Dems are now promising to go door to door rounding up “red hats” if they win again.

[struth]

Really…police refusing to serve and protect and you think that would get laughed out of court?

Yes. Govt has no duty to you. Called the public duty doctrine

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Yes. Govt has no duty to you. Called the public duty doctrine

.

Unfortunately.

.

 

[struth]

.

Unfortunately.

.

Actually, I think it’s great.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Actually, I think it’s great.

.

But most people haven't a glimmer of an inclination towards accepting responsibility for their own welfare. The left cultists, as soon as they're in trouble, holler for the law that they wanted defunded last week.

.

 

[ThisIsMe]

Yes. Govt has no duty to you. Called the public duty doctrine

actually they do. Our taxes pay them and they are duty bound to uphold the law.

Public duty doctine doesn’t mean they are totally immune from prosecution.

Litigation can still be brought against them.

Public duty doctrine would only protect them if their refusal wasn’t due to malice, or failure to their duty. If this was the case, no police officer could ever be sued, and we know that’s not the case

 

[my2¢]

What I found most confounding in that short video was her perception of "critical thinking skills."

 

[struth]

actually they do. Our taxes pay them and they are duty bound to uphold the law.

Public duty doctine doesn’t mean they are totally immune from prosecution.

Litigation can still be brought against them.

Public duty doctrine would only protect them if their refusal wasn’t due to malice, or failure to their duty. If this was the case, no police officer could ever be sued, and we know that’s not the case

No the owe a duty to the public

Not you.

They have no duty to act. You can come whinny about how your neighbor did this or that, and they can say…ok…and do nothing

 

[M14 Shooter]

Really…police refusing to serve and protect and you think that would get laughed out of court?

The police have no duty to protect you - thus, you cannot sue them if they don't.

 

[ThisIsMe]

No the owe a duty to the public

Not you.

They have no duty to act. You can come whinny about how your neighbor did this or that, and they can say…ok…and do nothing

Really, so what you’re telling me is, if one of these nosey entitled people show up on my doorstep, if I take my baseball bat and tap them on the head a few times, if the police decide to not investigate that…I’m in the clear??

Interesting…

 

[WorldWatcher]

Really, so what you’re telling me is, if one of these nosey entitled people show up on my doorstep, if I take my baseball bat and tap them on the head a few times, if the police decide to not investigate that…I’m in the clear??

Interesting…

If videoing an officer is justification for being shot.

I would suspect if you tapped them in the head with a baseball bat then 4-5 officers would take you to the ground, take the bat away from you and once you were disarmed pump 10 rounds in your back as you lay there face down.

Just say'n

WW

 

[M14 Shooter]

Really, so...

 

[struth]

Really, so what you’re telling me is, if one of these nosey entitled people show up on my doorstep, if I take my baseball bat and tap them on the head a few times, if the police decide to not investigate that…I’m in the clear??

Interesting…

Well, no they can sue you.

But yes, the police have no duty to that individual, you could walk. I wouldn't recommend doing it though.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Well, no they can sue you.

But yes, the police have no duty to that individual, you could walk. I wouldn't recommend doing it though.

.

I think what happened with the CHAZ murder was, the mother of the victim successfully sued the city of Seattle, but I agree that it would be hard to sue an individual LEO.

.

 

[Jarlaxle]

Really…police refusing to serve and protect and you think that would get laughed out of court?

Police have no obligation to protect you. Castle Rock vs Gonzales.

 

[tshrimp]

.

But most people haven't a glimmer of an inclination towards accepting responsibility for their own welfare. The left cultists, as soon as they're in trouble, holler for the law that they wanted defunded last week.

.

Even after they did a FAFO they will whine to the police. They have become so violent, I am thinking I should dye my hair purple and get a bull nose ring, so I don't have to worry about them.

 

[ThisIsMe]

If videoing an officer is justification for being shot.

I would suspect if you tapped them in the head with a baseball bat then 4-5 officers would take you to the ground, take the bat away from you and once you were disarmed pump 10 rounds in your back as you lay there face down.

Just say'n

WW

You must have not read the whole conversation because it has nothing to do what what you just said

 

[ThisIsMe]

Well, no they can sue you.

But yes, the police have no duty to that individual, you could walk. I wouldn't recommend doing it though.

Sue me for what? It’s their word against mine. “I have no idea officer, I’ve never seen this person before”

If what you’re telling me is true, I can get away with it if the police decide not to investigate.

 

[ThisIsMe]

Police have no obligation to protect you. Castle Rock vs Gonzales.

Interesting, so, they have no duty to uphold the law then…so why do we pay them?

 

[struth]

Sue me for what? It’s their word against mine. “I have no idea officer, I’ve never seen this person before”

If what you’re telling me is true, I can get away with it if the police decide not to investigate.

Sue you for assault

Yes the police don’t have to investigate and sure you can get away with a crime

But they can sue you for assault, and yes they have the burden of proof, but only need to be prove to jury by a preposterous of the evidence it was you that assault them

 

[ThisIsMe]

Sue you for assault

Yes the police don’t have to investigate and sure you can get away with a crime

But they can sue you for assault, and yes they have the burden of proof, but only need to be prove to jury by a preposterous of the evidence it was you that assault them

They can sue me for assault their word against mine. Who’s gonna investigate it?