Democrats Already Preparing to Impeach Trump if he’s Re-Elected

[Bush92]

What a clown show these Democrats are!
Democrat Karen Bass says she's open to impeach Trump again if he gets reelected in 2020

Will she even have a job after 2020?

She is a black incumbent Democrat from a black district. She is safe.

 

[Bush92]

So do you think that witnesses should testify?

Oh yes! I want to see who the partisan joke of a whistleblower is.

Why? To make him pay for following all the rules?

How do we know he did? He hasn't testified.

The IG said he followed all the rules.

Maybe y’all want to dunk him in the lake and see if he floats? Would that satisfy y’all?

No problem with the IG. He did what he could with the authority he had, and has set the table.

Barr and Durham, on the other hand, have all the authority and are well adept at field dressing game, I'd wager.

Lying to get those FISA warrants will cost people their freedom.

 

[Crixus]

What a clown show these Democrats are!
Democrat Karen Bass says she's open to impeach Trump again if he gets reelected in 2020

Will she even have a job after 2020?

She is a black incumbent Democrat from a black district. She is safe.

Probably, but maybe not as safe as we think. Honestly, to me it seems like everyone is getting sick of this hyper partisan bullshit. Sure she will probably win, but maybe not with the wide margins she had before?

 

[beautress]

Democrat Karen Bass says she's open to impeach Trump again if he gets reelected in 2020

Never going to stop

Yes it will. Attorney General Barr has the truth on his side, and those who participated in destroying US Law who were consigned on their oaths to support the Constitution and its law will be explaining in court before sentencing.

 

[toobfreak]

What a clown show these Democrats are!
Democrat Karen Bass says she's open to impeach Trump again if he gets reelected in 2020

That would be a great thing! Now that the Democrats have lowered the bar for impeachment to any policy they don't agree with, I'm sure they can never put it down! Eventually it can only lead to the realization that the DNC is no longer a legit, legal party but merely a rogue outfit working for the utter anarchy of the nation!

Democrats don’t believe in the Constitution or democracy. Just a spoiled bunch of children who can’t get over losing a free and fair election.

Or maybe even worse: that it was free at all to allow the actual voter to pick the winner they really wanted. After all, they had just spent 2 billion dollars telling America they really wanted Hillary. That is the reason for the Russian story and Hillary's books: how to explain to their base why they lost without admitting they simply were the loser.

 

[colfax_m]

So do you think that witnesses should testify?

Oh yes! I want to see who the partisan joke of a whistleblower is.

Why? To make him pay for following all the rules?

How do we know he did? He hasn't testified.

The IG said he followed all the rules.

Maybe y’all want to dunk him in the lake and see if he floats? Would that satisfy y’all?

No problem with the IG. He did what he could with the authority he had, and has set the table.

Barr and Durham, on the other hand, have all the authority and are well adept at field dressing game, I'd wager.

You're confused. There's different IG for different communities. The IC IG handled the whistleblower complaint. Rules were followed. Durham doesn't have anything to do with it.

 

[Cellblock2429]

What a clown show these Democrats are!
Democrat Karen Bass says she's open to impeach Trump again if he gets reelected in 2020

/——/ Not to be out done, Jabba declared we don’t need no stinkin’ elections.
“We cannot rely on an election to solve our problems, when the president threatens the very integrity of that election," House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., said in his opening statement.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Oh yes! I want to see who the partisan joke of a whistleblower is.

Why? To make him pay for following all the rules?

How do we know he did? He hasn't testified.

The IG said he followed all the rules.

Maybe y’all want to dunk him in the lake and see if he floats? Would that satisfy y’all?

No problem with the IG. He did what he could with the authority he had, and has set the table.

Barr and Durham, on the other hand, have all the authority and are well adept at field dressing game, I'd wager.

You're confused. There's different IG for different communities. The IC IG handled the whistleblower complaint. Rules were followed. Durham doesn't have anything to do with it.

Many of the players are being investigated by both, with Horowitz' authority being the more limited.

 

[colfax_m]

Why? To make him pay for following all the rules?

How do we know he did? He hasn't testified.

The IG said he followed all the rules.

Maybe y’all want to dunk him in the lake and see if he floats? Would that satisfy y’all?

No problem with the IG. He did what he could with the authority he had, and has set the table.

Barr and Durham, on the other hand, have all the authority and are well adept at field dressing game, I'd wager.

You're confused. There's different IG for different communities. The IC IG handled the whistleblower complaint. Rules were followed. Durham doesn't have anything to do with it.

Many of the players are being investigated by both, with Horowitz' authority being the more limited.

