ZestolPastilevsky
Diamond Member
- Oct 24, 2024
- 1,171
- 958
- 1,893
Even the crappiest lawyer ever would just argue that they're merely providing the public with information.How about to meddle in an election?....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Even the crappiest lawyer ever would just argue that they're merely providing the public with information.How about to meddle in an election?....
The intent seems pretty clear.Wouldn't fly. In order to prove libel you have to prove that what was published was not only false, but that it was published specifically with the intent to cause damage to your image. Very very tricky to prove in court.
To you. To a judge?The intent seems pretty clear.
A story that is demonstrably false, 30 years old, never ever mentioned before, two weeks before the election? Her intent is crystal clear.To you. To a judge?
Demonstrably false, maybe. But short of having her intent on paper, or on a recording somewhere, she has plausible deniability.A story that is demonstrably false, 30 years old, never ever mentioned before, two weeks before the election? Her intent is crystal clear.
Only if the trial was held in Manhattan or Los Angeles.Demonstrably false, maybe. But short of having her intent on paper, or on a recording somewhere, she has plausible deniability.
You mean PMSNBC?King Donny elect said that Dear Uncle Adolf did some good things .
And that is indisputable .
But as we all know he was not always a decent chap .
This is all about the extreme lefty Mutants having no hope in the vote and resorting to any drivel to get a few stupid people paying attention .
MSNBC or Decomposing Dog Turds ?
Take your pick. Not much difference
MSDNCYou mean PMSNBC?
To deny that Hitler did anything good at all is sort of silly. That's not to say that he wasn't overwhelmingly a force for evil in the world. I think many of these people lack a sort of nuance. They think that if you say ANYTHING good about something bad, then it's not different than saying that thing is good. But...people are funny like that. A lot of modern historical revisionism is rooted in that mentality.
Cigarette warning labels. German highway system. VW brand. Founded INTERPOL. Improved working conditions and overall standard of living for Germans, at least until like 1941 or so.ok, what good things did he do?
Cigarette warning labels. German highway system. VW brand. Founded INTERPOL. Improved working conditions and overall standard of living for Germans, at least until like 1941 or so.
Hitler can be admired merely for being better than democrats.Lawrence makes a great point. Trump's first response wasn't to deny that he made remarks praising Hitler, but rather to attack Kelley. lol. What a guy. I'm sure a president that admires Hitler and his generals would make a leader for this country.
Hitler can be admired merely for being better than democrats.
Without a doubt, Hitler. I say that as a child of Jews. Harris hates Jews as much or more than Hitler.Who would you vote for Hitler or Harris?