Kamala Harris, Tim Walz Push AR-15 Ban in First Joint Campaign Appearance

If they wanted an end to gun violence, they'd crack down on gun violence.

They want to end private gun ownership. If they cracked down on gun violence, that would make it more difficult to realize their goal of disarming the American people.
 

As one might have expected from a pair of leftist loons, they have an agenda that focuses on stripping away Constitutional rights.​


From the very people who chose not to interfere with their BLM and antifa heroes burning down city streets, theses are the loons who want to further enable their criminal protected class.


During their first joint campaign appearance in Philadelphia, Kamala Harris and Tim Walz pushed a ban on AR-15s and other firearms that Democrats refer to as “assault weapons.”
I agree with the ban the AR 15 … nobody should have one period … that all they are doing is banning your rightist loons a AR15 or the AK 47 you rightist loins think you need a gun that totally blows away the head of a child … that makes you rightist loons feel like a tuff guys… just so you can blow the head right off a child head in one shot …
 
If they wanted an end to gun violence, they'd crack down on gun violence.

They want to end private gun ownership. If they cracked down on gun violence, that would make it more difficult to realize their goal of disarming the American people.
No democrat is for disarming anybody … they just want to stop you rightist loons from blowing the heads off of 6th,7th, and 8th graders … we want to take away your hunting skills of young children this way it stops you rightist loons from mounting their heads in you den …
 
The Left has to prevent any more uprisings when they torch more cities that the Left-wing mayors refuse to protect.

View attachment 991432
No they don’t there no constitutional right that allows you to own a ar15 or a AK 47 show me where it say you have a constitutional right to own that gun … what the constitution does say is we the people have the right to regulate the guns you can buy and we dems are going to do it … I’m sorry that it takes away your ability to hunt 6th 7th, 8 th graders from getting kill just so you can mount their heads in your den…
 
I agree with the ban the AR 15 … nobody should have one period … that all they are doing is banning your rightist loons a AR15 or the AK 47 you rightist loins think you need a gun that totally blows away the head of a child … that makes you rightist loons feel like a tuff guys… just so you can blow the head right off a child head in one shot …
So after you ban the AR-15, what is next? Obviously the AK-47. Then what? The Mini-14?, the SKS?, the M1A?, the M-1 Garand?,the M-1 Carbine? They are all semi-automatic rifles and the last two are actual weapons of war unlike the AR-15, Mini-14 and M-1A. The interesting thing is that with the exception of SOME Mini-14s, all are more powerful than the AR-15. What is your end-game? Where do you plan to stop?
 
I agree with the ban the AR 15 … nobody should have one period … that all they are doing is banning your rightist loons a AR15 or the AK 47 you rightist loins think you need a gun that totally blows away the head of a child … that makes you rightist loons feel like a tuff guys… just so you can blow the head right off a child head in one shot …
So after you ban the AR-15, what is next? Obviously the AK-47. Then what? The Mini-14?, the SKS?, the M1A?, the M-1 Garand?,the M-1 Carbine? They are all semi-automatic rifles and the last two are actual weapons of war unlike the AR-15, Mini-14 and M-1A. The interesting thing is that with the exception of SOME Mini-14s, all are more powerful than the AR-15. What is your end-game? Where do you plan to stop
No they don’t there no constitutional right that allows you to own a ar15 or a AK 47 show me where it say you have a constitutional right to own that gun … what the constitution does say is we the people have the right to regulate the guns you can buy and we dems are going to do it … I’m sorry that it takes away your ability to hunt 6th 7th, 8 th graders from getting kill just so you can mount their heads in your den…

Where in the Constitution does it say that a private person could own an artillery piece or a warship? It doesn’t, but in 1787 both were legal and common. If it was legal to own a warship, why wouldn’t the same logic apply to AR-15s? ( this is not typed by billytock123, but byvAZrailwhale.
 
So after you ban the AR-15, what is next? Obviously the AK-47. Then what? The Mini-14?, the SKS?, the M1A?, the M-1 Garand?,the M-1 Carbine? They are all semi-automatic rifles and the last two are actual weapons of war unlike the AR-15, Mini-14 and M-1A. The interesting thing is that with the exception of SOME Mini-14s, all are more powerful than the AR-15. What is your end-game? Where do you plan to stop
yep, ban them all as far as I'm concerned... Here is how you determine who gets their guns taken away ...first you get their registration to vote if they are Republicans you take their guns ... now you don't tell them how they got their guns taken away you tell them a lie ... oh like Donald trump told us to take your gun ...then go and impregnate their wife and daughters being abortion is illegal they get to fight that fight ...
 
So after you ban the AR-15, what is next? Obviously the AK-47. Then what? The Mini-14?, the SKS?, the M1A?, the M-1 Garand?,the M-1 Carbine? They are all semi-automatic rifles and the last two are actual weapons of war unlike the AR-15, Mini-14 and M-1A. The interesting thing is that with the exception of SOME Mini-14s, all are more powerful than the AR-15. What is your end-game? Where do you plan to stop?
one more observant do you have a reading disability...it seems like you do... I listed the AK 47 ... maybe I should have said Simi automatic weapons ... do you understand that thought or are you going to say do you mean Ar 15 and AK47 too ... comprehension is not your forte ...
 
Back
Top Bottom