Did flight 77 hit the Pentagon?

[Fort Fun Indiana]

False.

Now let's end this embarrassing display;

What sort of evidence would convince you that an airliner full of people hit the Pentagon?

Give us a few examples.

crickets

Every time...

 

[candycorn]

By people like you with closed and well brainwashed minds, I have been seen as an unhinged lunatic for 20 years. By people with closed and well brainwashed minds I have been seen as an unhinged lunatic for 5 years because I pointed out the clot shots are poison.

Don’t be so modest, you’ve been seen as an unhinged lunatic for far longer than 5 years.

I've been right on both counts.

Thanks for the chuckle.

What simple minds like you see as conspiracy theory have become conspiracy fact.

None of which is true. 9/11 truthers are seen as the dumbest people on the planet.

You will never understand, and you're in the majority. You follow the herd, I think for myself.

No. You don’t think at all. Otherwise you’d come up with a viable theory for what took down the light poles.

I’m happy to give you a micrphone and let you explain them.

I mean...
we know they were taken down at the same time AA77 hit the pentagon
we know they were far enough apart to where your theory can’t be true.

These are known facts. You can’t explain them. Again, sucks to be you.

 

[candycorn]

so now we have a claim that 2 planes were faked. In order to be true, since we know they took off, one has to explain, if they didn't crash where did they go. Who captured all the passengers and crew and murdered them. How did they force the planes to fly to these undisclosed locations. How many radar techs, traffic control and other planes pilots had to be in on it. How many guards were needed to herd the people off the planes and murder them then dispose of the bodies and the aircraft, how have the people that planned it kept all those people quiet all these years?

How many FBI agents were in on it?

Could you imagine if you would apply that sort of logic to the 2020 election... just think about how much happier yould be.

 

[PeterPilot]

Launched from where and by whom?

Mark Fuhrman?

I was not in on the planning or execution. Were you?

Why does it matter from where and by whom it was launched?

For those of us who are independent thinkers all that really matters is what happened at any of the numerous sites that comprise the Official Conspiracy Theory. No airliner at the Pentagon, no airliner at Shanksville, no airliners at WTC. What's a boy to do?

 

[candycorn]

I was not in on the planning or execution. Were you?

Why does it matter from where and by whom it was launched?

For those of us who are independent thinkers all that really matters is what happened at any of the numerous sites that comprise the Official Conspiracy Theory. No airliner at the Pentagon, no airliner at Shanksville, no airliners at WTC. What's a boy to do?

No brains in that head of yours either.

Still pining for attention I see.

Sad...really.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Simple question. Yes or No.

I already know who won't be answering. This is a public poll. I will even give the idiot response of I don't know.

No, physically impossible

 

[candycorn]

No, physically impossible

Okay...so what did hit the Pentagon? Air Traffic control tracked the flight into the Pentagon...

 

[RetiredGySgt]

I was not in on the planning or execution. Were you?

Why does it matter from where and by whom it was launched?

For those of us who are independent thinkers all that really matters is what happened at any of the numerous sites that comprise the Official Conspiracy Theory. No airliner at the Pentagon, no airliner at Shanksville, no airliners at WTC. What's a boy to do?

LOL now you are claiming that the airliners we all SAW hit the Twin Towers weren't really there? How did millions see something that didn't happen. And before you claim faked video thousands saw then with their own eyes in New York City.

 

[PeterPilot]

LOL now you are claiming that the airliners we all SAW hit the Twin Towers weren't really there? How did millions see something that didn't happen. And before you claim faked video thousands saw then with their own eyes in New York City.

Hey Sarge, thanks for the input and the display of factual ignorance. You almost sound like Dubya, sitting there reading My Pet Goat in Sarasota. Dumbass Dubya commented subsequently that when he saw the first (North) tower being struck he was angered. What Dumbass didn't know was that very damn few cameras recorded the first strike, so unless he was there, and he wasn't, there was no way he could have seen the first tower being struck. Dumbass is as dumbass does, eh?

