Do You Believe We Came From Monkeys?

[Picaro]

It's fun reading a lot of rubbish about how 'similar' the assorted DNA sequences are, even though they mean absolutely nothing to with being related. Any freshman chemistry student can point out that having 'similar' atoms combining has radically different results in chemical compounds with only very slight 'differences' in structures and numbers of atoms; it's as common as dirt in fact for 'similar' atomic compounds to be very different, and the same goes for DNA arrangements or any other chemically based processes and combos. '99%' doesn't equal '100%' or even mean there is automatically a relationship of any kind. The nature of DNA is dependent on the environment it operates in, and that indicates a lot 'similarities' are de facto going to be present in all forms of life, period.

'Evolution' is nothing but a cult fantasy; no empirical evidence exists for it, no chain of evidence. Fossils from extinct species of apes and monkeys scattered over millions of years, and very few of them at that, is not a chain of evidence under the premises of empiricism.

 

[RWS]

I know there are similarities but I think they are coincidental, like cats and seals both have whiskers. But cats didn't come from seals or vice a versa.

Our DNA is 95-98% the same as chimps. So, yes, we are evolved from the primate family that apes also evolved from. Why is that a problem for you, for anyone? "...the ancestral population of apes that gave rise to humans, chimps, and bonobos was quite large and diverse genetically—numbering about 27,000 breeding individuals. Once the ancestors of humans split from the ancestor of bonobos and chimps more than 4 million years ago..." Four million years ago and you are concerned about this? Ridiculous.
http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2012/06/bonobos-join-chimps-closest-human-relatives

The basic error you make is assuming we have a common relative because of Darwin. Darwin was wrong about his tree of life. It's more like separate and non-related bushes (common ancestors within the bushes or family). Darwin was wrong about a lot of his theories lol.

We share a lot of our DNA with an earthworm, too. Bottom line is take out Darwin's all the animals share a common ancestor and you have no relationship. Apes and humans didn't share a common ancestor.

I haven't made an error. It has nothing to do with me. Science confirms that our DNA is closely linked to that of apes. More than any other being on the planet. The DNA simply confirms what Darwin theorized.

The real question is why you people are so pushed out of shape knowing that humans evolved, 4 million years ago BTW, from apes. You would be happier if we evolved from worms? LOL How ridiculous you are. It doesn't matter what species we decended from, IT WAS 4 MILLION YEARS AGO. WFT? Who ******* cares?

It's a religious thing...

 

[longknife]

I know there are similarities but I think they are coincidental, like cats and seals both have whiskers. But cats didn't come from seals or vice a versa.

I wasn't certain until watching all the butthurt leftists screaming about President Trump's election.

 

[james bond]

I know there are similarities but I think they are coincidental, like cats and seals both have whiskers. But cats didn't come from seals or vice a versa.

Our DNA is 95-98% the same as chimps. So, yes, we are evolved from the primate family that apes also evolved from. Why is that a problem for you, for anyone? "...the ancestral population of apes that gave rise to humans, chimps, and bonobos was quite large and diverse genetically—numbering about 27,000 breeding individuals. Once the ancestors of humans split from the ancestor of bonobos and chimps more than 4 million years ago..." Four million years ago and you are concerned about this? Ridiculous.
http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2012/06/bonobos-join-chimps-closest-human-relatives

The basic error you make is assuming we have a common relative because of Darwin. Darwin was wrong about his tree of life. It's more like separate and non-related bushes (common ancestors within the bushes or family). Darwin was wrong about a lot of his theories lol.

We share a lot of our DNA with an earthworm, too. Bottom line is take out Darwin's all the animals share a common ancestor and you have no relationship. Apes and humans didn't share a common ancestor.

Yes we did.

Even if there were bushes instead of one tree apes and humans share a bush.

And god didn’t poof those bushes into existence. Every land creature evolved from a water creature first. That’s what evolution says. The alternative is what? God did it?

