Democrats Vow Revenge for Clinton's Being Subpoenaed

[Lesh]

Trump stopped well before any of his legal issues, unlike Pedo Slick.

Trump kicked Epstein out of MAL years before his first arrest, meanwhile Slick was having him at the White House 17 times.

TRump isn't pictured with Epstein since years before his first arrest, unlike Pedo SLick and his hot tub pics with underage sex slaves.

Who’s legal issues?

Epstein?

Hardly

 

[jc456]

What did Trump do over the last ten years that would make you think he couldn’t have been involved?

The Access Hollywood tapes
His comments about women?

If you ask that question you know absolutely nothing about this Epstein discussion

 

[jc456]

These people did know him.
Did pal around with him

Including Trump

What does that mean?

 

[jc456]

Who’s legal issues?

Epstein?

Hardly

Again, it’s obvious you don’t have a clue on Epstein discussion

 

[struth]

These people did know him.
Did pal around with him

Including Trump

Yeah but trump stopped paling around in the 90s, and kicked him out of his club

Dems hung around him even after he was a sex offfender

Heck Obama’s White House counsel was his great defender

Members of Congress took real time direction from him in congressional hearings to try and get Trump before he arrested him

 

[Nostra]

Who’s legal issues?

Epstein?

Hardly

Do you have to be a complete idiot 24/7/365?

Don't answer.


Female employees soon started to notice that Epstein was being s——- aggressive and even indecently exposed himself in front of them. However, the house visits continued till 2003.

Meanwhile, an 18-year-old girl complained to the HR that Epstein was allegedly pressuring her into sleeping with him in his Florida mansion. This alarmed the HR team, and they reportedly sent out a fax to Trump detailing the questionable behavior of his friend.

Thus, Trump decided to ban Epstein from his club, which likely led to their fallout. Two years later, Epstein was accused of m——– a minor, which led to the unearthing of his crimes.

MSN

 

[struth]

Do you have to be a complete idiot 24/7/365?

Don't answer.


Female employees soon started to notice that Epstein was being s——- aggressive and even indecently exposed himself in front of them. However, the house visits continued till 2003.

Meanwhile, an 18-year-old girl complained to the HR that Epstein was allegedly pressuring her into sleeping with him in his Florida mansion. This alarmed the HR team, and they reportedly sent out a fax to Trump detailing the questionable behavior of his friend.

Thus, Trump decided to ban Epstein from his club, which likely led to their fallout. Two years later, Epstein was accused of m——– a minor, which led to the unearthing of his crimes.

MSN

Wait…isn’t that what Trump said happened?

Funny

 

[Lesh]

Do you have to be a complete idiot 24/7/365?

Don't answer.


Female employees soon started to notice that Epstein was being s——- aggressive and even indecently exposed himself in front of them. However, the house visits continued till 2003.

Meanwhile, an 18-year-old girl complained to the HR that Epstein was allegedly pressuring her into sleeping with him in his Florida mansion. This alarmed the HR team, and they reportedly sent out a fax to Trump detailing the questionable behavior of his friend.

Thus, Trump decided to ban Epstein from his club, which likely led to their fallout. Two years later, Epstein was accused of m——– a minor, which led to the unearthing of his crimes.

MSN

So after hanging out with the pedo creep for over a decade he was completely shocked to find out he was who he was?

When did Trump say “we share an affinity for women. He likes em on the young side”?

And he sent girls to Epstein’s HOUSE… to do what?

Oh … when HR got wind of it Trump had no choice but to distance himself

 

[ThisIsMe]

And the files are out there

They were friendly in the early 90s and knew one another…Trump kicked him out of mar largo

Why don’t you all want to know why he was so closely tied to the Dem party? Even after being a convicted sex offender?

I want to know it all, but if you are going to say trump shouldn’t testify, then you should also say Clinton shouldn’t testify

 

[ThisIsMe]

who cares? you're missing the point, he's already done it. Why can't they without whining?

Trump has never been forced to sit down and answer direct questions about the Epstein files.

I’m not interested in politics here, I think people deserve answers. If you think trump shouldn’t be questioned, then Clinton shouldn’t either.

 

[Nostra]

Wait…isn’t that what Trump said happened?

Funny

Been the story since then, Simp. It didn't just come up.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

"After Republicans push Clintons to testify on Epstein, Democrats warn they'll haul in Trump

Democrats say Republicans have set a precedent with subpoenas of an ex-president and first lady. "We will follow it ... Donald Trump, all of his kids. Everybody," Rep. Maxwell Frost said.


