Dem Sen. Hirono: I Told a Class of 8th Graders Their Abortion Rights Are Under Attack

[Lysistrata]

Apparently, these kids were on a class trip to DC, and visited one of their senators, not some presentation at their school thousands of miles away, so this is not a matter of something that took place at their school.

I suspect that there are thousands of eighth graders with whom teachers are discussing the subject of abortion, at least in religious private schools, if not public ones, so I don't think that age appropriateness is an issue.

If she had told the students that she was going to a rally to outlaw abortion, I wonder if people would be making the same complaints.

 

[22lcidw]

Apparently, these kids were on a class trip to DC, and visited one of their senators, not some presentation at their school thousands of miles away, so this is not a matter of something that took place at their school.

I suspect that there are thousands of eighth graders with whom teachers are discussing the subject of abortion, at least in religious private schools, if not public ones, so I don't think that age appropriateness is an issue.

If she had told the students that she was going to a rally to outlaw abortion, I wonder if people would be making the same complaints.

There are people who will trade every secret we have then listen to something like that become more powerful. She has to be an agent of the home country in Asia. Honolulu Maize has replaced Tokyo Rose.

 

[Lysistrata]

Apparently, these kids were on a class trip to DC, and visited one of their senators, not some presentation at their school thousands of miles away, so this is not a matter of something that took place at their school.

I suspect that there are thousands of eighth graders with whom teachers are discussing the subject of abortion, at least in religious private schools, if not public ones, so I don't think that age appropriateness is an issue.

If she had told the students that she was going to a rally to outlaw abortion, I wonder if people would be making the same complaints.

There are people who will trade every secret we have then listen to something like that become more powerful. She has to be an agent of the home country in Asia. Honolulu Maize has replaced Tokyo Rose.

How would you figure that? Now people who hold pro-choice views are agents of foreign countries? That is absurd. If she were anti-choice, would she still be a foreign agent? I think that you have lost your marbles, if you had any to begin with.

 

[irosie91]

Here is the quote:

“I just met sixty 8th graders from a public school in Hawaii, and I told them I was coming to a rally in front of the Supreme Court. And they said, why? I said, it is because we are -- we have to fight for abortion rights, and they knew all about it. And I asked a girl in that group from 8th graders, how many of you girls think that government should be telling us women when and if we want to have babies? Not a single one of them raised their hand. And then -- (Cheering and Applause) -- boys who were there among the sixty, I said you know, it's kind of hard for a women to get pregnant without you guys. (Laughter) They got it. How many of you boys think that government should be telling girls and women when and if we're going to have babies? And not a single one of them raised their hand." (Cheering and Applause)

You may not like her stance on abortion but there is nothing untoward in what she said and the subject of reproductive rights is perfectly acceptable in an 8th grade class.

I do not agree-----to young for that kind of discussion------it might
be ok for a few at that age----but not all----AND there is also a
religious issue that could play out on the playground in kids
that young

They are old enough to get pregnant so, yeah, they should be able to handle a conversation about their rights.

They are not old enough to get pregnant------the discussions should
be more like "WHY NOT TO....." Not "don't worry ----you can always
get rid of it" Abortion is not a benign procedure. It has both
psychological and physiological repercussions. Reminds me of
my youth-----in Health class when the RIGHT TO SMOKE AND
DRINK came up. I do not see any of it as a "right" for a 14 year old

8th graders are about 13 or 14, I'm sure you have at least an elementary understanding of human physiology.

Hirano wasn't teaching a class on sex education, she was visiting a class and talking about reproductive rights and government, it's perfectly fine. I'm sure if some **** from Alabama visited a school and spoke on the sanctity of the prolife movement you'd be fine with it.

you are SURE of quite a bit. I have more than an elementary understanding of human physiology. Feel free to ask questions.
The Human OVARY matures way ahead of the Human FOREBRAIN.
The forebrain is kinda-----the last bodily part to GROW UP. For the
record---I am prochoice for adult women. I am an adult woman and
know lots about the psychological and physiological downside of
abortion but am STILL PROCHOICE----for adult women. ---a 14
year old has a baby forebrain and a REALLY HOT CLITORIS. And
now for the shocker!!!! -----------for 14 year olds----I support the
endorsement of autoeroticism -----as delicately as possible. ---its safer.
That's for the girls. For the boys------even more endorsement for
autoeroticism (delicately----they are very vulnerable)

