- Dec 18, 2013
- 136,216
- 27,825
- 2,180
I'd agree.again, I'd challenge that logic. but like I said, that's your argument. but if you think sleazy sites like that wouldn't include younger teens, then I think you aren't being honest. he isn't being honest by what he stated in the thread, but I think we can actually assume that younger teens were most likely in that site.Because I didn't make an assumption. Why not state that you are lying and be done with it?Why not state that you made a false assumption and be done with it?
You assumed teen porn meant child pornography. I am not the only one on this thread who sees this and is calling you on it. Read the thread.
I am finished with your dishonesty.
If that were the case, law enforcement is not doing their jobs!