easyt65
Diamond Member
- Aug 4, 2015
- 90,307
- 61,123
- 2,645
- Thread starter
- #61
So, NO, you could not answer the question without attempting to divert attention to President Trump again, which is not the topic of this threadWhat is 'uncomfortable' is your incredible display of stupidity, your inability to read, and your limitless partisanship....
You think you can stick to the thread topic now, or are you going to continue to obfuscate and attempt to hijack the threat / divert attention from the thread topic?
I was hoping for an uncomfortable question and I didn't see one.
So, did Mueller know? I would presume at some point he'd look at his record.
Did Trump know?
In an investigation you don't get to choose the witnesses and as pointed out to you before, they usually aren't angels.
It seems like it would kill you to have to answer a question without trying to slip an attack in on President Trump.
I am glad, though, that you admitted Mueller stooped to pressuring a proven political hack and repeat child porn convict into agreeing to testify in what seems to be a pay-off of a reduced sentence.
This, on top of learning Mueller once again hid evidence of INNOCENSE while attempting to prosecute someone, is just the proverbial icing on the cake proving Mueller was the 'Insurance Policy' running the exposed witch hunt.