Democrat Rep Ramon Perez distributes porn

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Title of thread is a tad misleading.

It is?!?

He distributed porn to his colleagues. That's exactly what he did. What is "misleading" about that?

How many images did he distribute?

I never said "images". The title doesn't say "images". Pornography can include words and sounds, snowflake. Oops...

So sorry man! You lose on this point. It was misleading! You are better than that!

It wasn't "misleading" at all. I never said "images". Never.

You said he distributed porn. He did not. Come on man! You are acting like a liberal!

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Good for him....Looking at porn and having sex is part of being free.

Then why is desperately trying to claim that someone else "gave him" the screen shot? Oops...

(Hint: at best this is highly unprofessional...at worst he was viewing child pornography on the "teen porn" tab)

Why do you want to limit people? I thought you were a liberterian?

As I've told you at least seventy times now, I am not a libertarian. Never have been, never will be. You continue to illustrate your illiteracy. It worse when you're in the bag from your drinking problem (which is 99% of the time at this point).

I am a true constitutional conservative. Bookmark this post so you can refer back to it in the future.

Let's review some math terminology. What comes after seventeen? And then after that?

Do they also not end in "teen".

It is not child pornography.

 

[P@triot]

You believe porn is "immoral"?

You don't?!?

Let's see...it's sex outside of marriage, it's extreme promiscuity, the girls are exploited (and often times raped), it spreads a hoard of diseases - including AIDS which has killed some of them, and the girls have to resort to drugs and suicide over being treated like filthy animals - all so you can get off Seawytch.

And the left claims to "care" about people. Hilarious. Seawytch will exploit a young girl to the point of AIDS and suicide just so she can get off.

 

[P@triot]

Good for him....Looking at porn and having sex is part of being free.

Then why is desperately trying to claim that someone else "gave him" the screen shot? Oops...

(Hint: at best this is highly unprofessional...at worst he was viewing child pornography on the "teen porn" tab)

Why do you want to limit people? I thought you were a liberterian?

As I've told you at least seventy times now, I am not a libertarian. Never have been, never will be. You continue to illustrate your illiteracy. It worse when you're in the bag from your drinking problem (which is 99% of the time at this point).

I am a true constitutional conservative. Bookmark this post so you can refer back to it in the future.

Let's review some math terminology. What comes after seventeen? And then after that?

Do they also not end in "teen".

It is not child pornography.

I said "at worst". I didn't say he was doing that. There is no way for us to know what was under that tab.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Good for him....Looking at porn and having sex is part of being free.

Then why is desperately trying to claim that someone else "gave him" the screen shot? Oops...

(Hint: at best this is highly unprofessional...at worst he was viewing child pornography on the "teen porn" tab)

Why do you want to limit people? I thought you were a liberterian?

As I've told you at least seventy times now, I am not a libertarian. Never have been, never will be. You continue to illustrate your illiteracy. It worse when you're in the bag from your drinking problem (which is 99% of the time at this point).

I am a true constitutional conservative. Bookmark this post so you can refer back to it in the future.

Let's review some math terminology. What comes after seventeen? And then after that?

Do they also not end in "teen".

It is not child pornography.

I said "at worst". I didn't say he was doing that. There is no way for us to know what was under that tab.

Why do assume "at worst"?

It is dishonest.

 

[Avatar4321]

Rhode Island state representative Ramon Perez (D) took a screen shot of a Wikipedia article he needed for some legislation he was working on and distributed it. Unfortunately for him, he failed to close his browsers other open tabs which included stuff such as "Teen Porn" and "MILF Porn" among others.

Yet another example of the "quality" leaders the left elects to represent the people.

Democrat lawmaker accidentally distributes documents referencing pornography. It doesn’t end well.

Note to RI State Rep. Perez: Close All Porn Tabs When Taking a Browser Screen Grab

Was it legal porn?

Trump cheats on his wives and sexually harasses women.


Which is worse?

So you can do bad things as long as the other guy does something you think is worse?

No. It was a question you don't dare answer.

It's a question I don't have all the facts to answer

You on the other hand are using the question deflect.

Things I don't know:

Is the congressmen married? If he is the use of porn is adultery as much as trumps extramarital activities and both are wrong.

Did Trump actually sexually harass anyone? Accusations exist sure but they conveniently came out during the election and disappeared shortly afterwards.

The "Teen" porn is disturbing. Is it 18 & 19 year olds? Is it 20 year olds pretending to be teens? Or is it 13 to 17 year olds? All is disturbing but particularly the last. I will never know this answer because I wont be looking through his stash. But considering the abuse that is often involved with porn he may be supporting far worse abuse than trump is assuming the allegations against trump are correct.

Now again why would i be afraid to answer?

 

[P@triot]

Why do assume "at worst"? It is dishonest.

I didn't assume. If I had, I wouldn't have prefaced it with "at best" followed by "at worst". I gave a range because we don't know.

The only thing dishonest was your ignorant post here. Would you like to try again?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Why do assume "at worst"? It is dishonest.

