I'm sorry but this is absolutely incorrect. ICE vehicles suffer fires at rates dozens and dozens of times higher than EVs. ICE vehicles are FAR, FAR, FAR more likely to experience fires.
Thats only because EV's are
new and haven't been in existence since 1903.
EV's are more DEADLY when they burn, as the battery and all those toxic, deadly chemicals burn completely and leave a deadly resin on the ground, poisoning the ground and anything under it.
Gas engines burn until the fuel is cut off, drowned, or burned off. The the rest of the vehicle can be extinguished.
EV fires burn HOTTER
because of the batteries chemicals. The entire vehicle is burned to a toxic ash.
The fire spews deadly smoke and chemicals into the air.
Anybody breathing in the smoke from a gas engine fire can recover. Anybody breathing in the smoke of an EV fire will die.
Gas and oil are not as toxic and deadly as EV chemical fires. The environment can easily recover from the output and residues of gas and oil fires, usually 50-100 years. The environment takes three times longer or more, to recover from deadly, toxic EV residues in the environment.....more like a Chernobyl type destruction on a smaller scale.
And just as Chernobyl wasn't regarded as a deadly environmental threat until the "accident" happened...........nobody is taking into consideration the deadly toxicity of what burnt EV's leave behind..........until it's too late.
Hybrid vehicles are considered the worst, as they are a threat from both sides of the scale, and pretty much bombs on wheels.