Do Federal/State/Local Governments Create Jobs?

[SweetTea]

yeah, he pretty much did. He said he would accept them if they were legit, which in Trump talk means he won.

Remember this is the guy that said the only legit polls were the ones that favored him.

Yes, if they are legit he would accept the results. Look, as much spin as lefties like to put on the free and fair election bit, normal, informed people can see the potential of a scam. The shenanigans Democrats pull by changing the rules for COVID and keeping them in perpetuity because it benefits them and allows for a much easier way to cheat and much harder time proving it in mass, not wanting voter id, allowing illegals to get driver’s licenses in some states and not being questioned regarding their immigration status and even allowing non-citizens to vote in local elections, etc. It is mind boggling that lefties don’t see the what is very likely going on. I guess I shouldn’t be surprised because, for example, many still believe to this day that Democrats want to stop illegal immigration, that walls don’t work, that Hunter’s laptop was Russian disinformation, that Trump colluded with Russia. The list goes on and on.

 

[SweetTea]

In Trumps world, he gets to decide which elections are legit.
The fact that he is unable to convince the courts that they are not has no bearing.

No election is legal until Trump admits he lost

And in the Democrat’s world, unless millions of illegal ballots can be individually proven to be fraudulent, there is no fraud. It is a brilliant strategy, but it only fools the ignorant Democratic masses…the same ones that only recently figured out that Joe is senile.

 

[rightwinger]

Yes, if they are legit he would accept the results

Yea, yea……And it is Trump who gets to decide if the election is legit

Not the voters
Not the states who certify the results
Not the courts who hear whatever objections Trump may have

Trumps only criteria is if he LOST, it is not legit

 

[22lcidw]

Yea, yea……And it is Trump who gets to decide if the election is legit

Not the voters
Not the states who certify the results
Not the courts who hear whatever objections Trump may have

Trumps only criteria is if he LOST, it is not legit

It is the cheating. In ghetto areas in the dark.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Yes, if they are legit he would accept the results.

And in his world the only legit election is one that he won. And I get that you all agree with that, but it is not reality.

As far back as 2016 he was calling primaries he lost as rigged.

 

[rightwinger]

And in the Democrat’s world, unless millions of illegal ballots can be individually proven to be fraudulent, there is no fraud. It is a brilliant strategy, but it only fools the ignorant Democratic masses…the same ones that only recently figured out that Joe is senile.

Not millions, but it would support your claims if you could prove a few.

Illegal votes lead to duplicate attempts to vote, more votes than registered voters, invalid signatures

Guess what?
Republicans get to oversee the election and the counting. They get to challenge ballots they think are bogus.
But they find nothing and then declare fraud

 

[SweetTea]

Yea, yea……And it is Trump who gets to decide if the election is legit

Not the voters
Not the states who certify the results
Not the courts who hear whatever objections Trump may have

Trumps only criteria is if he LOST, it is not legit

Change the sketchy rules devised and supported by Democrats and maybe there wouldn’t be such skepticism.

 

[rightwinger]

Change the sketchy rules devised and supported by Democrats and maybe there wouldn’t be such skepticism.

Republicans are free to challenge voting rules in court
They have and they have lost

The rules apply to all parties

 

[SweetTea]

Not millions, but it would support your claims if you could prove a few.

Illegal votes lead to duplicate attempts to vote, more votes than registered voters, invalid signatures

Guess what?
Republicans get to oversee the election and the counting. They get to challenge ballots they think are bogus.
But they find nothing and then declare fraud

That is simply untrue. There were cases of voter fraud, but they couldn’t provide enough for it to be considered substantial enough to change the results. That is kind of the beauty of the cheat and why Democrats don’t want to go back to pre-COVID voting rules.

 

[rightwinger]

That is simply untrue. There were cases of voter fraud, but they couldn’t provide enough for it to be considered substantial enough to change the results. That is kind of the beauty of the cheat and why Democrats don’t want to go back to pre-COVID voting rules.

Every election has a few anomalies or questionable votes
But it doesn’t remotely approach the massive fraud that Republicans are claiming

 

[SweetTea]

And in his world the only legit election is one that he won. And I get that you all agree with that, but it is not reality.

As far back as 2016 he was calling primaries he lost as rigged.

Democrats lie, repeatedly. They have no moral compass so forgive us for thinking they may cheat in elections.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Democrats lie, repeatedly. They have no moral compass so forgive us for thinking they may cheat in elections.

Dude, you are a cult member that will cover for anything and everything your beloved party does, going so far as to have your beloved party as your avatar.

Talking to you about Trump is like talking to a member of the People's Temple about Jim Jones as they are sipping on the kool aid

 

[SweetTea]

Every election has a few anomalies or questionable votes
But it doesn’t remotely approach the massive fraud that Republicans are claiming

Mass mail-in voting created a greater opportunity to cheat. Democrats like it and want to keep it in place. No id creates a greater opportunity to cheat. Democrats like it and want to keep it in place. There is nothing that actually secures the election that Democrats want. They use the tired voter disenfranchisement argument that many dimwits believe. The reality is they don’t want to secure the election because the more opportunities there are to cheat, the better it is for them.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Mass mail-in voting created a greater opportunity to cheat.

And yet little to no cheating was found by using it. Why is that?

 

[SweetTea]

Dude, you are a cult member that will cover for anything and everything your beloved party does, going so far as to have your beloved party as your avatar.

Talking to you about Trump is like talking to a member of the People's Temple about Jim Jones as they are sipping on the kool aid

Pot meet kettle. Let me guess, you believe Biden wants to secure the border and that Russia wants Trump elected as President.

 

[SweetTea]

And yet little to no cheating was found by using it. Why is that?

Because we don’t have the resources to sort through all the ballots to determine what you would consider “mass” fraud. Get it yet?

 

[rightwinger]

Mass mail-in voting created a greater opportunity to cheat. Democrats like it and want to keep it in place. No id creates a greater opportunity to cheat. Democrats like it and want to keep it in place. There is nothing that actually secures the election that Democrats want. They use the tired voter disenfranchisement argument that many dimwits believe. The reality is they don’t want to secure the election because the more opportunities there are to cheat, the better it is for them.

Yet, Republicans were unable to identify any significant cheating
Mail in voting was extremely popular with more people voting than any time in history

It is safe and it is convenient

A signature has proven to be an effective way to validate identity for hundreds of years
There is no evidence of people showing up at the polls and voting for someone else

 

[Dragonlady]

He absolutely did not say he wouldn’t accept results…you’re lying again.

No he didn't. He said if he accepts it's "fair and legal" and he's already said that if he doesn't win, it's rigged.

Last time, it was fair and legal, and he denies simply that it was. He didn't say he would accept the results at all at the debate. It's all weasel wording.

No "if's", no "and's" and no "buts". Yes or no - and he refuses to say "yes". Anything less than an "unequivocal "Yes", is unacceptable.

 

[rightwinger]

Lets be real
Some person casting a fraudulent vote does not steal elections

What steals elections is

Endorsing fake electors to ignore the vote of the people
Pressuring local officials to “find” enough votes for you to win
Pressuring a Vice President to overturn the EVs of a state

 

[Dragonlady]

Because we don’t have the resources to sort through all the ballots to determine what you would consider “mass” fraud. Get it yet?

Even when you did, there was NOTHING amiss. Your Cyber Ninjas said Biden won.

Trump has said that the only way he loses is if it's rigged. Even though there is ZERO evidence of anyone trying to rig the election, other than Trump.