I don't think CNN is laughing, the lawsuits are piling up and they are guilty in all of them.
Wow bodecea, how can you be so obtuse. Pretty much every intelligent person on the planet knows CNN is purely a propaganda outfit at this point. They are known liars, worse than Fox.
It was only a matter of time before someone called them on their bullshit.
Wow bodecea, how can you be so obtuse. Pretty much every intelligent person on the planet knows CNN is purely a propaganda outfit at this point. They are known liars, worse than Fox.
It was only a matter of time before someone called them on their bullshit.
You need to step outside the tRumpling bubble and look at the real world occasionally, it's nothing like what they tell you it's is
Wow bodecea, how can you be so obtuse. Pretty much every intelligent person on the planet knows CNN is purely a propaganda outfit at this point. They are known liars, worse than Fox.
It was only a matter of time before someone called them on their bullshit.
You need to step outside the tRumpling bubble and look at the real world occasionally, it's nothing like what they tell you it's is
Everyone on this forum will tell you I don't give two shits about Trump, I know the global capitalists have every election in the bag. It is a set up man, a con job, start to finish.
C'mon. . . YOU actually believed CNN and MSNBC when they told you that Trump colluded with the Russians?
. . . .and then, when that report came out and said he never did, you realized he didn't for a while, and now you are in denial, aren't you?
Rachel Maddow has stopped, why haven't you?
You live in a fantasy world buddy.
You know what is in those Wiki-leaked emails, you know how corrupt the DNC is, but you don't want to face that. . Nope, you would rather believe some fairy tale about how those got out, into the public domain. Yeah, that is better to focus on than the corruption of the DNC.
You know both parties are terribly corrupt, you know you have no power and things are fucked, totally. Face the truth already.
That is best. Better to tell yourself that then to focus on the truth of your dying reality.
That isn't what he said.
Wow. Really?
Why are you not listening?
Is it because you work for CNN?
CNN Tells Viewers It's Illegal For Them To Read Wikileaks Document Dumps. CNN Is Wrong
CNN Tells Viewers It's Illegal For Them To Read Wikileaks Document Dumps. CNN Is Wrong
". . .Yeah, that's not how the First Amendment works. Legal precedent has repeatedly made it clear that the First Amendment offers the same protection to the press as to the public, even when it comes to possessing or distributing illegally obtained material (just as long as you weren't directly involved in the theft of the material in question). In its 2001 Bartnicki v. Vopper decision, the Supreme Court rejected even civil liability for distributing illegally obtained cellphone recordings, and refused to differentiate the public from the media in its ruling:"The . . . question is whether the application of these statutes [that purport to ban distributing illegally obtained material, even when one wasn’t involved in the distribution,] in such circumstances violates the First Amendment. [Footnote: In answering this question, we draw no distinction between the media respondents and Yocum.]"As the Washington Post and the Wall Street Journal's law blog were quick to highlight, that case cited New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, which also treated press outlets and the public equally in the eyes of the law in such situations. The Supreme Court's Pearson v. Dodd ruling also makes clear that the possession of illegally leaked materials is simply not treated the same way as knowingly possessing physical, stolen property.
This isn't Cuomo's first run in with being violently wrong on legal fundamentals despite having graduated from Fordham with a law degree. He also took a bit of a beating last year when he apparently hallucinated a "hate speech" exception buried in the First Amendment. At some point you have to wonder if CNN is actively trying to be this bad at what it does, or if CNN boss Jeff Zucker is a subversive artist of the highest order, working tirelessly to craft a crushing, satirical look at modern American intellectual dysfunction.. . ."
First Amendment Experts: Downloading Hacked Clinton Campaign Emails Not a Crime
First Amendment Experts: Downloading Hacked Clinton Campaign Emails Not a Crime
It bears repeating, over and over and over. . . CNN IS GARBAGE!
Did you already forget about the CEO's personal grudge against the POTUS?
That isn't news, it is a smear rag.
That isn't what he said.
Wow. Really?
Why are you not listening?
Is it because you work for CNN?
CNN Tells Viewers It's Illegal For Them To Read Wikileaks Document Dumps. CNN Is Wrong
CNN Tells Viewers It's Illegal For Them To Read Wikileaks Document Dumps. CNN Is Wrong
". . .Yeah, that's not how the First Amendment works. Legal precedent has repeatedly made it clear that the First Amendment offers the same protection to the press as to the public, even when it comes to possessing or distributing illegally obtained material (just as long as you weren't directly involved in the theft of the material in question). In its 2001 Bartnicki v. Vopper decision, the Supreme Court rejected even civil liability for distributing illegally obtained cellphone recordings, and refused to differentiate the public from the media in its ruling:"The . . . question is whether the application of these statutes [that purport to ban distributing illegally obtained material, even when one wasn’t involved in the distribution,] in such circumstances violates the First Amendment. [Footnote: In answering this question, we draw no distinction between the media respondents and Yocum.]"As the Washington Post and the Wall Street Journal's law blog were quick to highlight, that case cited New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, which also treated press outlets and the public equally in the eyes of the law in such situations. The Supreme Court's Pearson v. Dodd ruling also makes clear that the possession of illegally leaked materials is simply not treated the same way as knowingly possessing physical, stolen property.
This isn't Cuomo's first run in with being violently wrong on legal fundamentals despite having graduated from Fordham with a law degree. He also took a bit of a beating last year when he apparently hallucinated a "hate speech" exception buried in the First Amendment. At some point you have to wonder if CNN is actively trying to be this bad at what it does, or if CNN boss Jeff Zucker is a subversive artist of the highest order, working tirelessly to craft a crushing, satirical look at modern American intellectual dysfunction.. . ."
First Amendment Experts: Downloading Hacked Clinton Campaign Emails Not a Crime
First Amendment Experts: Downloading Hacked Clinton Campaign Emails Not a Crime
It bears repeating, over and over and over. . . CNN IS GARBAGE!
Did you already forget about the CEO's personal grudge against the POTUS?
That isn't news, it is a smear rag.
Here's the actual quote:
"...Remember, it’s illegal to possess these stolen documents. It’s different for the media. So everything you learn about this, you’re learning from us."
This thread didn't age well:
good good good!