Monkeys, apes and gorillas share one bush of primate mammals with fur, walk on fours and have smaller cranial capacity.

Humans are in a separate bush.of bipedal and larger cranial cavity mammals.

Water creatures are either fish or aquatic mammals.

There are epigeneticists who are trying to sort these bushes out now and aim to complete by 2020.

 

[james bond]

I know there are similarities but I think they are coincidental, like cats and seals both have whiskers. But cats didn't come from seals or vice a versa.

Our DNA is 95-98% the same as chimps. So, yes, we are evolved from the primate family that apes also evolved from. Why is that a problem for you, for anyone? "...the ancestral population of apes that gave rise to humans, chimps, and bonobos was quite large and diverse genetically—numbering about 27,000 breeding individuals. Once the ancestors of humans split from the ancestor of bonobos and chimps more than 4 million years ago..." Four million years ago and you are concerned about this? Ridiculous.
http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2012/06/bonobos-join-chimps-closest-human-relatives

The basic error you make is assuming we have a common relative because of Darwin. Darwin was wrong about his tree of life. It's more like separate and non-related bushes (common ancestors within the bushes or family). Darwin was wrong about a lot of his theories lol.

We share a lot of our DNA with an earthworm, too. Bottom line is take out Darwin's all the animals share a common ancestor and you have no relationship. Apes and humans didn't share a common ancestor.

I haven't made an error. It has nothing to do with me. Science confirms that our DNA is closely linked to that of apes. More than any other being on the planet. The DNA simply confirms what Darwin theorized.

The real question is why you people are so pushed out of shape knowing that humans evolved, 4 million years ago BTW, from apes. You would be happier if we evolved from worms? LOL How ridiculous you are. It doesn't matter what species we decended from, IT WAS 4 MILLION YEARS AGO. WFT? Who ******* cares?

Just using DNA isn't enough. It's just statistics. If one uses molecules, then there are like 35 million protein differences and 5 million structure differences. What should shake out with current research being done in epiegenetics are differences between apes, monkeys and gorillas in one primate mammal family with fur, non-bipedal and smaller cranial capacity while humans will be a different primate mammal family that are bipedal, have larger cranial capacity and have hair instead of fur.

 

[james bond]

I know there are similarities but I think they are coincidental, like cats and seals both have whiskers. But cats didn't come from seals or vice a versa.

Our DNA is 95-98% the same as chimps. So, yes, we are evolved from the primate family that apes also evolved from. Why is that a problem for you, for anyone? "...the ancestral population of apes that gave rise to humans, chimps, and bonobos was quite large and diverse genetically—numbering about 27,000 breeding individuals. Once the ancestors of humans split from the ancestor of bonobos and chimps more than 4 million years ago..." Four million years ago and you are concerned about this? Ridiculous.
http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2012/06/bonobos-join-chimps-closest-human-relatives

The basic error you make is assuming we have a common relative because of Darwin. Darwin was wrong about his tree of life. It's more like separate and non-related bushes (common ancestors within the bushes or family). Darwin was wrong about a lot of his theories lol.

We share a lot of our DNA with an earthworm, too. Bottom line is take out Darwin's all the animals share a common ancestor and you have no relationship. Apes and humans didn't share a common ancestor.

I haven't made an error. It has nothing to do with me. Science confirms that our DNA is closely linked to that of apes. More than any other being on the planet. The DNA simply confirms what Darwin theorized.

The real question is why you people are so pushed out of shape knowing that humans evolved, 4 million years ago BTW, from apes. You would be happier if we evolved from worms? LOL How ridiculous you are. It doesn't matter what species we decended from, IT WAS 4 MILLION YEARS AGO. WFT? Who ******* cares?

It's a religious thing...

Not religion, but creation science vs atheist or secular science.

 

[sealybobo]

I know there are similarities but I think they are coincidental, like cats and seals both have whiskers. But cats didn't come from seals or vice a versa.

