Deranged Transgender Democrat pulls Gun on Sidewalk Preacher - nearly Hits him in Face with the Barrel.

Seymour Flops

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2021
Messages
19,962
Reaction score
17,018
Points
2,288
Location
Texas

Watch the video. The preacher shows grace under pressure, while the (BB?) gun-weilding Democrat shows anger and fear, then runs away.
 

Watch the video. The preacher shows grace under pressure, while the (BB?) gun-weilding Democrat shows anger and fear, then runs away.

No name of the Tranny Terrorist in the story? Hasn't this sodomite been picked up yet? Does the Orange County sheriff need help from the Feds and the Civil Right Commission, since the minister was persecuted due to his religious beliefs?
 

Watch the video. The preacher shows grace under pressure, while the (BB?) gun-weilding Democrat shows anger and fear, then runs away.
Probably not the first time, the preacher saw a gun in his face or maybe pulled one himself.
 

Watch the video. The preacher shows grace under pressure, while the (BB?) gun-weilding Democrat shows anger and fear, then runs away.
.

That tranny is a hilarious piece of business! I hope it gets arrested. New sheriff now and the democrats are no longer above the law.

Would have been funny if it had tried that ridiculous shit in my state. Everyone is armed here and it's wise not to pull anything remotely resembling a firearm on anyone here.


.
 
.

That tranny is a hilarious piece of business! I hope it gets arrested. New sheriff now and the democrats are no longer above the law.

Would have been funny if it had tried that ridiculous shit in my state. Everyone is armed here and it's wise not to pull anything remotely resembling a firearm on anyone here.


.
Yeah, I would imagine the state U R residing in @ current would @ least match Idaho in number for armed citizens per capita. Committing an armed assault in your area of abode would be the fastest way an armed assailant could go from upright to pushing daises that I can think of!
 
Yeah, I would imagine the state U R residing in @ current would @ least match Idaho in number for armed citizens per capita. Committing an armed assault in your area of abode would be the fastest way an armed assailant could go from upright to pushing daises that I can think of!
.

After living in a filthy blue area, it feels so sweet to feel safe again.


.
 

Watch the video. The preacher shows grace under pressure, while the (BB?) gun-weilding Democrat shows anger and fear, then runs away.


That person is clearly dangerously unstable. He should be instiutionalized and treated until he is calm enough to hold it together or dies of old age.
 

Watch the video. The preacher shows grace under pressure, while the (BB?) gun-weilding Democrat shows anger and fear, then runs away.
I have my suspicions this was staged, theater. For one thing, why on earth would anyone just so happen to be standing there filming this "preacher" in the first place? US sidewalks are littered with such people, ten a penny and so it seems like rather a steep coincidence that at that very time someone would come along and brandish a firearm (almost certainly a felony in any state) all while being filmed.

Furthermore what is he "preaching" about? what is his goal? Surely he should be focusing on the gospel not alienating the very people he seeks to influence by telling them how "wrong" they are.
 
Last edited:
I have my suspicions this was staged, theater. For one thing, why on earth would anyone just so happen to be standing there filming this "preacher" in the first place? US sidewalks are littered with such people, ten a penny and so it seems like rather a steep coincidence that at that very time someone would come along and brandish a firearm (almost certainly a felony in any state) all while being filmed.

Furthermore what is he "preaching" about? what is his goal? Surely he should be focusing on the gospel not alienating the very people he seeks to influence by telling them how "wrong" they are.


Plenty of people "preach" or talk and film themselves doing it, and post it online as content.

And if they are conservative, they are often confronted by crazy libs, but I repeat myself.

It could be staged, but it is completely plausible that it really happened. You libs do tend to be crazy and those using crazy drugs to fuck with their bodies, are even more so.
 
