Did Jesus commit treason against the liberal state?

treason is a political act
Can someone be financially motivated to commit treason?
Can someone be religiously motivated to commit treason?
We both know that you will not answer these questions because the answers prove you wrong.
Doesn't matter what the motivation is
Treason is a political act
One that can be committed by an apolitical person, contrary to your previous claim.
What claim was that?
Please link.

Jesus did not commit treason?

Treason is a political act - try to squirm around it all you like. Your attempts at silly semantics have failed miserably. You can choose willful ignorance if you like - I choose a different path.
 
You're actually going to try to tell us that Rome invented Liberalism now?

Why not, Jefferson posthumously founding the RP has been working out so well....


Dumbass.

LOL, Jefferson was nothing like the Democrats are, keep up that delusion
 
treason is a political act
Can someone be financially motivated to commit treason?
Can someone be religiously motivated to commit treason?
We both know that you will not answer these questions because the answers prove you wrong.
Doesn't matter what the motivation is
Treason is a political act
One that can be committed by an apolitical person, contrary to your previous claim.
What claim was that?
Please link.
Post 39.

Jesus was apolitical.
He did not commit "treason"


One does not need to be political to commit a political act; that Jesus was apolitical does not in any way mean he could not commit treason.
 
Would conservatives heal the sick for free? They say "let him die".
Would conservatives feed the hungry. No. That would encourage them to breed.
Would conservatives uplift the downtrodden? No. That would be a disincentive for them to better their own lives.

Jesus wasn't a conservative. Rome and Judea were not liberal.
*edit Conservatives are actually considerably more charitable than Liberals, with their own money, that is.

Sorry but that is horseshit...

Conclusion
Individuals play a key role in maintaining the financial health of nonprofit organizations. Understanding what individual attitudes predict giving is therefore important both for the vitality of nonprofits and the welfare state as a whole. Previous research and media commentary have popularized the notion that conservatives give more to charitable causes than liberals; however, the importance of this question requires careful, corroborated analyses. In this paper, we show that the association between conservatism and generosity is a function of conservatives being wealthier and more religious than liberals. Further, any conservative advantage in giving that remains after adjusting for confounders is driven by a greater propensity by conservatives to donate to religious causes, especially their own congregation.


https://s3.amazonaws.com/s3.documentcloud.org/documents/1100129/who-gives.pdf


Don't worry Ernie, you are not the first Con to peddle this manure....
 
Jesus was a Tea Partier. It's obvious.

He was also a lifetime subscriber to Spears and Ammo. His angry letters to the editor about "Tiberius is cummin to take yer spearz" are well worth the read. Especially the one about the Department of Empire Security ordering 6.1 billion arrows.

That's why he was silenced.
 
Last edited:
You're actually going to try to tell us that Rome invented Liberalism now?

Why not, Jefferson posthumously founding the RP has been working out so well....


Dumbass.
Of course the Romans were liberals. They didn't believe in Jesus and imposed taxes!
and lets not forget the Roman liberals believed in an all powerful central govt.
 
You're actually going to try to tell us that Rome invented Liberalism now?

Why not, Jefferson posthumously founding the RP has been working out so well....


Dumbass.
Of course the Romans were liberals. They didn't believe in Jesus and imposed taxes!
and lets not forget the Roman liberals believed in an all powerful central govt.
Actually that was Romans, period. And they lasted a hell of a lot longer than we will at this rate.
 
You're actually going to try to tell us that Rome invented Liberalism now?

Why not, Jefferson posthumously founding the RP has been working out so well....


Dumbass.
Of course the Romans were liberals. They didn't believe in Jesus and imposed taxes!
and lets not forget the Roman liberals believed in an all powerful central govt.
Actually that was Romans, period. And they lasted a hell of a lot longer than we will at this rate.
I was being sarcastic. Arguing liberal or conservative for Jesus is idiotic. To paraphrase g5000
 
You're actually going to try to tell us that Rome invented Liberalism now?

Why not, Jefferson posthumously founding the RP has been working out so well....


Dumbass.
Of course the Romans were liberals. They didn't believe in Jesus and imposed taxes!
and lets not forget the Roman liberals believed in an all powerful central govt.

Then why were the Jews allowed to decide Christ's fate?
 
1iihyq.jpg

Funniest topic...EVAH!!!
 
You're actually going to try to tell us that Rome invented Liberalism now?

Why not, Jefferson posthumously founding the RP has been working out so well....


Dumbass.
Of course the Romans were liberals. They didn't believe in Jesus and imposed taxes!
and lets not forget the Roman liberals believed in an all powerful central govt.
Actually that was Romans, period. And they lasted a hell of a lot longer than we will at this rate.
I was being sarcastic. Arguing liberal or conservative for Jesus is idiotic. To paraphrase g5000
Well the Jews thought him anything but conservative, so now what? Was he just batshit fucking crazy? BTW, he was.
 
You're actually going to try to tell us that Rome invented Liberalism now?

Why not, Jefferson posthumously founding the RP has been working out so well....


Dumbass.
Of course the Romans were liberals. They didn't believe in Jesus and imposed taxes!
and lets not forget the Roman liberals believed in an all powerful central govt.
Actually that was Romans, period. And they lasted a hell of a lot longer than we will at this rate.
I was being sarcastic. Arguing liberal or conservative for Jesus is idiotic. To paraphrase g5000
Well the Jews thought him anything but conservative, so now what? Was he just batshit fucking crazy? BTW, he was.
Personally, I believe he was a social revolutionary, who was not liberal in our meaning of the word because he made no pronouncement as to govt or even taxes, yet he was not conservative because his message upset the Jewish social order, which the Romans depended upon to control the populace ... which caused them to nail him to a tree.
 
Actually yes; thats why they killed him!!

The Jewish Sanhedrin convicted Jesus. Are you making the old anti-Semitic argument about the Jews killing Jesus?

dear, too stupid!! you just said the Jewish Sanhedrin convicted Jesus and then asked me if I was being anti-Semitic for saying the Jews killed Jesus. You idiot, you made the anti-Semitic argument while I said the Roman liberals killed Christ.

The Gospel of Luke[28] records that members of the Sanhedrin then took Jesus before Pilate where they accused him of sedition against Rome by opposing the payment of taxes to Caesar and calling himself a king. Fomenting tax resistance was a capital offense.[29] Pilate was responsible for imperial tax collections in Judaea. Jesus had asked the tax collector Levi, at work in his tax booth in Capernaum, to quit his post. Jesus also appears to have influenced Zacchaeus, "a chief tax collector" in Jericho, which is in Pilate's tax jurisdiction, to resign.
 

Forum List

Back
Top