You are way out of your depth. This video about the CBS rifle test fails to mention some key facts. And I note that you just brushed aside the WC's own revealing rifle test. Regarding the CBS test:
One, none--as in not one--of the 11 experienced riflemen in the test scored two-out-of-three (2/3) on his first attempt--Oswald would have had only one attempt.
Two, seven of the 11 riflemen failed to go 2/3 on any of their attempts. Only four did so, but only on later attempts--again, not one did so on the first attempt.
Three, all of the riflemen had the chance to fire practice shots before the test--a luxury Oswald would not have had.
Four, the rifle used in the test was already zeroed. It would have taken at least seven shots to zero the alleged murder rifle, as a Marine rifle expert informed the Warren Commission. The Commission was never able to establish when Oswald would have had the chance to zero the alleged murder weapon.
Five, the CBS test did
not use the actual alleged murder rifle itself but used a different Carcano rifle. This is a huge difference because the alleged Oswald Carcano had a difficult bolt, an odd trigger pull, and a defective scope.
Six, the CBS test did not include the key conditions of firing through a half-opened window and firing in the cramped conditions in which Oswald would have had to fire. This, of course, made it easier for the CBS riflemen to aim and fire the rifle.
Two other facts:
It has been known for years now that the bullet fragments on the back of JFK's skull could not have come from the type of ammo that Oswald allegedly used, i.e., FMJ ammo. No FMJ bullet in the history of forensic science has ever deposited one bullet fragment, much less two bullet fragments, on the outer table and just above the outer table while entering the skull.
A recent, first-of-its-kind 3D virtual reenactment of the assassination done by the respected forensic engineering firm Knott Laboratory has proved that the single-bullet theory is impossible. With the final destruction of the single-bullet theory, the lone-gunman theory is rendered impossible as well, since no lone gunman could have hit both JFK and Connally with separate bullets.
So you just call it "wild" even though you haven't read any of the evidence and even though you noticeably declined to comment on the declassified intercept.
And why exactly is it "wild"? We know that several other Nazi officials faked their deaths to throw Allied investigators off their trail and to make it easier to escape. What is "wild" about the idea that Hitler did the same thing to facilitate his escape?
Have you read any of the scholarly books that present the evidence that Hitler escaped? Have you watched any of the serious documentaries that discuss this evidence? I'm guessing the answer to both questions is No.
I provide links on this subject in the section on Hitler on my website on the Holocaust (
LINK).