 

[HappyJoy]

Here is the quote:

“I just met sixty 8th graders from a public school in Hawaii, and I told them I was coming to a rally in front of the Supreme Court. And they said, why? I said, it is because we are -- we have to fight for abortion rights, and they knew all about it. And I asked a girl in that group from 8th graders, how many of you girls think that government should be telling us women when and if we want to have babies? Not a single one of them raised their hand. And then -- (Cheering and Applause) -- boys who were there among the sixty, I said you know, it's kind of hard for a women to get pregnant without you guys. (Laughter) They got it. How many of you boys think that government should be telling girls and women when and if we're going to have babies? And not a single one of them raised their hand." (Cheering and Applause)

You may not like her stance on abortion but there is nothing untoward in what she said and the subject of reproductive rights is perfectly acceptable in an 8th grade class.

I do not agree-----to young for that kind of discussion------it might
be ok for a few at that age----but not all----AND there is also a
religious issue that could play out on the playground in kids
that young

They are old enough to get pregnant so, yeah, they should be able to handle a conversation about their rights.

They are not old enough to get pregnant------the discussions should
be more like "WHY NOT TO....." Not "don't worry ----you can always
get rid of it" Abortion is not a benign procedure. It has both
psychological and physiological repercussions. Reminds me of
my youth-----in Health class when the RIGHT TO SMOKE AND
DRINK came up. I do not see any of it as a "right" for a 14 year old

8th graders are about 13 or 14, I'm sure you have at least an elementary understanding of human physiology.

Hirano wasn't teaching a class on sex education, she was visiting a class and talking about reproductive rights and government, it's perfectly fine. I'm sure if some **** from Alabama visited a school and spoke on the sanctity of the prolife movement you'd be fine with it.

you are SURE of quite a bit. I have more than an elementary understanding of human physiology. Feel free to ask questions.
The Human OVARY matures way ahead of the Human FOREBRAIN.
The forebrain is kinda-----the last bodily part to GROW UP. For the
record---I am prochoice for adult women. I am an adult woman and
know lots about the psychological and physiological downside of
abortion but am STILL PROCHOICE----for adult women. ---a 14
year old has a baby forebrain and a REALLY HOT CLITORIS. And
now for the shocker!!!! -----------for 14 year olds----I support the
endorsement of autoeroticism -----as delicately as possible. ---its safer.
That's for the girls. For the boys------even more endorsement for
autoeroticism (delicately----they are very vulnerable)

You said this, right? "They are not old enough to get pregnant".

I'm sorry, you would be wrong.

I also don't believe it's bad to talk to 13 and 14 year olds about legislating reproductive rights. Again, Hirano wasn't teaching a sex ed class, why would she, that' for educators. Shes a senator, she's talking about civics.

Wow, just wow.

 

[22lcidw]

Apparently, these kids were on a class trip to DC, and visited one of their senators, not some presentation at their school thousands of miles away, so this is not a matter of something that took place at their school.

I suspect that there are thousands of eighth graders with whom teachers are discussing the subject of abortion, at least in religious private schools, if not public ones, so I don't think that age appropriateness is an issue.

If she had told the students that she was going to a rally to outlaw abortion, I wonder if people would be making the same complaints.

There are people who will trade every secret we have then listen to something like that become more powerful. She has to be an agent of the home country in Asia. Honolulu Maize has replaced Tokyo Rose.

How would you figure that? Now people who hold pro-choice views are agents of foreign countries? That is absurd. If she were anti-choice, would she still be a foreign agent? I think that you have lost your marbles, if you had any to begin with.

You are changing the rules and laws of elections because you do not like the results. Since you are a traitor to me and I am to you obviously for not agreeing with Prog socialist dogma, your life means nothing as mine means nothing to you. I know who keeps the system going. Unfortunately you do not.

 

[irosie91]

I do not agree-----to young for that kind of discussion------it might
be ok for a few at that age----but not all----AND there is also a
religious issue that could play out on the playground in kids
that young

They are old enough to get pregnant so, yeah, they should be able to handle a conversation about their rights.

