALL.

 

[Shazoomx4]

The the earth was likely created roughly 6000 to 10,000 years ago by GOD. When the Fall of Adam & Eve occurred, deterioration kicked in for the entire Universe. Prior to that event everything existed in a continuing state of perfection. Monkeys, gorillas and humans in no way share a common ancestor; however, they do share a common CREATOR. The present state of our planet reflects the continuing deterioration of the environment due to the FALL and the scares from the FLOOD. Meteor and asteroid strikes throughout the Solar system are the result of the FALL.

Nop the world exist 4.5 billion years..

 

[alex.harmuth]

Has there ever been a Jew who was a Creationist? A modern Jew who believes in a literal interpretation of the Old Testament and uses pretend science like the Creato-Christians do- to somehow bolster their own feeble faith in their God?

I can't think of any.

The Creato-Christian movement is a rather odd Christian cult that somehow feels a need to deny science in order to somehow convince themselves that Jesus is their savior.

Strap yourself in...

Rational people have already seen the numerous fatal flaws in Evolution.

First off, Show me 1 animal fossil of a half reptile half mammal. A reptile with fur and gave birth to live offspring but was cold blooded like all reptiles are. Show me 1. You can't, because it doesn't exist. For the theory of evolution to even be viable, there shouldn't just be 1 animal fossil that's half reptile half mammal, there should be hundreds if not thousands if not millions over the supposed millions of years it takes for evolution to work. When you're done not finding the half reptile half mammal, start looking for the half bacteria half fish, half fish half bird, half bird half otter, half otter half gorilla, etc. or whatever fantasy animal you think was real. Macro evolution, the change of kinds, the evolution that is forced down people's throats, has NEVER been seen in the fossil record and will never be seen because it is not real. This flaw in the religion of evolution is quickly dismissed by it's worshipers for whatever reason no one can ever explain.

Another flaw is, what caused evolution to begin? You might say natural selection but you would be wrong. Life supposedly began as single celled organisms in the ocean who got their energy from the sun. Natural selection requires that there is competition. So what were the first lifeforms competing against each other for, sunlight? Seems pretty absurd if you actually take 2 seconds to think about it doesn't it? In fact, some evolutionists HAVE thought about this and there is a growing movement in the scientific world away from natural selection. Eventually one day natural selection will be disproven officially by scientists and the religion of evolution worshipers will accept it blindly and continue to march on.

Another flaw is life itself and if you can't see how life beginning to exist and evolution aren't connected than we're well and truly done here and good luck. When you build a house you start with it's foundation. That's what life is for evolution, the foundation. Without life, there is no evolution. Currently, the mainstream scientific concensus on how life began is... nothing. Science has NO answer on how life began in fact, according to some early scientific "laws" (which were actually theories) it was impossible for life to even be real. It was once believed that life can only come from life. At the same time, it was believed that the Earth, and by extension the universe, was completely lifeless. To a mealworm, that doesn't even make sense. So they changed their beliefs (because science can do that in an instant) to life CAN come from non-life. They gave this study a name, Abiogensis. It was introduced in the early 70's and has since been rejected as mainstream science and for nearly 50 years has not proven anything but that life could not have possibly started in the ocean. They have now resorted to just simply saying "evolution is based on life already existing" and they've found their useful idiot worshipers have accepted it without question and march on.

I seriously could go on literally till the day I die pointing out to you how dumb evolution is and how it makes zero sense but I have better things to do. If you want to believe in tadpole fishmen, go right ahead. But don't for a second try to force that utter stupidity onto anyone else. I would rather see the World get over evolution and turn to the belief in something greater than they are. It doesn't even have to be Christianity. If that doesn't make sense to you, find something else. There are plenty of creation religions you can choose from. Every one of them makes more sense than evolution and hopefully the World will soon realize that.

Sent from my SM-S975L using Tapatalk

 

[Shazoomx4]

Has there ever been a Jew who was a Creationist? A modern Jew who believes in a literal interpretation of the Old Testament and uses pretend science like the Creato-Christians do- to somehow bolster their own feeble faith in their God?

