Did MAGA Rig the election?

[Blisterfinger]

If Trump ends up at 78 million, is that an anomaly? That's pretty close to 81 million.

That must mean that Trump stole this election, right?

There is no way Biden got north of 81 million votes gullible Democrat.

 

[XponentialChaos]

Leftist, if a baseball player averaged 9hrs per year for 10 years and in yr 11 hits 35Hrs, would the 35 be a statistical anomaly? Yes or no? Not discussing why just asking if it is. Let’s see if you can answer it. I doubt it. You will dodge

You mean a statistical outlier.

Yes, that would be an outlier.

 

[XponentialChaos]

There is no way Biden got north of 81 million votes gullible Democrat.

Based on what?

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

If Trump ends up at 78 million, is that an anomaly? That's pretty close to 81 million.

That must mean that Trump stole this election, right?

When did I say “stole”. I am saying it’s an anomaly. Why it’s an anomaly I do not know. You said “stole”

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

You mean a statistical outlier.

Yes, that would be an outlier.

Great. Anomaly and outlier are synonymous to me.

So now if that hitter hits 45 again the following season, is it still an outlier/anomaly? I would argue, no. As we saw with Luis Gonzalez in AZ. The hitter adjusted their swing and became more of a power hitter and now we have two consecutive years of this data. Fair? You following along?

 

[Blisterfinger]

Based on what?

He's a liar who campaigned from his basement with dementia. Not fit for office.

 

[XponentialChaos]

Great. Anomaly and outlier are synonymous to me.

So now if that hitter hits 45 again the following season, is it still an outlier/anomaly? I would argue, no. As we saw with Luis Gonzalez in AZ. The hitter adjusted their swing and became more of a power hitter and now we have two consecutive years of this data. Fair? You following along?

Outlier has a specific definition in statistics, which is why I mentioned it. I can be objective when I call something a statistical outlier based on the definition.

You're correct about this example. The 35 would be considered an outlier before the 45 was introduced. After the 45 is introduced, it's no longer an outlier.

 

[XponentialChaos]

He's a liar who campaigned from his basement with dementia. Not fit for office.

So based on feelings, not evidence.

 

[Slade3200]

Nope. Exceeded it in this election. And 10 million Dem voters magically disappeared.

Not magically.just went back to historical engagement levels. Trump kept his base engaged at COVID election levels. Not hard to do as an opposition candidate during tough economic times… add on top of it a dishonest “stolen election” narrative he injected to put a chip on every bodies shoulders. A gullible bunch those MAGAs are

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Outlier has a specific definition in statistics, which is why I mentioned it. I can be objective when I call something a statistical outlier based on the definition.

You're somewhat correct about this example. The 35 was an outlier before the 45 was introduced. With the additional data point 45, the 35 is no longer considered an outlier. However, the 45 is now considered an outlier based on the information you provided.

Excellent. So Trump is no longer an outlier. He got 74mil two yrs in a row. The 81mil is an outlier. As to why, the answer is record number of mail in ballots at the time due to Covid.

Guessing why that happened is fruitless. Move on. But the 81mil is an outlier. That is indisputable. You leftists believe math is racist but it isn’t. It’s just math.

 

[Slade3200]

Are you going to answer me or not? The answer is no because he did it again in 2024 you moron ‘

Answer what?

So according to your logic as soon as the Dems get 80 million votes again your anomaly theory goes out the window… is that right?

 

[XponentialChaos]

Excellent. So Trump is no longer an outlier. He got 74mil two yrs in a row. The 81mil is an outlier. As to why, the answer is record number of mail in ballots at the time due to Covid.

Guessing why that happened is fruitless. Move on. But the 81mil is an outlier. That is indisputable. You leftists believe math is racist but it isn’t. It’s just math.

I'm not sure about that. What election year numbers would you like me to use to see if 81 million is an outlier or not?

Using your baseball analogy, if the baseball player had a good year but came up short from the 35 hr, it still may remove the outlier label from the 35. For example, if the player hit 32 hr instead of 45, that makes 35 not an outlier.

 

[Blisterfinger]

So based on feelings, not evidence.

