Did you notice how Obama never called Fox News “an enemy of the people”?

[rightwinger]

Well, Obama didn't spend his days communicating almost exclusively in cartoonish hyperbole and saying anything it took to please his base, so.....

OMG you're brainwashed. Obama constantly did that

Fence sitters and fake moderates(although actual moderates could not have voted for Hillary)constantly have to make up bullshit about the right or lie about what the left actually does to justify the overt lunacy going on in the left every single day.

Yes, that Trump and the Russians worked together and that Trump is a racist for example are stories that are entirely constructed of lies. The left has to keep changing what Trump said to make those lies work.

Fake News is all fake. They are a party with an agenda. It's hysterical how they attack Trump constantly then cry when he hits back and all the leftists are melting down about that. Poor dears

Trump and the Russians did work together
Even Trump is now admitting it

He is just claiming it is not a crime

 

[rightwinger]

Sure they fundamentally disagreed, but Obama didn’t try to undermine their freedom of expression by calling them “fake news” or “enemies of the people”. He even appeared on Fox multiple times for interviews on their terms. Trump is too much of a ***** to go to any news source that isn’t Fox. He’s a pathetic, whiny little ***** who doesn’t care if what he says contradicts the 1st amendment. All that matters to him is his tender sensibility.

That’s because FOX isn’t an enemy of the people. The left wing media is.

Fox is self admitted fake news

Or as they call it........”news entertainment”

 

[ptbw forever]

He bitched non stop about Fox News just as you nuts do!

The Great Obama even consented to an interview with Bill O’Reilly

When will Crooked Donnie give an interview to Rachel Maddow?

Trump would have her sucking his dick in the green room halfway through the interview.

LOL

Crooked Donnie will only give interviews to those who give him on air blowjobs

Considering how stupid MSNBC’s audience is and how degenerate the programming itself is, I think “The place for blowjobs” could conceivably work as a new ad for the channel.

The Great Obama accepted interviews on Fox

Why won’t Crooked Donnie take an interview on MSNBC?

Why are you such an open cuckold?

Trump doesn’t entertain cucks.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Sure they fundamentally disagreed, but Obama didn’t try to undermine their freedom of expression by calling them “fake news” or “enemies of the people”. He even appeared on Fox multiple times for interviews on their terms. Trump is too much of a ***** to go to any news source that isn’t Fox. He’s a pathetic, whiny little ***** who doesn’t care if what he says contradicts the 1st amendment. All that matters to him is his tender sensibility.

President Obama never referred to a free press in general as the ‘enemy of the people,’ unlike Trump.

 

[kaz]

Sure they fundamentally disagreed, but Obama didn’t try to undermine their freedom of expression by calling them “fake news” or “enemies of the people”. He even appeared on Fox multiple times for interviews on their terms. Trump is too much of a ***** to go to any news source that isn’t Fox. He’s a pathetic, whiny little ***** who doesn’t care if what he says contradicts the 1st amendment. All that matters to him is his tender sensibility.

Another Fake News zombie. Obama went after Fox all the time. He tried to exclude them from press events, didn't call on them when they got in anyway. He continually bashed Sean Hannity personally.

Fox doesn't lie either. Of course you're like what and your head explodes when I say that, but you consider anything anyone says a lie if it's not a leftist lie. That's just how you roll. No, they aren't leftist. But unlike the Fake News you worship, they have the opposition on all the time to speak for themselves

Fox lies constantly...against the right.

I struggle with that. On one hand, I like that there are so many leftists on Fox. On the other, I hate that Fox lets them lie so constantly. There's a difference between allowing leftists to state leftist views and a leftist telling factual lies. But leftists are going to lie, so what do you do? Exclude them? Constantly correct their lies? There's no easy answer.

Juan Williams particularly just flat out lies on The Five constantly

They should have fired Juan shortly after NPR did.

All he does is attack Fox and defend Democrats after Fox literally saved his worthless ass from Democrats destroying his career.

There used to be decent Democrats on Fox like Kirsten Powers, but unfortunately the whole Roger Ailes and Bill O’Reilly thing scared them away.

I was thinking about that with Juan too. He got fired for deviating in the slightest from the Democrat playbook, yet he continually defends the intolerant left fake news networks.

Greg should ask him the next time he defends fake news why he got fired and follow that up with whether fake news would fire him again for doing the same thing now.

It's hilarious though how Juan's kids are Republicans ...

