Desperate Dems Try to Smear Moore, But O.K. With This...

[bripat9643]

Prove he did it first, douchebag.

So, wait...so you're saying you don't think Moore had any contact with these girls? But you also say that a 32 year old man being romantically involved with a 14 year old girl is the parents' fault.

Well, if it didn't happen then you can't say what didn't happen was the fault of the parents. You get that, right? You get how your argument contradicts itself, right?

No, I'm not saying that, asshole.

 

[The Derp]

Wrong. Democrats are always behind it, and they are behind this. Which is another reason not to believe it.

So you flat out don't believe Moore had any contact with these girls at all?

 

[The Derp]

No, I'm not saying that, asshole.

Yes you are. You've gone from denying anything even happened, to excusing it by blaming the girl's parents. So how are you able to blame the girl's parents for something you think never happened?

That's why you're a propagandist...and not a very good one.

 

[bripat9643]

So the fact that you can't prove it means you get to say whatever you like and make things up?

So you're arguing two contradicting points:

1. You argue that these women are lying, impugning the good name of Judge Roy Moore who never had any contact with these girls.

But you also argue

2. There's nothing wrong with a 32 year old man seducing a 14 year old girl and it's the parents' fault for letting it happen.

So...those two arguments of yours directly contradict one another.

Which makes me think you're just a propagandist paid to spread this bullshit.

No, I'm not saying that, asshole.

 

[The Derp]

No, I'm not saying that, asshole.

So then what are the women lying about? Are they lying about having contact with Moore, or are they lying about having sexual contact with him? Because in either case, Moore had contact with underage girls.

 

[bodecea]

That is some sick homo pedo shit

Ever seen a child beauty pageant? Very popular in red States.

 

[The Derp]

No, I'm not saying that, asshole.

That is precisely what you're saying. You say it's "not true"...what's "not true"? Is the allegation that he had any contact with them what's "not true", or is the allegation that he had sexual contact with them what's "not true"? What is it you think the women are lying about?

 

[Lastamender]

Alabama The age of consent is sixteen. With parental consent, parties can marry at age fourteen. However, this parental consent is not required if the minor has already been married. (Other statutory laws apply.) Common law marriage is recognized.

State-by-State Marriage

Democrats say nothing when Muslims marry child brides much younger. Apparently, if the parents knew Moore was there or the girl was sixteen he broke 0 laws.

 

[bodecea]

Here's the thing...if the guy is guilty Conservatives across the board will demand his incarceration.
Liberals on the other hand will defend the likes of Roman Polanski till the bitter end and actually promote the behavior of these idiots.

Nope...they'll elect him like they elected a ***** grabber president.

 

[bodecea]

40 years ago and somehow we are supposed to believe the story just came out now? with her two best friends and mommy backing her story? Please...

Why do you automatically believe it just came out now?

 

[The Derp]

Democrats say nothing when Muslims marry child brides much younger..

No they don't, Democrats are widely opposed to child brides of any kind. You are the ones who like little girls.

Apparently, if the parents knew Moore was there or the girl was sixteen he broke 0 laws.

Why is a 32 year old man pursuing underage girls?

 

[Lastamender]

40 years ago and somehow we are supposed to believe the story just came out now? with her two best friends and mommy backing her story? Please...

Why do you automatically believe it just came out now?

Show us when it surfaced before.

 

[Lastamender]

Democrats say nothing when Muslims marry child brides much younger..

No they don't, Democrats are widely opposed to child brides of any kind. You are the ones who like little girls.

Apparently, if the parents knew Moore was there or the girl was sixteen he broke 0 laws.

Why is a 32 year old man pursuing underage girls?

Why is it legal? Not Moore's problem.

 

[The Derp]

Why is it legal? Not Moore's problem.

So wait a second...did Moore have contact with these girls or didn't he? Because you are saying these women are lying, yet here you are saying there's nothing wrong with what Moore did.

So what are they lying about, then?

 

[The Derp]

Show us when it surfaced before.

So because they didn't automatically run to the authorities right away (of who Moore worked closely with as he was a prosecutor), that makes what Moore did OK?

 

[bripat9643]

No, I'm not saying that, asshole.

Yes you are. You've gone from denying anything even happened, to excusing it by blaming the girl's parents. So how are you able to blame the girl's parents for something you think never happened?

That's why you're a propagandist...and not a very good one.

Where did I blame the girl's parents? You just can't stop lying, can you?

 

[bripat9643]

Alabama The age of consent is sixteen. With parental consent, parties can marry at age fourteen. However, this parental consent is not required if the minor has already been married. (Other statutory laws apply.) Common law marriage is recognized.

State-by-State Marriage

Democrats say nothing when Muslims marry child brides much younger. Apparently, if the parents knew Moore was there or the girl was sixteen he broke 0 laws.

When Obama was president, US troops in Afghanistan were ordered not to interfere when adult male Afghanis sexually molested young boys.

 

[The Derp]

Why is it legal? Not Moore's problem.

Here's the problem:

You all say the women are lying. About what, you don't say. You just say they are lying...but then you also say there was nothing wrong with what Moore did by having this inappropriate contact. So what are the women lying about, according to you? Because you've justified Moore being with an underage girl...which was the accusation. So you're admitting that he had contact with the underage girls. Are you accusing the women of lying about having contact at all, or that the contact was sexual? Because you just admitted he had "romantic" (re: sexual) contact with these underage girls.

 

[bripat9643]

Show us when it surfaced before.

So because they didn't automatically run to the authorities right away (of who Moore worked closely with as he was a prosecutor), that makes what Moore did OK?

You mean 40 years later. Yet, all you douchebags claim Jaunita Brodderick can't be believed for the very same reason.

 

[The Derp]

Where did I blame the girl's parents? You just can't stop lying, can you?

Apologies, I'm getting my Russian trolls all mixed up.

So you don't blame the girl's parents for Moore having contact with underage girls?