Democrats setting a precedent on doxxing

[LeftofLeft]

Activists upset about the leaked document detailing a SCOTUS review of Roe V Wade are planning to dox and protest the homes of Supreme Court Justices.

This is another precedent being set by the Left. If you don’t like the action our outcome of the Court, you can dox them and protest outside their homes.

Abortion protests Biden won’t condemn at doxxed SCOTUSÂ homes may be illegal

While pro-choice activists publish Supreme Court justices’ addresses online, the protests they are planning are not protected under the First Amendment.

nypost.com

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Somebody is trying to start something they most likely will be unable to finish.

Stay tuned.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Activists upset about the leaked document detailing a SCOTUS review of Roe V Wade are planning to dox and protest the homes of Supreme Court Justices.

This is another precedent being set by the Left. If you don’t like the action our outcome of the Court, you can dox them and protest outside their homes.

Abortion protests Biden won’t condemn at doxxed SCOTUSÂ homes may be illegal

While pro-choice activists publish Supreme Court justices’ addresses online, the protests they are planning are not protected under the First Amendment.

nypost.com

It's from the "How Commies Rule" playbook

 

[Viktor]

Just like he chickened out of Afghanistan, too

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Remember there's a difference between the ones stirring the pot and the ones in the pot.

 

[Vrenn]

Just like he chickened out of Afghanistan, too

Enough already. Biden is right. It's not up to him to weigh in on this. And Pawxsnoos has taken something and blown it out of proportion once again. It makes the hate rise to the top. Cut out the hate speech already. Here is the real points without the making crap up by Pawssnoos.

Is it a states right. Can the states voter make that determination.

I am a big proponent of states rights. And each state should vote in a ballot (free and honest) on many things. It's not up to a bunch of old guys like it is today either at federal or state level.

The only reason that SCCA got involved back then was that the death toll was so great someone had to do something and the States refused to do anything. In many states, I see it going back to the way it was and the voter needs to kick the "Elected" or "Appointed" officials out of office.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

The controversial far left extremist Democrat Senator Chuck Schumer threatened the US Supreme Court Judges when he said that "You have released the whirlwind, and you will pay the price".
Schumer should be investigated for inciting an insurrection.
The corrupt Democrat Party's crazy cult has reached a new level of hate and violence.
They are a threat to peace and democracy.

 

[beautress]

Just like he chickened out of Afghanistan, too

Cowardice in the Oval Office. Sickening.

We'll have to change a couple of lines the national anthem words a little, that's all:

For the laaaaand where Biden fleae-eeeees!

And thu-uh-uh home of thuuuuh slaves!

damn commies.​

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

The Biden administration is full of sociopaths and pathological liars.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Just like he chickened out of Afghanistan, too

That you're talking about the Supreme Court, but only manage to talk about Afghanistan is impressive.
That you're condemning him for things Trump did and you probably supported, and you supported Trump when he said he would stop warring....

It's like if Trump says it you're for it, if Biden says the exact same thing, you're totally against it.

How fucking weird.

 

[wamose]

Like the Democrats say, silence is violence. Biden is a classless Marxist.

 

[wamose]

The controversial far left extremist Democrat Senator Chuck Schumer threatened the US Supreme Court Judges when he said that "You have released the whirlwind, and you will pay the price".
Schumer should be investigated for inciting an insurrection.
The corrupt Democrat Party's crazy cult has reached a new level of hate and violence.
They are a threat to peace and democracy.

That's so true. Poppins and Garland should be the ones bringing charges if either of them had any credibility at all. But they won't because they're both exclusively Democrat attack dogs and Commie lowlifes.

 

[1srelluc]

Benny Johnson should stop by and ask them some questions.

Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson)

 

[Moonglow]

The people have every tight to protest no matter what you people think or approve.

 

[easyt65]

These are the same people who incited an assassination attempt of GOP politicians, during which Scalise was shot, who supported and encouraged BLM and Antifa attacks / terrorism, declaring they needed to continue after the election...

Now they are doxxing USC Justices, calling for i timidation and violence, openly calling for Insurrections while trying to undermine the USSC....

Did you really expect differently?

 

[occupied]

Why should he condemn lawful protest? Instead of bitching you people should learn how to do it without running afoul of the law.

 

[easyt65]

Why should he condemn lawful protest? Instead of bitching you people should learn how to do it without running afoul of the law.

Yeah, why shod they apologize for what they did to Scalise, for calling for intimidation and violence, for attempting to delegitimize the USSC just because they did not get their way?!

You can't fault them for being who they are....

 

[occupied]

Yeah, why shod they apologize for what they did to Scalise, for calling for intimidation and violence, for attempting to delegitimize the USSC just because they did not get their way?!

You can't fault them for being who they are....

Since the conservative judges have made the decision to put partisan politics above the good of the nation they must now face the wrath of their intended victims. Where's your usual complaint about activist judges now hack? This decision has the potential to cause so much harm they should never have another minute's peace.

 

[DBA]

Why should he condemn lawful protest? Instead of bitching you people should learn how to do it without running afoul of the law.

You don’t see any harm in every extremists group “peacefully” protesting every partisan issue brought before any court? Every judge would face the equivalent of a paparazzi crowd everywhere he/she went. You believe this is productive, particularly for the highest court in the land? You don’t believe that inevitable, given that type of environment, that things may get out of hand and lead to violence?

Someone not only leaked internal notes from the SCJ, but also the home address of the justices. You can’t see how potentially dangerous this type of behavior is to the very fabric of the court and 1/3 of our federal government?

 

[LeftofLeft]

Leave it to the Left to make doxxing acceptable as part of protest and free speech. The Administration has every opportunity right now to put boundaries on protest and even say no to doxxing.

This too shall return to bite the Left in the ass. Remember this when Right Wing activist doxx liberal judges and politicians over an outcome or means of intimidation.