 

[Tilly]

Hair on fire about what Trump doesn’t say.
TDS at its most hilarious

 

[ptbw forever]

Sure they fundamentally disagreed, but Obama didn’t try to undermine their freedom of expression by calling them “fake news” or “enemies of the people”. He even appeared on Fox multiple times for interviews on their terms. Trump is too much of a ***** to go to any news source that isn’t Fox. He’s a pathetic, whiny little ***** who doesn’t care if what he says contradicts the 1st amendment. All that matters to him is his tender sensibility.

Another Fake News zombie. Obama went after Fox all the time. He tried to exclude them from press events, didn't call on them when they got in anyway. He continually bashed Sean Hannity personally.

Fox doesn't lie either. Of course you're like what and your head explodes when I say that, but you consider anything anyone says a lie if it's not a leftist lie. That's just how you roll. No, they aren't leftist. But unlike the Fake News you worship, they have the opposition on all the time to speak for themselves

Fox lies constantly...against the right.

I struggle with that. On one hand, I like that there are so many leftists on Fox. On the other, I hate that Fox lets them lie so constantly. There's a difference between allowing leftists to state leftist views and a leftist telling factual lies. But leftists are going to lie, so what do you do? Exclude them? Constantly correct their lies? There's no easy answer.

Juan Williams particularly just flat out lies on The Five constantly

They should have fired Juan shortly after NPR did.

All he does is attack Fox and defend Democrats after Fox literally saved his worthless ass from Democrats destroying his career.

There used to be decent Democrats on Fox like Kirsten Powers, but unfortunately the whole Roger Ailes and Bill O’Reilly thing scared them away.

I was thinking about that with Juan too. He got fired for deviating in the slightest from the Democrat playbook, yet he continually defends the intolerant left fake news networks.

Greg should ask him the next time he defends fake news why he got fired and follow that up with whether fake news would fire him again for doing the same thing now.

It's hilarious though how Juan's kids are Republicans ...

Last time I watched The Five like a month ago Juan was really pissing the other 4 personalities off and I thought they were going to go for the kill with a question like that. Greg is the only one I give a damn about on that show now, and even he is just not enough to deal with these assholes.

It is sad that Juan was once a permanent fixture for shows like Special Report alongside Krauthammer.

He is an absolute joke, and I knew that back when I was a teenager who was ignorant about big picture politics.

 

[rightwinger]

The Great Obama even consented to an interview with Bill O’Reilly

When will Crooked Donnie give an interview to Rachel Maddow?

Trump would have her sucking his dick in the green room halfway through the interview.

LOL

Crooked Donnie will only give interviews to those who give him on air blowjobs

Considering how stupid MSNBC’s audience is and how degenerate the programming itself is, I think “The place for blowjobs” could conceivably work as a new ad for the channel.

The Great Obama accepted interviews on Fox

Why won’t Crooked Donnie take an interview on MSNBC?

Why are you such an open cuckold?

Trump doesn’t entertain cucks.

The Great Obama was not afraid of the media....even Fox
Crooked Donnie hides and brings out Hannity

 

[rightwinger]

Why doesn’t Crooked Donnie go on 60 minutes?

 

[Meister]

Trump would have her sucking his dick in the green room halfway through the interview.

LOL

Crooked Donnie will only give interviews to those who give him on air blowjobs

Considering how stupid MSNBC’s audience is and how degenerate the programming itself is, I think “The place for blowjobs” could conceivably work as a new ad for the channel.

The Great Obama accepted interviews on Fox

Why won’t Crooked Donnie take an interview on MSNBC?

Why are you such an open cuckold?

Trump doesn’t entertain cucks.

The Great Obama was not afraid of the media....even Fox
Crooked Donnie hides and brings out Hannity

It wasn't like the MSM would hide anything negative that Opie would do, was it? LOL

 

[OODA_Loop]

Obama just said he was going change how FOX reports.

 

[francoHFW]

Good for him, you do live on another planet... Where are journalists?

Don’t watch Fox News, ever. Try again. And what about Obama actually going after journalist with the espionage act?

CNN's Tapper: Obama has used Espionage Act more than all previous administrations

I don’t see trump going after Omurosa, or Comey with the espionage act. You can’t just ignore the fact that Obama went after whistleblowers, and the journalist they contacted HARD.

Every media that agrees with Fox is just more of the same b******* propaganda... Rush Savage Laverne Jones Etc are pure crap.

