Dear
BULLDOG
We can agree on the reality we see in common:
1. the mailin ballots that were not notarized are what is making the election results faith based
We can agree that without legal proof that these ballots are signed under penalty of perjury,
then these do not meet the criteria required of roughly half the voters across states or the nation.
2. the rules on mailin ballots in the contested states were not changed by VOTE of STATE LEGISLATORS.
Again this fails to meet the AGREED rule and process nationally that half the voters consented to.
Given these 2 conflicts, this is why the results do not represent the public equally as required under
Constitutional standards and ethics.
You and proTrump people may not all agree with each other.
But I agree with you where YOU agree to those rule changes
but other people did not agree.
That is enough to justify recognizing separate administrations
for both halves of the populations per state and across the nation.
If you and others want to keep imposing your beliefs on each other, that is your problem.
But I as a taxpayer and citizen do not have to put up with being imposed upon by either group.
I can agree to respect your separate beliefs, policies and administrations.
While bringing together other people like me, from every party,
who AGREES to accommodate and include each other equally,
and formulate a Council and system of facilitating consensus
between the parties and their administrative reps.
Public policy and govt should represent ALL people regardless of party or belief.
You can still disagree with each other, but public policy should be independent of that,
and only reflect what all the public agrees on.
If you want the black folk to quit thinking of the GOP as racist, your best bet would be for the GOP to quit being racist.
BULLDOG
That isn't what is causing Liberals to blame GOP for racism.
AzogtheDefiler
What will clean up the playing field:
Agreeing to keep political religious beliefs out of Govt.
Of all the policies and proposals voted on had to pass Constitutional and ethics standards, these bills would have to be effectively written by consensus between people, states and parties.
As long as Democrats play by subjective rules, this skews both policies, representation and elections to favor biased beliefs and manipulate the voting and democratic process.
We have to go back and agree on the rules, in order to clean up govt and election campaigning.
We can't agree on the rules, as long as we can't agree on reality. Tell me again how trump won the election, and the SC os going to reinstate him on Aug 15.
at