Democrats vote for infanticide

[Votto]

Senate Democrats block bill requiring medical care for babies who survive being aborted

Senate Democrats voted Tuesday to block legislation that would have required medical care be provided to babies who survive being aborted, stopping the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act.
Ditch the fake news ==> Click here to get news you can trust sent right to your inbox. It's free!
What are the details?

Republican Sen. Ben Sasse of Nebraska sponsored the bill, which needed the support of 60 senators in order to advance. Ahead of the vote, Sasse took to the Senate floor to lambaste Democrats attempting to paint his legislation as an abortion bill.

"The piece of legislation we're voting on today, the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, is not about abortion," Sasse said, according to N ational Review. "The bill we're voting on doesn't change anyone's access to abortion. It doesn't have anything to do with Roe v Wade. It is about babies that are already born."

Sasse pointed to CNN's coverage of the measure, where the outlet described his bill as requiring "abortion providers to work to 'preserve the life and health' of a fetus that was born following an attempted abortion as they would for a newborn baby."


Breck Dumas




Senate Democrats voted Tuesday to block legislation that would have required medical care be provided to babies who survive being aborted, stopping the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act.

Ditch the fake news ==> Click here to get news you can trust sent right to your inbox. It's free!
What are the details?
Republican Sen. Ben Sasse of Nebraska sponsored the bill, which needed the support of 60 senators in order to advance. Ahead of the vote, Sasse took to the Senate floor to lambaste Democrats attempting to paint his legislation as an abortion bill.

"The piece of legislation we're voting on today, the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, is not about abortion," Sasse said, according to N ational Review. "The bill we're voting on doesn't change anyone's access to abortion. It doesn't have anything to do with Roe v Wade. It is about babies that are already born."

Sasse pointed to CNN's coverage of the measure, where the outlet described his bill as requiring "abortion providers to work to 'preserve the life and health' of a fetus that was born following an attempted abortion as they would for a newborn baby."

The Nebraska Republican added, "There is nothing in the bill that's about abortion. Nothing. It's about infanticide. That's the actual legislation."


In the end, the final tally was 56-41, with every vote against coming from Democrats. Fox News noted that the only three senators who crossed party lines on the legislation were Democratic Sens. Joe Manchin (W.Va.), Doug Jones (Ala.), and Bob Casey (Pa.).

Following the bill's failure, the Daily Wire's Matt Walsh tweeted, "Democrats have blocked a bill to guarantee medical treatment for babies born alive after abortion. There is no 'clump of cells' dodge here. These hideous monsters believe that actual infants, outside of the womb, should be left to die. These people are evil to their core."


Anything else?
Democrats also filibustered a separate bill on Tuesday, the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act, which would ban abortion at 20 weeks. That measure also required 60 votes, and failed 53-44 with Republican Sens. Susan Collins (Maine) and Lisa Murkowski (Alaska) voting against it.

Senate Democrats attempted to lump the two bills together as both being "anti-choice." Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) wrote of the measures, "The Senate is voting on 2 Republican anti-choice bills today. They are yet another effort to attack & limit a woman's right to health care."

 

[BlindBoo]

We already have a federal law that protects infants born alive regardless of whether or not it was a botched abortion or not.

SECTION 1. <<NOTE: 1 USC 1 note.>> SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ``Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of
2002''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF BORN-ALIVE INFANT.

(a) In General.--Chapter 1 of title 1, United States Code, is
amended by adding at the end the following:

``Sec. 8. `Person', `human being', `child', and `individual' as
including born-alive infant

``(a) In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, or of any
ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the various administrative
bureaus and agencies of the United States, the words `person', `human
being', `child', and `individual', shall include every infant member of
the species homo sapiens who is born alive at any stage of development.
``(b) As used in this section, the term `born alive', with respect
to a member of the species homo sapiens, means the complete expulsion or
extraction from his or her mother of that member, at any stage of
development, who after such expulsion or extraction breathes or has a
beating heart, pulsation of the umbilical cord, or definite movement of
voluntary muscles, regardless of whether the umbilical cord has been
cut, and regardless of whether the expulsion or extraction occurs as a
result of natural or induced labor, cesarean section, or induced
abortion.
``(c) Nothing in this section shall be construed to affirm, deny,
expand, or contract any legal status or legal right applicable to any
member of the species homo sapiens at any point prior to being `born
alive' as defined in this section.''.
(b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of
chapter 1 of title 1, United States Code, is amended by adding at the
end the following new item:

``8. `Person', `human being', `child', and `individual' as including
born-alive infant.''.

Approved August 5, 2002.

 

[tyroneweaver]

Senate Democrats block bill requiring medical care for babies who survive being aborted

Senate Democrats voted Tuesday to block legislation that would have required medical care be provided to babies who survive being aborted, stopping the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act.
Ditch the fake news ==> Click here to get news you can trust sent right to your inbox. It's free!
What are the details?

Republican Sen. Ben Sasse of Nebraska sponsored the bill, which needed the support of 60 senators in order to advance. Ahead of the vote, Sasse took to the Senate floor to lambaste Democrats attempting to paint his legislation as an abortion bill.

"The piece of legislation we're voting on today, the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, is not about abortion," Sasse said, according to N ational Review. "The bill we're voting on doesn't change anyone's access to abortion. It doesn't have anything to do with Roe v Wade. It is about babies that are already born."

Sasse pointed to CNN's coverage of the measure, where the outlet described his bill as requiring "abortion providers to work to 'preserve the life and health' of a fetus that was born following an attempted abortion as they would for a newborn baby."


Breck Dumas




Senate Democrats voted Tuesday to block legislation that would have required medical care be provided to babies who survive being aborted, stopping the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act.

