Difference between Covid 19 and being infected with Sars-CoV-2

EvMetro

Platinum Member
Mar 10, 2017
10,328
6,734
970
Anybody know the difference between having COVID-19 and being infected with Sars-CoV-2?


If you are asymptomatic, you do not have COVID-19. The worst that can be said is that you’re infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus. If you’re not actually ill, you don’t have the disease. This is one factor that differentiates a person who died from the illness compared to someone who died with a positive test result, meaning the cause of death was completely different, such as heart disease, automobile accident or a gunshot wound.
 
Anybody know the difference between having COVID-19 and being infected with Sars-CoV-2?


If you are asymptomatic, you do not have COVID-19. The worst that can be said is that you’re infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus. If you’re not actually ill, you don’t have the disease. This is one factor that differentiates a person who died from the illness compared to someone who died with a positive test result, meaning the cause of death was completely different, such as heart disease, automobile accident or a gunshot wound.

I learned the distinction with reviewing a couple of journal submissions and all papers using SARS-CoV-2 to denote papers relative to studying the virus itself, while COVID-19 references actual cases testing positive for virus and patients given the COVID-19 identification.

Thanks for the important elaboration:)
 
It is important to know the difference when you read statistics.
 
I learned the distinction with reviewing a couple of journal submissions and all papers using SARS-CoV-2 to denote papers relative to studying the virus itself, while COVID-19 references actual cases testing positive for virus and patients given the COVID-19 identification.

Thanks for the important elaboration:)
The distinction is something that lefties don't want to talk about, since it was exploited in order to inflate the number of covid deaths.
 

Forum List

Back
Top