Devin Nunes slams CNN with a $435 MILLION dollar lawsuit!

skye

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2012
Messages
37,937
Reaction score
18,804
Points
1,620
:04: :2up: good good good!



 

bodecea

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2009
Messages
137,963
Reaction score
15,910
Points
2,180
Location
#HasNoClothes
OP
MarathonMike

MarathonMike

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2014
Messages
18,824
Reaction score
10,030
Points
1,295
Location
The Southwestern Desert
It's the only way to either get that corrupt propaganda machine back in line or off the air. If there are no consequences, CNN and the rest will continue their baseless smear campaigns against Conservatives.

Devin Nunes Files $435 Million Defamation Lawsuit Against CNN Over ‘Demonstrably False’ Ukraine Story
Oh...good luck with that...and his lawsuit against his cow too. :auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg:
I don't think CNN is laughing, the lawsuits are piling up and they are guilty in all of them.
 

MisterBeale

Gold Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2012
Messages
25,598
Reaction score
6,611
Points
280
It's the only way to either get that corrupt propaganda machine back in line or off the air. If there are no consequences, CNN and the rest will continue their baseless smear campaigns against Conservatives.

Devin Nunes Files $435 Million Defamation Lawsuit Against CNN Over ‘Demonstrably False’ Ukraine Story
Oh...good luck with that...and his lawsuit against his cow too. :auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg:
Wow bodecea, how can you be so obtuse. Pretty much every intelligent person on the planet knows CNN is purely a propaganda outfit at this point. They are known liars, worse than Fox.

It was only a matter of time before someone called them on their bullshit.


 

Crepitus

Platinum Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2018
Messages
34,917
Reaction score
5,461
Points
1,140
It's the only way to either get that corrupt propaganda machine back in line or off the air. If there are no consequences, CNN and the rest will continue their baseless smear campaigns against Conservatives.

Devin Nunes Files $435 Million Defamation Lawsuit Against CNN Over ‘Demonstrably False’ Ukraine Story
Oh...good luck with that...and his lawsuit against his cow too. :auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg:
Wow bodecea, how can you be so obtuse. Pretty much every intelligent person on the planet knows CNN is purely a propaganda outfit at this point. They are known liars, worse than Fox.

It was only a matter of time before someone called them on their bullshit.


You need to step outside the tRumpling bubble and look at the real world occasionally, it's nothing like what they tell you it's is
 

MisterBeale

Gold Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2012
Messages
25,598
Reaction score
6,611
Points
280
It's the only way to either get that corrupt propaganda machine back in line or off the air. If there are no consequences, CNN and the rest will continue their baseless smear campaigns against Conservatives.

Devin Nunes Files $435 Million Defamation Lawsuit Against CNN Over ‘Demonstrably False’ Ukraine Story
Oh...good luck with that...and his lawsuit against his cow too. :auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg:
Wow bodecea, how can you be so obtuse. Pretty much every intelligent person on the planet knows CNN is purely a propaganda outfit at this point. They are known liars, worse than Fox.

It was only a matter of time before someone called them on their bullshit.


You need to step outside the tRumpling bubble and look at the real world occasionally, it's nothing like what they tell you it's is
Everyone on this forum will tell you I don't give two shits about Trump, I know the global capitalists have every election in the bag. It is a set up man, a con job, start to finish.

C'mon. . . YOU actually believed CNN and MSNBC when they told you that Trump colluded with the Russians? :auiqs.jpg:

. . . .and then, when that report came out and said he never did, you realized he didn't for a while, and now you are in denial, aren't you?

Rachel Maddow has stopped, why haven't you?

You live in a fantasy world buddy.

You know what is in those Wiki-leaked emails, you know how corrupt the DNC is, but you don't want to face that. . Nope, you would rather believe some fairy tale about how those got out, into the public domain. Yeah, that is better to focus on than the corruption of the DNC.

You know both parties are terribly corrupt, you know you have no power and things are fucked, totally. Face the truth already.

That is best. Better to tell yourself that then to focus on the truth of your dying reality.

 

Care4all

Warrior Princess
Joined
Mar 24, 2007
Messages
53,680
Reaction score
12,411
Points
2,220
Location
Maine
CNN is sticking by their reporting and not retracting... they always retract the story if they were wrong....

so, we will see....

Nunes has to show he was harmed, and that they intentionally printed something they knew was a lie, for a suit.... HOW was he harmed financially? How did he come up with the amount of $435 million, I wonder?

Those phone records released today, don't help him much... calls with Giuliani and Lev Parnus, the guy whose lawyer is the one making the claim.,, that CNN covered.
 

MisterBeale

Gold Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2012
Messages
25,598
Reaction score
6,611
Points
280
CNN is sticking by their reporting and not retracting... they always retract the story if they were wrong....

so, we will see....

Nunes has to show he was harmed, and that they intentionally printed something they knew was a lie, for a suit.... HOW was he harmed financially? How did he come up with the amount of $435 million, I wonder?

Those phone records released today, don't help him much... calls with Giuliani and Lev Parnus, the guy whose lawyer is the one making the claim.,, that CNN covered.
Wow. Really?

Why are you not listening?

Is it because you work for CNN?

:aug08_031:

CNN Tells Viewers It's Illegal For Them To Read Wikileaks Document Dumps. CNN Is Wrong
CNN Tells Viewers It's Illegal For Them To Read Wikileaks Document Dumps. CNN Is Wrong
". . .Yeah, that's not how the First Amendment works. Legal precedent has repeatedly made it clear that the First Amendment offers the same protection to the press as to the public, even when it comes to possessing or distributing illegally obtained material (just as long as you weren't directly involved in the theft of the material in question). In its 2001 Bartnicki v. Vopper decision, the Supreme Court rejected even civil liability for distributing illegally obtained cellphone recordings, and refused to differentiate the public from the media in its ruling:"The . . . question is whether the application of these statutes [that purport to ban distributing illegally obtained material, even when one wasn’t involved in the distribution,] in such circumstances violates the First Amendment. [Footnote: In answering this question, we draw no distinction between the media respondents and Yocum.]"As the Washington Post and the Wall Street Journal's law blog were quick to highlight, that case cited New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, which also treated press outlets and the public equally in the eyes of the law in such situations. The Supreme Court's Pearson v. Dodd ruling also makes clear that the possession of illegally leaked materials is simply not treated the same way as knowingly possessing physical, stolen property.

This isn't Cuomo's first run in with being violently wrong on legal fundamentals despite having graduated from Fordham with a law degree. He also took a bit of a beating last year when he apparently hallucinated a "hate speech" exception buried in the First Amendment. At some point you have to wonder if CNN is actively trying to be this bad at what it does, or if CNN boss Jeff Zucker is a subversive artist of the highest order, working tirelessly to craft a crushing, satirical look at modern American intellectual dysfunction.. . ."


First Amendment Experts: Downloading Hacked Clinton Campaign Emails Not a Crime
First Amendment Experts: Downloading Hacked Clinton Campaign Emails Not a Crime

It bears repeating, over and over and over. . . CNN IS GARBAGE!

Did you already forget about the CEO's personal grudge against the POTUS?

That isn't news, it is a smear rag.
 

Crepitus

Platinum Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2018
Messages
34,917
Reaction score
5,461
Points
1,140
It's the only way to either get that corrupt propaganda machine back in line or off the air. If there are no consequences, CNN and the rest will continue their baseless smear campaigns against Conservatives.

Devin Nunes Files $435 Million Defamation Lawsuit Against CNN Over ‘Demonstrably False’ Ukraine Story
Oh...good luck with that...and his lawsuit against his cow too. :auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg:
Wow bodecea, how can you be so obtuse. Pretty much every intelligent person on the planet knows CNN is purely a propaganda outfit at this point. They are known liars, worse than Fox.

It was only a matter of time before someone called them on their bullshit.


You need to step outside the tRumpling bubble and look at the real world occasionally, it's nothing like what they tell you it's is
Everyone on this forum will tell you I don't give two shits about Trump, I know the global capitalists have every election in the bag. It is a set up man, a con job, start to finish.

C'mon. . . YOU actually believed CNN and MSNBC when they told you that Trump colluded with the Russians? :auiqs.jpg:

. . . .and then, when that report came out and said he never did, you realized he didn't for a while, and now you are in denial, aren't you?

Rachel Maddow has stopped, why haven't you?

You live in a fantasy world buddy.

You know what is in those Wiki-leaked emails, you know how corrupt the DNC is, but you don't want to face that. . Nope, you would rather believe some fairy tale about how those got out, into the public domain. Yeah, that is better to focus on than the corruption of the DNC.

You know both parties are terribly corrupt, you know you have no power and things are fucked, totally. Face the truth already.

That is best. Better to tell yourself that then to focus on the truth of your dying reality.

Bill Barr and tRumps denials notwithstanding he did "collude" with Russia and various other entities in the 2016 election and is doing his best to do the same in the 2020.

How you can be so blind I do not know.

As far a your relationship with Cheeto Jesus I call it like I see it and you got orange lips, boy.
 

Crepitus

Platinum Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2018
Messages
34,917
Reaction score
5,461
Points
1,140
CNN is sticking by their reporting and not retracting... they always retract the story if they were wrong....

so, we will see....

Nunes has to show he was harmed, and that they intentionally printed something they knew was a lie, for a suit.... HOW was he harmed financially? How did he come up with the amount of $435 million, I wonder?

Those phone records released today, don't help him much... calls with Giuliani and Lev Parnus, the guy whose lawyer is the one making the claim.,, that CNN covered.
Wow. Really?

Why are you not listening?

Is it because you work for CNN?