Our DNA is 95-98% the same as chimps. So, yes, we are evolved from the primate family that apes also evolved from. Why is that a problem for you, for anyone? "...the ancestral population of apes that gave rise to humans, chimps, and bonobos was quite large and diverse genetically—numbering about 27,000 breeding individuals. Once the ancestors of humans split from the ancestor of bonobos and chimps more than 4 million years ago..." Four million years ago and you are concerned about this? Ridiculous.
http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2012/06/bonobos-join-chimps-closest-human-relatives

The basic error you make is assuming we have a common relative because of Darwin. Darwin was wrong about his tree of life. It's more like separate and non-related bushes (common ancestors within the bushes or family). Darwin was wrong about a lot of his theories lol.

We share a lot of our DNA with an earthworm, too. Bottom line is take out Darwin's all the animals share a common ancestor and you have no relationship. Apes and humans didn't share a common ancestor.

Yes we did.

Even if there were bushes instead of one tree apes and humans share a bush.

And god didn’t poof those bushes into existence. Every land creature evolved from a water creature first. That’s what evolution says. The alternative is what? God did it?

Monkeys, apes and gorillas share one bush of primate mammals with fur, walk on fours and have smaller cranial capacity.

Humans are in a separate bush.of bipedal and larger cranial cavity mammals.

Water creatures are either fish or aquatic mammals.

There are epigeneticists who are trying to sort these bushes out now and aim to complete by 2020.

How did the animals in your bush get here if they didn't crawl out of the water originally? Poof? Did god poof fully grown animals into existence? Is that your THEORY? We need to know when your science stops and your fantasy kicks in.

 

[Esmeralda]

I know there are similarities but I think they are coincidental, like cats and seals both have whiskers. But cats didn't come from seals or vice a versa.

Our DNA is 95-98% the same as chimps. So, yes, we are evolved from the primate family that apes also evolved from. Why is that a problem for you, for anyone? "...the ancestral population of apes that gave rise to humans, chimps, and bonobos was quite large and diverse genetically—numbering about 27,000 breeding individuals. Once the ancestors of humans split from the ancestor of bonobos and chimps more than 4 million years ago..." Four million years ago and you are concerned about this? Ridiculous.
http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2012/06/bonobos-join-chimps-closest-human-relatives

The basic error you make is assuming we have a common relative because of Darwin. Darwin was wrong about his tree of life. It's more like separate and non-related bushes (common ancestors within the bushes or family). Darwin was wrong about a lot of his theories lol.

We share a lot of our DNA with an earthworm, too. Bottom line is take out Darwin's all the animals share a common ancestor and you have no relationship. Apes and humans didn't share a common ancestor.

I haven't made an error. It has nothing to do with me. Science confirms that our DNA is closely linked to that of apes. More than any other being on the planet. The DNA simply confirms what Darwin theorized.

The real question is why you people are so pushed out of shape knowing that humans evolved, 4 million years ago BTW, from apes. You would be happier if we evolved from worms? LOL How ridiculous you are. It doesn't matter what species we decended from, IT WAS 4 MILLION YEARS AGO. WFT? Who ******* cares?

It's a religious thing...

Not religion, but creation science vs atheist or secular science.

Creationism is NOT SCIENCE. It's a joke, a lame attempt to try to make the creation story something other than a fantastic myth. LOL

 

[Esmeralda]

I know there are similarities but I think they are coincidental, like cats and seals both have whiskers. But cats didn't come from seals or vice a versa.

Our DNA is 95-98% the same as chimps. So, yes, we are evolved from the primate family that apes also evolved from. Why is that a problem for you, for anyone? "...the ancestral population of apes that gave rise to humans, chimps, and bonobos was quite large and diverse genetically—numbering about 27,000 breeding individuals. Once the ancestors of humans split from the ancestor of bonobos and chimps more than 4 million years ago..." Four million years ago and you are concerned about this? Ridiculous.
http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2012/06/bonobos-join-chimps-closest-human-relatives

The basic error you make is assuming we have a common relative because of Darwin. Darwin was wrong about his tree of life. It's more like separate and non-related bushes (common ancestors within the bushes or family). Darwin was wrong about a lot of his theories lol.