There's precisely zero reason to believe that Durham is investigating the whistleblower and if he is without a proper reason, that's intimidation and really bad.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

How do we know he did? He hasn't testified.

The IG said he followed all the rules.

Maybe y’all want to dunk him in the lake and see if he floats? Would that satisfy y’all?

No problem with the IG. He did what he could with the authority he had, and has set the table.

Barr and Durham, on the other hand, have all the authority and are well adept at field dressing game, I'd wager.

You're confused. There's different IG for different communities. The IC IG handled the whistleblower complaint. Rules were followed. Durham doesn't have anything to do with it.

Many of the players are being investigated by both, with Horowitz' authority being the more limited.

There's precisely zero reason to believe that Durham is investigating the whistleblower and if he is without a proper reason, that's intimidation and really bad.

Tough titty for you people. Best of luck whining about intimidation.

 

[colfax_m]

The IG said he followed all the rules.

Maybe y’all want to dunk him in the lake and see if he floats? Would that satisfy y’all?

No problem with the IG. He did what he could with the authority he had, and has set the table.

Barr and Durham, on the other hand, have all the authority and are well adept at field dressing game, I'd wager.

You're confused. There's different IG for different communities. The IC IG handled the whistleblower complaint. Rules were followed. Durham doesn't have anything to do with it.

Many of the players are being investigated by both, with Horowitz' authority being the more limited.

There's precisely zero reason to believe that Durham is investigating the whistleblower and if he is without a proper reason, that's intimidation and really bad.

Tough titty for you people. Best of luck whining about intimidation.

Is it really that hard to hold Trump to the same level of accountability as everyone else? Or is it just because Trump supporters are obsessed about “winning” that they decide he doesn’t need to follow any rules?

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

No problem with the IG. He did what he could with the authority he had, and has set the table.

Barr and Durham, on the other hand, have all the authority and are well adept at field dressing game, I'd wager.

You're confused. There's different IG for different communities. The IC IG handled the whistleblower complaint. Rules were followed. Durham doesn't have anything to do with it.

Many of the players are being investigated by both, with Horowitz' authority being the more limited.

There's precisely zero reason to believe that Durham is investigating the whistleblower and if he is without a proper reason, that's intimidation and really bad.

Tough titty for you people. Best of luck whining about intimidation.

Is it really that hard to hold Trump to the same level of accountability as everyone else? Or is it just because Trump supporters are obsessed about “winning” that they decide he doesn’t need to follow any rules?

Please list his high crimes and misdemeanors to date. It shouldn't be difficult what with all the evidence Adam Schiff has provided.

 

[edward37]

You folks do know the IG can investigate AG Barr?

 

[colfax_m]

You're confused. There's different IG for different communities. The IC IG handled the whistleblower complaint. Rules were followed. Durham doesn't have anything to do with it.

Many of the players are being investigated by both, with Horowitz' authority being the more limited.

There's precisely zero reason to believe that Durham is investigating the whistleblower and if he is without a proper reason, that's intimidation and really bad.

Tough titty for you people. Best of luck whining about intimidation.

Is it really that hard to hold Trump to the same level of accountability as everyone else? Or is it just because Trump supporters are obsessed about “winning” that they decide he doesn’t need to follow any rules?

Please list his high crimes and misdemeanors to date. It shouldn't be difficult what with all the evidence Adam Schiff has provided.

Why? Because you're actually interested in holding Trump accountable?

 

[edward37]

You're confused. There's different IG for different communities. The IC IG handled the whistleblower complaint. Rules were followed. Durham doesn't have anything to do with it.

Many of the players are being investigated by both, with Horowitz' authority being the more limited.

There's precisely zero reason to believe that Durham is investigating the whistleblower and if he is without a proper reason, that's intimidation and really bad.

Tough titty for you people. Best of luck whining about intimidation.

Is it really that hard to hold Trump to the same level of accountability as everyone else? Or is it just because Trump supporters are obsessed about “winning” that they decide he doesn’t need to follow any rules?

Please list his high crimes and misdemeanors to date. It shouldn't be difficult what with all the evidence Adam Schiff has provided.

House Democrats spoke for months about how investigations had established crimes that President Donald Trump committed, but on Tuesday they did not specifically include those allegations in articles of impeachment under the constitutional standard of “high crimes and misdemeanors.”

The two articles of impeachment Democrats filed — abuse of power and obstruction of Congress — stayed away from detailing where Trump might have broken the law with his dealings with Ukraine or interactions with the special counsel probe into Russian interference with the 2016 election.

