Did Jesus commit treason against the liberal state?

Actually yes; thats why they killed him!!
No, this is why they killed him, and why the GOP would disavow him today;

The Beatitudes

He said:

3 “Blessed are the poor in spirit,
for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.
4 Blessed are those who mourn,
for they will be comforted.
5 Blessed are the meek,
for they will inherit the earth.
6 Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for righteousness,
for they will be filled.
7 Blessed are the merciful,
for they will be shown mercy.
8 Blessed are the pure in heart,
for they will see God.
9 Blessed are the peacemakers,
for they will be called children of God.

10 Blessed are those who are persecuted because of righteousness,
for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.
 
. It's just conservative folks like you that put a price on everything.

so then can the liberal fool tell us health care can be free, with no price??

See why we say liberalism is based in pure ignorance?? Is any other conclusion possible??
Did Jesus charge anything for healing the sick? No, and that's treason against the capitalist, profit driven, conservative ideal.
Jesus did it himself. He didn't force someone else to do it for free. Maybe you should learn from that.
 
Why is this in Politics?




jesus_liberal_zps9a677905.jpg


Special Ed threads should by definition automatically shunt to the Rubber Room. I can't think of anything more fitting.
 
Why does everyone think socialist means stealing from one to give to another? It should and does mean EVERYONE working together to help each other.

too stupid of course since if everyone is putting his output in a common pot no one has an incentive to work hard.

Now you know how Stalin and Mao slowly starved 120 million to death. Do you understand??
That was communism and in those countries the elite still held power instead of everyone being of equal stature and power.More like NS Germany is a good example and its exactly why he was destroyed.
 
The Gospel writers were careful to explain that Jesus never broke any Roman or Judaic law. The Pharisees tried many times to trap Jesus into saying or doing something that would break the law, but he always figured a way out.

Jesus got an unfair trial before the Sanhedrin, where the witnesses had no real evidence, but he was convicted any way.

Jesus got an unfair trial before Pontius Pilate, where he was found completely innocent, but was condemned to death just the same.

If Jesus wasn't totally innocent of all wrongdoing, his sacrifice would not have been pure.

A man who deserved crucifixion could not have redeemed mankind, only an innocent man could do that.

Rome didn't really give a dinari about jurisprudence and fair trials. Rome cared about Rome -- the Empire. Nor did it care what its colonies were doing with religion. If Jesus even talked of religion at all -- and the entire story was put together and embellished long after the fact -- Rome would have yawned and moved on to its next conquest. But challenge the Empire's authority, and now you've got Rome very interested indeed.

That's why starting a riot in the Temple -- with an influx of population coming in for Passover at the same time -- was not going to go unnoticed. What Jesus was arrested and executed for was political, not religious. Judea was in the middle of three hundred years under the Roman thumb. Jesus was certainly not the only one to try to upstage the colonizer, but they all met the same fate.

Rome certainly had nothing to do with "Liberalism", which wouldn't even be invented as a government until -- special bulletin for the OP -- Thomas Jefferson and his cronies did it in the late 18th century. Strangely enough, BEFORE his own death.
 
Would conservatives heal the sick for free? They say "let him die".
Would conservatives feed the hungry. No. That would encourage them to breed.
Would conservatives uplift the downtrodden? No. That would be a disincentive for them to better their own lives.

Jesus wasn't a conservative. Rome and Judea were not liberal.
*edit Conservatives are actually considerably more charitable than Liberals, with their own money, that is.
 
Last edited:
Actually yes; thats why they killed him!!
No, this is why they killed him, and why the GOP would disavow him today;

The Beatitudes

He said:

3 “Blessed are the poor in spirit,
for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.
4 Blessed are those who mourn,
for they will be comforted.
5 Blessed are the meek,
for they will inherit the earth.
6 Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for righteousness,
for they will be filled.
7 Blessed are the merciful,
for they will be shown mercy.
8 Blessed are the pure in heart,
for they will see God.
9 Blessed are the peacemakers,
for they will be called children of God.

