Democrat/Hollywood mogul, Harvey Weinstein, officially accused of rape by women

[EverCurious]

Also, for the record, see my sig. I'm an LGBT capitalist, not a conservative. In fact, I'm closer to a classical liberal than I am to a conservative (on social/moral issues anyway.)

You're one of those fools who Trump has convinced that the media is lying to you. Not him of course, the media. LOL. And don't lie. You aren't close to a classical liberal. Here is what you told us 3 years ago

....an affiliation test was sent to me and I came out 86% Libertarian, 83% Republican, 67% Democrat, 62% Green Party, and 17% Socialist.

Libertarians are retarded. Especially the ones who take dicks in the ass.

Actually that was my sig last year yea... 11%-20% isn't that much of a difference son, and /all/ of it is social/moral issues - as I said.

Again, Partisan much? Here I am saying I'm a classical liberal and my shit reflects that I supported well over half of D's positions in 2016 - aka I am on the left's side on a good number of issues - and you're calling me "retarded" for not being 100% on 'your' side... Son, this is why your side loses elections, reflect on that for a while.

You're just proving how easily duped you are. If that's all it takes to get you to either not vote or vote Republican.

And you said you didn't even vote in the last election so I don't give a fuck what you think. Was that in 2012, 14 or 2016?

You remind me of the stupid black people who take a knee but then don't show up to vote.

I did not vote in 2012 because I wasn't informed on the candidates, and? I did vote this year, for Donald Trump, who I know from having watched him for some 30+ years is an independent.

Clearly you've never been an independent before, and this next paragraph will probably be lost in your partisan take on politics... You seem to be unable to understand that viewpoints on specific issues can bridge the parties. Just because I voted R in 2016 doesn't mean I agree with everything on the R platform... It just means that was my best option that year. Independents like me vote on a win/loss ratio; there are issues that we find are "most important" and we have to kind of "sacrifice" other issues that we might disagree with the person we vote for on. There is no such thing as a "perfect candidate" for people like me, we always end up losing on something. You do get used to filtering through everything and sorting out the pros and cons of those running, but it takes a lot of time and effort to do - which is a lot of why I ended up not voting in 2012, because I was disheartened by who was on the ticket, of having to chose between beliefs (right and left) that were /both/ important to me each time, and yea, because OWS was very disturbing for me in particular ( as a capitalist ), especially when the R's were caving into D's instead of standing up for capitalism ( in my opinion anyway. )

How do you think the Republican way is going to benefit you? What do you do for a living? Me? I'm rich (sort of), white, college educated, no kids, a man, straight. The GOP will screw everyone else before they screw me.

I'm a capitalist, I play the stock market for a living. I've been able to retire since I was like 25 (thank you Microsoft and BP.) I climbed the corporate ladder, I later went into business for myself as an interim executive; basically when a CEO or higher up manager gets canned, quits, or dies, I would come in and hold down the fort. I also did consulting for logistics and HR. In more "recent" years I've managed a couple small businesses - though that was more to help out friends of the family than anything else; generally speaking, these days, I play housewife and do whatever the hell I want all day.

What do R's offer me? That's a partisan question. It's about the issues, not the party.

Why did I vote Trump? That's a question I can answer. Because he loves this country and knows that socialism is a losing proposition, because I like that he's straight forward and doesn't play bullshit games with hiding his feelings on issues, because he's a balls to the walls kind of guy who I have no doubt will do everything in his power to get what he wants done, done. I agree with a lot of what he believes in, and the stuff I don't agree with I could "lose" on this time around. Nothing he's done or said was enough for me to vote for Hillary Clinton; though to be fair I've never liked her. Bill was okay, damned disrespectful of the Oval office, but alright. He fucked up with the housing thing, but other than that he did pretty well - him and Trump actually have a lot in common if you could find your way down off your partisan high horse to look for it...

In any event, just to tear your accusations of me all to shit; I am more apt to vote D on the local level than R - up here the R's are all in the oil companies pockets and sell us out, where as the D's actually put forward logical and realistic social programs and systems that can work and that I fully support.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

For 8 years Obama had $40,000 a plate fund raisers with rich donors whilst telling the poor uneducated Democrat Voters that the Democratic Party is fighting for equality.
Orwell, some animals are more equal than others

Who cares if they have expensive fund raisers for their rich donors. Double standard much?

Oh WOW, so does this mean that the Troglocrat Voters have stopped hating rich people.

 

[Dr Grump]

Another Democrat, Bill Clinton, raped women and managed to stay out of prison. Will Harvey be able to do the same?

Huh? I thought you Orange Buffoon lovers were okay with grabbing women's pussies.

 

[Dr Grump]

Apparently NBC fake news media knew about the allegations and refused to publish them. Wot a fookin' suprise!

No surprise there. That's what these liberal elite scumbags do: cover for each other until they have to cover their own asses.

no surprises you support someone who admittedly loves grabbing women's pussies but have a problem with Weinstein. Me? I think they're both big, fat, disgusting, rich, unattractive pigs.

