when Democrats were gerrymandering there were no computerized algorithms and analysis of voters to precisely draw the lines....for ones guaranteed benefit at every point in the process R's have taken gerrymandering to an all new level...!!!
DEMONRATS STEAL ANOTHER RACE — Manufacture 43,000 Votes In Broward County — FLIP FL State AG...
- Thread starter The Purge
- Start date
skookerasbil
Platinum Member
Lol....Sage....how hysterical is it that these people stay up at night looking for the green death juice thinking about the popular vote!
CrusaderFrank
Diamond Member
- May 20, 2009
- 160,972
- 87,418
- 2,645
You won't get democrats to stop cheating and obey the law until 101st Airborne shows up. The more things change...
RoshawnMarkwees
Assimilationist
- Banned
- #24
For democrats, ethics and principles are only designed to use against those with ethics and principles.
JoeB131
Diamond Member
If we voted for the world leader... maybe...
The point is, you guys don't get to whine about the election when you keep using tricks to ignore the will of the American People.
frigidweirdo
Diamond Member
- Mar 7, 2014
- 55,129
- 15,278
- 2,180
You have to love Republicans talking about "stealing elections".
The party that hasn't managed to get a new president since 1989 by winninwinn the popular vote.
The party that has so much gerrymandering.
So, Republicans get 2.4 million votes and Democrats get 2.1 million votes and somehow South Carolina ends up 10-3 for seats in the House.
That's a difference of 53.22% to 46.4% for votes to 77% to 23% for actual seats.
I mean, it's cheating isn't it? That's one party gained 24% to the other losing 23% just because the Republican Party who control the state have decided that the will of the people isn't important.
Pennsylvania is 13-5 in favor of the Republicans with 53% to 45%.
That's 72% to 27% for seats. Or a gain of 19% for the Republicans.
West Virginia where you have 64% to 32% and it's 3-0 which is clearly an increase of 36% for the Republicans.
Or Kentucky where it's 5-1 with 70% to 30% which is 83% of seats to 16% or an increase of 13%
Or Louisiana where it's 5-1 but the people in Louisiana can't even manage to get their numbers that are easy to find, but let's just say it's gerrymandered and we know it shouldn't be 5-1.
Or Utah where it's 4-0 for 63% to 32%.
I could go on, it's all cheating, and they know it, and they know it's not illegal so they don't give a ****.
But cheating's cheating, isn't it?
you're talking about changing our form of government from a representative republic to an absolute democracy. It's a great idea in theory but trust me it will not work.....it never has and it simply cannot coexist with human nature.
Jo
Trust you because you can say "it won't work". The current system doesn't work. PR WORKS every single day in many, MANY countries.
So I'm calling bullshit on your weak "argument".
frigidweirdo
Diamond Member
- Mar 7, 2014
- 55,129
- 15,278
- 2,180
The Popular Vote Is for Populists OnlyYou have to love Republicans talking about "stealing elections".
The party that hasn't managed to get a new president since 1989 by winninwinn the popular vote.
The party that has so much gerrymandering.
So, Republicans get 2.4 million votes and Democrats get 2.1 million votes and somehow South Carolina ends up 10-3 for seats in the House.
That's a difference of 53.22% to 46.4% for votes to 77% to 23% for actual seats.
I mean, it's cheating isn't it? That's one party gained 24% to the other losing 23% just because the Republican Party who control the state have decided that the will of the people isn't important.
Pennsylvania is 13-5 in favor of the Republicans with 53% to 45%.
That's 72% to 27% for seats. Or a gain of 19% for the Republicans.
West Virginia where you have 64% to 32% and it's 3-0 which is clearly an increase of 36% for the Republicans.
Or Kentucky where it's 5-1 with 70% to 30% which is 83% of seats to 16% or an increase of 13%
Or Louisiana where it's 5-1 but the people in Louisiana can't even manage to get their numbers that are easy to find, but let's just say it's gerrymandered and we know it shouldn't be 5-1.
Or Utah where it's 4-0 for 63% to 32%.
I could go on, it's all cheating, and they know it, and they know it's not illegal so they don't give a ****.
But cheating's cheating, isn't it?
you're talking about changing our form of government from a representative republic to an absolute democracy. It's a great idea in theory but trust me
Jo
Sorry to interrupt your recitation of your Masters' self-serving ideology, but in a democracy feral minorities would not be allowed to vote. In your precious plutocratic republic, the majority's will is frustrated time and time again.
It was a "mob" that settled our frontier. It was a "mob" that created our industrial supremacy. It was a "mob" that died on the beaches of Normandy. Yet, since the Great Betrayal after World War II, a bipartisan Snob Mob took credit for all that and instituted absolute Birth-Class Supremacy.
Christ, get an attack in before you even start. "your Masters' self-serving ideology", but the current system is all about the rich being able to control the system. You tell me that changing this will do what already exists.