Ok, I listen/watch to none of these. Once again, Obama enacted the espionage act more than any other president combined to go after journalist and whistleblowers...what’s you’re response to something I actually say? Is there a ghost version of my account posting stuff that I’m not saying? Who the hell are you talking too?

CNN's Tapper: Obama has used Espionage Act more than all previous administrations

Well I don't know where you were coming from originally then... Anyway the Espionage Act? Okay highly debatable that's the way it goes LOL I don't care. And it is very debatable what Tapper was doing LOL

CNN's Tapper: Obama has used Espionage Act more than all previous administrations
By Jon Greenberg on Friday, January 10th, 2014 at 10:00 a.m.



The federal criminal charges filed against National Security Agency leaker Edward Snowden make it seven times that the Obama administration has used the Espionage Act against government workers who shared information with the press. In at least two instances, the government’s investigations have delved into the practices of reporters and news organizations and put reporters in legal jeopardy.

This has raised red flags among defenders of the media. In a vigorous exchange on CNN’s The Lead, host Jake Tapper asserted to Ruth Marcus of the Washington Post that "the Obama administration has used the Espionage Act to go after whistleblowers who leaked to journalists ... more than all previous administrations combined."

On one level, a simple tally would address Tapper’s claim and -- spoiler alert -- the raw numbers back him up. But a scrupulous vetting of the record uncovers important ambiguities in the entire business of talking about leaks in Washington.

The basic numbers

Most tallies, like the one by the investigative service ProPublica, begin with Daniel Ellsberg and the release of the Vietnam War era documents known as the Pentagon Papers. Including Ellsberg, the government has used the Espionage Act 10 times to prosecute government workers who shared classified information with journalists. If we push back to 1945, there is one more case. So of those 11, seven have taken place while Barack Obama has been president.

Law professor David Pozen at Columbia University, has researched th
The whistleblower label debate

The Justice Department does not quibble about number of prosecutions but in a statement to PunditFact, the department said: "It is definitely not the case that anyone who leaks classified information is a whistleblower. Very few of those prosecuted in recent years for unauthorized disclosures even sought to be considered that way."

To take a couple of examples, in 2010, State Department contractor Stephen Kim was indicted for providing information about North Korea to Fox News. Later that year, Jeffrey Sterling, a Central Intelligence Agency officer, was indicted for sharing information with a journalist James Risen about America’s work to counter Iran’s nuclear program. Both defendants have pled not guilty
No matter how broadly interpreted, Kim and Stirling don’t seem to fit that definition. In a statement given to ProPublica, the Justice Department said it does not target whistleblowers who follow the rules, but "we cannot sanction or condone federal employees who knowingly and willfully disclose classified information to the media or others not entitled to receive such information."

We raised this issue of who is and isn’t a whistleblower with Tapper and he said in the fast pace of a live interview, he might have wanted to use slightly different words to make his point.

"It would be better to say ‘leakers, many of whom are seen as whistleblowers,’ instead of just ‘whistleblowers’," Tapper said.

The only reason you care “where I am coming from”, is because you rely on things like ad hominems instead of actually arguing the points.

And the trump administration has had a crazy amount of leaks, he’s still not using the espionage act. I chose this article, trying to give Obama leeway, for a reason. Their only way to do so was to say “maybe tapper should have used leakers instead of whistleblowers”. Still doesn’t change any of the facts. They were actively hacking into Cheryl Atkinson’s, a CBS reporter, computer and she caught them and called them out on it. Nobody on the left, or at CBS, had the character to publicly say “this is wrong” so she left CBS. They just plugged their ears and said “lalalalalala”. So, are you saying do what you want to reporters as long as it’s trying to be done in secret?

You wanna know what is an actual threat to democracy? Using the IRS to go after tea party groups, purposefully auditing them for political reasons, not allowing them to receive donations in the process. That happened to thousands of groups across the nation. This was all ADMITTED too, no speculation about it. The only speculation is who ordered and coordinated it since they destroyed evidenced subpeanoed by congress, and just said “oh you wanted this evidence on these hardrives? Well we decided we were just gonna run a drill through them, whoops.” One thing we do know, this was not done by a few low level employees in Cleveland, it happened nationally.

What is a gigantic pile of GOP propaganda... So where do you get this crap?