Ditch the fake news ==> Click here to get news you can trust sent right to your inbox. It's free!
What are the details?
Republican Sen. Ben Sasse of Nebraska sponsored the bill, which needed the support of 60 senators in order to advance. Ahead of the vote, Sasse took to the Senate floor to lambaste Democrats attempting to paint his legislation as an abortion bill.

"The piece of legislation we're voting on today, the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, is not about abortion," Sasse said, according to N ational Review. "The bill we're voting on doesn't change anyone's access to abortion. It doesn't have anything to do with Roe v Wade. It is about babies that are already born."

Sasse pointed to CNN's coverage of the measure, where the outlet described his bill as requiring "abortion providers to work to 'preserve the life and health' of a fetus that was born following an attempted abortion as they would for a newborn baby."

The Nebraska Republican added, "There is nothing in the bill that's about abortion. Nothing. It's about infanticide. That's the actual legislation."


In the end, the final tally was 56-41, with every vote against coming from Democrats. Fox News noted that the only three senators who crossed party lines on the legislation were Democratic Sens. Joe Manchin (W.Va.), Doug Jones (Ala.), and Bob Casey (Pa.).

Following the bill's failure, the Daily Wire's Matt Walsh tweeted, "Democrats have blocked a bill to guarantee medical treatment for babies born alive after abortion. There is no 'clump of cells' dodge here. These hideous monsters believe that actual infants, outside of the womb, should be left to die. These people are evil to their core."


Anything else?
Democrats also filibustered a separate bill on Tuesday, the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act, which would ban abortion at 20 weeks. That measure also required 60 votes, and failed 53-44 with Republican Sens. Susan Collins (Maine) and Lisa Murkowski (Alaska) voting against it.

Senate Democrats attempted to lump the two bills together as both being "anti-choice." Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) wrote of the measures, "The Senate is voting on 2 Republican anti-choice bills today. They are yet another effort to attack & limit a woman's right to health care."

Dems aren't to up on science and biology. They deny both
Ya know a sonogram or if it has testicles it's a boy or a vagina it's a girl

 

[night_son]

Senate Democrats block bill requiring medical care for babies who survive being aborted

Senate Democrats voted Tuesday to block legislation that would have required medical care be provided to babies who survive being aborted, stopping the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act.
Ditch the fake news ==> Click here to get news you can trust sent right to your inbox. It's free!
What are the details?

Republican Sen. Ben Sasse of Nebraska sponsored the bill, which needed the support of 60 senators in order to advance. Ahead of the vote, Sasse took to the Senate floor to lambaste Democrats attempting to paint his legislation as an abortion bill.

"The piece of legislation we're voting on today, the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, is not about abortion," Sasse said, according to N ational Review. "The bill we're voting on doesn't change anyone's access to abortion. It doesn't have anything to do with Roe v Wade. It is about babies that are already born."

Sasse pointed to CNN's coverage of the measure, where the outlet described his bill as requiring "abortion providers to work to 'preserve the life and health' of a fetus that was born following an attempted abortion as they would for a newborn baby."


Breck Dumas




Senate Democrats voted Tuesday to block legislation that would have required medical care be provided to babies who survive being aborted, stopping the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act.

Ditch the fake news ==> Click here to get news you can trust sent right to your inbox. It's free!
What are the details?
Republican Sen. Ben Sasse of Nebraska sponsored the bill, which needed the support of 60 senators in order to advance. Ahead of the vote, Sasse took to the Senate floor to lambaste Democrats attempting to paint his legislation as an abortion bill.

"The piece of legislation we're voting on today, the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, is not about abortion," Sasse said, according to N ational Review. "The bill we're voting on doesn't change anyone's access to abortion. It doesn't have anything to do with Roe v Wade. It is about babies that are already born."

Sasse pointed to CNN's coverage of the measure, where the outlet described his bill as requiring "abortion providers to work to 'preserve the life and health' of a fetus that was born following an attempted abortion as they would for a newborn baby."

The Nebraska Republican added, "There is nothing in the bill that's about abortion. Nothing. It's about infanticide. That's the actual legislation."


In the end, the final tally was 56-41, with every vote against coming from Democrats. Fox News noted that the only three senators who crossed party lines on the legislation were Democratic Sens. Joe Manchin (W.Va.), Doug Jones (Ala.), and Bob Casey (Pa.).

Following the bill's failure, the Daily Wire's Matt Walsh tweeted, "Democrats have blocked a bill to guarantee medical treatment for babies born alive after abortion. There is no 'clump of cells' dodge here. These hideous monsters believe that actual infants, outside of the womb, should be left to die. These people are evil to their core."


Anything else?
Democrats also filibustered a separate bill on Tuesday, the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act, which would ban abortion at 20 weeks. That measure also required 60 votes, and failed 53-44 with Republican Sens. Susan Collins (Maine) and Lisa Murkowski (Alaska) voting against it.

Senate Democrats attempted to lump the two bills together as both being "anti-choice." Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) wrote of the measures, "The Senate is voting on 2 Republican anti-choice bills today. They are yet another effort to attack & limit a woman's right to health care."

It's quite elementary, my dear Watson. The modern democratic party IS the party of modern barbarism, paganism, satanism. Strong words, sure. But truer words . . . never. They (the democrats) ought to just own it. They're fucking Evil and they sort of are owning it with legislation like this.

 

[BlindBoo]

Senate Democrats block bill requiring medical care for babies who survive being aborted

Senate Democrats voted Tuesday to block legislation that would have required medical care be provided to babies who survive being aborted, stopping the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act.
Ditch the fake news ==> Click here to get news you can trust sent right to your inbox. It's free!
What are the details?

Republican Sen. Ben Sasse of Nebraska sponsored the bill, which needed the support of 60 senators in order to advance. Ahead of the vote, Sasse took to the Senate floor to lambaste Democrats attempting to paint his legislation as an abortion bill.