Based on Democrat lies and the way his campaign went. Many anomalies in that election. No way he got 81 million votes

 

[Slade3200]

Leftist, if a baseball player averaged 9hrs per year for 10 years and in yr 11 hits 35Hrs, would the 35 be a statistical anomaly? Yes or no? Not discussing why just asking if it is. Let’s see if you can answer it. I doubt it. You will dodge

Yes it’s an anomaly… just like Trump getting 11M more votes in 2020. It happened because COVID engaged a record number of people. Those people stayed engaged with Trump. Biden’s engagement fell as he got blamed for inflation and the age issues and then dropping fro the race… Kamala only picked up a fraction of that support,

This is all simple common sense stuff.

 

[Slade3200]

There is no way Biden got north of 81 million votes gullible Democrat.

Except for he did. And yall can’t show where these millions of fake votes came from so you don’t really have an argument

 

[The Duke]

Notice how we aren't hearing any claims of cheating or challenging the legitimacy of the election? It's noteworthy to look at some of the differences between the last few elections.

When Trump lost he called the Dems cheaters, claimed he won and the election was rigged. He refused to concede and respect the democratic process. It led to a riot at the capital that tried to stop the certification of the election.

Look at how the Dems are reacting to this election. They are reflecting on what they got wrong, trying to understand what happened and how they can adjust. There is plenty of crumbs to go after the "Cheating" narrative if they want. One of Trumps key "rigged" claims in 2020 had to do with Social Media companies working with the gov to give favor to the Dems. Well Trump had Elon the owner of X "Twitter" giving out a million dollars a day for people to register to vote and then he followed up by flooding his platform with MAGA talking points. This is something the Dems could focus on to claim an unfair advantage but it is nowhere near the top of the headlines.

Last points, I think the Dems do need to chill out now and give Trump a chance. He won by a substantial amount of votes and our democracy has handed him mandate to pursue his agenda. Not to say Dems need to agree with everything, debate and negotiation is necessary, but do so in good faith and not overpoliticized obstruction which has become the norm in Washington.

For the Republicans, a little humility would be helpful. Imagine for a second that Trump was a Dem pushing a leftist agenda. Using his same dishonest, bully tactics. You all would be losing your minds and the words dictator and commies would be in every talking point. Y'all need to mellow out as well and guide Trump in a better direction instead of enabling every ugly impulse to crush political enemies. We are one country in this together. Let's start acting like it.

#RantOver

Oh my damn! Seriously?

What do you wanna see? People coming at you with boiling tar on a wagon n stuff?

 

[XponentialChaos]

Based on Democrat lies and the way his campaign went. Many anomalies in that election. No way he got 81 million votes

So no evidence, just more feelings. Got it.

 

[The Duke]

Except for he did. And yall can’t show where these millions of fake votes came from so you don’t really have an argument

 

[Blisterfinger]

Except for he did. And yall can’t show where these millions of fake votes came from so you don’t really have an argument

I already explained it to you, what about my exclamation didn't you understand?

 

[Frankeneinstein]

Notice how we aren't hearing any claims of cheating or challenging the legitimacy of the election? It's noteworthy to look at some of the differences between the last few elections.

When Trump lost he called the Dems cheaters, claimed he won and the election was rigged. He refused to concede and respect the democratic process. It led to a riot at the capital that tried to stop the certification of the election.

Look at how the Dems are reacting to this election. They are reflecting on what they got wrong, trying to understand what happened and how they can adjust. There is plenty of crumbs to go after the "Cheating" narrative if they want. One of Trumps key "rigged" claims in 2020 had to do with Social Media companies working with the gov to give favor to the Dems. Well Trump had Elon the owner of X "Twitter" giving out a million dollars a day for people to register to vote and then he followed up by flooding his platform with MAGA talking points. This is something the Dems could focus on to claim an unfair advantage but it is nowhere near the top of the headlines.

Last points, I think the Dems do need to chill out now and give Trump a chance. He won by a substantial amount of votes and our democracy has handed him mandate to pursue his agenda. Not to say Dems need to agree with everything, debate and negotiation is necessary, but do so in good faith and not overpoliticized obstruction which has become the norm in Washington.

For the Republicans, a little humility would be helpful. Imagine for a second that Trump was a Dem pushing a leftist agenda. Using his same dishonest, bully tactics. You all would be losing your minds and the words dictator and commies would be in every talking point. Y'all need to mellow out as well and guide Trump in a better direction instead of enabling every ugly impulse to crush political enemies. We are one country in this together. Let's start acting like it.

#RantOver

I think "what goes around comes around" a.k.a. "karma" will win the day bro...anything wrong with that in this situation?