They are not old enough to get pregnant------the discussions should
be more like "WHY NOT TO....." Not "don't worry ----you can always
get rid of it" Abortion is not a benign procedure. It has both
psychological and physiological repercussions. Reminds me of
my youth-----in Health class when the RIGHT TO SMOKE AND
DRINK came up. I do not see any of it as a "right" for a 14 year old

8th graders are about 13 or 14, I'm sure you have at least an elementary understanding of human physiology.

Hirano wasn't teaching a class on sex education, she was visiting a class and talking about reproductive rights and government, it's perfectly fine. I'm sure if some **** from Alabama visited a school and spoke on the sanctity of the prolife movement you'd be fine with it.

you are SURE of quite a bit. I have more than an elementary understanding of human physiology. Feel free to ask questions.
The Human OVARY matures way ahead of the Human FOREBRAIN.
The forebrain is kinda-----the last bodily part to GROW UP. For the
record---I am prochoice for adult women. I am an adult woman and
know lots about the psychological and physiological downside of
abortion but am STILL PROCHOICE----for adult women. ---a 14
year old has a baby forebrain and a REALLY HOT CLITORIS. And
now for the shocker!!!! -----------for 14 year olds----I support the
endorsement of autoeroticism -----as delicately as possible. ---its safer.
That's for the girls. For the boys------even more endorsement for
autoeroticism (delicately----they are very vulnerable)

You said this, right? "They are not old enough to get pregnant".

I'm sorry, you would be wrong.

I also don't believe it's bad to talk to 13 and 14 year olds about legislating reproductive rights. Again, Hirano wasn't teaching a sex ed class, why would she, that' for educators. Shes a senator, she's talking about civics.

Wow, just wow.

14 year old children are VERY IMPRESSIONABLE and ---in a public
school----usually a MULTITUDE of levels of intellect. While some
would be able to handle "hey----we need your opinion on "age of smoking"
and "age of driving' and "age of drinking" and "age of aborting"----some kids MIGHT be led to imagine that they really can MAKE THOSE DECISIONS without a mature forebrain

 

[daveman]

It is. I don't know why they do it.

They don't. The fact that you equate talking to 8th graders about reproductive rights regardless of which side you're on as "sexualizing children" says a boatload about you.

My goodness, that's simply not accurate.

NBC Promotes 11-Year-Old 'Drag Kid' Who Performed At Adult Gay Bar

The mainstream media are unabashedly continuing their disturbing promotion of so-called "drag kids." On Saturday, CNBC published a video tweet of Desmond Napoles — AKA "Desmond is Amazing" — an 11-year-old "drag kid" who, earlier this month, "performed" a dance number at a gay bar while collecting dollar bills from the adult men in the crowd.
​

Sex Education for Kindergartners

What has yet to be widely reported is that the bill supported by Obama is part of a much broader campaign by the Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States (SIECUS) to implement its radical Guidelines for Comprehensive Sexuality Education: Kindergarten through 12th Gradein school districts across the nation. The SIECUS guidelines make clear that sex ed for kindergartners is precisely what the mainline sex education lobby wants right now, and last year the Obama campaign itself cited the SIECUS guidelines as an example of the kind of “age appropriate” sex education that Sen. Obama favors.

According to the SIECUS standards, children starting at age 5 are supposed to be taught about vaginal intercourse (p. 26), homosexual relationships (p. 29), same-sex marriage (p. 39), masturbation (pp. 51-52), unwanted pregnancies (p. 61), AIDS (p. 65), and other sexually transmitted diseases (p. 63). That’s right, all this starting at age 5. If you don’t believe me, read the SIECUS guidelines for yourself. One can support “age appropriate” sex education (as I do) without embracing SIECUS’s intrusive effort to force five-year-olds to deal with all manner of explicit topics.​

It's not conservatives who are pushing these things.

I see, you're confusing conversations about sex, sexual identity and reproductive rights as sexualizing children. Got it.

Do you think 5-year-olds need to know about vaginal intercourse?

Normal people don't.

It is. I don't know why they do it.

They don't. The fact that you equate talking to 8th graders about reproductive rights regardless of which side you're on as "sexualizing children" says a boatload about you.

My goodness, that's simply not accurate.