"The piece of legislation we're voting on today, the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, is not about abortion," Sasse said, according to N ational Review. "The bill we're voting on doesn't change anyone's access to abortion. It doesn't have anything to do with Roe v Wade. It is about babies that are already born."

Sasse pointed to CNN's coverage of the measure, where the outlet described his bill as requiring "abortion providers to work to 'preserve the life and health' of a fetus that was born following an attempted abortion as they would for a newborn baby."


Breck Dumas




Senate Democrats voted Tuesday to block legislation that would have required medical care be provided to babies who survive being aborted, stopping the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act.

Ditch the fake news ==> Click here to get news you can trust sent right to your inbox. It's free!
What are the details?
Republican Sen. Ben Sasse of Nebraska sponsored the bill, which needed the support of 60 senators in order to advance. Ahead of the vote, Sasse took to the Senate floor to lambaste Democrats attempting to paint his legislation as an abortion bill.

"The piece of legislation we're voting on today, the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, is not about abortion," Sasse said, according to N ational Review. "The bill we're voting on doesn't change anyone's access to abortion. It doesn't have anything to do with Roe v Wade. It is about babies that are already born."

Sasse pointed to CNN's coverage of the measure, where the outlet described his bill as requiring "abortion providers to work to 'preserve the life and health' of a fetus that was born following an attempted abortion as they would for a newborn baby."

The Nebraska Republican added, "There is nothing in the bill that's about abortion. Nothing. It's about infanticide. That's the actual legislation."


In the end, the final tally was 56-41, with every vote against coming from Democrats. Fox News noted that the only three senators who crossed party lines on the legislation were Democratic Sens. Joe Manchin (W.Va.), Doug Jones (Ala.), and Bob Casey (Pa.).

Following the bill's failure, the Daily Wire's Matt Walsh tweeted, "Democrats have blocked a bill to guarantee medical treatment for babies born alive after abortion. There is no 'clump of cells' dodge here. These hideous monsters believe that actual infants, outside of the womb, should be left to die. These people are evil to their core."


Anything else?
Democrats also filibustered a separate bill on Tuesday, the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act, which would ban abortion at 20 weeks. That measure also required 60 votes, and failed 53-44 with Republican Sens. Susan Collins (Maine) and Lisa Murkowski (Alaska) voting against it.

Senate Democrats attempted to lump the two bills together as both being "anti-choice." Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) wrote of the measures, "The Senate is voting on 2 Republican anti-choice bills today. They are yet another effort to attack & limit a woman's right to health care."

It's quite elementary, my dear Watson. The modern democratic party IS the party of modern barbarism, paganism, satanism. Strong words, sure. But truer words . . . never. They (the democrats) ought to just own it. They're fucking Evil and they sort of are owning it with legislation like this.

The Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002 was passed Congress by unanimous consent.

Who is the Father of all Lies?

Trumpybear and his Banana Republicans are the Dark Lords Disciples.

Muh-HaHa!

 

[Chuz Life]

Senate Democrats block bill requiring medical care for babies who survive being aborted

Senate Democrats voted Tuesday to block legislation that would have required medical care be provided to babies who survive being aborted, stopping the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act.
Ditch the fake news ==> Click here to get news you can trust sent right to your inbox. It's free!
What are the details?

Republican Sen. Ben Sasse of Nebraska sponsored the bill, which needed the support of 60 senators in order to advance. Ahead of the vote, Sasse took to the Senate floor to lambaste Democrats attempting to paint his legislation as an abortion bill.

"The piece of legislation we're voting on today, the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, is not about abortion," Sasse said, according to N ational Review. "The bill we're voting on doesn't change anyone's access to abortion. It doesn't have anything to do with Roe v Wade. It is about babies that are already born."

Sasse pointed to CNN's coverage of the measure, where the outlet described his bill as requiring "abortion providers to work to 'preserve the life and health' of a fetus that was born following an attempted abortion as they would for a newborn baby."


Breck Dumas




Senate Democrats voted Tuesday to block legislation that would have required medical care be provided to babies who survive being aborted, stopping the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act.

Ditch the fake news ==> Click here to get news you can trust sent right to your inbox. It's free!
What are the details?
Republican Sen. Ben Sasse of Nebraska sponsored the bill, which needed the support of 60 senators in order to advance. Ahead of the vote, Sasse took to the Senate floor to lambaste Democrats attempting to paint his legislation as an abortion bill.

"The piece of legislation we're voting on today, the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, is not about abortion," Sasse said, according to N ational Review. "The bill we're voting on doesn't change anyone's access to abortion. It doesn't have anything to do with Roe v Wade. It is about babies that are already born."

Sasse pointed to CNN's coverage of the measure, where the outlet described his bill as requiring "abortion providers to work to 'preserve the life and health' of a fetus that was born following an attempted abortion as they would for a newborn baby."

The Nebraska Republican added, "There is nothing in the bill that's about abortion. Nothing. It's about infanticide. That's the actual legislation."


In the end, the final tally was 56-41, with every vote against coming from Democrats. Fox News noted that the only three senators who crossed party lines on the legislation were Democratic Sens. Joe Manchin (W.Va.), Doug Jones (Ala.), and Bob Casey (Pa.).

Following the bill's failure, the Daily Wire's Matt Walsh tweeted, "Democrats have blocked a bill to guarantee medical treatment for babies born alive after abortion. There is no 'clump of cells' dodge here. These hideous monsters believe that actual infants, outside of the womb, should be left to die. These people are evil to their core."


Anything else?
Democrats also filibustered a separate bill on Tuesday, the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act, which would ban abortion at 20 weeks. That measure also required 60 votes, and failed 53-44 with Republican Sens. Susan Collins (Maine) and Lisa Murkowski (Alaska) voting against it.

