Democrats To Use 'Loophole' Allowing Them To Reject White House Witnesses And Evidence

[White_MAGA_Man]

This is totally Un-American. They're going to make the president not be able to defend himself. This will backfire large time in the Senate.


Impeachment Resolution Lets Democrats Reject White House Witnesses

 

[Daryl Hunt]

This is totally Un-American. They're going to make the president not be able to defend himself. This will backfire large time in the Senate.


Impeachment Resolution Lets Democrats Reject White House Witnesses

Yah, the Democrats are using a loophole in the House. It's called the Constitution of the United States and they aren't allowing the rightwing nutjobs the ability to rewrite it to suit themselves. Those dastardly Dems.

 

[Bo Didleysquat]

This is totally Un-American. They're going to make the president not be able to defend himself. This will backfire large time in the Senate.


Impeachment Resolution Lets Democrats Reject White House Witnesses

Hey, they can't use loopholes on people who pay no attention to laws, that's just wrong.

 

[L.K.Eder]

You are the loophole!

 

[Ricky LIbtardo]

This is totally Un-American. They're going to make the president not be able to defend himself. This will backfire large time in the Senate.


Impeachment Resolution Lets Democrats Reject White House Witnesses

Yah, the Democrats are using a loophole in the House. It's called the Constitution of the United States and they aren't allowing the rightwing nutjobs the ability to rewrite it to suit themselves. Those dastardly Dems.

So if you were going to court and you had witnesses with evidence that could exonerate you, you would be OK with the prosecution not allowing your defense lawyer to call witnesses to defend you?

Ya, right, you'd be railing like the baldfaced snowflake you are.

 

[Staidhup]

I guess that’s sort of like a lynching?

 

[Daryl Hunt]

This is totally Un-American. They're going to make the president not be able to defend himself. This will backfire large time in the Senate.


Impeachment Resolution Lets Democrats Reject White House Witnesses

Yah, the Democrats are using a loophole in the House. It's called the Constitution of the United States and they aren't allowing the rightwing nutjobs the ability to rewrite it to suit themselves. Those dastardly Dems.

So if you were going to court and you had witnesses with evidence that could exonerate you, you would be OK with the prosecution not allowing your defense lawyer to call witnesses to defend you?

Ya, right, you'd be railing like the baldfaced snowflake you are.

I don't have a problem with that person testifying during the actual trial. But I do have a problem with a crackpot lawyer grilling him during the police interrogation trying to discredit his testimony before the trial ever starts. And that is what you are demanding. The Trial hasn't started. They are in the gathering of information phase. There is NO cross examination until the actual Trial. Or do you widdle rumpsters want special treatment and a pony too?

 

[Ricky LIbtardo]

This is totally Un-American. They're going to make the president not be able to defend himself. This will backfire large time in the Senate.


Impeachment Resolution Lets Democrats Reject White House Witnesses

Yah, the Democrats are using a loophole in the House. It's called the Constitution of the United States and they aren't allowing the rightwing nutjobs the ability to rewrite it to suit themselves. Those dastardly Dems.

So if you were going to court and you had witnesses with evidence that could exonerate you, you would be OK with the prosecution not allowing your defense lawyer to call witnesses to defend you?

Ya, right, you'd be railing like the baldfaced snowflake you are.

I don't have a problem with that person testifying during the actual trial. But I do have a problem with a crackpot lawyer grilling him during the police interrogation trying to discredit his testimony before the trial ever starts. And that is what you are demanding. The Trial hasn't started. They are in the gathering of information phase. There is NO cross examination until the actual Trial. Or do you widdle rumpsters want special treatment and a pony too?

Then you'll have no problem when McConnell presents a list of 200 witnesses to Justice Roberts. The Senate will call all the witnesses back to testify in front of the entire country. Shethead made the mistake of obstructing due process and the House voted to give veto power to shethead. McConnell will have the power to call witnesses in the order he wants. The trees the House cut down to print impeachment documents on will be used as toilet paper for the homeless.

And Trump will be elected in 2020.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

This is totally Un-American. They're going to make the president not be able to defend himself. This will backfire large time in the Senate.


Impeachment Resolution Lets Democrats Reject White House Witnesses

Yah, the Democrats are using a loophole in the House. It's called the Constitution of the United States and they aren't allowing the rightwing nutjobs the ability to rewrite it to suit themselves. Those dastardly Dems.

So if you were going to court and you had witnesses with evidence that could exonerate you, you would be OK with the prosecution not allowing your defense lawyer to call witnesses to defend you?

Ya, right, you'd be railing like the baldfaced snowflake you are.