NBC Promotes 11-Year-Old 'Drag Kid' Who Performed At Adult Gay Bar

The mainstream media are unabashedly continuing their disturbing promotion of so-called "drag kids." On Saturday, CNBC published a video tweet of Desmond Napoles — AKA "Desmond is Amazing" — an 11-year-old "drag kid" who, earlier this month, "performed" a dance number at a gay bar while collecting dollar bills from the adult men in the crowd.
​

Sex Education for Kindergartners

What has yet to be widely reported is that the bill supported by Obama is part of a much broader campaign by the Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States (SIECUS) to implement its radical Guidelines for Comprehensive Sexuality Education: Kindergarten through 12th Gradein school districts across the nation. The SIECUS guidelines make clear that sex ed for kindergartners is precisely what the mainline sex education lobby wants right now, and last year the Obama campaign itself cited the SIECUS guidelines as an example of the kind of “age appropriate” sex education that Sen. Obama favors.

According to the SIECUS standards, children starting at age 5 are supposed to be taught about vaginal intercourse (p. 26), homosexual relationships (p. 29), same-sex marriage (p. 39), masturbation (pp. 51-52), unwanted pregnancies (p. 61), AIDS (p. 65), and other sexually transmitted diseases (p. 63). That’s right, all this starting at age 5. If you don’t believe me, read the SIECUS guidelines for yourself. One can support “age appropriate” sex education (as I do) without embracing SIECUS’s intrusive effort to force five-year-olds to deal with all manner of explicit topics.​

It's not conservatives who are pushing these things.

I see, you're confusing conversations about sex, sexual identity and reproductive rights as sexualizing children. Got it.

Do you think 5-year-olds need to know about vaginal intercourse?

Normal people don't.

You have a problem with 5 years being taught how to defend themselves against sexual predators? You're literally rehashing lies from Alan "I'm a ******* liar" Keyes?

Ad on Sex Education Distorts Obama Policy

Let me know when you're ready to stop lying and actually debate.

Ahhh, the New York Times: "All The News That Fits Our Leftist Agenda".

Looks like we're done here.

 

[HappyJoy]

They don't. The fact that you equate talking to 8th graders about reproductive rights regardless of which side you're on as "sexualizing children" says a boatload about you.

My goodness, that's simply not accurate.

NBC Promotes 11-Year-Old 'Drag Kid' Who Performed At Adult Gay Bar

The mainstream media are unabashedly continuing their disturbing promotion of so-called "drag kids." On Saturday, CNBC published a video tweet of Desmond Napoles — AKA "Desmond is Amazing" — an 11-year-old "drag kid" who, earlier this month, "performed" a dance number at a gay bar while collecting dollar bills from the adult men in the crowd.
​

Sex Education for Kindergartners

What has yet to be widely reported is that the bill supported by Obama is part of a much broader campaign by the Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States (SIECUS) to implement its radical Guidelines for Comprehensive Sexuality Education: Kindergarten through 12th Gradein school districts across the nation. The SIECUS guidelines make clear that sex ed for kindergartners is precisely what the mainline sex education lobby wants right now, and last year the Obama campaign itself cited the SIECUS guidelines as an example of the kind of “age appropriate” sex education that Sen. Obama favors.

According to the SIECUS standards, children starting at age 5 are supposed to be taught about vaginal intercourse (p. 26), homosexual relationships (p. 29), same-sex marriage (p. 39), masturbation (pp. 51-52), unwanted pregnancies (p. 61), AIDS (p. 65), and other sexually transmitted diseases (p. 63). That’s right, all this starting at age 5. If you don’t believe me, read the SIECUS guidelines for yourself. One can support “age appropriate” sex education (as I do) without embracing SIECUS’s intrusive effort to force five-year-olds to deal with all manner of explicit topics.​

It's not conservatives who are pushing these things.

I see, you're confusing conversations about sex, sexual identity and reproductive rights as sexualizing children. Got it.

Do you think 5-year-olds need to know about vaginal intercourse?

Normal people don't.

They don't. The fact that you equate talking to 8th graders about reproductive rights regardless of which side you're on as "sexualizing children" says a boatload about you.

My goodness, that's simply not accurate.