You and CandyCorn have a very low knowledge base regarding the facts that day, and I accept that. You don't know that actually SOME people did see the first strike and actually called NYPD to report it. In the early days before the spooks started deleting information that made it to the internet, this was covered by NYT and mainstream media. It was about a dozen citizens that called NYPD to report the first strike, and about half of them noted to NYPD that the airplane was not an airliner, but just a small commuter type aircraft or maybe a corporate jet of some sort.

The South Tower was struck by a Boeing, but the trained eye recognized that the airplane itself was not a stock 767. It had been modified and showed unusual fairings at the wing root and belly. More, the engine that continued the trajectory and ended up on the sidewalk was not a stock 767 engine. It was the engine from a 747, and was used on about 25 aircraft that had been modified in Israel as part of a project to replace the aging KC135 and KC10. Yeah, they didn't teach that to you at Cherry Point, so there is no reason you would know it today because the Marines do not teach men to think critically or independently.

Simple question Sarge, assuming your knowledge base is sufficient to answer it: Why did the FBI seize so many civilian facility surveillance camera footage from the area near the Pentagon? Why would the feds need to cover up/confiscate such video? One would think that if AA77 really did hit the Pentagon, the civilian surveillance footage would show that and support the official story. Why did they remove it Sarge?

 

[Faun]

Hey Sarge, thanks for the input and the display of factual ignorance. You almost sound like Dubya, sitting there reading My Pet Goat in Sarasota. Dumbass Dubya commented subsequently that when he saw the first (North) tower being struck he was angered. What Dumbass didn't know was that very damn few cameras recorded the first strike, so unless he was there, and he wasn't, there was no way he could have seen the first tower being struck. Dumbass is as dumbass does, eh?

You and CandyCorn have a very low knowledge base regarding the facts that day, and I accept that. You don't know that actually SOME people did see the first strike and actually called NYPD to report it. In the early days before the spooks started deleting information that made it to the internet, this was covered by NYT and mainstream media. It was about a dozen citizens that called NYPD to report the first strike, and about half of them noted to NYPD that the airplane was not an airliner, but just a small commuter type aircraft or maybe a corporate jet of some sort.

The South Tower was struck by a Boeing, but the trained eye recognized that the airplane itself was not a stock 767. It had been modified and showed unusual fairings at the wing root and belly. More, the engine that continued the trajectory and ended up on the sidewalk was not a stock 767 engine. It was the engine from a 747, and was used on about 25 aircraft that had been modified in Israel as part of a project to replace the aging KC135 and KC10. Yeah, they didn't teach that to you at Cherry Point, so there is no reason you would know it today because the Marines do not teach men to think critically or independently.

Simple question Sarge, assuming your knowledge base is sufficient to answer it: Why did the FBI seize so many civilian facility surveillance camera footage from the area near the Pentagon? Why would the feds need to cover up/confiscate such video? One would think that if AA77 really did hit the Pentagon, the civilian surveillance footage would show that and support the official story. Why did they remove it Sarge?

Bush was clearly talking about watching the news reporting on a plane hitting a tower. You'd get that if only you weren't so fucked in the head.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Hey Sarge, thanks for the input and the display of factual ignorance. You almost sound like Dubya, sitting there reading My Pet Goat in Sarasota. Dumbass Dubya commented subsequently that when he saw the first (North) tower being struck he was angered. What Dumbass didn't know was that very damn few cameras recorded the first strike, so unless he was there, and he wasn't, there was no way he could have seen the first tower being struck. Dumbass is as dumbass does, eh?

You and CandyCorn have a very low knowledge base regarding the facts that day, and I accept that. You don't know that actually SOME people did see the first strike and actually called NYPD to report it. In the early days before the spooks started deleting information that made it to the internet, this was covered by NYT and mainstream media. It was about a dozen citizens that called NYPD to report the first strike, and about half of them noted to NYPD that the airplane was not an airliner, but just a small commuter type aircraft or maybe a corporate jet of some sort.