Senate Democrats attempted to lump the two bills together as both being "anti-choice." Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) wrote of the measures, "The Senate is voting on 2 Republican anti-choice bills today. They are yet another effort to attack & limit a woman's right to health care."

It's quite elementary, my dear Watson. The modern democratic party IS the party of modern barbarism, paganism, satanism. Strong words, sure. But truer words . . . never. They (the democrats) ought to just own it. They're fucking Evil and they sort of are owning it with legislation like this.

The Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002 was passed Congress by unanimous consent.

Who is the Father of all Lies?

Trumpybear and his Banana Republicans are the Dark Lords Disciples.

Muh-HaHa!

Ummmm

No.

H.R. 3504: Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act -- House Vote #506 -- Sep 18, 2015

 

[Cecilie1200]

We already have a federal law that protects infants born alive regardless of whether or not it was a botched abortion or not.

SECTION 1. <<NOTE: 1 USC 1 note.>> SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ``Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of
2002''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF BORN-ALIVE INFANT.

(a) In General.--Chapter 1 of title 1, United States Code, is
amended by adding at the end the following:

``Sec. 8. `Person', `human being', `child', and `individual' as
including born-alive infant

``(a) In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, or of any
ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the various administrative
bureaus and agencies of the United States, the words `person', `human
being', `child', and `individual', shall include every infant member of
the species homo sapiens who is born alive at any stage of development.
``(b) As used in this section, the term `born alive', with respect
to a member of the species homo sapiens, means the complete expulsion or
extraction from his or her mother of that member, at any stage of
development, who after such expulsion or extraction breathes or has a
beating heart, pulsation of the umbilical cord, or definite movement of
voluntary muscles, regardless of whether the umbilical cord has been
cut, and regardless of whether the expulsion or extraction occurs as a
result of natural or induced labor, cesarean section, or induced
abortion.
``(c) Nothing in this section shall be construed to affirm, deny,
expand, or contract any legal status or legal right applicable to any
member of the species homo sapiens at any point prior to being `born
alive' as defined in this section.''.
(b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of
chapter 1 of title 1, United States Code, is amended by adding at the
end the following new item:

``8. `Person', `human being', `child', and `individual' as including
born-alive infant.''.

Approved August 5, 2002.

Except that that law does nothing to prevent "medical care providers" from simply leaving the unwanted baby to die, unattended, and doesn't provide for enforcement. Hence the need for this law.

So this argument in favor of dead babies is as specious as all the others.

 

[Cecilie1200]

Senate Democrats block bill requiring medical care for babies who survive being aborted

Senate Democrats voted Tuesday to block legislation that would have required medical care be provided to babies who survive being aborted, stopping the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act.
Ditch the fake news ==> Click here to get news you can trust sent right to your inbox. It's free!
What are the details?

Republican Sen. Ben Sasse of Nebraska sponsored the bill, which needed the support of 60 senators in order to advance. Ahead of the vote, Sasse took to the Senate floor to lambaste Democrats attempting to paint his legislation as an abortion bill.

"The piece of legislation we're voting on today, the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, is not about abortion," Sasse said, according to N ational Review. "The bill we're voting on doesn't change anyone's access to abortion. It doesn't have anything to do with Roe v Wade. It is about babies that are already born."

Sasse pointed to CNN's coverage of the measure, where the outlet described his bill as requiring "abortion providers to work to 'preserve the life and health' of a fetus that was born following an attempted abortion as they would for a newborn baby."


Breck Dumas




Senate Democrats voted Tuesday to block legislation that would have required medical care be provided to babies who survive being aborted, stopping the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act.

Ditch the fake news ==> Click here to get news you can trust sent right to your inbox. It's free!
What are the details?
Republican Sen. Ben Sasse of Nebraska sponsored the bill, which needed the support of 60 senators in order to advance. Ahead of the vote, Sasse took to the Senate floor to lambaste Democrats attempting to paint his legislation as an abortion bill.

"The piece of legislation we're voting on today, the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, is not about abortion," Sasse said, according to N ational Review. "The bill we're voting on doesn't change anyone's access to abortion. It doesn't have anything to do with Roe v Wade. It is about babies that are already born."

Sasse pointed to CNN's coverage of the measure, where the outlet described his bill as requiring "abortion providers to work to 'preserve the life and health' of a fetus that was born following an attempted abortion as they would for a newborn baby."

The Nebraska Republican added, "There is nothing in the bill that's about abortion. Nothing. It's about infanticide. That's the actual legislation."


In the end, the final tally was 56-41, with every vote against coming from Democrats. Fox News noted that the only three senators who crossed party lines on the legislation were Democratic Sens. Joe Manchin (W.Va.), Doug Jones (Ala.), and Bob Casey (Pa.).

Following the bill's failure, the Daily Wire's Matt Walsh tweeted, "Democrats have blocked a bill to guarantee medical treatment for babies born alive after abortion. There is no 'clump of cells' dodge here. These hideous monsters believe that actual infants, outside of the womb, should be left to die. These people are evil to their core."


Anything else?
Democrats also filibustered a separate bill on Tuesday, the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act, which would ban abortion at 20 weeks. That measure also required 60 votes, and failed 53-44 with Republican Sens. Susan Collins (Maine) and Lisa Murkowski (Alaska) voting against it.

Senate Democrats attempted to lump the two bills together as both being "anti-choice." Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) wrote of the measures, "The Senate is voting on 2 Republican anti-choice bills today. They are yet another effort to attack & limit a woman's right to health care."

It's quite elementary, my dear Watson. The modern democratic party IS the party of modern barbarism, paganism, satanism. Strong words, sure. But truer words . . . never. They (the democrats) ought to just own it. They're fucking Evil and they sort of are owning it with legislation like this.

The Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002 was passed Congress by unanimous consent.

Who is the Father of all Lies?