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

How about getting the Orange sex deviate the help he desperately need s

Seth Rogen destroys Trump Jr. over Harvey Weinstein comments
Hollywood star and comedic actor Seth Rogen once again trolled and slid into Donald Trump Jr.’s direct messages on Twitter Thursday.

View image on Twitter

Follow
Seth Rogen ✔ @Sethrogen

Sliding in to @DonaldJTrumpJr DMs to remind him his father is a sexual predator like:

11:07 AM - Oct 12, 2017

• 1,534 1,534 Replies
• 27,601 27,601 Retweets
• 114,323

 

[EverCurious]

Apparently NBC fake news media knew about the allegations and refused to publish them. Wot a fookin' suprise!

No surprise there. That's what these liberal elite scumbags do: cover for each other until they have to cover their own asses.

no surprises you support someone who admittedly loves grabbing women's pussies but have a problem with Weinstein. Me? I think they're both big, fat, disgusting, rich, unattractive pigs.

Twisting words...

Trump was making a joke, and it was actually derogatory toward the women who'd let him do it (as in they were slutty.)

Frankly, even if Trump does love grabbing pussy, there's nothing wrong with that so get off your phony moral high horse and stop making a fool of yourself. Personally I have zero issues with letting my husband grab my pussy - I loved it before we got married, before we got "serious," before we were even officially "dating."

 

[Dr Grump]

Twisting words...

Trump was making a joke, and it was actually derogatory toward the women who'd let him do it (as in they were slutty.)

Frankly, even if Trump does love grabbing pussy, there's nothing wrong with that so get off your phony moral high horse and stop making a fool of yourself. Personally I have zero issues with letting my husband grab my pussy - I loved it before we got married, before we got "serious," before we were even officially "dating."

Yeah, but I bet you loved your husband. What phony high horse? I'm disgusted by pig like the Orange Buffoon using his power and influence to intimidate women and grab their pussies and you're not. That says a lot about you. None of it good.

 

[EverCurious]

Twisting words...

Trump was making a joke, and it was actually derogatory toward the women who'd let him do it (as in they were slutty.)

Frankly, even if Trump does love grabbing pussy, there's nothing wrong with that so get off your phony moral high horse and stop making a fool of yourself. Personally I have zero issues with letting my husband grab my pussy - I loved it before we got married, before we got "serious," before we were even officially "dating."

Yeah, but I bet you loved your husband. What phony high horse? I'm disgusted by pig like the Orange Buffoon using his power and influence to intimidate women and grab their pussies and you're not. That says a lot about you. None of it good.

My first husband? Yes I do, but that immature young love we had when we got married was... transient, for both of us. We were in a rush for that white picket fence, American dream; a home and starting a family. We love each other as friends, always have, likely always will, we tried to turn that into marriage and it's just not the same kind of love.

Trump didn't intimidate anyone, nor did he use power and influence to get women in bed. Again you're making shit up. He said "they would" throw themselves at him, he said they'd "let him" grab them by the pussy. That is not the same as doing it, nor is it the same as condoning it - if you note his tone of voice he was contemptuous of it, of those types of women.

News flash kido; most men do not like gold diggers or those who want to use them to advance their personal standing or finances. Now you know.

 

[Roudy]

Apparently NBC fake news media knew about the allegations and refused to publish them. Wot a fookin' suprise!

No surprise there. That's what these liberal elite scumbags do: cover for each other until they have to cover their own asses.

no surprises you support someone who admittedly loves grabbing women's pussies but have a problem with Weinstein. Me? I think they're both big, fat, disgusting, rich, unattractive pigs.

Meanwhile Trump just joked about it, while Leftist leaders who pretend to be for Lefty causes like women's rights, actually end up being sick rapists and perverts like Weiner and Weinstein.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

It's ironic that democrats who made a cottage industry of phony complaints against republicans now get caught in a very real monumenal scandal of their own.

 

[Dr Grump]

My first husband? Yes I do, but that immature young love we had when we got married was... transient, for both of us. We were in a rush for that white picket fence, American dream; a home and starting a family. We love each other as friends, always have, likely always will, we tried to turn that into marriage and it's just not the same kind of love.

Trump didn't intimidate anyone, nor did he use power and influence to get women in bed. Again you're making shit up. He said "they would" throw themselves at him, he said they'd "let him" grab them by the pussy. That is not the same as doing it, nor is it the same as condoning it - if you note his tone of voice he was contemptuous of it, of those types of women.

News flash kido; most men do not like gold diggers or those who want to use them to advance their personal standing or finances. Now you know.

Of course he used his power and position to try and get women to sleep with him. There were many examples given during the election and that is what Weinstein is finding now. I like how you say "he says". Yeah, he also says he had the biggest crowds and his inauguration. He has said a lot of things that have been utter BS. He opens his mouth and lies come rolling out. No, he didn't sound contemptuous at all. It was more amazement and an attempt to ingratiate himself with Billy Boy.

