Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
He passed this awful law to demonize gay people.
Yes, the teacher should give a short, historical account of who Jesus was
As long as the teacher also offers similar content regarding Buddah, and Muhammed, sure, that'll be fine...
If the student ask about those then yes
He passed this awful law to demonize gay people.
No, it's all or nothing.
Period.
You seem to have misspelled “subhuman pieces of shit who sexually abuse children”.
That is just stupid. If a student ask a question then give them an answer. If a student ask a question about a dog should the teach talk about every other animal?
I know gay people.You seem to have misspelled “subhuman pieces of shit who sexually abuse children”.He passed this awful law to demonize gay people.
Oddly, none of them has ever abused, not have they advocated for the abuse of, children.
Your comment exposes just what kind of special idiot you really are...
You seem to have [probably intentionally] misunderstood my point.
Incel Joe was lying that it was “gay people” who are the targets of DeSantis' law to protect children from sexual abusers.
You pretty much see that, anywhere, now, that any politician takes any action intended to protect children form being sexually abused, that it is the faggot/tranny lobby that comes out and claims that they are the targets of that action.
I wonder why that is?
Although the connection is rather obvious between the two groups, my post was not intended to say that faggots and child abusers are the same group, but to take Incel Joe to task for crying that a law protecting children from sexual abuse was intended to “demonize gay people”.
To whatever extent there may exist faggots who are not interested in sexually abusing children, there is no reason at all why they should feel targeted by this law.
No, but animals aren't beliefs.
If a child asks about Jesus, the teacher should simply tell the student that such a question is nest answered by the child's parents. I don't want a Christian teacher explaining who Mohammed is, or vice versa, simply because of the bias which will be unavoidably present. Seriously, if you can't see the difference between explaining who Jesus was and explaining what a Collie is, you may not be intelligent enough for the internet.
But, let's go ahead and contnue on with your version of how things should go: Let's say your 7 year old daughter hears the word "blowjob". Do you want little Sally's male 2nd grade teacher explaining to your 7 year old daughter what a blowjob is? That should be fine as long as he talks about going down on a woman, too, right?
Certain things do not belong in a grammar school classroom. Religion and sexuality are two of those things...
Jesus is a person from history, no different than if the student asked about Gandhi.
This is not the same thing as asking about a sexual act.
That you equate the two is scary as fuck to be honest
That said, asking about Jesus would be nothing like asking about Gandhi. People don't believe that Gandhi turned water into whine. They don't believe that Gandhi rose from the dead or was born to a virgin. You can't have any meaningful discussion about Jesus without discussing the religious aspects, and that just shouldn't be allowed in a public school classroom.
But, then again, why do you bother to differentiate between the two? You don't want someone telling your precious little Sally what a blowjob is (and understandably so), despite the fact that blowjobs exist, but you're fine with someone telling her about someone on whom an entire world religion is based.
Again, you are comparing two totally different things, that you equate them is very troubling. There is no way to talk about a blowjob leaving out the sexual part of it. There is a way to speak of Jesus without the religious part of it.
Really?
What happens when the kid asks who Jesus' father was?
Because it sure the fuck wasn't Joseph...
Why would a kid ask that? Would they ask who the father of Thomas Edison was?
To what extent should a teacher explain who Jesus was?
I already gave you the answer, in the historical perspective only. None of the rest needs to be brought up, if the child ask too many question you just redirect and move on like you would with any other topic
You seem to have misspelled “subhuman pieces of shit who sexually abuse children”.
You seem to have [probably intentionally] misunderstood my point.
@Incel Joe was lying that it was “gay people” who are the targets of DeSantis' law to protect children from sexual abusers.
You pretty much see that, anywhere, now, that any politician takes any action intended to protect children form being sexually abused, that it is the faggot/tranny lobby that comes out and claims that they are the targets of that action.
Trump/DeSantis 2024 "Make America Hate Again"