Plenty of people "preach" or talk and film themselves doing it, and post it online as content.
Yes that's true, I accept that.
And if they are conservative, they are often confronted by crazy libs, but I repeat myself.
People who point guns as a threat are not to be classed as liberals though, liberals are typically conservative when it comes to guns. You have no idea of this person's political views, if it did indeed threaten the guy with a gun then it's pretty hard to see how that's the act of a liberal minded person, they are just a dangerous nutcase another single issue fanatic.
It could be staged, but it is completely plausible that it really happened.
True, but I am just suspicious and also as a student of theology myself, I really don't see any value in lecturing people about what men and women are, that's immaterial insofar as the gospel is concerned - IMHO.
You libs do tend to be crazy and those using crazy drugs to fuck with their bodies, are even more so.
Again you are choosing to classify crazy people as liberals, but a person isn't a liberal when they approve of guns to the extent that person does, that's a much more republican attitude, many republicans and maga are liberal with respect to guns and gun laws.

I'm somewhat liberal minded but I do not personally approve of the extremist transgender practices that have developed over the years. I'm from a blue collar working class background and that's a culture of men are men and women are women, yet their politics is liberal, socialist.

Labelling crazy and dangerous nutjobs as "liberal" is disingenuous, it is just another way to discredit people who are opposed to the growth of fascism here.
 
Last edited:
Yes that's true, I accept that.
Noted.


People who point guns as a threat are not to be classed as liberals though, liberals are typically conservative when it comes to guns. You have no idea of this person's political views, if it did indeed threaten the guy with a gun then it's pretty hard to see how that's the act of a liberal minded person, they are just a dangerous nutcase another single issue fanatic.

Yeah, that's shit talk. IN the real world, libs are known for their hypocrisy and double standards. So, yes, TALKING about being anti-gun, and use guns to threaten people. Completely plausible lib behavior.


True, but I am just suspicious and also as a student of theology myself, I really don't see any value in lecturing people about what men and women are, that's immaterial insofar as the gospel is concerned - IMHO.

I'm NOT a student of theology myself, and I am well aware of the huge tradition of going forth and spreading the word, so, lol, this point is... just wrong. Nonsensical even.


Again you are choosing to classify crazy people as liberals, but a person isn't a liberal when they approve of guns to the extent that person does, that's a much more republican attitude, many republicans and maga are liberal with respect to guns and gun laws.

Not all crazy people are libs, clearly. But libs do have much higher levels of being crazy. ANd add in the whole gender confusion mental illness not to mention the likely use of hormones and psych drugs... yeah, completely plausible.


I'm somewhat liberal minded but I do not personally approve of the extremist transgender practices that have developed over the years. I'm from a blue collar working class background and that's a culture of men are men and women are women, yet their politics is liberal, socialist.

YOu say that, but you are here to defend them from this... "accusation". When you know it is plausible.


Labelling crazy and dangerous nutjobs as "liberal" is disingenuous, it is just another way to discredit people who are opposed to the growth of fascism here.

I don't need to discredit people that though that Biden's lawfare was good and that Trump is "fascism".

your own words and actions do that.
 
Noted.

Yeah, that's shit talk. IN the real world, libs are known for their hypocrisy and double standards. So, yes, TALKING about being anti-gun, and use guns to threaten people. Completely plausible lib behavior.
I'm a liberal as are many people I know, I've seen no evidence of "double standards" you're likely stereotyping.

I'm NOT a student of theology myself, and I am well aware of the huge tradition of going forth and spreading the word, so, lol, this point is... just wrong. Nonsensical even.

Not all crazy people are libs, clearly. But libs do have much higher levels of being crazy. ANd add in the whole gender confusion mental illness not to mention the likely use of hormones and psych drugs... yeah, completely plausible.
Well people who struggle with mental issues and depression and so on are often shunned by republican politics, liberal minded people often have a more sympathetic attitude and a desire to help in some way, support programs and so on, conflating the two is what you seem to be doing.