WASHINGTON — Facing the threat of being held in contempt of Congress, Bill and Hillary Clinton agreed Tuesday to testify before the House Oversight Committee about convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

NBC News Icon
Subscribe to read this story ad-free

Get unlimited access to ad-free articles and exclusive content.

arrow
Democrats now say Republicans have established a precedent when it comes to Congress’ ability to subpoena and haul in past presidents, first ladies and family members under threat of criminal charges if they refuse — a precedent they warn the GOP and Oversight Chairman James Comer, R-Ky., will soon regret.

"We are absolutely going to have Donald Trump testify under oath" when Democrats take back power, California Rep. Ted Lieu, a member of Democratic leadership who for years has been highlighting Donald Trump's ties to Epstein, told NBC News on Tuesday."

After Republicans push Clintons to testify on Epstein, Democrats warn they'll haul in Trump

Democrats say Republicans have set a precedent with subpoenas of an ex-president and first lady. "We will follow it ... Donald Trump, all of his kids. Everybody," Rep. Maxwell Frost said.

www.nbcnews.com

This from the political party that tried to imprison Trump multiple times. The same party that had Steve Bannon and Peter Navarro imprisoned for not
answering congressional subpoenas.

So now they really arent that interested in getting the people involved. Unless of course they are republican.

 

[DonGlock26]

So now they really arent that interested in getting the people involved. Unless of course they are republican.

The Dems don't seem to be nearly as excited about the Epstein files, since they saw the Bill Clinton in Jeffreys' hot tub photos.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

Trump has never been forced to sit down and answer direct questions about the Epstein files.

I’m not interested in politics here, I think people deserve answers. If you think trump shouldn’t be questioned, then Clinton shouldn’t either.

Would you like to question him about his whereabouts during the Kennedy and Lincoln assasination’s as well?

Clinton has tons of evidence for his involvement, Trump has none, other than left wing wishful thinking.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

The Dems don't seem to be nearly as excited about the Epstein files, since they saw the Bill Clinton in Jeffreys' hot tub photos.


View attachment 1215433

They sure don’t want him testifying about anything. But they do want to front line Trump over nothing.

 

[ThisIsMe]

Would you like to question him about his whereabouts during the Kennedy and Lincoln assasination’s as well?

Clinton has tons of evidence for his involvement, Trump has none, other than left wing wishful thinking.

I don’t know what to tell you I just think that what’s good for the goose is good for the gander in this case. Considering that there are many high profile people who are all wrapped up in this Epstein thing it wouldn’t be right to question some, but not others.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

I don’t know what to tell you I just think that what’s good for the goose is good for the gander in this case. Considering that there are many high profile people who are all wrapped up in this Epstein thing it wouldn’t be right to question some, but not others.

That’s just ******* stupid. You focus on those involved. Not some imaginary line of if you’re high profile. WTF does that even mean. Everyone in Hollywood needs to come be questioned because they’re high profile?

 

[ThisIsMe]

That’s just ******* stupid. You focus on those involved. Not some imaginary line of if you’re high profile. WTF does that even mean. Everyone in Hollywood needs to come be questioned because they’re high profile?

Anyone who was involved with having relationships with children, or anybody who was involved with facilitating it, or anybody who knew about it, but covered it up, should be questioned. I only say there are many high profile people because in our current political climate that’s the only thing that people are really interested in you. You’ve got the right who are trying to burn the Clintons and you’ve got the lift who are trying to burn Trump.

This is not to excuse anybody else who might be culpable. But in this current context, that’s what I mean.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

Anyone who was involved with having relationships with children, or anybody who was involved with facilitating it, or anybody who knew about it, but covered it up, should be questioned. I only say there are many high profile people because in our current political climate that’s the only thing that people are really interested in you. You’ve got the right who are trying to burn the Clintons and you’ve got the lift who are trying to burn Trump.

This is not to excuse anybody else who might be culpable. But in this current context, that’s what I mean.

The democrats aren’t going to focus on those people they’re all in their party or their donors. The Trump shit is nothing but retarded left wing bullshit.

 

[ThisIsMe]

The democrats aren’t going to focus on those people they’re all in their party or their donors. The Trump shit is nothing but retarded left wing bullshit.

Very likely. However, because Trump is indeed implicated in these files just like Clinton is, if Clinton has to sit in a hot seat, then Trump should as well.

I fully expect that Democrats will try to pull some shenanigans. However, I still believe that anybody who is implicated in those files should face questioning.