The South Tower was struck by a Boeing, but the trained eye recognized that the airplane itself was not a stock 767. It had been modified and showed unusual fairings at the wing root and belly. More, the engine that continued the trajectory and ended up on the sidewalk was not a stock 767 engine. It was the engine from a 747, and was used on about 25 aircraft that had been modified in Israel as part of a project to replace the aging KC135 and KC10. Yeah, they didn't teach that to you at Cherry Point, so there is no reason you would know it today because the Marines do not teach men to think critically or independently.

Simple question Sarge, assuming your knowledge base is sufficient to answer it: Why did the FBI seize so many civilian facility surveillance camera footage from the area near the Pentagon? Why would the feds need to cover up/confiscate such video? One would think that if AA77 really did hit the Pentagon, the civilian surveillance footage would show that and support the official story. Why did they remove it Sarge?

Well, I would suggest there is medication for your delusions. But I doubt you would take them.

 

[candycorn]

Hey Sarge, thanks for the input and the display of factual ignorance. You almost sound like Dubya, sitting there reading My Pet Goat in Sarasota. Dumbass Dubya commented subsequently that when he saw the first (North) tower being struck he was angered. What Dumbass didn't know was that very damn few cameras recorded the first strike, so unless he was there, and he wasn't, there was no way he could have seen the first tower being struck. Dumbass is as dumbass does, eh?

You and CandyCorn have a very low knowledge base regarding the facts that day, and I accept that. You don't know that actually SOME people did see the first strike and actually called NYPD to report it. In the early days before the spooks started deleting information that made it to the internet, this was covered by NYT and mainstream media. It was about a dozen citizens that called NYPD to report the first strike, and about half of them noted to NYPD that the airplane was not an airliner, but just a small commuter type aircraft or maybe a corporate jet of some sort.

The South Tower was struck by a Boeing, but the trained eye recognized that the airplane itself was not a stock 767. It had been modified and showed unusual fairings at the wing root and belly. More, the engine that continued the trajectory and ended up on the sidewalk was not a stock 767 engine. It was the engine from a 747, and was used on about 25 aircraft that had been modified in Israel as part of a project to replace the aging KC135 and KC10. Yeah, they didn't teach that to you at Cherry Point, so there is no reason you would know it today because the Marines do not teach men to think critically or independently.

Simple question Sarge, assuming your knowledge base is sufficient to answer it: Why did the FBI seize so many civilian facility surveillance camera footage from the area near the Pentagon? Why would the feds need to cover up/confiscate such video? One would think that if AA77 really did hit the Pentagon, the civilian surveillance footage would show that and support the official story. Why did they remove it Sarge?

LOL...

Absolutely zero evidence supports your wild and silly contentions.

You never explained what took down the light poles. Why haven’t you explained that?

 

[candycorn]

Well, I would suggest there is medication for your delusions. But I doubt you would take them.

Can’t blame him. You guys didn’t take yours when you had the same baseless claims about the 2020 election.

He is what MAGA has become.

 

[Soupnazi630]

I was not in on the planning or execution. Were you?

Why does it matter from where and by whom it was launched?

For those of us who are independent thinkers all that really matters is what happened at any of the numerous sites that comprise the Official Conspiracy Theory. No airliner at the Pentagon, no airliner at Shanksville, no airliners at WTC. What's a boy to do?

Wrong

There were proven airliners at all three sites,

You are not an independant thinker. You are a lemming following along with delusional tales

 

[Skylar]

Flight 77 hit the Pentagon...but there is growing evidence that shows it was not American Airlines Flight 77, but rather Delta Flight 77.

What evidence is that?

I'm pretty sure there's no 'c' in Delta Airlines.

 

[Skylar]

Certainly doesn't look like Delta wreckage

Nope.