Then you use the term "mob", oh, **** me, since when has democracy been "mob"? I've heard other people use this term. The rich have literally paid people to tell you people that democracy is a "mob".
Maybe we should put George III back on the throne, he wasn't a "mob", you'd be happy then, right?
Disgrace.
skookerasbil
Platinum Member
Hey.....just heard they turned up some votes for Gore!
iceberg
Diamond Member
- May 15, 2017
- 36,788
- 14,929
- 1,600
well that's ok, neither can he.
You have to love Republicans talking about "stealing elections".
The party that hasn't managed to get a new president since 1989 by winninwinn the popular vote.
The party that has so much gerrymandering.
So, Republicans get 2.4 million votes and Democrats get 2.1 million votes and somehow South Carolina ends up 10-3 for seats in the House.
That's a difference of 53.22% to 46.4% for votes to 77% to 23% for actual seats.
I mean, it's cheating isn't it? That's one party gained 24% to the other losing 23% just because the Republican Party who control the state have decided that the will of the people isn't important.
Pennsylvania is 13-5 in favor of the Republicans with 53% to 45%.
That's 72% to 27% for seats. Or a gain of 19% for the Republicans.
West Virginia where you have 64% to 32% and it's 3-0 which is clearly an increase of 36% for the Republicans.
Or Kentucky where it's 5-1 with 70% to 30% which is 83% of seats to 16% or an increase of 13%
Or Louisiana where it's 5-1 but the people in Louisiana can't even manage to get their numbers that are easy to find, but let's just say it's gerrymandered and we know it shouldn't be 5-1.
Or Utah where it's 4-0 for 63% to 32%.
I could go on, it's all cheating, and they know it, and they know it's not illegal so they don't give a ****.
But cheating's cheating, isn't it?
you're talking about changing our form of government from a representative republic to an absolute democracy. It's a great idea in theory but trust me it will not work.....it never has and it simply cannot coexist with human nature.
Jo
iceberg
Diamond Member
- May 15, 2017
- 36,788
- 14,929
- 1,600
and they pay you to call everything racist and see things in the max-extreme value.The Popular Vote Is for Populists OnlyYou have to love Republicans talking about "stealing elections".
The party that hasn't managed to get a new president since 1989 by winninwinn the popular vote.
The party that has so much gerrymandering.
So, Republicans get 2.4 million votes and Democrats get 2.1 million votes and somehow South Carolina ends up 10-3 for seats in the House.
That's a difference of 53.22% to 46.4% for votes to 77% to 23% for actual seats.
I mean, it's cheating isn't it? That's one party gained 24% to the other losing 23% just because the Republican Party who control the state have decided that the will of the people isn't important.
Pennsylvania is 13-5 in favor of the Republicans with 53% to 45%.
That's 72% to 27% for seats. Or a gain of 19% for the Republicans.
West Virginia where you have 64% to 32% and it's 3-0 which is clearly an increase of 36% for the Republicans.
Or Kentucky where it's 5-1 with 70% to 30% which is 83% of seats to 16% or an increase of 13%
Or Louisiana where it's 5-1 but the people in Louisiana can't even manage to get their numbers that are easy to find, but let's just say it's gerrymandered and we know it shouldn't be 5-1.
Or Utah where it's 4-0 for 63% to 32%.
I could go on, it's all cheating, and they know it, and they know it's not illegal so they don't give a ****.
But cheating's cheating, isn't it?
you're talking about changing our form of government from a representative republic to an absolute democracy. It's a great idea in theory but trust me
Jo
Sorry to interrupt your recitation of your Masters' self-serving ideology, but in a democracy feral minorities would not be allowed to vote. In your precious plutocratic republic, the majority's will is frustrated time and time again.
It was a "mob" that settled our frontier. It was a "mob" that created our industrial supremacy. It was a "mob" that died on the beaches of Normandy. Yet, since the Great Betrayal after World War II, a bipartisan Snob Mob took credit for all that and instituted absolute Birth-Class Supremacy.
Christ, get an attack in before you even start. "your Masters' self-serving ideology", but the current system is all about the rich being able to control the system. You tell me that changing this will do what already exists.
Then you use the term "mob", oh, **** me, since when has democracy been "mob"? I've heard other people use this term. The rich have literally paid people to tell you people that democracy is a "mob".
Maybe we should put George III back on the throne, he wasn't a "mob", you'd be happy then, right?
Disgrace.
kinda like you're acting in this thread, huh?
justoffal
Diamond Member
- Jun 29, 2013
- 38,476
- 31,418
- 2,905
RoshawnMarkwees
Assimilationist
- Banned
- #32
The China analogy was an analogy.
Dan Stubbs
FORGET ---- HELL
- Banned
- #33
Strange but I use to transport the votes as a Deputy Sheriff and when did they change that transport mode.?