And most attractive women don't like big, fat, bloated buffoons hitting on them.

 

[Roudy]

So what happened is a lot of very vulnerable women got weinsteined into giving monicas in order to secure a ticket into an acting career.

The election of Trump was just the first step of the implosion of the Democratic Party and the crooked media as we know it.

This is the second.

 

[Dr Grump]

So what happened is a lot of very vulnerable women got weinsteined into giving monicas in order to secure a ticket into an acting career.

The election of Trump was just the first step of the implosion of the Democratic Party and the crooked media as we know it.

This is the second.

You are delusional

 

[Pogo]

So what happened is a lot of very vulnerable women got weinsteined into giving monicas in order to secure a ticket into an acting career.

The election of Trump was just the first step of the implosion of the Democratic Party and the crooked media as we know it.

This is the second.

This isn't even fucking related to politics.

I challenged the OP to demonstrate that alleged connection. He ran away.

 

[Roudy]

So what happened is a lot of very vulnerable women got weinsteined into giving monicas in order to secure a ticket into an acting career.

The election of Trump was just the first step of the implosion of the Democratic Party and the crooked media as we know it.

This is the second.

You are delusional

Yeah? The dominos are already falling. Stay tuned.

Roy Price Suspended from Amazon After Sexual Assault Allegations

 

[Pogo]

He said "they would" throw themselves at him, he said they'd "let him" grab them by the pussy. That is not the same as doing it, nor is it the same as condoning it - if you note his tone of voice he was contemptuous of it, of those types of women.

Holy SHIT --- ever heard the expression "Consider the source"?

 

[Roudy]

So what happened is a lot of very vulnerable women got weinsteined into giving monicas in order to secure a ticket into an acting career.

The election of Trump was just the first step of the implosion of the Democratic Party and the crooked media as we know it.

This is the second.

This isn't even fucking related to politics.

I challenged the OP to demonstrate that alleged connection. He ran away.

That's because you're a fucking moron and a hack!

 

[Pogo]

So what happened is a lot of very vulnerable women got weinsteined into giving monicas in order to secure a ticket into an acting career.

The election of Trump was just the first step of the implosion of the Democratic Party and the crooked media as we know it.

This is the second.

This isn't even fucking related to politics.

I challenged the OP to demonstrate that alleged connection. He ran away.

That's because you're a fucking moron and a hack!

Nnnnnnope. Actually it's because he can't answer it, because it's not there. And he doesn't have the balls to confess that he pulled it out of his ass.

And he ran away because he knows where I'd be going with the next question if he could find it. Straight to the Composition Fallacy trap door.

 

[Roudy]

So what happened is a lot of very vulnerable women got weinsteined into giving monicas in order to secure a ticket into an acting career.

The election of Trump was just the first step of the implosion of the Democratic Party and the crooked media as we know it.

This is the second.

This isn't even fucking related to politics.

I challenged the OP to demonstrate that alleged connection. He ran away.

That's because you're a fucking moron and a hack!

Nnnnnnope. Actually it's because he can't answer it, because it's not there. And he doesn't have the balls to confess that he pulled it out of his ass.

And he ran away because he knows where I'd be going with the next question if he could find it. Straight to the Composition Fallacy trap door.

Big time donor and promoter for Democratic leaders, who ran a few media outlets, falls on the sword between his legs. All the while Democrats pretend to be for sexual equality and women's rights blah blah blah, their leaders were in bed with a rapist and a sexual predator. Wow.

 

[jillian]

Twisting words...

Trump was making a joke, and it was actually derogatory toward the women who'd let him do it (as in they were slutty.)

Frankly, even if Trump does love grabbing pussy, there's nothing wrong with that so get off your phony moral high horse and stop making a fool of yourself. Personally I have zero issues with letting my husband grab my pussy - I loved it before we got married, before we got "serious," before we were even officially "dating."

Yeah, but I bet you loved your husband. What phony high horse? I'm disgusted by pig like the Orange Buffoon using his power and influence to intimidate women and grab their pussies and you're not. That says a lot about you. None of it good.

My first husband? Yes I do, but that immature young love we had when we got married was... transient, for both of us. We were in a rush for that white picket fence, American dream; a home and starting a family. We love each other as friends, always have, likely always will, we tried to turn that into marriage and it's just not the same kind of love.

Trump didn't intimidate anyone, nor did he use power and influence to get women in bed. Again you're making shit up. He said "they would" throw themselves at him, he said they'd "let him" grab them by the pussy. That is not the same as doing it, nor is it the same as condoning it - if you note his tone of voice he was contemptuous of it, of those types of women.

News flash kido; most men do not like gold diggers or those who want to use them to advance their personal standing or finances. Now you know.

you should probably worry more about the sexual predator in the White House.

no one on the left is defending Weinstein.... unlike the way you wackjobs defend the orange sociopath who has the hots for his own daughter and who likes watching teenage girls get undressed when he isn't grabbing women by the genitals.