This will be fun: Democrats' new "Blue MAGA" strategy about to drop

[YoursTruly]

I understand it’s a two party system, so why would be people that are upset spending has been cut enough vote for the party that wants to increase spending v the party they think didn’t cut enough?

You keep dodging the question

I don't know. For the same reasons Republicans nominated Mitt Romney. Or voted for Trump after he spent $8 trillion in just 4 years, increased or suspended the debt ceiling every time it came up. Or assaulted our 2A twice. Or never ended one war.
Political loyalist are retarded and will follow along like sheep when told to. Trump should've been kicked out of the GOP. Same as Harris should've been kicked out of the DNC.

 

[dblack]

I get called a Trump supporter by the left. And Biden supporter by the right.

Thinking for yourself is NOT OK!

 

[struth]

I don't know. For the same reasons Republicans nominated Mitt Romney. Or voted for Trump after he spent $8 trillion in just 4 years, increased or suspended the debt ceiling every time it came up. Or assaulted our 2A twice. Or never ended one war.
Political loyalist are retarded and will follow along like sheep when told to. Trump should've been kicked out of the GOP. Same as Harris should've been kicked out of the DNC.

So you are just throwing crap against the wall and have no real answer for your claim? Gotcha

 

[Concerned American]

They're not cutting anything substantial. In most cases, they're increasing spending, by trillions.

And you're whining about the government give-aways. Make up your mind.

 

[Concerned American]

Because when people get lied to, they tend to not support the liars.

And yet you still support democrats. Ironic

 

[Stryder50]

The GOP has the trifecta. No more excuses. No one with any common (political) sense would blame the democrats for something the GOP has the power to do.
IE: Individual bills with all the DOGE cuts built into them. Reducing even more spending than DOGE pointed out. Reducing the size and scope of government, as they promised they'd do.

These are the things that fiscal hawks would support. The reason they're NOT supporting them is because there are no actual cuts in spending. If there was, there wouldn't be a problem, as the democrats don't have enough to vote down the bill.

How about YOU start here;

https://www.usdebtclock.org/

.... and tell us what/how you'd cut and make the Budget and Tax Load drop down.

 

[leftwinger]

And now: MEGA. England wants in too. They already have a red hat MEGA.

 

[Stryder50]

This is exactly why I stopped voting for Republicans. I was sick of them promising spending cuts and then spending more than the democrats.
That didn't make me vote for democrats. I've never voted for one that I can remember. Because they spend too much also.

You never voted Republican/Conservative !

This is a classic line of disinformation common to typical Leftist agitators and malcontents.

Try being honest Komrade.

The alternative to conservative/Republicans are the pseudo-liberal Democrats who always talk and do, more spending and more taxes.

You want us to believe that since the one half that might make a difference doesn't in "your mind", that such is the reason you would vote for the opposite which is far worse ... ????
Along with "Get Real!", try being honest, Komrade 'YoursFooly'.

 

[BluesLegend]

First Blue MAGA ad out, it's Schumer and his BBQ with cheese on raw hamburger again. Phony Democrats gonna phony.

 

[YoursTruly]

You never voted Republican/Conservative !

This is a classic line of disinformation common to typical Leftist agitators and malcontents.

Try being honest Komrade.

The alternative to conservative/Republicans are the pseudo-liberal Democrats who always talk and do, more spending and more taxes.

You want us to believe that since the one half that might make a difference doesn't in "your mind", that such is the reason you would vote for the opposite which is far worse ... ????
Along with "Get Real!", try being honest, Komrade 'YoursFooly'.

I've always voted for fiscal conservatives. But never voted for a RINO.

Only political loyalist believe you have to vote for a Republican or Democrat. Those that think you have to vote for the LO2E's (Lesser of two evils). I stopped believing in that fairy tale a long time ago.

 

[marvin martian]

I get called a Trump supporter by the left. And Biden supporter by the right.

Pretty simple way to settle that. Who did you vote for?

 

[YoursTruly]

Pretty simple way to settle that. Who did you vote for?

 

[marvin martian]

View attachment 1116785

Why are you so active on an American political forum if you're not American?

 

[YoursTruly]

Why are you so active on an American political forum if you're not American?

I am American, dude. Born and raised here. So were my historical family, all the way back to the 1700's.

I voted for this guy because he's a fiscal conservative. He's doing what our president and congress should be doing. He's living proof that fiscal conservatism works.

 

[marvin martian]

I am American, dude. Born and raised here. So were my historical family, all the way back to the 1700's.

I voted for this guy because he's a fiscal conservative. He's doing what our president and congress should be doing. He's living proof that fiscal conservatism works.

You voted for Javier Milei in the US presidential election?

OK...

 

[dblack]

You voted for Javier Milei in the US presidential election?

So, does that settle it?

 

[YoursTruly]

You voted for Javier Milei in the US presidential election?

OK...

yes I did. And I knew you were going to make this a personal issue. When you Trumpbots can't refute fiscal conservatives and the facts, you always get personal and childish.

Try to stay on topic and keep up.

 

[Concerned American]

yes I did. And I knew you were going to make this a personal issue. When you Trumpbots can't refute fiscal conservatives and the facts, you always get personal and childish.

Try to stay on topic and keep up.

So did you figure that your single write-in vote for a guy that can't legally become POTUS would be effective? That thinking is ignorant--not being personal, just making a real world observation.

 

[YoursTruly]

So did you figure that your single write-in vote for a guy that can't legally become POTUS would be effective? That thinking is ignorant--not being personal, just making a real world observation.

It had the same effect if I had voted for anyone else. Trump or Harris. Because one single vote has never changed the outcome of any general or mid term election.

If you weren't trying to keep this conversation personal, and took two seconds to think about this, you'd know that. But here you are, trying to keep the conversation off topic and personal.

 

[marvin martian]

yes I did. And I knew you were going to make this a personal issue. When you Trumpbots can't refute fiscal conservatives and the facts, you always get personal and childish.

Try to stay on topic and keep up.

So you "voted" for someone who wasn't on the ballot, and can't be elected.

Next time, stay home and save the gas money.

Well done!