I don't have a problem with that person testifying during the actual trial. But I do have a problem with a crackpot lawyer grilling him during the police interrogation trying to discredit his testimony before the trial ever starts. And that is what you are demanding. The Trial hasn't started. They are in the gathering of information phase. There is NO cross examination until the actual Trial. Or do you widdle rumpsters want special treatment and a pony too?

Then you'll have no problem when McConnell presents a list of 200 witnesses to Justice Roberts. The Senate will call all the witnesses back to testify in front of the entire country. Shethead made the mistake of obstructing due process and the House voted to give veto power to shethead. McConnell will have the power to call witnesses in the order he wants. The trees the House cut down to print impeachment documents on will be used as toilet paper for the homeless.

And Trump will be elected in 2020.

And what happens if Pelosi decides not to turn it over to the Senate at all? She can elect to censor if she wishes and she has the votes to do that. She can openly condemn Rump, lay it all out and not give Rump any avenue to defend himself. She just presents the information openly. Remember, until it goes to the Senate, Rump has no right to face his accuser since the law reads that only in a court of law does a person have the right to face their accussor. And the Senate is the equiv of the Court. Pelosi only has to drag it out for only a few more months to keep it fresh in the voters mind. The Ball is Pelosi's court no matter what Rump claims.

 

[Ricky LIbtardo]

This is totally Un-American. They're going to make the president not be able to defend himself. This will backfire large time in the Senate.


Impeachment Resolution Lets Democrats Reject White House Witnesses

Yah, the Democrats are using a loophole in the House. It's called the Constitution of the United States and they aren't allowing the rightwing nutjobs the ability to rewrite it to suit themselves. Those dastardly Dems.

So if you were going to court and you had witnesses with evidence that could exonerate you, you would be OK with the prosecution not allowing your defense lawyer to call witnesses to defend you?

Ya, right, you'd be railing like the baldfaced snowflake you are.

I don't have a problem with that person testifying during the actual trial. But I do have a problem with a crackpot lawyer grilling him during the police interrogation trying to discredit his testimony before the trial ever starts. And that is what you are demanding. The Trial hasn't started. They are in the gathering of information phase. There is NO cross examination until the actual Trial. Or do you widdle rumpsters want special treatment and a pony too?

Then you'll have no problem when McConnell presents a list of 200 witnesses to Justice Roberts. The Senate will call all the witnesses back to testify in front of the entire country. Shethead made the mistake of obstructing due process and the House voted to give veto power to shethead. McConnell will have the power to call witnesses in the order he wants. The trees the House cut down to print impeachment documents on will be used as toilet paper for the homeless.

And Trump will be elected in 2020.

And what happens if Pelosi decides not to turn it over to the Senate at all? She can elect to censor if she wishes and she has the votes to do that. She can openly condemn Rump, lay it all out and not give Rump any avenue to defend himself. She just presents the information openly. Remember, until it goes to the Senate, Rump has no right to face his accuser since the law reads that only in a court of law does a person have the right to face their accussor. And the Senate is the equiv of the Court. Pelosi only has to drag it out for only a few more months to keep it fresh in the voters mind. The Ball is Pelosi's court no matter what Rump claims.

You should've posted that in the satire forum. Democrats won't get 20 Republicans to vote with them on removal in the Senate and the backlash will ensure Trump is re-elected. Don't forget, the longer it goes in the Senate the more evidence will come out. Going on during the IG report coming out, and Durham's investigation going on.

 

[Care4all]

This is totally Un-American. They're going to make the president not be able to defend himself. This will backfire large time in the Senate.


Impeachment Resolution Lets Democrats Reject White House Witnesses

Yah, the Democrats are using a loophole in the House. It's called the Constitution of the United States and they aren't allowing the rightwing nutjobs the ability to rewrite it to suit themselves. Those dastardly Dems.

So if you were going to court and you had witnesses with evidence that could exonerate you, you would be OK with the prosecution not allowing your defense lawyer to call witnesses to defend you?

Ya, right, you'd be railing like the baldfaced snowflake you are.

I don't have a problem with that person testifying during the actual trial. But I do have a problem with a crackpot lawyer grilling him during the police interrogation trying to discredit his testimony before the trial ever starts. And that is what you are demanding. The Trial hasn't started. They are in the gathering of information phase. There is NO cross examination until the actual Trial. Or do you widdle rumpsters want special treatment and a pony too?

Then you'll have no problem when McConnell presents a list of 200 witnesses to Justice Roberts. The Senate will call all the witnesses back to testify in front of the entire country. Shethead made the mistake of obstructing due process and the House voted to give veto power to shethead. McConnell will have the power to call witnesses in the order he wants. The trees the House cut down to print impeachment documents on will be used as toilet paper for the homeless.

