Democrats Already Preparing to Impeach Trump if he’s Re-Elected

OP
Bush92

Bush92

GHBush1992
Joined
May 23, 2014
Messages
30,273
Reaction score
5,285
Points
1,130
So do you think that witnesses should testify?
Oh yes! I want to see who the partisan joke of a whistleblower is.
Why? To make him pay for following all the rules?
How do we know he did? He hasn't testified.
The IG said he followed all the rules.

Maybe y’all want to dunk him in the lake and see if he floats? Would that satisfy y’all?
No problem with the IG. He did what he could with the authority he had, and has set the table.

Barr and Durham, on the other hand, have all the authority and are well adept at field dressing game, I'd wager.
Lying to get those FISA warrants will cost people their freedom.
 

Crixus

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2015
Messages
22,936
Reaction score
2,680
Points
290
Location
BFE Texas.
She is a black incumbent Democrat from a black district. She is safe.

Probably, but maybe not as safe as we think. Honestly, to me it seems like everyone is getting sick of this hyper partisan bullshit. Sure she will probably win, but maybe not with the wide margins she had before?
 

beautress

Always Faithful
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2018
Messages
14,174
Reaction score
5,913
Points
1,095
Location
Walker County, TX

toobfreak

Gold Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2017
Messages
25,344
Reaction score
7,328
Points
290
That would be a great thing! Now that the Democrats have lowered the bar for impeachment to any policy they don't agree with, I'm sure they can never put it down! Eventually it can only lead to the realization that the DNC is no longer a legit, legal party but merely a rogue outfit working for the utter anarchy of the nation!
Democrats don’t believe in the Constitution or democracy. Just a spoiled bunch of children who can’t get over losing a free and fair election.
Or maybe even worse: that it was free at all to allow the actual voter to pick the winner they really wanted. After all, they had just spent 2 billion dollars telling America they really wanted Hillary. That is the reason for the Russian story and Hillary's books: how to explain to their base why they lost without admitting they simply were the loser.
 

colfax_m

Gold Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2019
Messages
9,697
Reaction score
1,871
Points
150
So do you think that witnesses should testify?
Oh yes! I want to see who the partisan joke of a whistleblower is.
Why? To make him pay for following all the rules?
How do we know he did? He hasn't testified.
The IG said he followed all the rules.

Maybe y’all want to dunk him in the lake and see if he floats? Would that satisfy y’all?
No problem with the IG. He did what he could with the authority he had, and has set the table.

Barr and Durham, on the other hand, have all the authority and are well adept at field dressing game, I'd wager.
You're confused. There's different IG for different communities. The IC IG handled the whistleblower complaint. Rules were followed. Durham doesn't have anything to do with it.
 

Cellblock2429

Gold Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2016
Messages
21,924
Reaction score
3,828
Points
290
Location
New York

Billy_Kinetta

Paladin of the Lost Hour
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 4, 2013
Messages
47,015
Reaction score
11,782
Points
2,060
Oh yes! I want to see who the partisan joke of a whistleblower is.
Why? To make him pay for following all the rules?
How do we know he did? He hasn't testified.
The IG said he followed all the rules.

Maybe y’all want to dunk him in the lake and see if he floats? Would that satisfy y’all?
No problem with the IG. He did what he could with the authority he had, and has set the table.

Barr and Durham, on the other hand, have all the authority and are well adept at field dressing game, I'd wager.
You're confused. There's different IG for different communities. The IC IG handled the whistleblower complaint. Rules were followed. Durham doesn't have anything to do with it.
Many of the players are being investigated by both, with Horowitz' authority being the more limited.
 

colfax_m

Gold Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2019
Messages
9,697
Reaction score
1,871
Points
150
Why? To make him pay for following all the rules?
How do we know he did? He hasn't testified.
The IG said he followed all the rules.

Maybe y’all want to dunk him in the lake and see if he floats? Would that satisfy y’all?
No problem with the IG. He did what he could with the authority he had, and has set the table.

Barr and Durham, on the other hand, have all the authority and are well adept at field dressing game, I'd wager.
You're confused. There's different IG for different communities. The IC IG handled the whistleblower complaint. Rules were followed. Durham doesn't have anything to do with it.
Many of the players are being investigated by both, with Horowitz' authority being the more limited.
There's precisely zero reason to believe that Durham is investigating the whistleblower and if he is without a proper reason, that's intimidation and really bad.
 

Billy_Kinetta

Paladin of the Lost Hour
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 4, 2013
Messages
47,015
Reaction score
11,782
Points
2,060
How do we know he did? He hasn't testified.
The IG said he followed all the rules.

Maybe y’all want to dunk him in the lake and see if he floats? Would that satisfy y’all?
No problem with the IG. He did what he could with the authority he had, and has set the table.

