August West
Platinum Member
- Sep 5, 2014
- 16,633
- 7,843
- 400
Fishermen and/or drug dealers are not my enemies.No. That's not how war works. You kill the enemies before they kill you. No courts involved.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Fishermen and/or drug dealers are not my enemies.No. That's not how war works. You kill the enemies before they kill you. No courts involved.
Fishermen and/or drug dealers are not my enemies.
First of all let's completely dispel the myth of fishermen..... There were no fishing poles those parts. Drug dealers are certainly your enemy.Fishermen and/or drug dealers are not my enemies.
They [Democrats] haven't reached peak insanity yet.
We have a Congressman equating vile drug runners with...? People who disagree with them politically.
Wow. Just ... wow.Fishermen and/or drug dealers are not my enemies.
No one was insane enough to think the president had immunity at that time.
Show me where the SCOTUS decision says you can prosecute for core constitutional duties after impeachment.
They are very specifically overpowered speed boats.... They are not fishing boats, they are certainly not commercial cargo boats... And they're heading for areas of the coast that don't have developed receiving areas. It is almost 100% certain that they are drug runners.
I'm very sure you are correct about that.How much you want to bet they have these boats under drone and/or spec ops observation while they are being loaded?
Nixon resigned.No one tried prosecuting Presidents before they were impeached before that time.
Nixon resigned.
When are you going to show the part of the decision that backs you up?
Never. It’s never. You never do shit.
According to you, they couldn't prosecute him until they impeached him.And then was pardoned before they could try to prosecute him, which they were trying to do.
There aren't any because the question was never asked until now, because no one actually went through with legally gunning for a sitting President for Presidential acts until now.
According to you, they couldn't prosecute him until they impeached him.
You made a claim about the content of the SCOTUS decision giving Trump immunity which is wrong and you refuse to acknowledge it.
Ha! It’s not the same thing legally. Jesus Christ you’re a ******* moron. No one actually thinks that impeachment and conviction is equivalent to resigning.He resigned. Same thing legally, but we will never know because no one questioned it.
I am not wrong, you are making shit up.
Ha! It’s not the same thing legally. Jesus Christ you’re a ******* moron. No one actually thinks that impeachment and conviction is equivalent to resigning.
If you’re not wrong, why can’t you prove it?
Yes they are. Anyone that opposes destroying these drug boats is an absolute moron.Those boats are under surveillance all the time. They know what's being loaded, and who's loading them.
You're changing your story, hack.And if the situation came up the SC would render an opinion and settle it. To me they would settle it the way I described.
I've given my opinion on the matter. It doesn't matter what "proof" I provide because you won't accept it.
You are a dime store hack troll.
Once Impeached he can be prosecuted. That was the gist of the SC case.
You're changing your story, hack.
That's what you actually said. Now you're walking it back to "that's what they would have said". The SCOTUS decision is perfectly clear, you can't prosecute the president exercising core constitutional duties, at all.
And that's why it's such a dumb ******* ruling and needs to be overturned.
Whose court they aren't Americans but what they ARE TRANSPORTING IS KILLING AmericansSure... usually you have to prove that in court. But you guys don’t bother with the whole innoncent til proven guilty stuff, do you?
They [Democrats] haven't reached peak insanity yet.
We have a Congressman equating vile drug runners with...? People who disagree with them politically.