I can't think of any.

The Creato-Christian movement is a rather odd Christian cult that somehow feels a need to deny science in order to somehow convince themselves that Jesus is their savior.

Strap yourself in...

Rational people have already seen the numerous fatal flaws in Evolution.

First off, Show me 1 animal fossil of a half reptile half mammal. A reptile with fur and gave birth to live offspring but was cold blooded like all reptiles are. Show me 1. You can't, because it doesn't exist. For the theory of evolution to even be viable, there shouldn't just be 1 animal fossil that's half reptile half mammal, there should be hundreds if not thousands if not millions over the supposed millions of years it takes for evolution to work. When you're done not finding the half reptile half mammal, start looking for the half bacteria half fish, half fish half bird, half bird half otter, half otter half gorilla, etc. or whatever fantasy animal you think was real. Macro evolution, the change of kinds, the evolution that is forced down people's throats, has NEVER been seen in the fossil record and will never be seen because it is not real. This flaw in the religion of evolution is quickly dismissed by it's worshipers for whatever reason no one can ever explain.

Another flaw is, what caused evolution to begin? You might say natural selection but you would be wrong. Life supposedly began as single celled organisms in the ocean who got their energy from the sun. Natural selection requires that there is competition. So what were the first lifeforms competing against each other for, sunlight? Seems pretty absurd if you actually take 2 seconds to think about it doesn't it? In fact, some evolutionists HAVE thought about this and there is a growing movement in the scientific world away from natural selection. Eventually one day natural selection will be disproven officially by scientists and the religion of evolution worshipers will accept it blindly and continue to march on.

Another flaw is life itself and if you can't see how life beginning to exist and evolution aren't connected than we're well and truly done here and good luck. When you build a house you start with it's foundation. That's what life is for evolution, the foundation. Without life, there is no evolution. Currently, the mainstream scientific concensus on how life began is... nothing. Science has NO answer on how life began in fact, according to some early scientific "laws" (which were actually theories) it was impossible for life to even be real. It was once believed that life can only come from life. At the same time, it was believed that the Earth, and by extension the universe, was completely lifeless. To a mealworm, that doesn't even make sense. So they changed their beliefs (because science can do that in an instant) to life CAN come from non-life. They gave this study a name, Abiogensis. It was introduced in the early 70's and has since been rejected as mainstream science and for nearly 50 years has not proven anything but that life could not have possibly started in the ocean. They have now resorted to just simply saying "evolution is based on life already existing" and they've found their useful idiot worshipers have accepted it without question and march on.

I seriously could go on literally till the day I die pointing out to you how dumb evolution is and how it makes zero sense but I have better things to do. If you want to believe in tadpole fishmen, go right ahead. But don't for a second try to force that utter stupidity onto anyone else. I would rather see the World get over evolution and turn to the belief in something greater than they are. It doesn't even have to be Christianity. If that doesn't make sense to you, find something else. There are plenty of creation religions you can choose from. Every one of them makes more sense than evolution and hopefully the World will soon realize that.

Sent from my SM-S975L using Tapatalk

Half mammal, half reptile fossil discovered in Utah

 

[alex.harmuth]

Has there ever been a Jew who was a Creationist? A modern Jew who believes in a literal interpretation of the Old Testament and uses pretend science like the Creato-Christians do- to somehow bolster their own feeble faith in their God?

I can't think of any.

The Creato-Christian movement is a rather odd Christian cult that somehow feels a need to deny science in order to somehow convince themselves that Jesus is their savior.

Strap yourself in...

Rational people have already seen the numerous fatal flaws in Evolution.

