Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 92,588
- 58,466
- 2,645
Why would it have to be? My point stands regardless. And the Constitution guarantees that right to burn the flag, so you are on the worng side of it, anyway.
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Do You Believe Based on Evidence, Russia Changed Outcome of 2016 Election
- Thread starter Geaux4it
- Start date
- Dec 18, 2013
- 136,377
- 27,908
- 2,180
yes it does. again, not sure when climate became a constitutional item. let me know when you decide.Why would it have to be? My point stands regardless. And the Constitution guarantees that right to burn the flag, so you are on the worng side of it, anyway.since when is believing in climate science a constitutional thing?
WEATHER53
Diamond Member
- Apr 13, 2017
- 27,579
- 16,723
- 1,415
It may guarantee it but does not promote it. It’s my. Constitutional right to scratch my ass in public. Does not mean it’s good to exercise it.Why would it have to be? My point stands regardless. And the Constitution guarantees that right to burn the flag, so you are on the worng side of it, anyway.since when is believing in climate science a constitutional thing?
- Dec 18, 2013
- 136,377
- 27,908
- 2,180
still climate science is not part of the constitution. apples and oranges discussion as always with the fk.It may guarantee it but does not promote it. It’s my. Constitutional right to scratch my ass in public. Does not mean it’s good to exercise it.Why would it have to be? My point stands regardless. And the Constitution guarantees that right to burn the flag, so you are on the worng side of it, anyway.since when is believing in climate science a constitutional thing?
Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 92,588
- 58,466
- 2,645
But I don't care if it is in regards to the Constitution...I am not bound by your narrowmindedness....yes it does. again, not sure when climate became a constitutional item. let me know when you decide.Why would it have to be? My point stands regardless. And the Constitution guarantees that right to burn the flag, so you are on the worng side of it, anyway.since when is believing in climate science a constitutional thing?
And you are the one on the wrong side of the Constitution anyway, so you are kind of embarrassing yourself.
- Dec 18, 2013
- 136,377
- 27,908
- 2,180
I am? you're for flag burning are youBut I don't care if it is in regards to the Constitution...I am not bound by your narrowmindedness....yes it does. again, not sure when climate became a constitutional item. let me know when you decide.Why would it have to be? My point stands regardless. And the Constitution guarantees that right to burn the flag, so you are on the worng side of it, anyway.since when is believing in climate science a constitutional thing?
And you are the one on the wrong side of the Constitution anyway, so you are kind of embarrassing yourself.
I'm for this guy..
Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 92,588
- 58,466
- 2,645
I am? you're for flag burning are youBut I don't care if it is in regards to the Constitution...I am not bound by your narrowmindedness....yes it does. again, not sure when climate became a constitutional item. let me know when you decide.Why would it have to be? My point stands regardless. And the Constitution guarantees that right to burn the flag, so you are on the worng side of it, anyway.since when is believing in climate science a constitutional thing?
And you are the one on the wrong side of the Constitution anyway, so you are kind of embarrassing yourself.
I'm for this guy..
I'm for allowing it, and thanks for asking.
playtime
Diamond Member
- Aug 18, 2015
- 55,554
- 47,927
- 3,645
Every Democrat and Republican who has looked at the evidence says it was definitely the Russians who hacked. Powerless staffers bullshiting about dreams on emails mean nothing anyway, Dupes ...m'k............ and?
You mentioned the emails hacked from the DNC server and Russians hacking them.
The hacked emails Julian Assange released through WikiLeaks ...
He specifically stated didn't come from the Russians.
So ... Are you worried about the Russians hacking emails on the DNC server ...
Or are you worried about WikiLeaks releasing emails the Russians didn't provide them with?
.
No votes were changed
if someone broke into your house but didn't take anything valuable.... should they still be charged? should they be considered criminals & punished so they don't feel like they can do it again?
- Dec 18, 2013
- 136,377
- 27,908
- 2,180
I am? you're for flag burning are youBut I don't care if it is in regards to the Constitution...I am not bound by your narrowmindedness....yes it does. again, not sure when climate became a constitutional item. let me know when you decide.Why would it have to be? My point stands regardless. And the Constitution guarantees that right to burn the flag, so you are on the worng side of it, anyway.since when is believing in climate science a constitutional thing?
And you are the one on the wrong side of the Constitution anyway, so you are kind of embarrassing yourself.
I'm for this guy..
I'm for allowing it, and thanks for asking.
Freedom of speech allows it, doesn’t mean I like it. It’s the penalty of freedom! Wish you were for it
- Dec 18, 2013
- 136,377
- 27,908
- 2,180
Why wouldn’t they? You can’t be that stupidEvery Democrat and Republican who has looked at the evidence says it was definitely the Russians who hacked. Powerless staffers bullshiting about dreams on emails mean nothing anyway, Dupes ...m'k............ and?
You mentioned the emails hacked from the DNC server and Russians hacking them.
The hacked emails Julian Assange released through WikiLeaks ...
He specifically stated didn't come from the Russians.
So ... Are you worried about the Russians hacking emails on the DNC server ...
Or are you worried about WikiLeaks releasing emails the Russians didn't provide them with?
.
No votes were changed
if someone broke into your house but didn't take anything valuable.... should they still be charged? should they be considered criminals & punished so they don't feel like they can do it again?
playtime
Diamond Member
- Aug 18, 2015
- 55,554
- 47,927
- 3,645
Why wouldn’t they? You can’t be that stupidEvery Democrat and Republican who has looked at the evidence says it was definitely the Russians who hacked. Powerless staffers bullshiting about dreams on emails mean nothing anyway, Dupes ...m'k............ and?
You mentioned the emails hacked from the DNC server and Russians hacking them.
The hacked emails Julian Assange released through WikiLeaks ...