The strategy to focus on constitutional violations rather than the criminal violations they had discussed — such as bribery, extortion, campaign finance or obstruction of justice — highlights how Democrats contend that a president does not have to commit a crime to be impeached

 

[edward37]

Make Trump the 1st president impeached twice ,,supported by the lowest slime ever in our senate Let Americans see the slime they voted for

 

[edward37]

Many of the players are being investigated by both, with Horowitz' authority being the more limited.

There's precisely zero reason to believe that Durham is investigating the whistleblower and if he is without a proper reason, that's intimidation and really bad.

Tough titty for you people. Best of luck whining about intimidation.

Is it really that hard to hold Trump to the same level of accountability as everyone else? Or is it just because Trump supporters are obsessed about “winning” that they decide he doesn’t need to follow any rules?

Please list his high crimes and misdemeanors to date. It shouldn't be difficult what with all the evidence Adam Schiff has provided.

Why? Because you're actually interested in holding Trump accountable?

BK is a trumpette thru and thru Loves the way trump calls FBI scum

 

[colfax_m]

Many of the players are being investigated by both, with Horowitz' authority being the more limited.

There's precisely zero reason to believe that Durham is investigating the whistleblower and if he is without a proper reason, that's intimidation and really bad.

Tough titty for you people. Best of luck whining about intimidation.

Is it really that hard to hold Trump to the same level of accountability as everyone else? Or is it just because Trump supporters are obsessed about “winning” that they decide he doesn’t need to follow any rules?

Please list his high crimes and misdemeanors to date. It shouldn't be difficult what with all the evidence Adam Schiff has provided.

House Democrats spoke for months about how investigations had established crimes that President Donald Trump committed, but on Tuesday they did not specifically include those allegations in articles of impeachment under the constitutional standard of “high crimes and misdemeanors.”

The two articles of impeachment Democrats filed — abuse of power and obstruction of Congress — stayed away from detailing where Trump might have broken the law with his dealings with Ukraine or interactions with the special counsel probe into Russian interference with the 2016 election.

The strategy to focus on constitutional violations rather than the criminal violations they had discussed — such as bribery, extortion, campaign finance or obstruction of justice — highlights how Democrats contend that a president does not have to commit a crime to be impeached

There seems to be some misunderstanding about the phrase "high crime". That doesn't mean, like a really bad crime, as one might assume based on just looking at the words. A high crime is a crime uniquely committed by a person of high authority. It's essentially the same as a betrayal of authority and public trust. These are not crimes enumerated in law because you can't possibly write a book of laws solely for a person of power to follow, but rather designed to be decided upon by the House, which is the closest representation of the people of the country.

Trump's use of our taxpayer dollars to cajole an ally into investigating his political opponent is exactly what the founders had in mind when they wrote "high crimes".

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Many of the players are being investigated by both, with Horowitz' authority being the more limited.

There's precisely zero reason to believe that Durham is investigating the whistleblower and if he is without a proper reason, that's intimidation and really bad.

Tough titty for you people. Best of luck whining about intimidation.

Is it really that hard to hold Trump to the same level of accountability as everyone else? Or is it just because Trump supporters are obsessed about “winning” that they decide he doesn’t need to follow any rules?

Please list his high crimes and misdemeanors to date. It shouldn't be difficult what with all the evidence Adam Schiff has provided.

Why? Because you're actually interested in holding Trump accountable?

No, because I enjoy seeing you figuratively standing there mouth agape.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Many of the players are being investigated by both, with Horowitz' authority being the more limited.

There's precisely zero reason to believe that Durham is investigating the whistleblower and if he is without a proper reason, that's intimidation and really bad.

Tough titty for you people. Best of luck whining about intimidation.

Is it really that hard to hold Trump to the same level of accountability as everyone else? Or is it just because Trump supporters are obsessed about “winning” that they decide he doesn’t need to follow any rules?

Please list his high crimes and misdemeanors to date. It shouldn't be difficult what with all the evidence Adam Schiff has provided.

House Democrats spoke for months about how investigations had established crimes that President Donald Trump committed, but on Tuesday they did not specifically include those allegations in articles of impeachment under the constitutional standard of “high crimes and misdemeanors.”

The two articles of impeachment Democrats filed — abuse of power and obstruction of Congress — stayed away from detailing where Trump might have broken the law with his dealings with Ukraine or interactions with the special counsel probe into Russian interference with the 2016 election.

The strategy to focus on constitutional violations rather than the criminal violations they had discussed — such as bribery, extortion, campaign finance or obstruction of justice — highlights how Democrats contend that a president does not have to commit a crime to be impeached