 

[rightwinger]

Crooked Donnie will only give interviews to those who give him on air blowjobs

Considering how stupid MSNBC’s audience is and how degenerate the programming itself is, I think “The place for blowjobs” could conceivably work as a new ad for the channel.

The Great Obama accepted interviews on Fox

Why won’t Crooked Donnie take an interview on MSNBC?

Why are you such an open cuckold?

Trump doesn’t entertain cucks.

The Great Obama was not afraid of the media....even Fox
Crooked Donnie hides and brings out Hannity

It wasn't like the MSM would hide anything negative that Opie would do, was it? LOL

Given the partisan reporting of Fox News and the conservative dominance of radio that is highly unlikely.

Unlike Crooked Donnie, Obama did not declare war on the media

 

[ptbw forever]

Considering how stupid MSNBC’s audience is and how degenerate the programming itself is, I think “The place for blowjobs” could conceivably work as a new ad for the channel.

The Great Obama accepted interviews on Fox

Why won’t Crooked Donnie take an interview on MSNBC?

Why are you such an open cuckold?

Trump doesn’t entertain cucks.

The Great Obama was not afraid of the media....even Fox
Crooked Donnie hides and brings out Hannity

It wasn't like the MSM would hide anything negative that Opie would do, was it? LOL

Given the partisan reporting of Fox News and the conservative dominance of radio that is highly unlikely.

Unlike Crooked Donnie, Obama did not declare war on the media

Fox was 60/40 in favor of Obama.

Fox is 70/30 in favor of Trump.

Trump hates plenty of aspects of Fox News.

 

[Meister]

Considering how stupid MSNBC’s audience is and how degenerate the programming itself is, I think “The place for blowjobs” could conceivably work as a new ad for the channel.

The Great Obama accepted interviews on Fox

Why won’t Crooked Donnie take an interview on MSNBC?

Why are you such an open cuckold?

Trump doesn’t entertain cucks.

The Great Obama was not afraid of the media....even Fox
Crooked Donnie hides and brings out Hannity

It wasn't like the MSM would hide anything negative that Opie would do, was it? LOL

Given the partisan reporting of Fox News and the conservative dominance of radio that is highly unlikely.

Unlike Crooked Donnie, Obama did not declare war on the media

MSNBC, CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN, HLN, Univision......Obama didn't have to declare war on the media, they carried his water.

Spin it however you want RW, I really don't care.

 

[PredFan]

Sure they fundamentally disagreed, but Obama didn’t try to undermine their freedom of expression by calling them “fake news” or “enemies of the people”. He even appeared on Fox multiple times for interviews on their terms. Trump is too much of a ***** to go to any news source that isn’t Fox. He’s a pathetic, whiny little ***** who doesn’t care if what he says contradicts the 1st amendment. All that matters to him is his tender sensibility.

That’s because FOX isn’t an enemy of the people. The left wing media is.

Fox is self admitted fake news

Or as they call it........”news entertainment”

If that was true, it still wouldn’t make them an enemy of the people.

 

[jon_berzerk]

what a funny thread

the title suggests that all other "news" sources

are in the bag for the leftists

--LOL

thanks for pointing it out

 

[sakinago]

Don’t watch Fox News, ever. Try again. And what about Obama actually going after journalist with the espionage act?

CNN's Tapper: Obama has used Espionage Act more than all previous administrations

I don’t see trump going after Omurosa, or Comey with the espionage act. You can’t just ignore the fact that Obama went after whistleblowers, and the journalist they contacted HARD.

Every media that agrees with Fox is just more of the same b******* propaganda... Rush Savage Laverne Jones Etc are pure crap.

Ok, I listen/watch to none of these. Once again, Obama enacted the espionage act more than any other president combined to go after journalist and whistleblowers...what’s you’re response to something I actually say? Is there a ghost version of my account posting stuff that I’m not saying? Who the hell are you talking too?

CNN's Tapper: Obama has used Espionage Act more than all previous administrations

Well I don't know where you were coming from originally then... Anyway the Espionage Act? Okay highly debatable that's the way it goes LOL I don't care. And it is very debatable what Tapper was doing LOL

CNN's Tapper: Obama has used Espionage Act more than all previous administrations
By Jon Greenberg on Friday, January 10th, 2014 at 10:00 a.m.



The federal criminal charges filed against National Security Agency leaker Edward Snowden make it seven times that the Obama administration has used the Espionage Act against government workers who shared information with the press. In at least two instances, the government’s investigations have delved into the practices of reporters and news organizations and put reporters in legal jeopardy.