Trumpybear and his Banana Republicans are the Dark Lords Disciples.

Muh-HaHa!

Says the guy who's lying through his teeth.

 

[BlindBoo]

We already have a federal law that protects infants born alive regardless of whether or not it was a botched abortion or not.

SECTION 1. <<NOTE: 1 USC 1 note.>> SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ``Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of
2002''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF BORN-ALIVE INFANT.

(a) In General.--Chapter 1 of title 1, United States Code, is
amended by adding at the end the following:

``Sec. 8. `Person', `human being', `child', and `individual' as
including born-alive infant

``(a) In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, or of any
ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the various administrative
bureaus and agencies of the United States, the words `person', `human
being', `child', and `individual', shall include every infant member of
the species homo sapiens who is born alive at any stage of development.
``(b) As used in this section, the term `born alive', with respect
to a member of the species homo sapiens, means the complete expulsion or
extraction from his or her mother of that member, at any stage of
development, who after such expulsion or extraction breathes or has a
beating heart, pulsation of the umbilical cord, or definite movement of
voluntary muscles, regardless of whether the umbilical cord has been
cut, and regardless of whether the expulsion or extraction occurs as a
result of natural or induced labor, cesarean section, or induced
abortion.
``(c) Nothing in this section shall be construed to affirm, deny,
expand, or contract any legal status or legal right applicable to any
member of the species homo sapiens at any point prior to being `born
alive' as defined in this section.''.
(b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of
chapter 1 of title 1, United States Code, is amended by adding at the
end the following new item:

``8. `Person', `human being', `child', and `individual' as including
born-alive infant.''.

Approved August 5, 2002.

Except that that law does nothing to prevent "medical care providers" from simply leaving the unwanted baby to die, unattended, and doesn't provide for enforcement. Hence the need for this law.

So this argument in favor of dead babies is as specious as all the others.

This was the law that was passed in reaction to that nurse finding that infant being left to die alone in a closet. It most certainly requires for ordinary care for every live birth including a botched abortion. The punishment would be the same as if they kill an infant born in any way describe by the law.

Ordinary vs. Extraordinary Care - American Life League

 

[pknopp]

I'm Pro-Life. This is already the law so I don't see the point.

 

[BlindBoo]

Senate Democrats block bill requiring medical care for babies who survive being aborted

Senate Democrats voted Tuesday to block legislation that would have required medical care be provided to babies who survive being aborted, stopping the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act.
Ditch the fake news ==> Click here to get news you can trust sent right to your inbox. It's free!
What are the details?

Republican Sen. Ben Sasse of Nebraska sponsored the bill, which needed the support of 60 senators in order to advance. Ahead of the vote, Sasse took to the Senate floor to lambaste Democrats attempting to paint his legislation as an abortion bill.

"The piece of legislation we're voting on today, the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, is not about abortion," Sasse said, according to N ational Review. "The bill we're voting on doesn't change anyone's access to abortion. It doesn't have anything to do with Roe v Wade. It is about babies that are already born."

Sasse pointed to CNN's coverage of the measure, where the outlet described his bill as requiring "abortion providers to work to 'preserve the life and health' of a fetus that was born following an attempted abortion as they would for a newborn baby."


Breck Dumas




Senate Democrats voted Tuesday to block legislation that would have required medical care be provided to babies who survive being aborted, stopping the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act.

Ditch the fake news ==> Click here to get news you can trust sent right to your inbox. It's free!
What are the details?
Republican Sen. Ben Sasse of Nebraska sponsored the bill, which needed the support of 60 senators in order to advance. Ahead of the vote, Sasse took to the Senate floor to lambaste Democrats attempting to paint his legislation as an abortion bill.

"The piece of legislation we're voting on today, the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, is not about abortion," Sasse said, according to N ational Review. "The bill we're voting on doesn't change anyone's access to abortion. It doesn't have anything to do with Roe v Wade. It is about babies that are already born."

Sasse pointed to CNN's coverage of the measure, where the outlet described his bill as requiring "abortion providers to work to 'preserve the life and health' of a fetus that was born following an attempted abortion as they would for a newborn baby."

The Nebraska Republican added, "There is nothing in the bill that's about abortion. Nothing. It's about infanticide. That's the actual legislation."


In the end, the final tally was 56-41, with every vote against coming from Democrats. Fox News noted that the only three senators who crossed party lines on the legislation were Democratic Sens. Joe Manchin (W.Va.), Doug Jones (Ala.), and Bob Casey (Pa.).

Following the bill's failure, the Daily Wire's Matt Walsh tweeted, "Democrats have blocked a bill to guarantee medical treatment for babies born alive after abortion. There is no 'clump of cells' dodge here. These hideous monsters believe that actual infants, outside of the womb, should be left to die. These people are evil to their core."


Anything else?
Democrats also filibustered a separate bill on Tuesday, the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act, which would ban abortion at 20 weeks. That measure also required 60 votes, and failed 53-44 with Republican Sens. Susan Collins (Maine) and Lisa Murkowski (Alaska) voting against it.

Senate Democrats attempted to lump the two bills together as both being "anti-choice." Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) wrote of the measures, "The Senate is voting on 2 Republican anti-choice bills today. They are yet another effort to attack & limit a woman's right to health care."

It's quite elementary, my dear Watson. The modern democratic party IS the party of modern barbarism, paganism, satanism. Strong words, sure. But truer words . . . never. They (the democrats) ought to just own it. They're fucking Evil and they sort of are owning it with legislation like this.

The Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002 was passed Congress by unanimous consent.

Who is the Father of all Lies?

Trumpybear and his Banana Republicans are the Dark Lords Disciples.

Muh-HaHa!

Says the guy who's lying through his teeth.

You just lied about the 2002 law. Here's a snipet from what they were reacting to.

