Did Hillary give hand signals to Lester Holt?

[FA_Q2]

Again, that would have been worked out before hand without the need for asinine 'signals.' The idea that they created this elaborate plan but used signals on national television to implement it is just silly and unnecessary.

It's hilarious is what it is.

I must need to lighten up because I find the current political discourse depressing rather than funny. These are the people that are going help establish policies that effect billions of people for decades to come and to see how the electorate gauges them is sad.

I hear you, I've been there too. I just have to keep reminding myself that this board is the worst of the worst for the far right. My guess is if you sign up at stormfront you get a 2 for 1 deal at USMB.

Meh, the board is not the problem. It is worse off the board. At least here most of the people are engaged. I made a joke about Romney today and not one single person in the room knew who he was. The electorate at large is clueless and that is what makes things like this into 'issues' rather than actual policy. It is also why civil discussion is almost impossible - blind zealotry or complete ignorance is where politics is today.

What's worse? Knowing nothing or being loaded up on conspiracy theories and knowing less than nothing?

Knowing that your future will be decided by those two because they drown out your voice.

 

[ABikerSailor]

You know, the far right and Trumpidiots will believe anything that makes their Orange Messiah look good and the other person look bad.

Hand signals? Really? That's just as stupid as the claim that she was wearing an earpiece and being coached by someone off stage who had notes on the questions beforehand.

How much of a conspiracy can you RWNJ's concoct?

 

[Snouter]

Again, that would have been worked out before hand without the need for asinine 'signals.' The idea that they created this elaborate plan but used signals on national television to implement it is just silly and unnecessary.

You have obviously never performed live. Crooked Hillary had to indicate when she was ready to recite her prepared, goofy one liners. It would look bad if after The Donald reviewed Crooked Hillary's failures in regards to her time as Sec. of State as he did and Holt said, "Crooked Hillary, would you like to defend your record by babbling about a 1996 beauty pageant contestant who became an anal sex porn star who got fat?"

The fact is The Donald won the Commander in Chief forum and the first one on one debate. But the MSM orchestrated their response such that they were apparently able to fool low info individuals into believing them, not their own eyes.

 

[BluesLegend]

You know, the far right and Trumpidiots will believe anything that makes their Orange Messiah look good and the other person look bad.

Hand signals? Really? That's just as stupid as the claim that she was wearing an earpiece and being coached by someone off stage who had notes on the questions beforehand.

How much of a conspiracy can you RWNJ's concoct?

You seem to have a lot of bottled up hate and mouth foam for Trump and his supporters, the question is why?

 

[kiwiman127]

This thread belongs in conspiracies or the Rubber Room.
Is it that tough to come up with a thread that's meaningful or what?

 

[owebo]

Is quite obvious.....

 

[SmokeALib]

Being that Hillary is a bus stop rat bag old hag lying socialist power-hungry incompetent piece of shit, I would say that yes, she was sending signals to the moderator.

 

[SmokeALib]

You know, the far right and Trumpidiots will believe anything that makes their Orange Messiah look good and the other person look bad.

Hand signals? Really? That's just as stupid as the claim that she was wearing an earpiece and being coached by someone off stage who had notes on the questions beforehand.

How much of a conspiracy can you RWNJ's concoct?

Hey - If it talks like a duck...
...walks like a duck...
It's most likely a leftist, government-dependent, society-sucking, welfare-grabbing, hillary panty-sniffing, worthless, useless, armstretched, street corner-shitting, libstained, marxist, piece of shit "progressive".

 

[ShaklesOfBigGov]

WATCH: Did Hillary Clinton Give Hand Signals to Debate Moderator Lester Holt? Watch Infowars and learn. Or you can watch CNN the Clinton News Network and believe the BS.

Infowars providing the real story

Because she itched her face? At least you're not claiming she was having a stroke.

Anyway, who needed hand signals when they both would simply say to Holt something like "I'd like to respond to that" and then they went ahead and did just that.

It's called body language. Do you see any other presidential debates where a candidate made a similar jesture while looking at the moderator for a response? But hey, we are talking about a Clinton. Should we be at all surprised at the measures she would take to win a presidency? You could always call it nerves over Trumps response to the issues, if it makes you feel any better.

 

[Bassman007]

WATCH: Did Hillary Clinton Give Hand Signals to Debate Moderator Lester Holt? Watch Infowars and learn. Or you can watch CNN the Clinton News Network and believe the BS. Infowars providing the real story

Infowars!!!

WATCH: Did Hillary Clinton Give Hand Signals to Debate Moderator Lester Holt? Watch Infowars and learn. Or you can watch CNN the Clinton News Network and believe the BS. Infowars providing the real story

Infowars!!!

CNN is nonsense from word 1 to good night RETRACTION - CNN.com

Allegations of bias[edit]
CNN has been the subject of allegations of liberal bias. Conducted by the Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy at Harvard University and the Project for Excellence in Journalism, the authors found disparate treatment by the three major cable networks of Republican and Democratic candidates during the earliest five months of presidential primaries in 2007: "The CNN programming studied tended to cast a negative light on Republican candidates – by a margin of three-to-one. Four-in-ten stories (41%) were clearly negative while just 14% were positive and 46% were neutral. The network provided negative coverage of all three main candidates with McCain faring the worst (63% negative) and Romney faring a little better than the others only because a majority of his coverage was neutral. With the exception of Obama, Democrats tended not to fare well either. Nearly half of the Illinois Senator’s stories were positive (46%), vs. just 8% that were negative, but both Clinton and Edwards ended up with more negative than positive coverage overall. While Democrats on average tended to have more positive coverage, the trend was skewed by particularly positive coverage of Obama."[2]

Next doofus who does not watch Infowars..............

 

[Bassman007]

No, she didn't.

It would be asinine when it would be FAR easier to simply have him lay off in the first place. What would be the point of secrete hand signals? That is the worst possible way to slant the debates.

Yes she did now admit it or I will hold my breath until you do.

What an ass

 

[konradv]

Next doofus who does not watch Infowars..............

There's a big difference between alleged bias and rampant conspiricism.

 

[Dalia]

That will not surprise me at all She the "chouchou" of CNN

 

[FA_Q2]

No, she didn't.

It would be asinine when it would be FAR easier to simply have him lay off in the first place. What would be the point of secrete hand signals? That is the worst possible way to slant the debates.

Yes she did now admit it or I will hold my breath until you do.

What an ass

?

Do you even read what you respond to? Are you really demanding that I admit to a falsehood because you are going to 'hold your breath?'

You might want to go back to first grade...