We share a lot of our DNA with an earthworm, too. Bottom line is take out Darwin's all the animals share a common ancestor and you have no relationship. Apes and humans didn't share a common ancestor.

I haven't made an error. It has nothing to do with me. Science confirms that our DNA is closely linked to that of apes. More than any other being on the planet. The DNA simply confirms what Darwin theorized.

The real question is why you people are so pushed out of shape knowing that humans evolved, 4 million years ago BTW, from apes. You would be happier if we evolved from worms? LOL How ridiculous you are. It doesn't matter what species we decended from, IT WAS 4 MILLION YEARS AGO. WFT? Who ******* cares?

Just using DNA isn't enough. It's just statistics. If one uses molecules, then there are like 35 million protein differences and 5 million structure differences. What should shake out with current research being done in epiegenetics are differences between apes, monkeys and gorillas in one primate mammal family with fur, non-bipedal and smaller cranial capacity while humans will be a different primate mammal family that are bipedal, have larger cranial capacity and have hair instead of fur.

My goodness, you are desperate.

 

[Skull Pilot]

I believe a large portion of us are still monkeys

 

[LTCArmyRet]

I know there are similarities but I think they are coincidental, like cats and seals both have whiskers. But cats didn't come from seals or vice a versa.

Our DNA is 95-98% the same as chimps. So, yes, we are evolved from the primate family that apes also evolved from. Why is that a problem for you, for anyone? "...the ancestral population of apes that gave rise to humans, chimps, and bonobos was quite large and diverse genetically—numbering about 27,000 breeding individuals. Once the ancestors of humans split from the ancestor of bonobos and chimps more than 4 million years ago..." Four million years ago and you are concerned about this? Ridiculous.
http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2012/06/bonobos-join-chimps-closest-human-relatives

Do pigs share 98 per cent of human genes? › Ask an Expert (ABC Science)
Scientists have discovered about 20,000 mammalian genes that encode proteins with similar basic functions. So if you compare the protein-encoding portion of our DNA we have a lot in common with a lot of mammals.

"Mammals have most of the same genes for similar biochemical and physiological functions. If you look at the details of the genes … there'll be differences between them, but they'll still be doing the same kind of function," says Moran.

"It's a little bit like having a Ford or a Holden — it's still obviously a car but a slightly different version."

But while 20,000 similar genes sounds like a lot, only one to two per cent of our DNA actually encodes proteins. Most of the rest is transcribed into RNA.

Pigs and humans share more genetic similarities than previously believed
Pigs share a number of surprising comparable traits with humans. For instance, we both have hairless skin, a thick layer of subcutaneous fat, light-colored eyes, protruding noses and heavy eyelashes. Pig skin tissues and heart valves can be used in medicine because of their compatibility with the human body. Medical students often practice suturing on pig's feet.

Most of these shared traits are likely due to convergent evolution, happenstance; they aren't the sign of close ancestry. But new genetic analysis suggests that pigs and primates may actually share a hidden evolutionary relationship after all


So....did we come from pigs? apes? hippopotamus? Jury is still out....no conclusive evidence. We (humans) once believed beyond a doubt that the earth was flat and we were the center of the universe.

 

[james bond]

We're primates that developed from a common ancestor 5-7 million years ago that yes was an ape.

That is a fact....The evidence is very strong.

Not a fact, it is a theory, big difference. And if we descended from an ape, why are there still apes?

OMG

This is the other deception. Scientists lie that apes from the past are different from today's evolved apes and that's why none of them walk (bipedal). What a crock. Feces alert .

 

[alang1216]

We're primates that developed from a common ancestor 5-7 million years ago that yes was an ape.

That is a fact....The evidence is very strong.