First off, Show me 1 animal fossil of a half reptile half mammal. A reptile with fur and gave birth to live offspring but was cold blooded like all reptiles are. Show me 1. You can't, because it doesn't exist. For the theory of evolution to even be viable, there shouldn't just be 1 animal fossil that's half reptile half mammal, there should be hundreds if not thousands if not millions over the supposed millions of years it takes for evolution to work. When you're done not finding the half reptile half mammal, start looking for the half bacteria half fish, half fish half bird, half bird half otter, half otter half gorilla, etc. or whatever fantasy animal you think was real. Macro evolution, the change of kinds, the evolution that is forced down people's throats, has NEVER been seen in the fossil record and will never be seen because it is not real. This flaw in the religion of evolution is quickly dismissed by it's worshipers for whatever reason no one can ever explain.

Another flaw is, what caused evolution to begin? You might say natural selection but you would be wrong. Life supposedly began as single celled organisms in the ocean who got their energy from the sun. Natural selection requires that there is competition. So what were the first lifeforms competing against each other for, sunlight? Seems pretty absurd if you actually take 2 seconds to think about it doesn't it? In fact, some evolutionists HAVE thought about this and there is a growing movement in the scientific world away from natural selection. Eventually one day natural selection will be disproven officially by scientists and the religion of evolution worshipers will accept it blindly and continue to march on.

Another flaw is life itself and if you can't see how life beginning to exist and evolution aren't connected than we're well and truly done here and good luck. When you build a house you start with it's foundation. That's what life is for evolution, the foundation. Without life, there is no evolution. Currently, the mainstream scientific concensus on how life began is... nothing. Science has NO answer on how life began in fact, according to some early scientific "laws" (which were actually theories) it was impossible for life to even be real. It was once believed that life can only come from life. At the same time, it was believed that the Earth, and by extension the universe, was completely lifeless. To a mealworm, that doesn't even make sense. So they changed their beliefs (because science can do that in an instant) to life CAN come from non-life. They gave this study a name, Abiogensis. It was introduced in the early 70's and has since been rejected as mainstream science and for nearly 50 years has not proven anything but that life could not have possibly started in the ocean. They have now resorted to just simply saying "evolution is based on life already existing" and they've found their useful idiot worshipers have accepted it without question and march on.

I seriously could go on literally till the day I die pointing out to you how dumb evolution is and how it makes zero sense but I have better things to do. If you want to believe in tadpole fishmen, go right ahead. But don't for a second try to force that utter stupidity onto anyone else. I would rather see the World get over evolution and turn to the belief in something greater than they are. It doesn't even have to be Christianity. If that doesn't make sense to you, find something else. There are plenty of creation religions you can choose from. Every one of them makes more sense than evolution and hopefully the World will soon realize that.

Sent from my SM-S975L using Tapatalk

Half mammal, half reptile fossil discovered in Utah

Article even says it was related to the platypus ergo, it's a platypus not a reptile.
It had hair (warm blooded) and laid eggs like the platypus. How is that half reptile? Just because the article writer called it a reptile doesn't make it one.

Keep in mind that evolutionist are so desperate to find these millions of missing transitional fossils that they would take a modern dog skull, make up a random animal to fill a niche, and call it proof of evolution.

The skull (that's all they found was the skull) is supposedly 15 million years old but was found a couple feet under the surface...? Um... that's not how time, works...

Even if I give you this 1, there's 999,999 more transitions to go. Where is the animal fossil that this one evolved from and into? Keep looking.

They also found an alien body in Russia. Turned out, it was a chicken.

Sent from my SM-S975L using Tapatalk

 

[james bond]

Because if Earth is the only place in the universe that contains life that would disprove evolution. Now go find some aliens. Sent from my SM-S975L using Tapatalk

Again- you just keep demonstrating you don't understand the theory of evolution.

The theory of evolution makes no claims as to how life started on Earth.

The Theory of Evolution doesn't care whether Earth is unique or whether life is everywhere.

Ha ha. We talked about this already. People who just want to argue ToE are the ones who doesn't understand ToE and how it's based on evolutionary thinking. And no aliens means that it's a point for creation. God didn't create aliens. In terms of evolution, the reason aliens do not exist is based on the fine tuning facts that atheist scientists discovered while trying to formulate the Big Bang Theory. There plenty of evidence of no aliens. Look up Fermi Paradox.

