Democrats' "Me Too" Disaster

[forkup]

I didn't find this creature feature to be credible. This is your star witness.


View attachment 1242443

No, this is the star witness.

This verdict on sexual assault is also a pretty good indication.
The jury found that Trump sexually abused Carroll and defamed her in his 2022 statements.

The testimony of the two women and the 2005 recording were deemed admissible under Federal Rules of Evidence 413 and 415, which allow evidence of other sexual assaults in cases involving sexual assault claims.

https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca2/23-793/23-793-2024-12-30.html

 

[Lesh]

Speaking of, how is Matt Gaetz doing these days?

I do not know the details on this but if guilty, nail him.

Well no… he’s a Republican..

 

[Dragonlady]

That the two drug addicts went to jail for stealing her diary.



Two juries found her very credible.

Or at least more credible than Trump.

(Of course, you think Trump's hair is perfectly normal.)

View attachment 1242447

That doesn't mean that everything that was published was actually written by Ashli Biden, now does it?

Project Veritas REFUSED to publish the materials. That's telling indeed. They thought it was forged.

 

[IM2]

Here we see the same peple who put a rapist in the white house and defend his every move running their mouths about Swalwell. So if Swalwell goes, Trump needs to go.

 

[Lesh]

That doesn't mean that everything that was published was actually written by Ashli Biden, now does it?

Project Veritas REFUSED to publish the materials. That's telling indeed. They thought it was forged.

In truth there was one line in that PERSONAL JOURNAL that made reference to her showering with her dad at a very young age.

She MUSED that she was questioning whether that was appropriate and a possible cause for her later issues in life.

These were personal musings by a disturbed young woman searching for answers.

When asked about that entry later she stated that the allegations of abuse were absolutely mischaracterized.

 

[IM2]

I didn't find this creature feature to be credible. This is your star witness.


View attachment 1242443

She was credible enough to the judge. But it's funny how you automatically find the person making claims against Swalwell credible

 

[DonGlock26]

She was credible enough to the judge. But it's funny how you automatically find the person making claims against Swalwell credible

NYC judge? Yeah of course.

 

[DonGlock26]

No, this is the star witness.

This verdict on sexual assault is also a pretty good indication.
The jury found that Trump sexually abused Carroll and defamed her in his 2022 statements.

The testimony of the two women and the 2005 recording were deemed admissible under Federal Rules of Evidence 413 and 415, which allow evidence of other sexual assaults in cases involving sexual assault claims.

https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca2/23-793/23-793-2024-12-30.html

Do you agree with the star witness?

 

[IM2]

NYC judge? Yeah of course.

And here we see the excuse made for Trump's sexual deviance.

 

[JoeB131]

Trump was talking about gold diggers and how they like rich and famous men to do whatever they want to them.

You know it’s the truth. Trump never said he does that to any woman, he was talking about those particular types. That isn’t sexual assault in any way, if they consent to it.

But you have to pretend such women don’t exist, you want them all to be victims.

Except he said nothing about "golddiggers", he said that as a celebrity, they "let" him do it.

 

[forkup]

Do you agree with the star witness?

Yes I do. I believe what she said.



Do you believe what she said in that interview, or are you just going to believe the little soundbite that you guys use in a pathetic attempt to claim she wanted what happened? Do you believe the jury who saw the evidence and judged he assaulted her? Do you believe the 2 other victims who testified to similar accounts under oath? Do you believe the 2 people who said under oath that Carroll told them about the assault after it happened. And do you believe Trump himself, who confessed to do the exact things Carroll accused him of?

 

[forkup]

NYC judge? Yeah of course.

Not just the judge but a JURY.

 

[80zephyr]

You mean a diary that was produced by two drug addicts that even Project Veritas wouldn't touch.

If your lies are so blatant that Project Veritas won't touch them, you know it's dubious.

Bullshit.

NEVER-BEFORE-SEEN: Ashley Biden Confirms Famed Diary Is Hers & The Full Story Behind The FBI Raids On American Journalists  | Project Veritas

Today, Project Veritas published the real story behind the Ashley Biden diary and personal items, when and how it came into our possession, and the subsequent…

www.projectveritas.com

 

[Dragonlady]

In truth there was one line in that PERSONAL JOURNAL that made reference to her showering with her dad at a very young age.

She MUSED that she was questioning whether that was appropriate and a possible cause for her later issues in life.

These were personal musings by a disturbed young woman searching for answers.

When asked about that entry later she stated that the allegations of abuse were absolutely mischaracterized.

That paragraph seemed about her fantasizing about showering with her father at that age, and that such fantasies were probably inappropriate.

 

[Lesh]

That paragraph seemed about her fantasizing about showering with her father at that age, and that such fantasies were probably inappropriate.

It was one line and there was no “fantasizing”

 

[Dragonlady]

Here we see the same peple who put a rapist in the white house and defend his every move running their mouths about Swalwell. So if Swalwell goes, Trump needs to go.

The thread title claims this is a "disaster" for Democrats. How is it a disaster. The guy is out of office, and will not likely run for anything after this. That's not a disaster at all.

 

[IM2]

The thread title claims this is a "disaster" for Democrats. How is it a disaster. The guy is out of office, and will not likely run for anything after this. That's not a disaster at all.

These ight wingerss love to exaggerate. Swalwell is done. He won't be able to whine about being politically persecuted, how unfair it is that his political opponent was doing this to try stopping him from being elected, or that lawfare was being used against him like Trump did and does.

 

[forkup]

The thread title claims this is a "disaster" for Democrats. How is it a disaster. The guy is out of office, and will not likely run for anything after this. That's not a disaster at all.

It's projection. They want to claim "look a Democrat politician sexually assaulted someone, so it's alright that we elected one that sexually assaults people."

It's not about Democrats or Swalwell. It's about trying to claim that if everybody does the same thing what they do isn't so bad.

If an appeal to hypcrosy is all you got. Jumping on something like this is what you do.

 

[DonGlock26]

Not just the judge but a JURY.

From where? NYC?

 

[Lesh]

From where? NYC?

lol. So the only rule of law you accept has to be Trump appointed and only THEN when it unfailingly agrees with Trump