Dem Rep. Jim Himes tells "MAGA" they better think twice about supporting strikes on drug traffickers because they "need to imagine who gets killed ...

[Marener]

Nope. Nice attempt at argumentum ad absurdum.

These are boats on the high seas not following the rules for boats on the high seas. a very specific case.

The Navy shoots at pirates trying to take over other ships all the time.

“Rules for boats”, Jesus you’re just so ******* dumb.

Tell me what mechanisms are in place to prevent the president from ordering the death of someone he wants dead.

SCOTUS said he can be prosecuted for it. Ever.

 

[22lcidw]

Sure... usually you have to prove that in court. But you guys don’t bother with the whole innoncent til proven guilty stuff, do you?

We can make them innocent boats by putting Prog Americans in them. And if found to have drugs OD their families with the drugs.

 

[martybegan]

“Rules for boats”, Jesus you’re just so ******* dumb.

Tell me what mechanisms are in place to prevent the president from ordering the death of someone he wants dead.

SCOTUS said he can be prosecuted for it. Ever.

No SCOTUS said if you want to prosecute him for things you have to go with the impeachment process as the Constitution mandates.

Impeachment is the mechanism in place.

 

[Marener]

No SCOTUS said if you want to prosecute him for things you have to go with the impeachment process as the Constitution mandates.

Impeachment is the mechanism in place.

Impeachment isn’t a criminal prosecution. It just removes Trump from office. He can get away with murder. Literal murder.

And that’s if Congress actually cares about Trump murdering people. Clearly they don’t.

 

[martybegan]

Impeachment isn’t a criminal prosecution. It just removes Trump from office. He can get away with murder. Literal murder.

And that’s if Congress actually cares about Trump murdering people. Clearly they don’t.

Once Impeached he can be prosecuted. That was the gist of the SC case.

It's not murder.

 

[Marener]

Once Impeached he can be prosecuted. That was the gist of the SC case.

It's not murder.

Ha! It absolutely was not the SC case.

Trump has total immunity for anything solely under their executive authority, such as commanding the US military.

Even after impeachment, he can’t be prosecuted for ordering the military to murder people.

The Republican Party now had the ability to kill anyone. That’s what SCOTUS did for us.

 

[martybegan]

Ha! It absolutely was not the SC case.

Trump has total immunity for anything solely under their executive authority, such as commanding the US military.

Even after impeachment, he can’t be prosecuted for ordering the military to murder people.

The Republican Party now had the ability to kill anyone. That’s what SCOTUS did for us.

Nope, once he is impeached AND removed those protections go bye bye.

Talk about hyperbole.

 

[Marener]

Nope, once he is impeached AND removed those protections go bye bye.

Talk about hyperbole.

Please quote the part of the decision that says he loses immunity after impeachment.

 

[martybegan]

Please quote the part of the decision that says he loses immunity after impeachment.

Please quote the part where immunity continues after impeachment.

 

[Marener]

Please quote the part where immunity continues after impeachment.

 

[martybegan]

View attachment 1178923

It says nothing about prosecuting them after impeachment AND Removal.

Not just impeachment, which is just an indictment.

"The President is not above the law"

 

[Marener]

It says nothing about prosecuting them after impeachment AND Removal.

Not just impeachment, which is just an indictment.

"The President is not above the law"

It says nothing about impeachment because it has nothing to do with impeachment. They gave the president immunity irrespective of impeachment. There's no caveats or carve outs for impeachment.

Where are you getting your theory that he can be prosecuted after impeachment for actions related to his core constitutional duties?

 

[martybegan]

It says nothing about impeachment because it has nothing to do with impeachment. They gave the president immunity irrespective of impeachment. There's no caveats or carve outs for impeachment.

Where are you getting your theory that he can be prosecuted after impeachment for actions related to his core constitutional duties?

Impeachment AND Removal implies high crimes and misdemeanors, it's part of the wording for impeachment.

They were going to prosecute Nixon after he was impeached, hence Ford's pardon.

 

[Marener]

Impeachment AND Removal implies high crimes and misdemeanors, it's part of the wording for impeachment.

They were going to prosecute Nixon after he was impeached, hence Ford's pardon.

No one was insane enough to think the president had immunity at that time.

Show me where the SCOTUS decision says you can prosecute for core constitutional duties after impeachment.

 

[justoffal]

If a nation dusted a boat full of Americans on mere suspicion of illegal activity, you guys would be singing a different tune.

So name a legitimate activity for a speed boat to be crossing over international waters heading for a remote area of the coast. None of those were fishing boats.... None of them were actual cargo boats either. It is nearly 100% certain that they were drug runners. If the cost guard stopped them, boarded The vessel and discovered drugs there would still be idiots in this country who would say it wasn't proof.

 

[justoffal]

Nope. Nice attempt at argumentum ad absurdum.

These are boats on the high seas not following the rules for boats on the high seas. a very specific case.

The Navy shoots at pirates trying to take over other ships all the time.

They are very specifically overpowered speed boats.... They are not fishing boats, they are certainly not commercial cargo boats... And they're heading for areas of the coast that don't have developed receiving areas. It is almost 100% certain that they are drug runners.

 

[kyzr]

Democrats probably get kickbacks from drug dealers.

 

[justoffal]

Democrats probably get kickbacks from drug dealers.

I think there are numerous elected officials both in the House and Senate of both political parties who have their hands in the cartel cookie jar.

 

[Marener]

They are very specifically overpowered speed boats.... They are not fishing boats, they are certainly not commercial cargo boats... And they're heading for areas of the coast that don't have developed receiving areas. It is almost 100% certain that they are drug runners.

How do you know? Did the military release footage of the strikes?

 

[justoffal]

How do you know? Did the military release footage of the strikes?

Well I'm certainly going to be very cautious giving my answer because not two days ago I was completely duped by an AI YouTube video.
That really pissed me off.

I saw videos posted by international news agencies that claim to be Pentagon footage. However after having made an ass of myself the other day I have definitely changed my position on what to trust and what not to trust. I will say that the videos I saw featured speed boats that are only good for one purpose. Running to the coast with contraband.