"Nurse Jill Stanek, formerly employed by Christ Hospital in a Chicago suburb, testified to Congress about that hospital's practice of "live-birth abortion." Instead of performing a grisly, mid-trimester abortion, doctors at Christ Hospital simply induced labor, delivered premature infants, and allowed them to die from respiratory distress due to immature lungs. Inductions were scheduled in the weeks just prior to expected "viability"so that children could not survive very long without medical attention. These newborns were simply abandoned to die in a back room or, in one case, accidentally dumped in a hamper with soiled linens. Nurse Stanek was reprimanded for comforting one little victim until he died in her arms 45 minutes later."

 

[Cecilie1200]

We already have a federal law that protects infants born alive regardless of whether or not it was a botched abortion or not.

SECTION 1. <<NOTE: 1 USC 1 note.>> SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ``Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of
2002''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF BORN-ALIVE INFANT.

(a) In General.--Chapter 1 of title 1, United States Code, is
amended by adding at the end the following:

``Sec. 8. `Person', `human being', `child', and `individual' as
including born-alive infant

``(a) In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, or of any
ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the various administrative
bureaus and agencies of the United States, the words `person', `human
being', `child', and `individual', shall include every infant member of
the species homo sapiens who is born alive at any stage of development.
``(b) As used in this section, the term `born alive', with respect
to a member of the species homo sapiens, means the complete expulsion or
extraction from his or her mother of that member, at any stage of
development, who after such expulsion or extraction breathes or has a
beating heart, pulsation of the umbilical cord, or definite movement of
voluntary muscles, regardless of whether the umbilical cord has been
cut, and regardless of whether the expulsion or extraction occurs as a
result of natural or induced labor, cesarean section, or induced
abortion.
``(c) Nothing in this section shall be construed to affirm, deny,
expand, or contract any legal status or legal right applicable to any
member of the species homo sapiens at any point prior to being `born
alive' as defined in this section.''.
(b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of
chapter 1 of title 1, United States Code, is amended by adding at the
end the following new item:

``8. `Person', `human being', `child', and `individual' as including
born-alive infant.''.

Approved August 5, 2002.

Except that that law does nothing to prevent "medical care providers" from simply leaving the unwanted baby to die, unattended, and doesn't provide for enforcement. Hence the need for this law.

So this argument in favor of dead babies is as specious as all the others.

This was the law that was passed in reaction to that nurse finding that infant being left to die alone in a closet. It most certainly requires for ordinary care for every live birth including a botched abortion. The punishment would be the same as if they kill an infant born in any way describe by the law.

Ordinary vs. Extraordinary Care - American Life League

I have no idea why you think that link proves your point, but I am glad to see by your "helpful" explanation of facts everyone else already knew that you are at least sober and vaguely lucid.

 

[Blackrook]

Democrats worship Baal and sacrifice babies to that ancient pagan god.

 

[Cecilie1200]

Senate Democrats block bill requiring medical care for babies who survive being aborted

Senate Democrats voted Tuesday to block legislation that would have required medical care be provided to babies who survive being aborted, stopping the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act.
Ditch the fake news ==> Click here to get news you can trust sent right to your inbox. It's free!
What are the details?

Republican Sen. Ben Sasse of Nebraska sponsored the bill, which needed the support of 60 senators in order to advance. Ahead of the vote, Sasse took to the Senate floor to lambaste Democrats attempting to paint his legislation as an abortion bill.

"The piece of legislation we're voting on today, the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, is not about abortion," Sasse said, according to N ational Review. "The bill we're voting on doesn't change anyone's access to abortion. It doesn't have anything to do with Roe v Wade. It is about babies that are already born."

Sasse pointed to CNN's coverage of the measure, where the outlet described his bill as requiring "abortion providers to work to 'preserve the life and health' of a fetus that was born following an attempted abortion as they would for a newborn baby."


Breck Dumas




Senate Democrats voted Tuesday to block legislation that would have required medical care be provided to babies who survive being aborted, stopping the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act.

Ditch the fake news ==> Click here to get news you can trust sent right to your inbox. It's free!
What are the details?
Republican Sen. Ben Sasse of Nebraska sponsored the bill, which needed the support of 60 senators in order to advance. Ahead of the vote, Sasse took to the Senate floor to lambaste Democrats attempting to paint his legislation as an abortion bill.

"The piece of legislation we're voting on today, the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, is not about abortion," Sasse said, according to N ational Review. "The bill we're voting on doesn't change anyone's access to abortion. It doesn't have anything to do with Roe v Wade. It is about babies that are already born."

Sasse pointed to CNN's coverage of the measure, where the outlet described his bill as requiring "abortion providers to work to 'preserve the life and health' of a fetus that was born following an attempted abortion as they would for a newborn baby."

The Nebraska Republican added, "There is nothing in the bill that's about abortion. Nothing. It's about infanticide. That's the actual legislation."


In the end, the final tally was 56-41, with every vote against coming from Democrats. Fox News noted that the only three senators who crossed party lines on the legislation were Democratic Sens. Joe Manchin (W.Va.), Doug Jones (Ala.), and Bob Casey (Pa.).

Following the bill's failure, the Daily Wire's Matt Walsh tweeted, "Democrats have blocked a bill to guarantee medical treatment for babies born alive after abortion. There is no 'clump of cells' dodge here. These hideous monsters believe that actual infants, outside of the womb, should be left to die. These people are evil to their core."


Anything else?
Democrats also filibustered a separate bill on Tuesday, the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act, which would ban abortion at 20 weeks. That measure also required 60 votes, and failed 53-44 with Republican Sens. Susan Collins (Maine) and Lisa Murkowski (Alaska) voting against it.

Senate Democrats attempted to lump the two bills together as both being "anti-choice." Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) wrote of the measures, "The Senate is voting on 2 Republican anti-choice bills today. They are yet another effort to attack & limit a woman's right to health care."