History of evolutionary thought - Wikipedia

And once again- the Theory of Evolution makes no claims about how life started on Earth- or even cares how life started on earth.


Hell it could even be that Zeus created the first life on Earth- and the Theory of Evolution would still be just as valid.

You are too weak and ignorant to understand the history of evolutionary thinking. We know Zeus does not exist because Mt. Olympus did not exist in the ancient past.

Prove that Mt. Olympus did not exist in the ancient past- go for it.

You are too weak to actually defend Christianity or understand the Theory of Evolution.

Remember- the Theory of Evolution makes no claim as to how life started on Earth.

While Christianity posits that the world was created around 6,000 years ago- and that every species of bird, mammal and reptile got onto a single boat and sailed around for awhile- and then unloaded them all on Mt. Ararat- and then miraculously in a couple thousand years- all of those animals made it to their individual far corners of the earth.

If I prove it, then what will you give me since you are too weak to provide anything?

 

[james bond]

And once again- the Theory of Evolution makes no claims about how life started on Earth- or even cares how life started on earth.

Since you cannot explain history of evolutionary thought and can only discuss ToE, then let's discuss chemical evolution.

Chemical evolution is part of the ‘General Theory of Evolution’, defined by the evolutionist G.A. Kerkut as. "the theory that all the living forms in the world have arisen from a single source which itself came from an inorganic form."

Kerkut, G.A., Implications of Evolution, Pergamon, Oxford, UK, p. 157, 1960.

 

[LittleNipper]

The the earth was likely created roughly 6000 to 10,000 years ago by GOD. When the Fall of Adam & Eve occurred, deterioration kicked in for the entire Universe. Prior to that event everything existed in a continuing state of perfection. Monkeys, gorillas and humans in no way share a common ancestor; however, they do share a common CREATOR. The present state of our planet reflects the continuing deterioration of the environment due to the FALL and the scares from the FLOOD. Meteor and asteroid strikes throughout the Solar system are the result of the FALL.

Well, the only alternative is that the Black man is at the bottom of the heap and the other races have evolved up from him with Caucasians having sprung up hundreds of thousands of years afterwards. So maybe you have a laugh at your own expense. I personally can never believe such nonsense. I am firm in my belief that EVERYONE was created in the image of GOD and every race is a brother and not a great, great, grandson... This is not the Planet of the Ape and it never was.

 

[LittleNipper]

The the earth was likely created roughly 6000 to 10,000 years ago by GOD. When the Fall of Adam & Eve occurred, deterioration kicked in for the entire Universe. Prior to that event everything existed in a continuing state of perfection. Monkeys, gorillas and humans in no way share a common ancestor; however, they do share a common CREATOR. The present state of our planet reflects the continuing deterioration of the environment due to the FALL and the scares from the FLOOD. Meteor and asteroid strikes throughout the Solar system are the result of the FALL.

Nop the world exist 4.5 billion years..

Nop you are wrong.

 

[LittleNipper]

Has there ever been a Jew who was a Creationist? A modern Jew who believes in a literal interpretation of the Old Testament and uses pretend science like the Creato-Christians do- to somehow bolster their own feeble faith in their God?

I can't think of any.

The Creato-Christian movement is a rather odd Christian cult that somehow feels a need to deny science in order to somehow convince themselves that Jesus is their savior.

Strap yourself in...

Rational people have already seen the numerous fatal flaws in Evolution.

First off, Show me 1 animal fossil of a half reptile half mammal. A reptile with fur and gave birth to live offspring but was cold blooded like all reptiles are. Show me 1. You can't, because it doesn't exist. For the theory of evolution to even be viable, there shouldn't just be 1 animal fossil that's half reptile half mammal, there should be hundreds if not thousands if not millions over the supposed millions of years it takes for evolution to work. When you're done not finding the half reptile half mammal, start looking for the half bacteria half fish, half fish half bird, half bird half otter, half otter half gorilla, etc. or whatever fantasy animal you think was real. Macro evolution, the change of kinds, the evolution that is forced down people's throats, has NEVER been seen in the fossil record and will never be seen because it is not real. This flaw in the religion of evolution is quickly dismissed by it's worshipers for whatever reason no one can ever explain.