10 Blessed are those who are persecuted because of righteousness,
for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.
Who has started wars?
World War I - Progressive Democrat Woodrow Wilson 53,400 combat deaths
World War II - Progressive Democrat Franklin Roosevelt 291,500
Korean Conflict - Progressive Democrat Harry Truman 33,700
Viet Nam - Democrat John Fitzgerald Kennedy 47,400
OK so George HW Bush (149) and his son, George W Bush (6,500 (number includes combat deaths under President obama)) started their own wars. Who's body count is the highest?
 
Rome wasnt interested in Christ either........ doubt he was even on their subversive radar
 
Why does everyone think socialist means stealing from one to give to another? It should and does mean EVERYONE working together to help each other.

How about giving us an example where it has actually worked that way.
National Socialist Germany, You could read the thread in the economy section for more information.

So Nazi Germany, where people were killed for their blood line and other trivial reasons, where neighbors were compelled to inform on neighbors, was a workers paradise? Every one equal, working together to help each other. Who knew? ROFLMFAO
 
Actually yes; thats why they killed him!!
No, this is why they killed him, and why the GOP would disavow him today;

The Beatitudes

He said:

3 “Blessed are the poor in spirit,
for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.
4 Blessed are those who mourn,
for they will be comforted.
5 Blessed are the meek,
for they will inherit the earth.
6 Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for righteousness,
for they will be filled.
7 Blessed are the merciful,
for they will be shown mercy.
8 Blessed are the pure in heart,
for they will see God.
9 Blessed are the peacemakers,
for they will be called children of God.

10 Blessed are those who are persecuted because of righteousness,
for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.
Who has started wars?
World War I - Progressive Democrat Woodrow Wilson 53,400 combat deaths
World War II - Progressive Democrat Franklin Roosevelt 291,500
Korean Conflict - Progressive Democrat Harry Truman 33,700
Viet Nam - Democrat John Fitzgerald Kennedy 47,400
OK so George HW Bush (149) and his son, George W Bush (6,500 (number includes combat deaths under President obama)) started their own wars. Who's body count is the highest?

Woodrow Wilson started WWI?? Are you insane? Austria-Hungary declared war on Serbia 1914. US didn't even enter until 1917.
FDR started WWII? Are you stupid? Ever hear of "Hitler"? Poland, 1939?
Korea? NK invaded SK, summer of 1950. US reacted later.
Vietnam -- 1955, five years before JFK was elected. One year before Eisenhower was re-elected.

Lie much Ernie? Apparently not, because these aren't too good.
 
Why does everyone think socialist means stealing from one to give to another? It should and does mean EVERYONE working together to help each other.

How about giving us an example where it has actually worked that way.
National Socialist Germany, You could read the thread in the economy section for more information.

So Nazi Germany, where people were killed for their blood line and other trivial reasons, where neighbors were compelled to inform on neighbors, was a workers paradise? Every one equal, working together to help each other. Who knew? ROFLMFAO
Sure if you believe the jew media version.
 
Why does everyone think socialist means stealing from one to give to another? It should and does mean EVERYONE working together to help each other.

How about giving us an example where it has actually worked that way.
National Socialist Germany, You could read the thread in the economy section for more information.

So Nazi Germany, where people were killed for their blood line and other trivial reasons, where neighbors were compelled to inform on neighbors, was a workers paradise? Every one equal, working together to help each other. Who knew? ROFLMFAO
Sure if you believe the jew media version.

Go away you stupid fuck, you're wasting my time.
 
Jesus healed the sick for free. Jesus fed the hungry multitudes for free. Jesus died for your sins - also for free. Sounds completely antithetical to the everything for a buck conservative capitalists.

You forgot that Jesus removed merchants from a temple.
However they have returned under the guise of "Tele-Evangelist", which is hypo-capitalism at it's finest.
 
Last edited:
Why does everyone think socialist means stealing from one to give to another? It should and does mean EVERYONE working together to help each other.
Socialism is predicated on the state forcing people to provide goods and services to others w/o compensation - not theft, but involuntary servitude.
 

Forum List

Back
Top