It's quite elementary, my dear Watson. The modern democratic party IS the party of modern barbarism, paganism, satanism. Strong words, sure. But truer words . . . never. They (the democrats) ought to just own it. They're fucking Evil and they sort of are owning it with legislation like this.

The Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002 was passed Congress by unanimous consent.

Who is the Father of all Lies?

Trumpybear and his Banana Republicans are the Dark Lords Disciples.

Muh-HaHa!

Says the guy who's lying through his teeth.

You just lied about the 2002 law. Here's a snipet from what they were reacting to.

"Nurse Jill Stanek, formerly employed by Christ Hospital in a Chicago suburb, testified to Congress about that hospital's practice of "live-birth abortion." Instead of performing a grisly, mid-trimester abortion, doctors at Christ Hospital simply induced labor, delivered premature infants, and allowed them to die from respiratory distress due to immature lungs. Inductions were scheduled in the weeks just prior to expected "viability"so that children could not survive very long without medical attention. These newborns were simply abandoned to die in a back room or, in one case, accidentally dumped in a hamper with soiled linens. Nurse Stanek was reprimanded for comforting one little victim until he died in her arms 45 minutes later."

You want the standing to call ME a liar, asshat, you'd better have more than just "a snippet of what they were reacting to". I know this logical thinking thing is alien to you, but try citing me from the actual law where enforcement is mentioned.

 

[Not a Monkeys Uncle]

Senate Democrats block bill requiring medical care for babies who survive being aborted

Senate Democrats voted Tuesday to block legislation that would have required medical care be provided to babies who survive being aborted, stopping the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act.
Ditch the fake news ==> Click here to get news you can trust sent right to your inbox. It's free!
What are the details?

Republican Sen. Ben Sasse of Nebraska sponsored the bill, which needed the support of 60 senators in order to advance. Ahead of the vote, Sasse took to the Senate floor to lambaste Democrats attempting to paint his legislation as an abortion bill.

"The piece of legislation we're voting on today, the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, is not about abortion," Sasse said, according to N ational Review. "The bill we're voting on doesn't change anyone's access to abortion. It doesn't have anything to do with Roe v Wade. It is about babies that are already born."

Sasse pointed to CNN's coverage of the measure, where the outlet described his bill as requiring "abortion providers to work to 'preserve the life and health' of a fetus that was born following an attempted abortion as they would for a newborn baby."


Breck Dumas




Senate Democrats voted Tuesday to block legislation that would have required medical care be provided to babies who survive being aborted, stopping the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act.

Ditch the fake news ==> Click here to get news you can trust sent right to your inbox. It's free!
What are the details?
Republican Sen. Ben Sasse of Nebraska sponsored the bill, which needed the support of 60 senators in order to advance. Ahead of the vote, Sasse took to the Senate floor to lambaste Democrats attempting to paint his legislation as an abortion bill.

"The piece of legislation we're voting on today, the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, is not about abortion," Sasse said, according to N ational Review. "The bill we're voting on doesn't change anyone's access to abortion. It doesn't have anything to do with Roe v Wade. It is about babies that are already born."

Sasse pointed to CNN's coverage of the measure, where the outlet described his bill as requiring "abortion providers to work to 'preserve the life and health' of a fetus that was born following an attempted abortion as they would for a newborn baby."

The Nebraska Republican added, "There is nothing in the bill that's about abortion. Nothing. It's about infanticide. That's the actual legislation."


In the end, the final tally was 56-41, with every vote against coming from Democrats. Fox News noted that the only three senators who crossed party lines on the legislation were Democratic Sens. Joe Manchin (W.Va.), Doug Jones (Ala.), and Bob Casey (Pa.).

Following the bill's failure, the Daily Wire's Matt Walsh tweeted, "Democrats have blocked a bill to guarantee medical treatment for babies born alive after abortion. There is no 'clump of cells' dodge here. These hideous monsters believe that actual infants, outside of the womb, should be left to die. These people are evil to their core."


Anything else?
Democrats also filibustered a separate bill on Tuesday, the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act, which would ban abortion at 20 weeks. That measure also required 60 votes, and failed 53-44 with Republican Sens. Susan Collins (Maine) and Lisa Murkowski (Alaska) voting against it.

Senate Democrats attempted to lump the two bills together as both being "anti-choice." Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) wrote of the measures, "The Senate is voting on 2 Republican anti-choice bills today. They are yet another effort to attack & limit a woman's right to health care."

Going back Obama's days in the state legislature, Illinois legislation was put forward in 2001, 2002 and 2003 that required doctors to provide immediate life-saving care to any infant that survived an intended abortion. The legislation, which included multiple bills, specified that an infant surviving a planned abortion is "born alive" and "shall be fully recognized as a human person and accorded immediate protection under the law."

Obama did not vote for it.

So this goes all the way back then.

 

[Not a Monkeys Uncle]

 

[Resnic]

Honestly I can't imagine the mind of anyone who doesn't say "it's not ok to kill babies".

Like it or not aborting a baby is killing a baby. I'm not religious, I don't think it's a "sin", and I am not politically against it. I just simply see it as a baby growing in a woman that if left alone will be born in 9 months, intentionally stopping that at any point is murdering a child plain and simple.

If you don't want a child be responsible, if you get pregnant and don't want it then birth it and put it up for adoption. Buyers remorse is no excuse to murder a person.

 

[pknopp]

Honestly I can't imagine the mind of anyone who doesn't say "it's not ok to kill babies".

Like it or not aborting a baby is killing a baby. I'm not religious, I don't think it's a "sin", and I am not politically against it. I just simply see it as a baby growing in a woman that if left alone will be born in 9 months, intentionally stopping that at any point is murdering a child plain and simple.

