Do you agree that the Bengals have "failed Joe Burrow"?

He gets "over-used". Chances for injury go up if you are the "whole team". Hurts doesn't have to drop back 40 times a game. The team looked better this year before he got hurt. But 2-0 ain't chopped liver either. Defense actually got some stops when it counted.
 
He gets "over-used". Chances for injury go up if you are the "whole team". Hurts doesn't have to drop back 40 times a game. The team looked better this year before he got hurt. But 2-0 ain't chopped liver either. Defense actually got some stops when it counted.
The Bengals are a "perfect storm" of sorts. I believe there are multiple reasons for Burrow's long list of injuries. I'm just saying it's always easy to blame the "system" when there are other factors as well.
 
Have the imbecile bengals ever had a decent back that lasted more than a couple years?
 
The Bengals are a "perfect storm" of sorts. I believe there are multiple reasons for Burrow's long list of injuries. I'm just saying it's always easy to blame the "system" when there are other factors as well.


If he was on the Tom Brady O-line, Bellicheat Defense he too would have 4-6 SB rings.

But, He is big and not that quick. Like you say, he adds to it. Usually the big helps out. Harder to injure a behemoth. But he is in harms way too often compared to some. In the olden days though, they really took some shots. Dan Fouts? Theisman era?
 
Back
Top Bottom