This has raised red flags among defenders of the media. In a vigorous exchange on CNN’s The Lead, host Jake Tapper asserted to Ruth Marcus of the Washington Post that "the Obama administration has used the Espionage Act to go after whistleblowers who leaked to journalists ... more than all previous administrations combined."

On one level, a simple tally would address Tapper’s claim and -- spoiler alert -- the raw numbers back him up. But a scrupulous vetting of the record uncovers important ambiguities in the entire business of talking about leaks in Washington.

The basic numbers

Most tallies, like the one by the investigative service ProPublica, begin with Daniel Ellsberg and the release of the Vietnam War era documents known as the Pentagon Papers. Including Ellsberg, the government has used the Espionage Act 10 times to prosecute government workers who shared classified information with journalists. If we push back to 1945, there is one more case. So of those 11, seven have taken place while Barack Obama has been president.

Law professor David Pozen at Columbia University, has researched th
The whistleblower label debate

The Justice Department does not quibble about number of prosecutions but in a statement to PunditFact, the department said: "It is definitely not the case that anyone who leaks classified information is a whistleblower. Very few of those prosecuted in recent years for unauthorized disclosures even sought to be considered that way."

To take a couple of examples, in 2010, State Department contractor Stephen Kim was indicted for providing information about North Korea to Fox News. Later that year, Jeffrey Sterling, a Central Intelligence Agency officer, was indicted for sharing information with a journalist James Risen about America’s work to counter Iran’s nuclear program. Both defendants have pled not guilty
No matter how broadly interpreted, Kim and Stirling don’t seem to fit that definition. In a statement given to ProPublica, the Justice Department said it does not target whistleblowers who follow the rules, but "we cannot sanction or condone federal employees who knowingly and willfully disclose classified information to the media or others not entitled to receive such information."

We raised this issue of who is and isn’t a whistleblower with Tapper and he said in the fast pace of a live interview, he might have wanted to use slightly different words to make his point.

"It would be better to say ‘leakers, many of whom are seen as whistleblowers,’ instead of just ‘whistleblowers’," Tapper said.

The only reason you care “where I am coming from”, is because you rely on things like ad hominems instead of actually arguing the points.

And the trump administration has had a crazy amount of leaks, he’s still not using the espionage act. I chose this article, trying to give Obama leeway, for a reason. Their only way to do so was to say “maybe tapper should have used leakers instead of whistleblowers”. Still doesn’t change any of the facts. They were actively hacking into Cheryl Atkinson’s, a CBS reporter, computer and she caught them and called them out on it. Nobody on the left, or at CBS, had the character to publicly say “this is wrong” so she left CBS. They just plugged their ears and said “lalalalalala”. So, are you saying do what you want to reporters as long as it’s trying to be done in secret?

You wanna know what is an actual threat to democracy? Using the IRS to go after tea party groups, purposefully auditing them for political reasons, not allowing them to receive donations in the process. That happened to thousands of groups across the nation. This was all ADMITTED too, no speculation about it. The only speculation is who ordered and coordinated it since they destroyed evidenced subpeanoed by congress, and just said “oh you wanted this evidence on these hardrives? Well we decided we were just gonna run a drill through them, whoops.” One thing we do know, this was not done by a few low level employees in Cleveland, it happened nationally.

What is a gigantic pile of GOP propaganda... So where do you get this crap?

Which crap? Everything the IRS admitted too, or what Cheryl Atkinson (not a right wing journalist) had to say? Do you have anything besides an appeal to ignorance?

 

[Thinker101]

Don’t watch Fox News, ever. Try again. And what about Obama actually going after journalist with the espionage act?

CNN's Tapper: Obama has used Espionage Act more than all previous administrations

I don’t see trump going after Omurosa, or Comey with the espionage act. You can’t just ignore the fact that Obama went after whistleblowers, and the journalist they contacted HARD.

Every media that agrees with Fox is just more of the same b******* propaganda... Rush Savage Laverne Jones Etc are pure crap.

Ok, I listen/watch to none of these. Once again, Obama enacted the espionage act more than any other president combined to go after journalist and whistleblowers...what’s you’re response to something I actually say? Is there a ghost version of my account posting stuff that I’m not saying? Who the hell are you talking too?