Another flaw is, what caused evolution to begin? You might say natural selection but you would be wrong. Life supposedly began as single celled organisms in the ocean who got their energy from the sun. Natural selection requires that there is competition. So what were the first lifeforms competing against each other for, sunlight? Seems pretty absurd if you actually take 2 seconds to think about it doesn't it? In fact, some evolutionists HAVE thought about this and there is a growing movement in the scientific world away from natural selection. Eventually one day natural selection will be disproven officially by scientists and the religion of evolution worshipers will accept it blindly and continue to march on.

Another flaw is life itself and if you can't see how life beginning to exist and evolution aren't connected than we're well and truly done here and good luck. When you build a house you start with it's foundation. That's what life is for evolution, the foundation. Without life, there is no evolution. Currently, the mainstream scientific concensus on how life began is... nothing. Science has NO answer on how life began in fact, according to some early scientific "laws" (which were actually theories) it was impossible for life to even be real. It was once believed that life can only come from life. At the same time, it was believed that the Earth, and by extension the universe, was completely lifeless. To a mealworm, that doesn't even make sense. So they changed their beliefs (because science can do that in an instant) to life CAN come from non-life. They gave this study a name, Abiogensis. It was introduced in the early 70's and has since been rejected as mainstream science and for nearly 50 years has not proven anything but that life could not have possibly started in the ocean. They have now resorted to just simply saying "evolution is based on life already existing" and they've found their useful idiot worshipers have accepted it without question and march on.

I seriously could go on literally till the day I die pointing out to you how dumb evolution is and how it makes zero sense but I have better things to do. If you want to believe in tadpole fishmen, go right ahead. But don't for a second try to force that utter stupidity onto anyone else. I would rather see the World get over evolution and turn to the belief in something greater than they are. It doesn't even have to be Christianity. If that doesn't make sense to you, find something else. There are plenty of creation religions you can choose from. Every one of them makes more sense than evolution and hopefully the World will soon realize that.

Sent from my SM-S975L using Tapatalk

Half mammal, half reptile fossil discovered in Utah

You realize that they are extrapolating this from only a shull ------ and a crushed one at that. Maybe they should check its DNA through Ancestry.com...

 

[Old Rocks]

Has there ever been a Jew who was a Creationist? A modern Jew who believes in a literal interpretation of the Old Testament and uses pretend science like the Creato-Christians do- to somehow bolster their own feeble faith in their God?

I can't think of any.

The Creato-Christian movement is a rather odd Christian cult that somehow feels a need to deny science in order to somehow convince themselves that Jesus is their savior.

Strap yourself in...

Rational people have already seen the numerous fatal flaws in Evolution.

First off, Show me 1 animal fossil of a half reptile half mammal. A reptile with fur and gave birth to live offspring but was cold blooded like all reptiles are. Show me 1. You can't, because it doesn't exist. For the theory of evolution to even be viable, there shouldn't just be 1 animal fossil that's half reptile half mammal, there should be hundreds if not thousands if not millions over the supposed millions of years it takes for evolution to work. When you're done not finding the half reptile half mammal, start looking for the half bacteria half fish, half fish half bird, half bird half otter, half otter half gorilla, etc. or whatever fantasy animal you think was real. Macro evolution, the change of kinds, the evolution that is forced down people's throats, has NEVER been seen in the fossil record and will never be seen because it is not real. This flaw in the religion of evolution is quickly dismissed by it's worshipers for whatever reason no one can ever explain.

Another flaw is, what caused evolution to begin? You might say natural selection but you would be wrong. Life supposedly began as single celled organisms in the ocean who got their energy from the sun. Natural selection requires that there is competition. So what were the first lifeforms competing against each other for, sunlight? Seems pretty absurd if you actually take 2 seconds to think about it doesn't it? In fact, some evolutionists HAVE thought about this and there is a growing movement in the scientific world away from natural selection. Eventually one day natural selection will be disproven officially by scientists and the religion of evolution worshipers will accept it blindly and continue to march on.