And Trump will be elected in 2020.

sigh....

McConnell does NOT call witnesses silly one!

McConnell is one of the Jurists!

Senators are the jury in the senate impeachment trial,

The House is the prosecutor, in the senate impeachment trial

the SC chief justice is the Judge in the impeachment trial

Trump will have his own lawyers defending him, and they can call witnesses for Trump's side, any that they want, and the Trump lawyers can question any prosecution witnesses.

 

[Ricky LIbtardo]

This is totally Un-American. They're going to make the president not be able to defend himself. This will backfire large time in the Senate.


Impeachment Resolution Lets Democrats Reject White House Witnesses

Yah, the Democrats are using a loophole in the House. It's called the Constitution of the United States and they aren't allowing the rightwing nutjobs the ability to rewrite it to suit themselves. Those dastardly Dems.

So if you were going to court and you had witnesses with evidence that could exonerate you, you would be OK with the prosecution not allowing your defense lawyer to call witnesses to defend you?

Ya, right, you'd be railing like the baldfaced snowflake you are.

I don't have a problem with that person testifying during the actual trial. But I do have a problem with a crackpot lawyer grilling him during the police interrogation trying to discredit his testimony before the trial ever starts. And that is what you are demanding. The Trial hasn't started. They are in the gathering of information phase. There is NO cross examination until the actual Trial. Or do you widdle rumpsters want special treatment and a pony too?

Then you'll have no problem when McConnell presents a list of 200 witnesses to Justice Roberts. The Senate will call all the witnesses back to testify in front of the entire country. Shethead made the mistake of obstructing due process and the House voted to give veto power to shethead. McConnell will have the power to call witnesses in the order he wants. The trees the House cut down to print impeachment documents on will be used as toilet paper for the homeless.

And Trump will be elected in 2020.

sigh....

McConnell does NOT call witnesses silly one!

McConnell is one of the Jurists!

Senators are the jury in the senate impeachment trial,

The House is the prosecutor, in the senate impeachment trial

the SC chief justice is the Judge in the impeachment trial

Trump will have his own lawyers defending him, and they can call witnesses for Trump's side, any that they want, and the Trump lawyers can question any prosecution witnesses.

I stand corrected. But what you just stated should scare the living hell out of Democrats. They can call Brennan, Shethead, Pelosi, and all the other traitors.

 

[ThisIsMe]

This is totally Un-American. They're going to make the president not be able to defend himself. This will backfire large time in the Senate.


Impeachment Resolution Lets Democrats Reject White House Witnesses

Which is why a house with overt bias against a president should never be the ones conducting the investigation.

 

[Care4all]

Yah, the Democrats are using a loophole in the House. It's called the Constitution of the United States and they aren't allowing the rightwing nutjobs the ability to rewrite it to suit themselves. Those dastardly Dems.

So if you were going to court and you had witnesses with evidence that could exonerate you, you would be OK with the prosecution not allowing your defense lawyer to call witnesses to defend you?

Ya, right, you'd be railing like the baldfaced snowflake you are.

I don't have a problem with that person testifying during the actual trial. But I do have a problem with a crackpot lawyer grilling him during the police interrogation trying to discredit his testimony before the trial ever starts. And that is what you are demanding. The Trial hasn't started. They are in the gathering of information phase. There is NO cross examination until the actual Trial. Or do you widdle rumpsters want special treatment and a pony too?

Then you'll have no problem when McConnell presents a list of 200 witnesses to Justice Roberts. The Senate will call all the witnesses back to testify in front of the entire country. Shethead made the mistake of obstructing due process and the House voted to give veto power to shethead. McConnell will have the power to call witnesses in the order he wants. The trees the House cut down to print impeachment documents on will be used as toilet paper for the homeless.

And Trump will be elected in 2020.

sigh....

McConnell does NOT call witnesses silly one!

McConnell is one of the Jurists!

Senators are the jury in the senate impeachment trial,

The House is the prosecutor, in the senate impeachment trial

the SC chief justice is the Judge in the impeachment trial

Trump will have his own lawyers defending him, and they can call witnesses for Trump's side, any that they want, and the Trump lawyers can question any prosecution witnesses.

I stand corrected. But what you just stated should scare the living hell out of Democrats. They can call Brennan, Shethead, Pelosi, and all the other traitors.

yes they can call witnesses in their defense of the CHARGES, so they would have to stay on topic.... the witness has to be in defense of their client's article of impeachment charges...

but yeah, they can call anyone in their defense of the president

 

[Daryl Hunt]

Yah, the Democrats are using a loophole in the House. It's called the Constitution of the United States and they aren't allowing the rightwing nutjobs the ability to rewrite it to suit themselves. Those dastardly Dems.