CNN's Tapper: Obama has used Espionage Act more than all previous administrations

Well I don't know where you were coming from originally then... Anyway the Espionage Act? Okay highly debatable that's the way it goes LOL I don't care. And it is very debatable what Tapper was doing LOL

CNN's Tapper: Obama has used Espionage Act more than all previous administrations
By Jon Greenberg on Friday, January 10th, 2014 at 10:00 a.m.



The federal criminal charges filed against National Security Agency leaker Edward Snowden make it seven times that the Obama administration has used the Espionage Act against government workers who shared information with the press. In at least two instances, the government’s investigations have delved into the practices of reporters and news organizations and put reporters in legal jeopardy.

This has raised red flags among defenders of the media. In a vigorous exchange on CNN’s The Lead, host Jake Tapper asserted to Ruth Marcus of the Washington Post that "the Obama administration has used the Espionage Act to go after whistleblowers who leaked to journalists ... more than all previous administrations combined."

On one level, a simple tally would address Tapper’s claim and -- spoiler alert -- the raw numbers back him up. But a scrupulous vetting of the record uncovers important ambiguities in the entire business of talking about leaks in Washington.

The basic numbers

Most tallies, like the one by the investigative service ProPublica, begin with Daniel Ellsberg and the release of the Vietnam War era documents known as the Pentagon Papers. Including Ellsberg, the government has used the Espionage Act 10 times to prosecute government workers who shared classified information with journalists. If we push back to 1945, there is one more case. So of those 11, seven have taken place while Barack Obama has been president.

Law professor David Pozen at Columbia University, has researched th
The whistleblower label debate

The Justice Department does not quibble about number of prosecutions but in a statement to PunditFact, the department said: "It is definitely not the case that anyone who leaks classified information is a whistleblower. Very few of those prosecuted in recent years for unauthorized disclosures even sought to be considered that way."

To take a couple of examples, in 2010, State Department contractor Stephen Kim was indicted for providing information about North Korea to Fox News. Later that year, Jeffrey Sterling, a Central Intelligence Agency officer, was indicted for sharing information with a journalist James Risen about America’s work to counter Iran’s nuclear program. Both defendants have pled not guilty
No matter how broadly interpreted, Kim and Stirling don’t seem to fit that definition. In a statement given to ProPublica, the Justice Department said it does not target whistleblowers who follow the rules, but "we cannot sanction or condone federal employees who knowingly and willfully disclose classified information to the media or others not entitled to receive such information."

We raised this issue of who is and isn’t a whistleblower with Tapper and he said in the fast pace of a live interview, he might have wanted to use slightly different words to make his point.

"It would be better to say ‘leakers, many of whom are seen as whistleblowers,’ instead of just ‘whistleblowers’," Tapper said.

The only reason you care “where I am coming from”, is because you rely on things like ad hominems instead of actually arguing the points.

And the trump administration has had a crazy amount of leaks, he’s still not using the espionage act. I chose this article, trying to give Obama leeway, for a reason. Their only way to do so was to say “maybe tapper should have used leakers instead of whistleblowers”. Still doesn’t change any of the facts. They were actively hacking into Cheryl Atkinson’s, a CBS reporter, computer and she caught them and called them out on it. Nobody on the left, or at CBS, had the character to publicly say “this is wrong” so she left CBS. They just plugged their ears and said “lalalalalala”. So, are you saying do what you want to reporters as long as it’s trying to be done in secret?

You wanna know what is an actual threat to democracy? Using the IRS to go after tea party groups, purposefully auditing them for political reasons, not allowing them to receive donations in the process. That happened to thousands of groups across the nation. This was all ADMITTED too, no speculation about it. The only speculation is who ordered and coordinated it since they destroyed evidenced subpeanoed by congress, and just said “oh you wanted this evidence on these hardrives? Well we decided we were just gonna run a drill through them, whoops.” One thing we do know, this was not done by a few low level employees in Cleveland, it happened nationally.

What is a gigantic pile of GOP propaganda... So where do you get this crap?

WTF, have you been sleeping for the last 10 years?

 

[westwall]

Sure they fundamentally disagreed, but Obama didn’t try to undermine their freedom of expression by calling them “fake news” or “enemies of the people”. He even appeared on Fox multiple times for interviews on their terms. Trump is too much of a ***** to go to any news source that isn’t Fox. He’s a pathetic, whiny little ***** who doesn’t care if what he says contradicts the 1st amendment. All that matters to him is his tender sensibility.

No, he merely had their reporters illegally investigated you ******* moron.