He specifically stated didn't come from the Russians.
So ... Are you worried about the Russians hacking emails on the DNC server ...
Or are you worried about WikiLeaks releasing emails the Russians didn't provide them with?
.
No votes were changed
if someone broke into your house but didn't take anything valuable.... should they still be charged? should they be considered criminals & punished so they don't feel like they can do it again?
it's pretty stupid to say that they should be.... but don't want russia held accountable for basically the same thing...since 'no votes were changed'.....
you couldn't figure out where that line of questioning was headed? go eat some more spinach- your brain has atrophied.
Of course 80% of usmb are GOP base and the question is a mess. Trump needed WikiLeaks and all of our media as accomplices...
No.
Though I wouldn't dismiss it entirely, and as a #NeverTrumper who voted for Hillary like President George HW Bush, I think Hillary lost it on her own.
She was a horrible candidate.
Though I wouldn't dismiss it entirely, and as a #NeverTrumper who voted for Hillary like President George HW Bush, I think Hillary lost it on her own.
She was a horrible candidate.
- Dec 18, 2013
- 136,377
- 27,908
- 2,180
The problem you have, is you never proved the Russians broke in. Any fking day eh?Why wouldn’t they? You can’t be that stupidEvery Democrat and Republican who has looked at the evidence says it was definitely the Russians who hacked. Powerless staffers bullshiting about dreams on emails mean nothing anyway, Dupes ...You mentioned the emails hacked from the DNC server and Russians hacking them.
The hacked emails Julian Assange released through WikiLeaks ...
He specifically stated didn't come from the Russians.
So ... Are you worried about the Russians hacking emails on the DNC server ...
Or are you worried about WikiLeaks releasing emails the Russians didn't provide them with?
.
No votes were changed
if someone broke into your house but didn't take anything valuable.... should they still be charged? should they be considered criminals & punished so they don't feel like they can do it again?
it's pretty stupid to say that they should be.... but don't want russia held accountable for basically the same thing...since 'no votes were changed'.....
you couldn't figure out where that line of questioning was headed? go eat some more spinach- your brain has atrophied.
playtime
Diamond Member
- Aug 18, 2015
- 55,554
- 47,927
- 3,645
The problem you have, is you never proved the Russians broke in. Any fking day eh?Why wouldn’t they? You can’t be that stupidEvery Democrat and Republican who has looked at the evidence says it was definitely the Russians who hacked. Powerless staffers bullshiting about dreams on emails mean nothing anyway, Dupes ...
No votes were changed
if someone broke into your house but didn't take anything valuable.... should they still be charged? should they be considered criminals & punished so they don't feel like they can do it again?
it's pretty stupid to say that they should be.... but don't want russia held accountable for basically the same thing...since 'no votes were changed'.....
you couldn't figure out where that line of questioning was headed? go eat some more spinach- your brain has atrophied.
you never proved they didn't. howeverrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr...................... 17 intel agencies said they did. they have quite the detailed info too....
& you? lol......
nuthin'.
- Dec 18, 2013
- 136,377
- 27,908
- 2,180
You mean media on his side? So, the media for hitlery wasn’t an accomplice? LOLOf course 80% of usmb are GOP base and the question is a mess. Trump needed WikiLeaks and all of our media as accomplices...
Based on the FACT that there is zero evidence, I'd have to say no at this time.
- Dec 18, 2013
- 136,377
- 27,908
- 2,180
Fake news still today thanksThe problem you have, is you never proved the Russians broke in. Any fking day eh?Why wouldn’t they? You can’t be that stupidNo votes were changed
if someone broke into your house but didn't take anything valuable.... should they still be charged? should they be considered criminals & punished so they don't feel like they can do it again?
it's pretty stupid to say that they should be.... but don't want russia held accountable for basically the same thing...since 'no votes were changed'.....
you couldn't figure out where that line of questioning was headed? go eat some more spinach- your brain has atrophied.
you never proved they didn't. howeverrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr...................... 17 intel agencies said they did. they have quite the detailed info too....
& you? lol......
nuthin'.
The problem you have, is you never proved the Russians broke in. Any fking day eh?Why wouldn’t they? You can’t be that stupidNo votes were changed
if someone broke into your house but didn't take anything valuable.... should they still be charged? should they be considered criminals & punished so they don't feel like they can do it again?
it's pretty stupid to say that they should be.... but don't want russia held accountable for basically the same thing...since 'no votes were changed'.....
you couldn't figure out where that line of questioning was headed? go eat some more spinach- your brain has atrophied.
you never proved they didn't. howeverrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr...................... 17 intel agencies said they did. they have quite the detailed info too....
& you? lol......
nuthin'.
Where is this info?
- Dec 18, 2013
- 136,377
- 27,908
- 2,180
by the way, the fact you can’t prove they did is my evidence!The problem you have, is you never proved the Russians broke in. Any fking day eh?Why wouldn’t they? You can’t be that stupidNo votes were changed
if someone broke into your house but didn't take anything valuable.... should they still be charged? should they be considered criminals & punished so they don't feel like they can do it again?
it's pretty stupid to say that they should be.... but don't want russia held accountable for basically the same thing...since 'no votes were changed'.....
you couldn't figure out where that line of questioning was headed? go eat some more spinach- your brain has atrophied.
you never proved they didn't. howeverrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr...................... 17 intel agencies said they did. they have quite the detailed info too....
& you? lol......
nuthin'.
Similar threads
- Replies
- 72
- Views
- 544
- Replies
- 19
- Views
- 485
- Replies
- 2
- Views
- 74
- Replies
- 9
- Views
- 92
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 101
- Views
- 903
- Replies
- 13
- Views
- 60
- Replies
- 28
- Views
- 251
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8054
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 469
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-