If you don't want a child be responsible, if you get pregnant and don't want it then birth it and put it up for adoption. Buyers remorse is no excuse to murder a person.

That applies to those born also.

Human Costs of U.S. Post-9/11 Wars: Direct War Deaths in Major War Zones | Figures | Costs of War

 

[BlindBoo]

Going back Obama's days in the state legislature, Illinois legislation was put forward in 2001, 2002 and 2003 that required doctors to provide immediate life-saving care to any infant that survived an intended abortion. The legislation, which included multiple bills, specified that an infant surviving a planned abortion is "born alive" and "shall be fully recognized as a human person and accorded immediate protection under the law."

Obama did not vote for it.

So this goes all the way back then.

Illinois already had a state law that protected all live births. Also "The Infant Born Alive Act" has been the law of the land for almost 20 years now.

Text - H.R.2175 - 107th Congress (2001-2002): Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002

Text for H.R.2175 - 107th Congress (2001-2002): Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002

www.congress.gov

To protect infants who are born alive. <<NOTE: Aug. 5, 2002 - [H.R.
2175]>>

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America in Congress <<NOTE: Born-Alive Infants
Protection Act of 2002.>> assembled,

SECTION 1. <<NOTE: 1 USC 1 note.>> SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ``Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of
2002''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF BORN-ALIVE INFANT.

(a) In General.--Chapter 1 of title 1, United States Code, is
amended by adding at the end the following:

``Sec. 8. `Person', `human being', `child', and `individual' as
including born-alive infant

``(a) In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, or of any
ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the various administrative
bureaus and agencies of the United States, the words `person', `human
being', `child', and `individual', shall include every infant member of
the species homo sapiens who is born alive at any stage of development.
``(b) As used in this section, the term `born alive', with respect
to a member of the species homo sapiens, means the complete expulsion or
extraction from his or her mother of that member, at any stage of
development, who after such expulsion or extraction breathes or has a
beating heart, pulsation of the umbilical cord, or definite movement of
voluntary muscles, regardless of whether the umbilical cord has been
cut, and regardless of whether the expulsion or extraction occurs as a
result of natural or induced labor, cesarean section, or induced
abortion.
``(c) Nothing in this section shall be construed to affirm, deny,
expand, or contract any legal status or legal right applicable to any
member of the species homo sapiens at any point prior to being `born
alive' as defined in this section.''.
(b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of
chapter 1 of title 1, United States Code, is amended by adding at the
end the following new item:

``8. `Person', `human being', `child', and `individual' as including
born-alive infant.''.

Approved August 5, 2002.

 

[marvin martian]

Senate Democrats block bill requiring medical care for babies who survive being aborted

Senate Democrats voted Tuesday to block legislation that would have required medical care be provided to babies who survive being aborted, stopping the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act.
Ditch the fake news ==> Click here to get news you can trust sent right to your inbox. It's free!
What are the details?

Republican Sen. Ben Sasse of Nebraska sponsored the bill, which needed the support of 60 senators in order to advance. Ahead of the vote, Sasse took to the Senate floor to lambaste Democrats attempting to paint his legislation as an abortion bill.

"The piece of legislation we're voting on today, the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, is not about abortion," Sasse said, according to N ational Review. "The bill we're voting on doesn't change anyone's access to abortion. It doesn't have anything to do with Roe v Wade. It is about babies that are already born."

Sasse pointed to CNN's coverage of the measure, where the outlet described his bill as requiring "abortion providers to work to 'preserve the life and health' of a fetus that was born following an attempted abortion as they would for a newborn baby."

Breck Dumas




Senate Democrats voted Tuesday to block legislation that would have required medical care be provided to babies who survive being aborted, stopping the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act.

Ditch the fake news ==> Click here to get news you can trust sent right to your inbox. It's free!
What are the details?
Republican Sen. Ben Sasse of Nebraska sponsored the bill, which needed the support of 60 senators in order to advance. Ahead of the vote, Sasse took to the Senate floor to lambaste Democrats attempting to paint his legislation as an abortion bill.

"The piece of legislation we're voting on today, the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, is not about abortion," Sasse said, according to N ational Review. "The bill we're voting on doesn't change anyone's access to abortion. It doesn't have anything to do with Roe v Wade. It is about babies that are already born."

Sasse pointed to CNN's coverage of the measure, where the outlet described his bill as requiring "abortion providers to work to 'preserve the life and health' of a fetus that was born following an attempted abortion as they would for a newborn baby."

The Nebraska Republican added, "There is nothing in the bill that's about abortion. Nothing. It's about infanticide. That's the actual legislation."


In the end, the final tally was 56-41, with every vote against coming from Democrats. Fox News noted that the only three senators who crossed party lines on the legislation were Democratic Sens. Joe Manchin (W.Va.), Doug Jones (Ala.), and Bob Casey (Pa.).

Following the bill's failure, the Daily Wire's Matt Walsh tweeted, "Democrats have blocked a bill to guarantee medical treatment for babies born alive after abortion. There is no 'clump of cells' dodge here. These hideous monsters believe that actual infants, outside of the womb, should be left to die. These people are evil to their core."


Anything else?
Democrats also filibustered a separate bill on Tuesday, the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act, which would ban abortion at 20 weeks. That measure also required 60 votes, and failed 53-44 with Republican Sens. Susan Collins (Maine) and Lisa Murkowski (Alaska) voting against it.

Senate Democrats attempted to lump the two bills together as both being "anti-choice." Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) wrote of the measures, "The Senate is voting on 2 Republican anti-choice bills today. They are yet another effort to attack & limit a woman's right to health care."

This is how you KNOW the DemoKKKrats' pro-abort politics have nothing to do with the lie they tell that it's about "women's health". It's ALWAYS been about killing babies for the left. The more, the better.