So if you were going to court and you had witnesses with evidence that could exonerate you, you would be OK with the prosecution not allowing your defense lawyer to call witnesses to defend you?

Ya, right, you'd be railing like the baldfaced snowflake you are.

I don't have a problem with that person testifying during the actual trial. But I do have a problem with a crackpot lawyer grilling him during the police interrogation trying to discredit his testimony before the trial ever starts. And that is what you are demanding. The Trial hasn't started. They are in the gathering of information phase. There is NO cross examination until the actual Trial. Or do you widdle rumpsters want special treatment and a pony too?

Then you'll have no problem when McConnell presents a list of 200 witnesses to Justice Roberts. The Senate will call all the witnesses back to testify in front of the entire country. Shethead made the mistake of obstructing due process and the House voted to give veto power to shethead. McConnell will have the power to call witnesses in the order he wants. The trees the House cut down to print impeachment documents on will be used as toilet paper for the homeless.

And Trump will be elected in 2020.

And what happens if Pelosi decides not to turn it over to the Senate at all? She can elect to censor if she wishes and she has the votes to do that. She can openly condemn Rump, lay it all out and not give Rump any avenue to defend himself. She just presents the information openly. Remember, until it goes to the Senate, Rump has no right to face his accuser since the law reads that only in a court of law does a person have the right to face their accussor. And the Senate is the equiv of the Court. Pelosi only has to drag it out for only a few more months to keep it fresh in the voters mind. The Ball is Pelosi's court no matter what Rump claims.

You should've posted that in the satire forum. Democrats won't get 20 Republicans to vote with them on removal in the Senate and the backlash will ensure Trump is re-elected. Don't forget, the longer it goes in the Senate the more evidence will come out. Going on during the IG report coming out, and Durham's investigation going on.

Please stop pulling a Rudy here. Reread what I typed. Pelosi may elect not to send it to the Senate. She may just go for censoring by the House but drag that out for the next couple of months. She has the votes to do that. Pelosi can elect to keep it inside the House and never send it to the Senate where she knows the Senate are filled with Rump boot lickers.

 

[Butch_Coolidge]

This is totally Un-American. They're going to make the president not be able to defend himself. This will backfire large time in the Senate.


Impeachment Resolution Lets Democrats Reject White House Witnesses

Hey, they can't use loopholes on people who pay no attention to laws, that's just wrong.

Hey! The right to face your accuser is overrated. As is discovery.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Butch_Coolidge]

This is totally Un-American. They're going to make the president not be able to defend himself. This will backfire large time in the Senate.


Impeachment Resolution Lets Democrats Reject White House Witnesses

Yah, the Democrats are using a loophole in the House. It's called the Constitution of the United States and they aren't allowing the rightwing nutjobs the ability to rewrite it to suit themselves. Those dastardly Dems.

So if you were going to court and you had witnesses with evidence that could exonerate you, you would be OK with the prosecution not allowing your defense lawyer to call witnesses to defend you?

Ya, right, you'd be railing like the baldfaced snowflake you are.

I don't have a problem with that person testifying during the actual trial. But I do have a problem with a crackpot lawyer grilling him during the police interrogation trying to discredit his testimony before the trial ever starts. And that is what you are demanding. The Trial hasn't started. They are in the gathering of information phase. There is NO cross examination until the actual Trial. Or do you widdle rumpsters want special treatment and a pony too?

Then you'll have no problem when McConnell presents a list of 200 witnesses to Justice Roberts. The Senate will call all the witnesses back to testify in front of the entire country. Shethead made the mistake of obstructing due process and the House voted to give veto power to shethead. McConnell will have the power to call witnesses in the order he wants. The trees the House cut down to print impeachment documents on will be used as toilet paper for the homeless.

And Trump will be elected in 2020.

And what happens if Pelosi decides not to turn it over to the Senate at all? She can elect to censor if she wishes and she has the votes to do that. She can openly condemn Rump, lay it all out and not give Rump any avenue to defend himself. She just presents the information openly. Remember, until it goes to the Senate, Rump has no right to face his accuser since the law reads that only in a court of law does a person have the right to face their accussor. And the Senate is the equiv of the Court. Pelosi only has to drag it out for only a few more months to keep it fresh in the voters mind. The Ball is Pelosi's court no matter what Rump claims.

Bring it, bitches.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk