Zincwarrior
Platinum Member
- Nov 18, 2021
- 19,769
- 11,918
- 1,138
Also, technically if he's doing da Fraud the existing bank groups could likely accelerate based on CPs breached.Well,I’d bet he gets it done…so much for dreams, eh?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Also, technically if he's doing da Fraud the existing bank groups could likely accelerate based on CPs breached.Well,I’d bet he gets it done…so much for dreams, eh?
What makes you think he's frauding the bank giving the hypothetical loan?Also, technically if he's doing da Fraud the existing bank groups could likely accelerate based on CPs breached.
That’s the goal of the left, is it not?
I would have agreed with you a few months ago. But with all the evidence they have on Trump and his offspring, the Trump empire may be about to collapse.I have to admit, I would find it pretty damn funny to see the grifter lose it all.
But, it will not happen so your god is safe....but keep sending him your money just in case.
Overvaluing his assets.if he attested to their value that opens the door. CAs have CPs related to the disclosure of information and it's veracity.What makes you think he's frauding the bank giving the hypothetical loan?
haha the BY AG investigation is over…all they believe they have is some lawsuit alledging he did what all property owners do. try to devalue their teal estate for tax purposes, and value it high for loan purposes…no bank has claimed to have issuesEmpty rabbit hole? LMAO!!
This is the investigation by the NY AG. For his shady financial practices covering years. This is lying on financial disclosures and on the value of properties (and even the size). This is not Trump declassifying documents by just thinking about it.
The word 'shady' doesn't accurately define it because the word shady gives the impression that what was done fell under an ill-defined 'gray area' of the law which is open to interpretation. That's not the case here. What the Trump Organization (meaning Trump himself) did was repeatedly engage in flat out illegal activity by submitting fraudulent documents to banks, insurance companies and the convening authorities of the State of NY.Empty rabbit hole? LMAO!!
This is the investigation by the NY AG. For his shady financial practices covering years. This is lying on financial disclosures and on the value of properties (and even the size). This is not Trump declassifying documents by just thinking about it.
the problem is no bank or insurance company has filed a law suit claiming he’s done anything illegal.The word 'shady' doesn't accurately define it because the word shady gives the impression that what was done fell under an ill-defined 'gray area' of the law which is open to interpretation. That's not the case here. What the Trump Organization (meaning Trump himself) did was repeatedly engage in flat out illegal activity by submitting fraudulent documents to banks, insurance companies and the convening authorities of the State of NY.
Anyone who's ever had any interaction with companies, or the government knows that before submitting a document, a person or a representative of a company is asked to swear and or affirm that the document is a true and accurate representation of the facts.
Thought so.I have to admit, I would find it pretty damn funny to see the grifter lose it all.
But, it will not happen so your god is safe....but keep sending him your money just in case.
And you don’t think the bank, any bank doesn’t verify those assets in due diligence? Really? Wow! Show me that bank, I need some money.Overvaluing his assets.if he attested to their value that opens the door. CAs have CPs related to the disclosure of information and it's veracity.
Oh, i see you have already convicted him.He makes people money? He also doesn't pay people what is owed. His inflated values reported are criminal.
That make analysis of properties based on information derived from the tax rolls, but also from data provided by the Company. Is that data is fraudulent, its fraudulent.And you don’t think the bank, any bank doesn’t verify those assets in due diligence? Really? Wow! Show me that bank, I need some money.
Oh, was it Trump?That make analysis of properties based on information derived from the tax rolls, but also from data provided by the Company. Is that data is fraudulent, its fraudulent.
We had a client spinning off a company, they dropped all the environmental liabilities into that company. They told us about the properties but grossly (geometrically) low balled the liabilities associated with them. When it imploded, the Bank group sued and won recourse back to the parent.