NBC Promotes 11-Year-Old 'Drag Kid' Who Performed At Adult Gay Bar

The mainstream media are unabashedly continuing their disturbing promotion of so-called "drag kids." On Saturday, CNBC published a video tweet of Desmond Napoles — AKA "Desmond is Amazing" — an 11-year-old "drag kid" who, earlier this month, "performed" a dance number at a gay bar while collecting dollar bills from the adult men in the crowd.
​

Sex Education for Kindergartners

What has yet to be widely reported is that the bill supported by Obama is part of a much broader campaign by the Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States (SIECUS) to implement its radical Guidelines for Comprehensive Sexuality Education: Kindergarten through 12th Gradein school districts across the nation. The SIECUS guidelines make clear that sex ed for kindergartners is precisely what the mainline sex education lobby wants right now, and last year the Obama campaign itself cited the SIECUS guidelines as an example of the kind of “age appropriate” sex education that Sen. Obama favors.

According to the SIECUS standards, children starting at age 5 are supposed to be taught about vaginal intercourse (p. 26), homosexual relationships (p. 29), same-sex marriage (p. 39), masturbation (pp. 51-52), unwanted pregnancies (p. 61), AIDS (p. 65), and other sexually transmitted diseases (p. 63). That’s right, all this starting at age 5. If you don’t believe me, read the SIECUS guidelines for yourself. One can support “age appropriate” sex education (as I do) without embracing SIECUS’s intrusive effort to force five-year-olds to deal with all manner of explicit topics.​

It's not conservatives who are pushing these things.

I see, you're confusing conversations about sex, sexual identity and reproductive rights as sexualizing children. Got it.

Do you think 5-year-olds need to know about vaginal intercourse?

Normal people don't.

You have a problem with 5 years being taught how to defend themselves against sexual predators? You're literally rehashing lies from Alan "I'm a ******* liar" Keyes?

Ad on Sex Education Distorts Obama Policy

Let me know when you're ready to stop lying and actually debate.

Ahhh, the New York Times: "All The News That Fits Our Leftist Agenda".

Looks like we're done here.

Yeah, sorry its not gateway pundit. But they are right, I can't help it if you rely on mom's basement dwellers for your news.

 

[daveman]

My goodness, that's simply not accurate.

NBC Promotes 11-Year-Old 'Drag Kid' Who Performed At Adult Gay Bar

The mainstream media are unabashedly continuing their disturbing promotion of so-called "drag kids." On Saturday, CNBC published a video tweet of Desmond Napoles — AKA "Desmond is Amazing" — an 11-year-old "drag kid" who, earlier this month, "performed" a dance number at a gay bar while collecting dollar bills from the adult men in the crowd.
​

Sex Education for Kindergartners

What has yet to be widely reported is that the bill supported by Obama is part of a much broader campaign by the Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States (SIECUS) to implement its radical Guidelines for Comprehensive Sexuality Education: Kindergarten through 12th Gradein school districts across the nation. The SIECUS guidelines make clear that sex ed for kindergartners is precisely what the mainline sex education lobby wants right now, and last year the Obama campaign itself cited the SIECUS guidelines as an example of the kind of “age appropriate” sex education that Sen. Obama favors.

According to the SIECUS standards, children starting at age 5 are supposed to be taught about vaginal intercourse (p. 26), homosexual relationships (p. 29), same-sex marriage (p. 39), masturbation (pp. 51-52), unwanted pregnancies (p. 61), AIDS (p. 65), and other sexually transmitted diseases (p. 63). That’s right, all this starting at age 5. If you don’t believe me, read the SIECUS guidelines for yourself. One can support “age appropriate” sex education (as I do) without embracing SIECUS’s intrusive effort to force five-year-olds to deal with all manner of explicit topics.​

It's not conservatives who are pushing these things.

I see, you're confusing conversations about sex, sexual identity and reproductive rights as sexualizing children. Got it.

Do you think 5-year-olds need to know about vaginal intercourse?

Normal people don't.

My goodness, that's simply not accurate.