I didn't assume. If I had, I wouldn't have prefaced it with "at best" followed by "at worst". I gave a range because we don't know.

The only thing dishonest was your ignorant post here. Would you like to try again?

Unfortunately, your post says you are dishonest.

I do not condone what he did, and I think it is as funny as hell, but you don't have to (pardon the pun) trump up what he did to child porn from adult porn without knowing the truth.

If you weren't trying to do that, why draw specific attention to it?

 

[P@triot]

If you weren't trying to do that, why draw specific attention to it?

Because I stick to the facts. There was a tab that said "teen". The better question is - why are you so desperate to draw attention away from the facts?

 

[P@triot]

Unfortunately, your post says you are dishonest.

Unfortunately, your post says that you are an asshole. You've falsely accused me of "assuming" when I clearly did no such thing, and now you're falsely accusing me of being "dishonest" when I am far and away the most honest poster here.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

If you weren't trying to do that, why draw specific attention to it?

Because I stick to the facts. There was a tab that said "teen". The better question is - why are you so desperate to draw attention away from the facts?

I am not drawing attention away from the facts. I stated it as such in my previous post.

The tab says teen, That includes 18 and 19 year-old people who are of legal age and is not child pornography. You jumped to the conclusion that it was child pornography. Why are you dishonest?

 

[jc456]

If you weren't trying to do that, why draw specific attention to it?

Because I stick to the facts. There was a tab that said "teen". The better question is - why are you so desperate to draw attention away from the facts?

I am not drawing attention away from the facts. I stated it as such in my previous post.

The tab says teen, That includes 18 and 19 year-old people who are of legal age and is not child pornography. You jumped to the conclusion that it was child pornography. Why are you dishonest?

Not taking sides here, but that's a stretch to think that only 18 and 19 year olds would be on that tab with what we know about the internet and porn sites. I'm just saying, you can't truly believe that. Again, I have no skin in this fight, I'm just asking an obvious question that comes from your statement.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Unfortunately, your post says you are dishonest.

Unfortunately, your post says that you are an asshole. You've falsely accused me of "assuming" when I clearly did no such thing, and now you're falsely accusing me of being "dishonest" when I am far and away the most honest poster here.

Says you. That could also be dishonest.

Your name-calling seems to indicate that you have lost the argument.

Why not state that you made a false assumption and be done with it?

 

[jc456]

Unfortunately, your post says you are dishonest.

Unfortunately, your post says that you are an asshole. You've falsely accused me of "assuming" when I clearly did no such thing, and now you're falsely accusing me of being "dishonest" when I am far and away the most honest poster here.

dude, then if you are truly the most honest, then you need to kill this thread, recreate one using a different line then he passed porn. He passed a screen shot showing he was on a porn site. that's all right?

 

[Avatar4321]

Good for him....Looking at porn and having sex is part of being free.

Why do you want to limit people? I thought you were a liberterian?

Good for him....Looking at porn and having sex is part of being free.

Why do you want to limit people? I thought you were a liberterian?

Who has mentioned passing any laws?

Right and wrong exist outside congressional action.

 

[P@triot]

Why not state that you made a false assumption and be done with it?

Because I didn't make an assumption. Why not state that you are lying and be done with it?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Why not state that you made a false assumption and be done with it?

Because I didn't make an assumption. Why not state that you are lying and be done with it?

You assumed teen porn meant child pornography. I am not the only one on this thread who sees this and is calling you on it. Read the thread.

I am finished with your dishonesty.

 

[HappyJoy]

It is?!?

He distributed porn to his colleagues. That's exactly what he did. What is "misleading" about that?

How many images did he distribute?

I never said "images". The title doesn't say "images". Pornography can include words and sounds, snowflake. Oops...

So sorry man! You lose on this point. It was misleading! You are better than that!

It wasn't "misleading" at all. I never said "images". Never.

You said he distributed porn. He did not. Come on man! You are acting like a liberal!

No,no, no, no. Conservatives own this guy, don't push him off on us.

 

[jc456]

Why not state that you made a false assumption and be done with it?

Because I didn't make an assumption. Why not state that you are lying and be done with it?

You assumed teen porn meant child pornography. I am not the only one on this thread who sees this and is calling you on it. Read the thread.

I am finished with your dishonesty.

again, I'd challenge that logic. but like I said, that's your argument. but if you think sleazy sites like that wouldn't include younger teens, then I think you aren't being honest. he isn't being honest by what he stated in the thread, but I think we can actually assume that younger teens were most likely in that site.

 

[HappyJoy]

Why not state that you made a false assumption and be done with it?

Because I didn't make an assumption. Why not state that you are lying and be done with it?

You assumed teen porn meant child pornography. I am not the only one on this thread who sees this and is calling you on it. Read the thread.

I am finished with your dishonesty.

again, I'd challenge that logic. but like I said, that's your argument. but if you think sleazy sites like that wouldn't include younger teens, then I think you aren't being honest. he isn't being honest by what he stated in the thread, but I think we can actually assume that younger teens were most likely in that site.

You've never been to a porn site have you?