Democrat Prosecutor: Trump Should Not Be Allowed to Defend Himself

[Weatherman2020]

On January 6th 2021?
Then they will.

Oh, so only if you touch that wall on certain days.

Please cite the law banning touching the wall.

 

[berg80]

Again, wrestling pigs.

Again, you embarrass yourself. Refute this or admit defeat.

https://www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/file/Court_Probation/Supreme_Court/Opinions/2023/23SA300.pdf

 

[Stormy Daniels]

He has a right to make any claim that he wants in court

False. The court has rules about conduct, procedures, what kind of evidence may be presented, and how that evidence may be presented.

 

[j-mac]

Again, you embarrass yourself.

To who? You? lol.....You're not even real for Christ sake....lol

 

[berg80]

To who? You? lol.....You're not even real for Christ sake....lol

Refute this or admit defeat.

https://www.courts.state.co.us/user...ation/Supreme_Court/Opinions/2023/23SA300.pdf

 

[j-mac]

Refute this or admit defeat.

https://www.courts.state.co.us/user...ation/Supreme_Court/Opinions/2023/23SA300.pdf

I'll wait to see what SCOTUS says, rather than your either or fallacy...

 

[Crepitus]

Democrat Prosecutor: Trump Should Not Be Allowed to Defend Himself​

A. The prosecutor isn't a Democrat, he has in fact prosecuted Democrats in the course of his career.

B. Nobody has tried to prevent tRump from defending himself, they want to prevent him attacking others.

So

C. your thread is, as usual for you, utter bullshit.

 

[berg80]

The trial began, as scheduled, on October 30. The evidentiary portion lasted five days, with closing arguments almost two weeks later, on November 15.
During those two weeks, the Electors, the Secretary, President Trump, and CRSCC submitted proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law. The court issued its written final order on November 17, finding, by clear and convincing evidence, that the events of January 6 constituted an insurrection and President Trump engaged in that insurrection.

https://www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/file/Court_Probation/Supreme_Court/Opinions/2023/23SA300.pdf

 

[berg80]

I'll wait to see what SCOTUS says, rather than your either or fallacy...

So you either can't or are unwilling to try to refute anything about the CO SC's ruling.......as I expected.

 

[j-mac]

So you either can't or are unwilling to try to refute anything about the CO SC's ruling.......as I expected.

You can think what you want, it's a free country....Don't look for me to stop you from making a fool out of yourself....

 

[kaz]

No it sedition.
THIS is an insurrection. (fail)

View attachment 880862

And yet you see pictures of leftists rioting and destroying cities and burning buildings and say there is nothing to see here.

Double standards are not something you do, it's your identity, MAGA man

 

[kyzr]

Trump ran on “getting Clinton”. Spare us the outrage.

Actually it was Trump against everyone, the FBI, the MSM, the Clintons, Hollywood, etc.

 

[kaz]

So you either can't or are unwilling to try to refute anything about the CO SC's ruling.......as I expected.

CO's ruling was based on their own opinion and not a conviction. Innocent until proven guilty is no longer a Constitutional protection, MAGA man.

Yet flip parties, and bam, it's back in the Constitution! It's how you roll, you're a racist and a scum bag

 

[kyzr]

These displays of ignorance, regurgitating right wing talking points, are ones I assume you would not express if not for the anonymity afforded to you by this message board.

If you are attempting to refute my prior post?? Epic fail. Thanks for playing.

 

[kaz]

Educate yourself.

https://www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/file/Court_Probation/Supreme_Court/Opinions/2023/23SA300.pdf

So this explains your claim that it's reasonable to believe Democrats are innocent until proven guilty and Republicans aren't?

EVERYONE knows your view is driven by party. That alone doesn't prove you wrong, but it does prove the insincerity of your argument, MAGA man

 

[kaz]

If you are attempting to refute my prior post?? Epic fail. Thanks for playing.

I like it, someone from Lithuania like you learning about American democracy

 

[kyzr]

James didn't bring the NY indictment.

Last time I checked, we didn't put people on trial for what their relatives did.

Point was, a grand jury looked at the indictment and indicted Trump.

now you are fantasizing. If that were the case, Trump wouldn't be trying to delay these trials until after the election.

1. True. She filed a $250m lawsuit. Alvin brought the 34 count bullshit indictment for paying Stormy with his own money.

https://www.npr.org/2023/04/04/1167708172/trump-charges-hush-money-new-york-indictment

Former President Donald Trump pleaded not guilty to a 34-count felony indictment unsealed in a New York City courtroom on Tuesday.
The indictment alleges that Trump falsified New York business records in order to conceal damaging information before the 2016 presidential election.

2. Grand Juries in DC or Fulton County are 99% democrat. A change of venue is warranted. Grounds for appeal.

3. Jack Smith is either legitimate or not. Ed Meese said he is not. I have not heard otherwise yet.

 

[berg80]

You can think what you want, it's a free country....Don't look for me to stop you from making a fool out of yourself....

The thing is, you are incapable of explaining in detail why you believe I'm making a fool of myself. Either because you are too dumb to defend your position or smart enough to understand your position is a steaming pile of dung.

 

[kyzr]

I like it, someone from Lithuania like you learning about American democracy

Blimy, you still here mate? I thought you'd be out waving at your appointed by God...King Charles!!

 

[kaz]

The thing is, you are incapable of explaining in detail why you believe I'm making a fool of myself

Gotcha covered. Because EVERYONE knows flip parties and you flip sides. Some like you for lying and some don't, but EVERYONE knows you're lying, MAGA man