NBC Promotes 11-Year-Old 'Drag Kid' Who Performed At Adult Gay Bar

The mainstream media are unabashedly continuing their disturbing promotion of so-called "drag kids." On Saturday, CNBC published a video tweet of Desmond Napoles — AKA "Desmond is Amazing" — an 11-year-old "drag kid" who, earlier this month, "performed" a dance number at a gay bar while collecting dollar bills from the adult men in the crowd.
​

Sex Education for Kindergartners

What has yet to be widely reported is that the bill supported by Obama is part of a much broader campaign by the Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States (SIECUS) to implement its radical Guidelines for Comprehensive Sexuality Education: Kindergarten through 12th Gradein school districts across the nation. The SIECUS guidelines make clear that sex ed for kindergartners is precisely what the mainline sex education lobby wants right now, and last year the Obama campaign itself cited the SIECUS guidelines as an example of the kind of “age appropriate” sex education that Sen. Obama favors.

According to the SIECUS standards, children starting at age 5 are supposed to be taught about vaginal intercourse (p. 26), homosexual relationships (p. 29), same-sex marriage (p. 39), masturbation (pp. 51-52), unwanted pregnancies (p. 61), AIDS (p. 65), and other sexually transmitted diseases (p. 63). That’s right, all this starting at age 5. If you don’t believe me, read the SIECUS guidelines for yourself. One can support “age appropriate” sex education (as I do) without embracing SIECUS’s intrusive effort to force five-year-olds to deal with all manner of explicit topics.​

It's not conservatives who are pushing these things.

I see, you're confusing conversations about sex, sexual identity and reproductive rights as sexualizing children. Got it.

Do you think 5-year-olds need to know about vaginal intercourse?

Normal people don't.

You have a problem with 5 years being taught how to defend themselves against sexual predators? You're literally rehashing lies from Alan "I'm a ******* liar" Keyes?

Ad on Sex Education Distorts Obama Policy

Let me know when you're ready to stop lying and actually debate.

Ahhh, the New York Times: "All The News That Fits Our Leftist Agenda".

Looks like we're done here.

Yeah, sorry its not gateway pundit. But they are right, I can't help it if you rely on mom's basement dwellers for your news.

Hey, if you don't see a problem with a kid in drag dancing in a strip club, fine.

Just stay away from my kids.

 

[HappyJoy]

I see, you're confusing conversations about sex, sexual identity and reproductive rights as sexualizing children. Got it.

Do you think 5-year-olds need to know about vaginal intercourse?

Normal people don't.

I see, you're confusing conversations about sex, sexual identity and reproductive rights as sexualizing children. Got it.

Do you think 5-year-olds need to know about vaginal intercourse?

Normal people don't.

You have a problem with 5 years being taught how to defend themselves against sexual predators? You're literally rehashing lies from Alan "I'm a ******* liar" Keyes?

Ad on Sex Education Distorts Obama Policy

Let me know when you're ready to stop lying and actually debate.

Ahhh, the New York Times: "All The News That Fits Our Leftist Agenda".

Looks like we're done here.

Yeah, sorry its not gateway pundit. But they are right, I can't help it if you rely on mom's basement dwellers for your news.

Hey, if you don't see a problem with a kid in drag dancing in a strip club, fine.

Just stay away from my kids.

I believe it was a gay bar, not a strip club.

 

[Lysistrata]

I see, you're confusing conversations about sex, sexual identity and reproductive rights as sexualizing children. Got it.

Do you think 5-year-olds need to know about vaginal intercourse?

Normal people don't.

I see, you're confusing conversations about sex, sexual identity and reproductive rights as sexualizing children. Got it.

Do you think 5-year-olds need to know about vaginal intercourse?

Normal people don't.

You have a problem with 5 years being taught how to defend themselves against sexual predators? You're literally rehashing lies from Alan "I'm a ******* liar" Keyes?

Ad on Sex Education Distorts Obama Policy

Let me know when you're ready to stop lying and actually debate.

Ahhh, the New York Times: "All The News That Fits Our Leftist Agenda".

Looks like we're done here.

Yeah, sorry its not gateway pundit. But they are right, I can't help it if you rely on mom's basement dwellers for your news.

Hey, if you don't see a problem with a kid in drag dancing in a strip club, fine.

Just stay away from my kids.

Just don't keep your kids ignorant, dressed in little white party dresses, giving them "purity rings," and then scream at them when they become pregnant or come out as LGBT. Your daughter's pregnancy or teenage shotgun wedding will be your fault. Your failure to love a child of your own who is LGBT will be your fault also.

 

[JoeB131]

Public education is only about brainwashing children now. Teachers just line them up for programming.