Dan Stubbs
FORGET ---- HELL
- Banned
- #34
How about Bite me, you high standard Troll.The Popular Vote Is for Populists OnlyYou have to love Republicans talking about "stealing elections".
The party that hasn't managed to get a new president since 1989 by winninwinn the popular vote.
The party that has so much gerrymandering.
So, Republicans get 2.4 million votes and Democrats get 2.1 million votes and somehow South Carolina ends up 10-3 for seats in the House.
That's a difference of 53.22% to 46.4% for votes to 77% to 23% for actual seats.
I mean, it's cheating isn't it? That's one party gained 24% to the other losing 23% just because the Republican Party who control the state have decided that the will of the people isn't important.
Pennsylvania is 13-5 in favor of the Republicans with 53% to 45%.
That's 72% to 27% for seats. Or a gain of 19% for the Republicans.
West Virginia where you have 64% to 32% and it's 3-0 which is clearly an increase of 36% for the Republicans.
Or Kentucky where it's 5-1 with 70% to 30% which is 83% of seats to 16% or an increase of 13%
Or Louisiana where it's 5-1 but the people in Louisiana can't even manage to get their numbers that are easy to find, but let's just say it's gerrymandered and we know it shouldn't be 5-1.
Or Utah where it's 4-0 for 63% to 32%.
I could go on, it's all cheating, and they know it, and they know it's not illegal so they don't give a ****.
But cheating's cheating, isn't it?
you're talking about changing our form of government from a representative republic to an absolute democracy. It's a great idea in theory but trust me
Jo
Sorry to interrupt your recitation of your Masters' self-serving ideology, but in a democracy feral minorities would not be allowed to vote. In your precious plutocratic republic, the majority's will is frustrated time and time again.
It was a "mob" that settled our frontier. It was a "mob" that created our industrial supremacy. It was a "mob" that died on the beaches of Normandy. Yet, since the Great Betrayal after World War II, a bipartisan Snob Mob took credit for all that and instituted absolute Birth-Class Supremacy.
007
Charter Member
They didn't steal jack yet. This is corruption on steroids and the entire damn nation knows it. They won't get away with it.
WheelieAddict
Gold Member
- Feb 10, 2012
- 7,853
- 1,140
- 265
Marion Morrison
Diamond Member
- Feb 10, 2017
- 59,298
- 16,870
- 2,190
- Banned
- #37
They have to get the results before they know how many votes to manufacture to win. The election results are all fucked up here. Leftist rag newspapers encouraged people to vote against their best interest. I still maintain it was rigged!
Just look at what the leftist rags recommended here, and what passed/failed here: Who the **** would vote against keeping more of their money? ******* nobody. That shit was rigged like a ************.
I've talked to 20-ish people, and they all voted the way I did, so where the **** did these results come from?
Wtf? People vaping doesn't bother me. I'm from the days when people used to smoke cigarettes while eating.
Florida amendments election results: What passed, what failed
Last edited:
Marion Morrison
Diamond Member
- Feb 10, 2017
- 59,298
- 16,870
- 2,190
- Banned
- #38
BULLDOG
Diamond Member
- Jun 3, 2014
- 105,192
- 38,780
- 2,250
In that case, the right has nothing to worry about.
Yousaidwhat
Diamond Member
Quit ******* whining.
You have to love Republicans talking about "stealing elections".
The party that hasn't managed to get a new president since 1989 by winning the popular vote.
The party that has so much gerrymandering.
So, Republicans get 2.4 million votes and Democrats get 2.1 million votes and somehow South Carolina ends up 10-3 for seats in the House.
That's a difference of 53.22% to 46.4% for votes to 77% to 23% for actual seats.
I mean, it's cheating isn't it? That's one party gained 24% to the other losing 23% just because the Republican Party who control the state have decided that the will of the people isn't important.
Pennsylvania is 13-5 in favor of the Republicans with 53% to 45%.
That's 72% to 27% for seats. Or a gain of 19% for the Republicans.
West Virginia where you have 64% to 32% and it's 3-0 which is clearly an increase of 36% for the Republicans.
Or Kentucky where it's 5-1 with 70% to 30% which is 83% of seats to 16% or an increase of 13%
Or Louisiana where it's 5-1 but the people in Louisiana can't even manage to get their numbers that are easy to find, but let's just say it's gerrymandered and we know it shouldn't be 5-1.
Or Utah where it's 4-0 for 63% to 32%.
I could go on, it's all cheating, and they know it, and they know it's not illegal so they don't give a ****.
But cheating's cheating, isn't it?
I'm not a Republican.
I'm in Maryland.
Gerrymandering before I was born.
******* hypocrite.
Similar threads
New Topics
-
-
-
I suspect not one American in 500 knows about the Massacre of 1622.- Started by excalibur
- Replies: 2
-
Saving the Iranian People from Their Oppressive Regime by Carpet Bombing Them- Started by munkle
- Replies: 2