Another flaw is life itself and if you can't see how life beginning to exist and evolution aren't connected than we're well and truly done here and good luck. When you build a house you start with it's foundation. That's what life is for evolution, the foundation. Without life, there is no evolution. Currently, the mainstream scientific concensus on how life began is... nothing. Science has NO answer on how life began in fact, according to some early scientific "laws" (which were actually theories) it was impossible for life to even be real. It was once believed that life can only come from life. At the same time, it was believed that the Earth, and by extension the universe, was completely lifeless. To a mealworm, that doesn't even make sense. So they changed their beliefs (because science can do that in an instant) to life CAN come from non-life. They gave this study a name, Abiogensis. It was introduced in the early 70's and has since been rejected as mainstream science and for nearly 50 years has not proven anything but that life could not have possibly started in the ocean. They have now resorted to just simply saying "evolution is based on life already existing" and they've found their useful idiot worshipers have accepted it without question and march on.

I seriously could go on literally till the day I die pointing out to you how dumb evolution is and how it makes zero sense but I have better things to do. If you want to believe in tadpole fishmen, go right ahead. But don't for a second try to force that utter stupidity onto anyone else. I would rather see the World get over evolution and turn to the belief in something greater than they are. It doesn't even have to be Christianity. If that doesn't make sense to you, find something else. There are plenty of creation religions you can choose from. Every one of them makes more sense than evolution and hopefully the World will soon realize that.

Sent from my SM-S975L using Tapatalk

LOL You don't need half a day to demonstrate your stupidity and ignorance. You just did it in a few paragraphs.

The late Permian therapsid Lycaenops, a typical gorgonopsid. This animal was about the size of, and a large dog. It may have been covered in fur, and hence at least partially warm-blooded.
Artwork by Dmitry Bogdanov, GNU Free Documentation/Creative Commons Attribution license, Wikipedia
The Therapsids were one of the great success stories of the Permo-Triassic. First appearing in the middle or even the early (if Tetraceratops is a member of this group) Permian, they very quickly dominated terrestrial and semi-aquatic environments, filling a number of ecological niches and guilds, including felid, canid, bear, otter, ungulate, and even mole analogues, as well as many forms with no contemporary counterparts. In keeping with the episodic nature of synapsid evolution, there seem to have been at least two distinct dynasties, a middle Permian fauna dominated by dinocephalians and other primitive forms, and a late Permian fauna characterised by a wide range of more advanced carnivorous and herbivorous groups. These animals were so abundant (especially the herbivorous yet bizaarely specialised dicynodonts with their toothless beaks) that one could easily refer to this period as the age of therapsids, with both anapsid reptiles and relict pelycosaurs playing second fiddle. Their evolutionary success was unfortunately cut short by the end Permian extinction event, and although a number of lineages made it through to the Triassic, their protomammalian metabolism put them at a disadvantage in a hot dry Triassic world far more suited to sauropsid reptiles, and increasingly dominated by thecodontian archosaurs. They survived by becoming progressively smaller and more mammal-like, except for the dicynodonts which if anything became larger. By the time the dinosaurs had appeared, the therapsids had given rise to the first mammals, although one lineage of rodent-like, non-mammalian therapsids, the tritylodonts, would continue to the Middle Cretaceous. MAK120127

Palaeos Vertebrates: Therapsida Overview

 

[Shazoomx4]

The the earth was likely created roughly 6000 to 10,000 years ago by GOD. When the Fall of Adam & Eve occurred, deterioration kicked in for the entire Universe. Prior to that event everything existed in a continuing state of perfection. Monkeys, gorillas and humans in no way share a common ancestor; however, they do share a common CREATOR. The present state of our planet reflects the continuing deterioration of the environment due to the FALL and the scares from the FLOOD. Meteor and asteroid strikes throughout the Solar system are the result of the FALL.

Nop the world exist 4.5 billion years..

Nop you are wrong.

Yes I am right