HIRONO: “I just met sixty 8th graders from a public school in Hawaii, and I told them I was coming to a rally in front of the Supreme Court. And they said, why? I said, it is because we are — we have to fight for abortion rights, and they knew all about it. And I asked a girl in that group from 8th graders, how many of you girls think that government should be telling us women when and if we want to have babies? Not a single one of them raised their hand. And then — (Cheering and Applause) — boys who were there among the sixty, I said you know, it’s kind of hard for a women to get pregnant without you guys. (Laughter) They got it. How many of you boys think that government should be telling girls and women when and if we’re going to have babies? And not a single one of them raised their hand.” (Cheering and Applause)

Sen. Hirono: I Told a Class of 8th Graders Their Abortion Rights Are Under Attack

You know what, when I was in 6th or 7th Grade in the Catholic System, right after we got the bullshit sex ed from the old lesbian who never had sex in her life,

We got exposed to anti-abortion propaganda and pictures of medical waste presented as "Children".

So I'm really not seeing a problem with people pointing out to these 14 year olds what they are in for with the religious nutters coming after them.

 

[22lcidw]

Do you think 5-year-olds need to know about vaginal intercourse?

Normal people don't.

Do you think 5-year-olds need to know about vaginal intercourse?

Normal people don't.

You have a problem with 5 years being taught how to defend themselves against sexual predators? You're literally rehashing lies from Alan "I'm a ******* liar" Keyes?

Ad on Sex Education Distorts Obama Policy

Let me know when you're ready to stop lying and actually debate.

Ahhh, the New York Times: "All The News That Fits Our Leftist Agenda".

Looks like we're done here.

Yeah, sorry its not gateway pundit. But they are right, I can't help it if you rely on mom's basement dwellers for your news.

Hey, if you don't see a problem with a kid in drag dancing in a strip club, fine.

Just stay away from my kids.

Just don't keep your kids ignorant, dressed in little white party dresses, giving them "purity rings," and then scream at them when they become pregnant or come out as LGBT. Your daughter's pregnancy or teenage shotgun wedding will be your fault. Your failure to love a child of your own who is LGBT will be your fault also.

Those sky is falling agendas mean less and less. But you will most likely legalize pedophilia and beastiality within a couple of decades. At some point the cost of the diseases will outstrip the taxes possible to pay for it. You went with the Blitz Kreig when you should have dug in the trenches and prepared for a long fight. Instead when the time comes, the thousand year Reich will be over. And it is not because someone is of another party or not pure Prog socialist.

 

[daveman]

Do you think 5-year-olds need to know about vaginal intercourse?

Normal people don't.

Do you think 5-year-olds need to know about vaginal intercourse?

Normal people don't.

You have a problem with 5 years being taught how to defend themselves against sexual predators? You're literally rehashing lies from Alan "I'm a ******* liar" Keyes?

Ad on Sex Education Distorts Obama Policy

Let me know when you're ready to stop lying and actually debate.

Ahhh, the New York Times: "All The News That Fits Our Leftist Agenda".

Looks like we're done here.

Yeah, sorry its not gateway pundit. But they are right, I can't help it if you rely on mom's basement dwellers for your news.

Hey, if you don't see a problem with a kid in drag dancing in a strip club, fine.

Just stay away from my kids.

I believe it was a gay bar, not a strip club.

Oh, well, then, that's okay, then. Just never mind the fact the patrons were throwing dollar bills at him.

 

[daveman]

Do you think 5-year-olds need to know about vaginal intercourse?

Normal people don't.

Do you think 5-year-olds need to know about vaginal intercourse?

Normal people don't.

You have a problem with 5 years being taught how to defend themselves against sexual predators? You're literally rehashing lies from Alan "I'm a ******* liar" Keyes?

Ad on Sex Education Distorts Obama Policy

Let me know when you're ready to stop lying and actually debate.

Ahhh, the New York Times: "All The News That Fits Our Leftist Agenda".

Looks like we're done here.

Yeah, sorry its not gateway pundit. But they are right, I can't help it if you rely on mom's basement dwellers for your news.

Hey, if you don't see a problem with a kid in drag dancing in a strip club, fine.

Just stay away from my kids.

