Dems Will Pay you Not to Breed

[CrusaderFrank]

NYT Environment Reporter Floats Idea: Give Carbon Credits to Couples That Limit Themselves to One Child
Monday, October 19, 2009
By Edwin Mora

"Washington (CNSNews.com) – Andrew Revkin, who reports on environmental issues for The New York Times, floated an idea last week for combating global warming: Give carbon credits to couples that limit themselves to having one child.

Revkin later told CNSNews.com that he was not endorsing the idea, just trying to provoke some thinking on the topic."

CNSNews.com - NYT Environment Reporter Floats Idea: Give Carbon Credits to Couples That Limit Themselves to One Child

How very ChiComistic of you, Comrades!

Kids and Old People contribute to Global Warming, no wonder ObamaCare wants to eliminate them

 

[Oddball]

Ain't eugenics fun?

 

[rightwinger]

There are some people on this board that I would pay not to breed.....

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Ain't eugenics fun?

And good for the Environment too!

 

[DiamondDave]

There are some people on this board that I would pay not to breed.....

They don't need your $5 burger flipping money

 

[Mr Natural]

Good!

Last thing we need is more freakin' people.

 

[nodoginnafight]

any indication as to which political party this reporter represents??????? Or was this just one more figment of OP's imagination?

 

[Murf76]

Poor blighters can't even afford to move out of our basements... let alone breed.

Yay Socialism! Keeping families together.... FOREVER.

 

[jillian]

from CF's link:

"And obviously it's just a thought experiment, but it raises some interesting questions about all this.”

When CNSNews.com later followed up with questions about his comments, Revkin responded in an e-mail.

“I wasn't endorsing any of this, simply laying out the math and noting the reality that if one were serious about the population-climate intersection, it'd be hard to avoid asking hard questions about USA population growth,” wrote Revkin.

“By raising the notion of carbon credits for, say, single-child American families,” he continued, “I was aiming to provoke some thinking about where the brunt of emissions are still coming from on a per-capita basis

As if one NYT reporter is the dems... and like anyone ever heard of Andy Rivkin.

 

[jillian]

any indication as to which political party this reporter represents??????? Or was this just one more figment of OP's imagination?

bingo...

 

[AllieBaba]

Good!

Last thing we need is more freakin' people.

Good idea. Line up to have your balls cut off.

I'll do the honors, if you like.

 

[Mr Natural]

Good!

Last thing we need is more freakin' people.

Good idea. Line up to have your balls cut off.

I'll do the honors, if you like.

No thanks.

But it would be a tremendous honor for you to get anywhere near my balls.

 

[uptownlivin90]

Any indication that this guy is even a Democrat?

 

[nodoginnafight]

Any indication that this guy is even a Democrat?

apparently not - I asked a long time ago and ...... nothing

 

[manifold]

I'd be happy to opine about the op, once this gets moved to the flame zone where it belongs.

But I've already reported one thread today and that's my self-imposed quota.

Anyone else care to do the honors?

 

[RetiredGySgt]

I'd be happy to opine about the op, once this gets moved to the flame zone where it belongs.

But I've already reported one thread today and that's my self-imposed quota.

Anyone else care to do the honors?

Why would this get moved? Sounds political to me. As for the reporter all we need know is what paper he works for to know what political persuasion he is most likely to be.

 

[nodoginnafight]

what political persuasion he is most likely to be

ooohhhhh pa-leeeeze

 

[manifold]

I'd be happy to opine about the op, once this gets moved to the flame zone where it belongs.

But I've already reported one thread today and that's my self-imposed quota.

Anyone else care to do the honors?

Why would this get moved? Sounds political to me. As for the reporter all we need know is what paper he works for to know what political persuasion he is most likely to be.

The thread title and op are obvious intents to flame. Usually that is enough.

 

[nodoginnafight]

I'd be happy to opine about the op, once this gets moved to the flame zone where it belongs.

But I've already reported one thread today and that's my self-imposed quota.

Anyone else care to do the honors?

Why would this get moved? Sounds political to me. As for the reporter all we need know is what paper he works for to know what political persuasion he is most likely to be.

The thread title and op are obvious intents to flame. Usually that is enough.

Yes, very true. No political party was mentioned at all in the piece and OP trying to link a controversial proposal to a political party is childish and transparent.

 

[chanel]

I would definitely contribute to the sterilization fund of crack hos and child molesters. But I can't imagine them being to trade carbon credits for meth or kiddie porn though.