Not a fact, it is a theory, big difference. And if we descended from an ape, why are there still apes?

OMG

This is the other deception. Scientists lie that apes from the past are different from today's evolved apes and that's why none of them walk (bipedal). What a crock. Feces alert .

Yeah, you figured it out, there is a vast conspiracy made up of almost every physicist, biologist, paleontologist, and geologist just to get you to question your faith in God. Keep that tin foil handy.

 

[james bond]

We're primates that developed from a common ancestor 5-7 million years ago that yes was an ape.

That is a fact....The evidence is very strong.

Not a fact, it is a theory, big difference. And if we descended from an ape, why are there still apes?

OMG

This is the other deception. Scientists lie that apes from the past are different from today's evolved apes and that's why none of them walk (bipedal). What a crock. Feces alert .

Yeah, you figured it out, there is a vast conspiracy made up of almost every physicist, biologist, paleontologist, and geologist just to get you to question your faith in God. Keep that tin foil handy.

Those who still believe in evolution. We saw that that apes to humans was backed up by lies and fraud.

However, those who are creation scientists think different. If we go by observation, then today's chimps and apes back up that we did not descend from chimps/apes and that backs up the Bible and creation scientists.

Also, explain how the apes today are not bipedal? And why do they still have small cranial capacity and fur?

 

[alang1216]

Those who still believe in evolution. We saw that that apes to humans was backed up by lies and fraud.

What lies? What frauds? The only lies and frauds I've seen come from the creation science people.

However, those who are creation scientists think different. If we go by observation, then today's chimps and apes back up that we did not descend from chimps/apes and that backs up the Bible and creation scientists.

I certainly believe they think differently but how does observing today's chimps and apes back up that we did not descend from chimps/apes? How does it support creation science?

Also, explain how the apes today are not bipedal? And why do they still have small cranial capacity and fur?

We're back to your fundamental lack of understanding of evolution. Do you think apes want to be men or that evolution has a goal?

Todays apes are not bipedal and still have small cranial capacity and fur because they are well suited to their environment and these features offer no survival advantage.

 

[james bond]

What lies? What frauds? The only lies and frauds I've seen come from the creation science people.

No lies from creation scientists, but lies and fraud from evolution such as Piltdown Man and Nebraska Man.

We're back to your fundamental lack of understanding of evolution. Do you think apes want to be men or that evolution has a goal?

You're back to not being able to explain any evolution nor been able to answer my questions. You've been shown to be ignorant and negligible.

 

[alang1216]

You're back to not being able to explain any evolution nor been able to answer my questions. You've been shown to be ignorant and negligible.

What questions have I not tried to answer?

 

[james bond]

What questions have I not tried to answer?

[/QUOTE]

Not tried, but can't answer. If you'd knew the answer, then you would jump on it like stink on feces . Thus, we know humans did not come from apes. Too much evidence against it

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

There is no empirical evidence humans come from a common ancestor.

See, there is zero point in engaging freaks like this. ^^

Let them talk and embarrass themselves. Who cares? Do we really have to try to rationalize with every 90 pound weakling who claims he can beat up Floyd Mayweather?

"Well son, you see, he has excellent technique, and had boxed professionally for many years. In fact, here are links to videos of him training and of him winning professional fights. Oh, and here are links to boxing experts describing how great he is. So, unfortunately, a person like you with zero skill or training in boxing is not going to beat him..."


Hahaha...no. We should only mock these fools.

 

[sealybobo]

I know there are similarities but I think they are coincidental, like cats and seals both have whiskers. But cats didn't come from seals or vice a versa.

Back before we shared a common ancestor that species of hominoid evolved from a species that was more like a rodent. It crawled on all fours. This too is our relative. Forget did we evolve from monkeys. What was that monkey before it evolved into one? We trace our history all the way back to a creature that crawled out of the water.

If you don’t believe evolution you believe the goat herders guide to the universe. We were poofed into being right?

You can’t deny evolution and say you’re a scientist