Just don't keep your kids ignorant, dressed in little white party dresses, giving them "purity rings," and then scream at them when they become pregnant or come out as LGBT. Your daughter's pregnancy or teenage shotgun wedding will be your fault. Your failure to love a child of your own who is LGBT will be your fault also.

My son, who was born my daughter, is trans. I love him very much.

I believe you were saying something ignorant...?

 

[Ambivalent1]

Public education is only about brainwashing children now. Teachers just line them up for programming.

HIRONO: “I just met sixty 8th graders from a public school in Hawaii, and I told them I was coming to a rally in front of the Supreme Court. And they said, why? I said, it is because we are — we have to fight for abortion rights, and they knew all about it. And I asked a girl in that group from 8th graders, how many of you girls think that government should be telling us women when and if we want to have babies? Not a single one of them raised their hand. And then — (Cheering and Applause) — boys who were there among the sixty, I said you know, it’s kind of hard for a women to get pregnant without you guys. (Laughter) They got it. How many of you boys think that government should be telling girls and women when and if we’re going to have babies? And not a single one of them raised their hand.” (Cheering and Applause)

Sen. Hirono: I Told a Class of 8th Graders Their Abortion Rights Are Under Attack

The b*tch needs to be slapped.

 

[Lysistrata]

Public education is only about brainwashing children now. Teachers just line them up for programming.

HIRONO: “I just met sixty 8th graders from a public school in Hawaii, and I told them I was coming to a rally in front of the Supreme Court. And they said, why? I said, it is because we are — we have to fight for abortion rights, and they knew all about it. And I asked a girl in that group from 8th graders, how many of you girls think that government should be telling us women when and if we want to have babies? Not a single one of them raised their hand. And then — (Cheering and Applause) — boys who were there among the sixty, I said you know, it’s kind of hard for a women to get pregnant without you guys. (Laughter) They got it. How many of you boys think that government should be telling girls and women when and if we’re going to have babies? And not a single one of them raised their hand.” (Cheering and Applause)

Sen. Hirono: I Told a Class of 8th Graders Their Abortion Rights Are Under Attack

The b*tch needs to be slapped.

Why? She is telling like it is, isn't she? Do you want to run away from reality?

 

[Lysistrata]

You have a problem with 5 years being taught how to defend themselves against sexual predators? You're literally rehashing lies from Alan "I'm a ******* liar" Keyes?

Ad on Sex Education Distorts Obama Policy

Let me know when you're ready to stop lying and actually debate.

Ahhh, the New York Times: "All The News That Fits Our Leftist Agenda".

Looks like we're done here.

Yeah, sorry its not gateway pundit. But they are right, I can't help it if you rely on mom's basement dwellers for your news.

Hey, if you don't see a problem with a kid in drag dancing in a strip club, fine.

Just stay away from my kids.

Just don't keep your kids ignorant, dressed in little white party dresses, giving them "purity rings," and then scream at them when they become pregnant or come out as LGBT. Your daughter's pregnancy or teenage shotgun wedding will be your fault. Your failure to love a child of your own who is LGBT will be your fault also.

Those sky is falling agendas mean less and less. But you will most likely legalize pedophilia and beastiality within a couple of decades. At some point the cost of the diseases will outstrip the taxes possible to pay for it. You went with the Blitz Kreig when you should have dug in the trenches and prepared for a long fight. Instead when the time comes, the thousand year Reich will be over. And it is not because someone is of another party or not pure Prog socialist.

Who is talking about pedophilia and beastiality and legalizing any such thing? Your brain is totally scrambled.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Here is the quote:

“I just met sixty 8th graders from a public school in Hawaii, and I told them I was coming to a rally in front of the Supreme Court. And they said, why? I said, it is because we are -- we have to fight for abortion rights, and they knew all about it. And I asked a girl in that group from 8th graders, how many of you girls think that government should be telling us women when and if we want to have babies? Not a single one of them raised their hand. And then -- (Cheering and Applause) -- boys who were there among the sixty, I said you know, it's kind of hard for a women to get pregnant without you guys. (Laughter) They got it. How many of you boys think that government should be telling girls and women when and if we're going to have babies? And not a single one of them raised their hand." (Cheering and Applause)

You may not like her stance on abortion but there is nothing untoward in what she said and the subject of reproductive rights is perfectly acceptable in an 8th grade class.

That is, but not "thou shall not kill?"


.