PeterPilot
Diamond Member
- Jan 17, 2023
- 2,891
- 1,946
- 1,938
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Better check the scoreboard. You're sitting in the corner with the spoonbenders and alien abductees. And everyone else is pointing and laughing at all of you.
If your knowledge base of facts and events that day was high quality you would know he claimed he saw the first tower strike. Your knowledge base is non-existent, or more accurately consists only of the Official Narrative.Bush was clearly talking about watching the news reporting on a plane hitting a tower. You'd get that if only you weren't so fucked in the head.
I expect to be laughed at by the brainwashed herd. Proud to be laughed at by the brainwashed herd. You're probably one of those guys who actually believes the shots to be safe and effective.Better check the scoreboard. You're sitting in the corner with the spoonbenders and alien abductees. And everyone else is pointing and laughing at all of you.
Total bullshit on your part.There was aircraft debris at the Pentagon, but there was no debris from a transport category aircraft like 77. What debris was there was from a relatively small aircraft. Have you ever seen the landing gear from a 757? The engines? None of that was there.
April Gallop US Army was working very near ground zero there that day. She managed to get her son out of the day care and they both exited the building through the rubble. She commented that she saw no sign at all of passengers, baggage, airliner seats, jetfuel or anything else.
The Fox News reporter early on scene elaborated on the fact that there were no signs that an airliner had crashed there, and pointed out that the building front did not collapse until after he had arrived.
There was no airliner at the Pentagon. That's why the FBI took surveillance cameras from numerous civilian buildings nearby.
That shit disintegrates and burns in a jet fuel fire. The engines were found deep in the main hole in the Pentagon where they made further holes because of their momentum. You saw wrong.My view exactly. No rows of collapsed seats, O/H bins....you know the drill. The fan on an RB 211 is about six feet in diameter. I saw pix of a smaller (one) disk. Hard to say what it was from. Didn't notice any engine impact holes in the Pentagon either.
Pure bullshit Admiral, and we both know it.That shit disintegrates and burns in a jet fuel fire. The engines were found deep in the main hole in the Pentagon where they made further holes because of their momentum. You saw wrong.
BS! Where's the link to his saying that?No airliner at Shanksville either. The local coroner Wally Miller made that clear as he walked out of the field.
Because you weren't shown pictures of the wreckage inside the Pentagon.My view exactly. No rows of collapsed seats, O/H bins....you know the drill. The fan on an RB 211 is about six feet in diameter. I saw pix of a smaller (one) disk. Hard to say what it was from. Didn't notice any engine impact holes in the Pentagon either.
How many aircraft accidents have you been involved with? The Pentagon had tons of the engines, landing gear and other structurally strong debris found in the rubble. The outer hull remnants were painted in the airliner livery.Pure bullshit Admiral, and we both know it.
Link? It happened 23 years ago Admiral. Many books have been written about it. Wally Miller the local coroner was recorded on European TV 23 frigging years ago Admiral. What were you then, a Boy Scout? There was no airliner or sign of an airliner at Shanksville, and in the trial for the 19th hijacker there was discovery. That's why there were no other trials, the discovery kills the official narrative. Discovery showed that ARINC records showed UA93 flying somewhere in southern Illinois 30 minutes AFTER it supposedly crashed in Shanksville.BS! Where's the link to his saying that?
Every A-3 in the world that is not in a museum has long since been destroyed. There were no A-3s left when I was in the Navy in the late 70s, and 80s.No, I'm not saying 2 aircraft hit the Pentagon. You said that, not I.
I'm saying some sort of aircraft hit the Pentagon, but it was NOT an airliner.
Possibly an A-3 turned into a drone. Douglas A-3 Skywarrior - Wikipedia
How would a dumb shit who doesn't know about the ARINC data for UA93 know anything about anything at all? Ensign or CPO for you sir, grossly uninformed.Every A-3 in the world that is not in a museum has long since been destroyed. There were no A-3s left when I was in the Navy in the late 70s, and 80s.
A dozen witnesses who were being paid to tell stories.
You know nothing about cameras it seems. Do you know what a wide angle camera lens is? Do you know that many or most surveillance cameras are wide angle? In your brilliant ignorance you come across as a fool, still defending 20+ years later a story contradicted by all facts and evidence. AA77, no Boeing, did not strike the Pentagon that day darling.
How would a dumb shit who doesn't know about the ARINC data for UA93 know anything about anything at all? Ensign or CPO for you sir, grossly uninformed.
Yes, I am very well familiar with this case. In 2001, I had been a public school teacher for 5 years. The day it happened I was taking my GRE for graduate school. I had just finished a career in the Navy as a propulsion engineer, where I was trained in strengths of materials, firefighting and naval engineering. Aviation has been my hobby since I joined the Civil Air Patrol and AFJROTC when I was 13. Every wonder why the debris field at Shanksville was relatively small? The plane was nearly vertical when it hit the ground and blew a crater in the earth.Link? It happened 23 years ago Admiral. Many books have been written about it. Wally Miller the local coroner was recorded on European TV 23 frigging years ago Admiral. What were you then, a Boy Scout? There was no airliner or sign of an airliner at Shanksville, and in the trial for the 19th hijacker there was discovery. That's why there were no other trials, the discovery kills the official narrative. Discovery showed that ARINC records showed UA93 flying somewhere in southern Illinois 30 minutes AFTER it supposedly crashed in Shanksville.
No graduate school for you Ensign. You're not even aware of the facts of the case.
OK, where is the link to your data? I can't find something that does not exist!How would a dumb shit who doesn't know about the ARINC data for UA93 know anything about anything at all? Ensign or CPO for you sir, grossly uninformed.
Wally MillerHow many aircraft accidents have you been involved with? The Pentagon had tons of the engines, landing gear and other structurally strong debris found in the rubble. The outer hull remnants were painted in the airliner livery.
Wow! This just gets better and better with your wild unsupported rants? Have you considered seeking psychiatric help for these delusions?Hey Sarge, thanks for the input and the display of factual ignorance. You almost sound like Dubya, sitting there reading My Pet Goat in Sarasota. Dumbass Dubya commented subsequently that when he saw the first (North) tower being struck he was angered. What Dumbass didn't know was that very damn few cameras recorded the first strike, so unless he was there, and he wasn't, there was no way he could have seen the first tower being struck. Dumbass is as dumbass does, eh?
You and CandyCorn have a very low knowledge base regarding the facts that day, and I accept that. You don't know that actually SOME people did see the first strike and actually called NYPD to report it. In the early days before the spooks started deleting information that made it to the internet, this was covered by NYT and mainstream media. It was about a dozen citizens that called NYPD to report the first strike, and about half of them noted to NYPD that the airplane was not an airliner, but just a small commuter type aircraft or maybe a corporate jet of some sort.
The South Tower was struck by a Boeing, but the trained eye recognized that the airplane itself was not a stock 767. It had been modified and showed unusual fairings at the wing root and belly. More, the engine that continued the trajectory and ended up on the sidewalk was not a stock 767 engine. It was the engine from a 747, and was used on about 25 aircraft that had been modified in Israel as part of a project to replace the aging KC135 and KC10. Yeah, they didn't teach that to you at Cherry Point, so there is no reason you would know it today because the Marines do not teach men to think critically or independently.
Simple question Sarge, assuming your knowledge base is sufficient to answer it: Why did the FBI seize so many civilian facility surveillance camera footage from the area near the Pentagon? Why would the feds need to cover up/confiscate such video? One would think that if AA77 really did hit the Pentagon, the civilian surveillance footage would show that and support the official story. Why did they remove it Sarge?