Because liberalism might strive to support and help such hapless people, doesn't mean that their ideology in any way endorses mental instability and so on.
You say that, but you are here to defend them from this... "accusation". When you know it is plausible.
What is plausible?
I don't need to discredit people that though that Biden's lawfare was good and that Trump is "fascism".

your own words and actions do that.
Have you ever watched the movie Serpico? He was a liberal, I admire him, he respects law and order and was excited to work as a police officer, see what happened to him, it's a true story and shows that liberalism is not lawlessness, is not double standards, is not corruption.

 
I'm a liberal as are many people I know, I've seen no evidence of "double standards" you're likely stereotyping.

Stereotypes are often based in truth. As is this one.
Well people who struggle with mental issues and depression and so on are often shunned by republican politics, liberal minded people often have a more sympathetic attitude and a desire to help in some way, support programs and so on, conflating the two is what you seem to be doing.

Because liberalism might strive to support and help such hapless people, doesn't mean that their ideology in any way endorses mental instability and so on.

Thank you for admitting my point about crazy people likely being libs. YOur positive spin on it, is noted.


What is plausible?

Have you ever watched the movie Serpico? He was a liberal, I admire him, he respects law and order and was excited to work as a police officer, see what happened to him, it's a true story and shows that liberalism is not lawlessness, is not double standards, is not corruption.



Before my time. ANd really old now. You want to cite examples from this millennium?
 
Stereotypes are often based in truth. As is this one.


Thank you for admitting my point about crazy people likely being libs. YOur positive spin on it, is noted.




Before my time. ANd really old now. You want to cite examples from this millennium?
So you'd rather not watch a movie about a liberal minded decent cop who refused to accept bribes and instead became a victim for that, being setup and shot by fellow cops?

Fine, but I understand you better now.

Francesco Vincent "Frank" Serpico (/ˈsɜːrpɪkoʊ/ SUR-pik-oh; born April 14, 1936) is an American retired New York Police Department detective, best known for whistleblowing on police corruption. In the late 1960s and early 1970s, he was a plainclothes police officer working in Brooklyn, the Bronx and Manhattan to expose vice racketeering. In 1967, he reported credible evidence of widespread police corruption, to no effect.[2] In 1970, he contributed to a front-page story in The New York Times on widespread corruption in the NYPD, which drew national attention to the problem.[2] Mayor John V. Lindsay appointed a five-member panel to investigate accusations of police corruption, which became the Knapp Commission.

Serpico was shot in the face during an arrest attempt on February 3, 1971, at 778 Driggs Avenue, in Williamsburg, Brooklyn. The bullet severed an auditory nerve, and left bullet fragments lodged in his brain. The circumstances surrounding Serpico's shooting were quickly called into question, raising the possibility that Serpico had been led to the apartment by his colleagues to be murdered. There was no formal investigation,[3] but Edgar Echevarria, who had shot Serpico, was subsequently convicted of attempted murder.

Source: Frank Serpico - Wikipedia
 
So you'd rather not watch a movie about a liberal minded decent cop who refused to accept bribes and instead became a victim for that, being setup and shot by fellow cops?

Fine, but I understand you better now.



Source: Frank Serpico - Wikipedia


Whatever.

I hope that the crazy person with the gun, is identified and institutionalized.


Do you?
 
Whatever.

I hope that the crazy person with the gun, is identified and institutionalized.


Do you?
Sure, of course I do and I find the question flippant even insulting after what I've just told you about my own views.

Brandishing a gun is almost always a felony, even here in Arizona with it's liberal gun laws, the person should be punished according to the laws, even if staged and the gun was fake, that is a felony and nowhere have I said otherwise.

I'm a gun owner and safety conscious, that kind of behavior is absolutely to be condemned.
 
Sure, of course I do and I find the question flippant even insulting after what I've just told you about my own views.

Brandishing a gun is almost always a felony, even here in Arizona with it's liberal gun laws, the person should be punished according to the laws, even if staged and the gun was fake, that is a felony and nowhere have I said otherwise.

I'm not gong to lie about my negative view of liberals. They are well founded, based on years of dealing with you people.
 
Back
Top Bottom