FBI re-releases 9/11 Pentagon photos

FBI re-releases images from inside the Pentagon of the crashed airliner.

abcnews.go.com

 

[Skylar]

Hey Sarge, thanks for the input and the display of factual ignorance. You almost sound like Dubya, sitting there reading My Pet Goat in Sarasota. Dumbass Dubya commented subsequently that when he saw the first (North) tower being struck he was angered. What Dumbass didn't know was that very damn few cameras recorded the first strike, so unless he was there, and he wasn't, there was no way he could have seen the first tower being struck. Dumbass is as dumbass does, eh?

You and CandyCorn have a very low knowledge base regarding the facts that day, and I accept that. You don't know that actually SOME people did see the first strike and actually called NYPD to report it. In the early days before the spooks started deleting information that made it to the internet, this was covered by NYT and mainstream media. It was about a dozen citizens that called NYPD to report the first strike, and about half of them noted to NYPD that the airplane was not an airliner, but just a small commuter type aircraft or maybe a corporate jet of some sort.

The South Tower was struck by a Boeing, but the trained eye recognized that the airplane itself was not a stock 767. It had been modified and showed unusual fairings at the wing root and belly. More, the engine that continued the trajectory and ended up on the sidewalk was not a stock 767 engine. It was the engine from a 747, and was used on about 25 aircraft that had been modified in Israel as part of a project to replace the aging KC135 and KC10. Yeah, they didn't teach that to you at Cherry Point, so there is no reason you would know it today because the Marines do not teach men to think critically or independently.

Simple question Sarge, assuming your knowledge base is sufficient to answer it: Why did the FBI seize so many civilian facility surveillance camera footage from the area near the Pentagon? Why would the feds need to cover up/confiscate such video? One would think that if AA77 really did hit the Pentagon, the civilian surveillance footage would show that and support the official story. Why did they remove it Sarge?

Or.....civilian security cam footage was pointed at civilian businesses. Not at the pentagon or the sky.

Your assumption is predicated on the idea that gas stations security cams were pointed up to capture planes going by rather than pointed down at the gas stations. You imagine civilian footage that captured the impact, despite having zero evidence of it.

And your assumptions aren't evidence. Especially when they're poorly thought through.

This didn't happen in a vacuum. The plane flew over I-395 in broad day light in the middle of a traffic jam. There were over a dozen witnesses. They reported a plane that flew over or by them and toward the pentagon. Plane parts from the lawn of the pentagon. They pulled plane parts from inside the Pentagon. They pulled the bodies of those in Flight 77 from within the Pentagon.

That's evidence.

 

[Faun]

Or.....civilian security cam footage was pointed at civilian businesses. Not at the pentagon or the sky.

Your assumption is predicated on the idea that gas stations and security cams were pointed up to capture planes going by rather than pointed down at the gas stations. You imagine civilian footage that captured the impact, despite having zero evidence of it.

And your assumptions aren't evidence. Especially when they're poorly thought through.

This didn't happen in a vacuum. The plane flew over I-395 in broad day light in the middle of a traffic jam. There were over a dozen witnesses. They reported a plane that flew over or by them and toward the pentagon. Plane parts from the lawn of the pentagon. They pulled plane parts from inside the Pentagon. They pulled the bodies of those in Flight 77 from within the Pentagon.

That's evidence.

C'mon. Who needs actual evidence when you can just make up your own?

 

[PeterPilot]

A dozen witnesses who were being paid to tell stories.

You know nothing about cameras it seems. Do you know what a wide angle camera lens is? Do you know that many or most surveillance cameras are wide angle? In your brilliant ignorance you come across as a fool, still defending 20+ years later a story contradicted by all facts and evidence. AA77, no Boeing, did not strike the Pentagon that day darling.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

A dozen witnesses who were being paid to tell stories.

You know nothing about cameras it seems. Do you know what a wide angle camera lens is? Do you know that many or most surveillance cameras are wide angle? In your brilliant ignorance you come across as a fool, still defending 20+ years later a story contradicted by all facts and evidence. AA77, no Boeing, did not strike the Pentagon that day darling.

There were a lot more than a dozen witnesses.

You're running out of steam.