Barr and Durham, on the other hand, have all the authority and are well adept at field dressing game, I'd wager.
You're confused. There's different IG for different communities. The IC IG handled the whistleblower complaint. Rules were followed. Durham doesn't have anything to do with it.
Many of the players are being investigated by both, with Horowitz' authority being the more limited.
There's precisely zero reason to believe that Durham is investigating the whistleblower and if he is without a proper reason, that's intimidation and really bad.
Tough titty for you people. Best of luck whining about intimidation.
 

colfax_m

Gold Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2019
Messages
9,697
Reaction score
1,871
Points
150
The IG said he followed all the rules.

Maybe y’all want to dunk him in the lake and see if he floats? Would that satisfy y’all?
No problem with the IG. He did what he could with the authority he had, and has set the table.

Barr and Durham, on the other hand, have all the authority and are well adept at field dressing game, I'd wager.
You're confused. There's different IG for different communities. The IC IG handled the whistleblower complaint. Rules were followed. Durham doesn't have anything to do with it.
Many of the players are being investigated by both, with Horowitz' authority being the more limited.
There's precisely zero reason to believe that Durham is investigating the whistleblower and if he is without a proper reason, that's intimidation and really bad.
Tough titty for you people. Best of luck whining about intimidation.
Is it really that hard to hold Trump to the same level of accountability as everyone else? Or is it just because Trump supporters are obsessed about “winning” that they decide he doesn’t need to follow any rules?
 

Billy_Kinetta

Paladin of the Lost Hour
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 4, 2013
Messages
47,015
Reaction score
11,782
Points
2,060
No problem with the IG. He did what he could with the authority he had, and has set the table.

Barr and Durham, on the other hand, have all the authority and are well adept at field dressing game, I'd wager.
You're confused. There's different IG for different communities. The IC IG handled the whistleblower complaint. Rules were followed. Durham doesn't have anything to do with it.
Many of the players are being investigated by both, with Horowitz' authority being the more limited.
There's precisely zero reason to believe that Durham is investigating the whistleblower and if he is without a proper reason, that's intimidation and really bad.
Tough titty for you people. Best of luck whining about intimidation.
Is it really that hard to hold Trump to the same level of accountability as everyone else? Or is it just because Trump supporters are obsessed about “winning” that they decide he doesn’t need to follow any rules?
Please list his high crimes and misdemeanors to date. It shouldn't be difficult what with all the evidence Adam Schiff has provided.
 

colfax_m

Gold Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2019
Messages
9,697
Reaction score
1,871
Points
150
You're confused. There's different IG for different communities. The IC IG handled the whistleblower complaint. Rules were followed. Durham doesn't have anything to do with it.
Many of the players are being investigated by both, with Horowitz' authority being the more limited.
There's precisely zero reason to believe that Durham is investigating the whistleblower and if he is without a proper reason, that's intimidation and really bad.
Tough titty for you people. Best of luck whining about intimidation.
Is it really that hard to hold Trump to the same level of accountability as everyone else? Or is it just because Trump supporters are obsessed about “winning” that they decide he doesn’t need to follow any rules?
Please list his high crimes and misdemeanors to date. It shouldn't be difficult what with all the evidence Adam Schiff has provided.
Why? Because you're actually interested in holding Trump accountable?
 

edward37

Gold Member
Joined
Jan 19, 2017
Messages
25,444
Reaction score
2,263
Points
290
You're confused. There's different IG for different communities. The IC IG handled the whistleblower complaint. Rules were followed. Durham doesn't have anything to do with it.
Many of the players are being investigated by both, with Horowitz' authority being the more limited.
There's precisely zero reason to believe that Durham is investigating the whistleblower and if he is without a proper reason, that's intimidation and really bad.
Tough titty for you people. Best of luck whining about intimidation.
Is it really that hard to hold Trump to the same level of accountability as everyone else? Or is it just because Trump supporters are obsessed about “winning” that they decide he doesn’t need to follow any rules?
Please list his high crimes and misdemeanors to date. It shouldn't be difficult what with all the evidence Adam Schiff has provided.
House Democrats spoke for months about how investigations had established crimes that President Donald Trump committed, but on Tuesday they did not specifically include those allegations in articles of impeachment under the constitutional standard of “high crimes and misdemeanors.”

The two articles of impeachment Democrats filed — abuse of power and obstruction of Congress — stayed away from detailing where Trump might have broken the law with his dealings with Ukraine or interactions with the special counsel probe into Russian interference with the 2016 election.

