Im not saying this to be ignorant to you.I was checking out the delegate counts on CNN.
2016 Election Center - Presidential Primaries and Caucuses – 2016 Election Center - CNNPolitics.com
Apparently despite Sanders kicking her butt in both states clinton is winning 431 to 50. Seriously? I know they are counting superdelegates but shouldn't they before adding superdelegates so it portrays an accurate account of how the people are voting?
But when are the American people going to wake the **** up and realize that our individual votes have not been considered for many years when it comes to presidents. Some times a conspiracy theory can be right.
The only way to fix this is to get rid of the electoral college and go for a straight 1 on 1 vote. Yes, I realize that would have meant that Gore would have destroyed the country for 4 years, but Im willing to take a chance on these things if thats what it takes to bring some level of confidence back to the process.
How about getting the Democratic Party to stop their super delegates?
The RNC doesn't have them.
What is a superdelegate
The Democratic National Committee is currently the only political party to appoint superdelegates or to have a weighted nomination system.