:aug08_031:

CNN Tells Viewers It's Illegal For Them To Read Wikileaks Document Dumps. CNN Is Wrong
CNN Tells Viewers It's Illegal For Them To Read Wikileaks Document Dumps. CNN Is Wrong
". . .Yeah, that's not how the First Amendment works. Legal precedent has repeatedly made it clear that the First Amendment offers the same protection to the press as to the public, even when it comes to possessing or distributing illegally obtained material (just as long as you weren't directly involved in the theft of the material in question). In its 2001 Bartnicki v. Vopper decision, the Supreme Court rejected even civil liability for distributing illegally obtained cellphone recordings, and refused to differentiate the public from the media in its ruling:"The . . . question is whether the application of these statutes [that purport to ban distributing illegally obtained material, even when one wasn’t involved in the distribution,] in such circumstances violates the First Amendment. [Footnote: In answering this question, we draw no distinction between the media respondents and Yocum.]"As the Washington Post and the Wall Street Journal's law blog were quick to highlight, that case cited New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, which also treated press outlets and the public equally in the eyes of the law in such situations. The Supreme Court's Pearson v. Dodd ruling also makes clear that the possession of illegally leaked materials is simply not treated the same way as knowingly possessing physical, stolen property.

This isn't Cuomo's first run in with being violently wrong on legal fundamentals despite having graduated from Fordham with a law degree. He also took a bit of a beating last year when he apparently hallucinated a "hate speech" exception buried in the First Amendment. At some point you have to wonder if CNN is actively trying to be this bad at what it does, or if CNN boss Jeff Zucker is a subversive artist of the highest order, working tirelessly to craft a crushing, satirical look at modern American intellectual dysfunction.. . ."


First Amendment Experts: Downloading Hacked Clinton Campaign Emails Not a Crime
First Amendment Experts: Downloading Hacked Clinton Campaign Emails Not a Crime

It bears repeating, over and over and over. . . CNN IS GARBAGE!

Did you already forget about the CEO's personal grudge against the POTUS?

That isn't news, it is a smear rag.
That isn't what he said.

Here's the actual quote:

"...Remember, it’s illegal to possess these stolen documents. It’s different for the media. So everything you learn about this, you’re learning from us."
 

MisterBeale

Gold Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2012
Messages
25,598
Reaction score
6,611
Points
280
CNN is sticking by their reporting and not retracting... they always retract the story if they were wrong....

so, we will see....

Nunes has to show he was harmed, and that they intentionally printed something they knew was a lie, for a suit.... HOW was he harmed financially? How did he come up with the amount of $435 million, I wonder?

Those phone records released today, don't help him much... calls with Giuliani and Lev Parnus, the guy whose lawyer is the one making the claim.,, that CNN covered.
Wow. Really?

Why are you not listening?

Is it because you work for CNN?

:aug08_031:

CNN Tells Viewers It's Illegal For Them To Read Wikileaks Document Dumps. CNN Is Wrong
CNN Tells Viewers It's Illegal For Them To Read Wikileaks Document Dumps. CNN Is Wrong
". . .Yeah, that's not how the First Amendment works. Legal precedent has repeatedly made it clear that the First Amendment offers the same protection to the press as to the public, even when it comes to possessing or distributing illegally obtained material (just as long as you weren't directly involved in the theft of the material in question). In its 2001 Bartnicki v. Vopper decision, the Supreme Court rejected even civil liability for distributing illegally obtained cellphone recordings, and refused to differentiate the public from the media in its ruling:"The . . . question is whether the application of these statutes [that purport to ban distributing illegally obtained material, even when one wasn’t involved in the distribution,] in such circumstances violates the First Amendment. [Footnote: In answering this question, we draw no distinction between the media respondents and Yocum.]"As the Washington Post and the Wall Street Journal's law blog were quick to highlight, that case cited New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, which also treated press outlets and the public equally in the eyes of the law in such situations. The Supreme Court's Pearson v. Dodd ruling also makes clear that the possession of illegally leaked materials is simply not treated the same way as knowingly possessing physical, stolen property.

This isn't Cuomo's first run in with being violently wrong on legal fundamentals despite having graduated from Fordham with a law degree. He also took a bit of a beating last year when he apparently hallucinated a "hate speech" exception buried in the First Amendment. At some point you have to wonder if CNN is actively trying to be this bad at what it does, or if CNN boss Jeff Zucker is a subversive artist of the highest order, working tirelessly to craft a crushing, satirical look at modern American intellectual dysfunction.. . ."


First Amendment Experts: Downloading Hacked Clinton Campaign Emails Not a Crime
First Amendment Experts: Downloading Hacked Clinton Campaign Emails Not a Crime

It bears repeating, over and over and over. . . CNN IS GARBAGE!

Did you already forget about the CEO's personal grudge against the POTUS?

That isn't news, it is a smear rag.
That isn't what he said.

Here's the actual quote:

"...Remember, it’s illegal to possess these stolen documents. It’s different for the media. So everything you learn about this, you’re learning from us."
. . . and the difference is? :dunno:
 

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top