The strategy to focus on constitutional violations rather than the criminal violations they had discussed — such as bribery, extortion, campaign finance or obstruction of justice — highlights how Democrats contend that a president does not have to commit a crime to be impeached
 

edward37

Gold Member
Joined
Jan 19, 2017
Messages
25,444
Reaction score
2,263
Points
290
Make Trump the 1st president impeached twice ,,supported by the lowest slime ever in our senate Let Americans see the slime they voted for
 

edward37

Gold Member
Joined
Jan 19, 2017
Messages
25,444
Reaction score
2,263
Points
290
Many of the players are being investigated by both, with Horowitz' authority being the more limited.
There's precisely zero reason to believe that Durham is investigating the whistleblower and if he is without a proper reason, that's intimidation and really bad.
Tough titty for you people. Best of luck whining about intimidation.
Is it really that hard to hold Trump to the same level of accountability as everyone else? Or is it just because Trump supporters are obsessed about “winning” that they decide he doesn’t need to follow any rules?
Please list his high crimes and misdemeanors to date. It shouldn't be difficult what with all the evidence Adam Schiff has provided.
Why? Because you're actually interested in holding Trump accountable?
BK is a trumpette thru and thru Loves the way trump calls FBI scum
 

colfax_m

Gold Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2019
Messages
9,697
Reaction score
1,871
Points
150
Many of the players are being investigated by both, with Horowitz' authority being the more limited.
There's precisely zero reason to believe that Durham is investigating the whistleblower and if he is without a proper reason, that's intimidation and really bad.
Tough titty for you people. Best of luck whining about intimidation.
Is it really that hard to hold Trump to the same level of accountability as everyone else? Or is it just because Trump supporters are obsessed about “winning” that they decide he doesn’t need to follow any rules?
Please list his high crimes and misdemeanors to date. It shouldn't be difficult what with all the evidence Adam Schiff has provided.
House Democrats spoke for months about how investigations had established crimes that President Donald Trump committed, but on Tuesday they did not specifically include those allegations in articles of impeachment under the constitutional standard of “high crimes and misdemeanors.”

The two articles of impeachment Democrats filed — abuse of power and obstruction of Congress — stayed away from detailing where Trump might have broken the law with his dealings with Ukraine or interactions with the special counsel probe into Russian interference with the 2016 election.

The strategy to focus on constitutional violations rather than the criminal violations they had discussed — such as bribery, extortion, campaign finance or obstruction of justice — highlights how Democrats contend that a president does not have to commit a crime to be impeached
There seems to be some misunderstanding about the phrase "high crime". That doesn't mean, like a really bad crime, as one might assume based on just looking at the words. A high crime is a crime uniquely committed by a person of high authority. It's essentially the same as a betrayal of authority and public trust. These are not crimes enumerated in law because you can't possibly write a book of laws solely for a person of power to follow, but rather designed to be decided upon by the House, which is the closest representation of the people of the country.

Trump's use of our taxpayer dollars to cajole an ally into investigating his political opponent is exactly what the founders had in mind when they wrote "high crimes".
 

Billy_Kinetta

Paladin of the Lost Hour
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 4, 2013
Messages
47,015
Reaction score
11,782
Points
2,060
Many of the players are being investigated by both, with Horowitz' authority being the more limited.
There's precisely zero reason to believe that Durham is investigating the whistleblower and if he is without a proper reason, that's intimidation and really bad.
Tough titty for you people. Best of luck whining about intimidation.
Is it really that hard to hold Trump to the same level of accountability as everyone else? Or is it just because Trump supporters are obsessed about “winning” that they decide he doesn’t need to follow any rules?
Please list his high crimes and misdemeanors to date. It shouldn't be difficult what with all the evidence Adam Schiff has provided.
Why? Because you're actually interested in holding Trump accountable?
No, because I enjoy seeing you figuratively standing there mouth agape.
 

Billy_Kinetta

Paladin of the Lost Hour
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 4, 2013
Messages
47,015
Reaction score
11,782
Points
2,060
Many of the players are being investigated by both, with Horowitz' authority being the more limited.
There's precisely zero reason to believe that Durham is investigating the whistleblower and if he is without a proper reason, that's intimidation and really bad.
Tough titty for you people. Best of luck whining about intimidation.
Is it really that hard to hold Trump to the same level of accountability as everyone else? Or is it just because Trump supporters are obsessed about “winning” that they decide he doesn’t need to follow any rules?
Please list his high crimes and misdemeanors to date. It shouldn't be difficult what with all the evidence Adam Schiff has provided.
House Democrats spoke for months about how investigations had established crimes that President Donald Trump committed, but on Tuesday they did not specifically include those allegations in articles of impeachment under the constitutional standard of “high crimes and misdemeanors.”

The two articles of impeachment Democrats filed — abuse of power and obstruction of Congress — stayed away from detailing where Trump might have broken the law with his dealings with Ukraine or interactions with the special counsel probe into Russian interference with the 2016 election.

The strategy to focus on constitutional violations rather than the criminal violations they had discussed — such as bribery, extortion, campaign finance or obstruction of justice — highlights how Democrats contend that a president does not have to commit a crime to be impeached
:auiqs.jpg:
 

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top